Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ADVIN SERVERS $8/MONTH 16GB RAM VPS + **GIVEAWAY EXPIRED**

1…3031333536…54

Comments

  • muffinmuffin Member
    edited December 2022

    Do the beta servers run raid 1? I remember the previous one didn't

  • noisycodenoisycode Member
    edited December 2022

    Nice offer @Advin !
    I'm gonna ask if it OK to do some compilation work occasionally on an Amsterdam - KVM Memory VPS - KVM Beta High Memory S G2 or an Amsterdam - KVM Standard S
    ? It happens once or twice a day, and takes ~20min/compilation.

  • zots0127zots0127 Member

    Invoice #9540
    Double BW! thank you

    And I make a mistake in Invoice #9539,that I forgot use coupon.

    Can you cancel it and refund to my account?

  • pan21pan21 Member

    @Advin
    Double Bandwidth please
    Invoice #9542
    thanks

  • pan21pan21 Member

    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)
  • AdvinAdvin Member, Host Rep
    edited December 2022

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

  • eijileijil Member

    Could you plz double the BW of invoice 9537?

  • pan21pan21 Member

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

    I actually have another server with NVME

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 787.06 MB/s (196.7k) 2.55 GB/s (39.9k)
    Write 789.14 MB/s (197.2k) 2.57 GB/s (40.1k)
    Total 1.57 GB/s (394.0k) 5.12 GB/s (80.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) 2.72 GB/s (2.6k)
    Write 2.10 GB/s (4.1k) 2.90 GB/s (2.8k)
    Total 4.11 GB/s (8.0k) 5.63 GB/s (5.5k)

    the 4k performance gap looks huge

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Host Rep
    edited December 2022

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

    I actually have another server with NVME

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 787.06 MB/s (196.7k) 2.55 GB/s (39.9k)
    Write 789.14 MB/s (197.2k) 2.57 GB/s (40.1k)
    Total 1.57 GB/s (394.0k) 5.12 GB/s (80.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) 2.72 GB/s (2.6k)
    Write 2.10 GB/s (4.1k) 2.90 GB/s (2.8k)
    Total 4.11 GB/s (8.0k) 5.63 GB/s (5.5k)

    the 4k performance gap looks huge

    Your other server is likely using some type of RAID with a lot of disks in RAID10/RAID0/etc, or is using some sort of caching (i.e. RAM caching) in order to achieve that 4K disk result.

    You can see that in reviews like these, the 4K speed is usually 50-100 MB/s for single Gen3 NVMe SSD's:
    https://appuals.com/samsung-970-evo-plus-m-2-nvme-ssd-review/
    That performance seems in line with expectations.

    Please note that we do not guarantee Gen4 NVMe SSD, or even NVMe SSD at all, the product page states that it could be NVMe or SATA (and those results are well above a SATA SSD). A lot of our host nodes are running Gen3 NVMe SSD.

    I would also take a look at HDD benchmarks or other Yabs benchmarks from other VPS providers that use Gen3 NVMe SSD or standard SATA SSD. If it was not SSD, the 4k performance would be 1/10th the speed that you are seeing.

    A lot of our host nodes are running pure Gen3/Gen4 NVMe SSD, and your benchmark seems in line with expectations.

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Host Rep

    @muffin said:
    Do the beta servers run raid 1? I remember the previous one didn't

    A lot of our beta host nodes do not run RAID, sadly. Some do run RAID1/RAID5/RAID10, but no guarantees.

  • pan21pan21 Member
    edited December 2022

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

    I actually have another server with NVME

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 787.06 MB/s (196.7k) 2.55 GB/s (39.9k)
    Write 789.14 MB/s (197.2k) 2.57 GB/s (40.1k)
    Total 1.57 GB/s (394.0k) 5.12 GB/s (80.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) 2.72 GB/s (2.6k)
    Write 2.10 GB/s (4.1k) 2.90 GB/s (2.8k)
    Total 4.11 GB/s (8.0k) 5.63 GB/s (5.5k)

    the 4k performance gap looks huge

    Your other server is likely using some type of RAID with a lot of disks in RAID10/RAID0/etc, or is using some sort of caching (i.e. RAM caching) in order to achieve that 4K disk result.

    You can see that in reviews like these, the 4K speed is usually 50-100 MB/s for single Gen3 NVMe SSD's:
    https://appuals.com/samsung-970-evo-plus-m-2-nvme-ssd-review/
    That performance seems in line with expectations.

    I would also take a look at HDD benchmarks or other Yabs benchmarks from other VPS providers that use Gen3 NVMe SSD or standard SATA SSD. If it was not SSD, the 4k performance would be 1/10th the speed that you are seeing.

    A lot of our host nodes are running pure Gen3/Gen4 NVMe SSD, and your benchmark seems in line with expectations.

    thanks for prompt reply first.

    im a little confused, cause my other advin server has better 4k performance,

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 82.29 MB/s (20.5k) 1.23 GB/s (19.3k)
    Write 82.50 MB/s (20.6k) 1.24 GB/s (19.4k)
    Total 164.79 MB/s (41.1k) 2.48 GB/s (38.7k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.88 GB/s (3.6k) 1.92 GB/s (1.8k)
    Write 1.98 GB/s (3.8k) 2.05 GB/s (2.0k)
    Total 3.86 GB/s (7.5k) 3.97 GB/s (3.8k)

    8x MB/s vs 5x MB/s looks strange
    in fact, im not looking for something crazy fast, but something close to 100MB is what i was looking for

  • corbpiecorbpie Member

    8823, 8982 and 9207 unmetered 40gbps and upgrade to 5.1Ghz thanks 👍

  • pan21pan21 Member

    @Advin
    btw, can I have double bandwidth on this new service please
    Invoice #9542
    thanks

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Host Rep

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

    I actually have another server with NVME

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 787.06 MB/s (196.7k) 2.55 GB/s (39.9k)
    Write 789.14 MB/s (197.2k) 2.57 GB/s (40.1k)
    Total 1.57 GB/s (394.0k) 5.12 GB/s (80.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) 2.72 GB/s (2.6k)
    Write 2.10 GB/s (4.1k) 2.90 GB/s (2.8k)
    Total 4.11 GB/s (8.0k) 5.63 GB/s (5.5k)

    the 4k performance gap looks huge

    Your other server is likely using some type of RAID with a lot of disks in RAID10/RAID0/etc, or is using some sort of caching (i.e. RAM caching) in order to achieve that 4K disk result.

    You can see that in reviews like these, the 4K speed is usually 50-100 MB/s for single Gen3 NVMe SSD's:
    https://appuals.com/samsung-970-evo-plus-m-2-nvme-ssd-review/
    That performance seems in line with expectations.

    I would also take a look at HDD benchmarks or other Yabs benchmarks from other VPS providers that use Gen3 NVMe SSD or standard SATA SSD. If it was not SSD, the 4k performance would be 1/10th the speed that you are seeing.

    A lot of our host nodes are running pure Gen3/Gen4 NVMe SSD, and your benchmark seems in line with expectations.

    thanks for prompt reply first.

    im a little confused, cause my other advin server has better 4k performance,

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 82.29 MB/s (20.5k) 1.23 GB/s (19.3k)
    Write 82.50 MB/s (20.6k) 1.24 GB/s (19.4k)
    Total 164.79 MB/s (41.1k) 2.48 GB/s (38.7k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.88 GB/s (3.6k) 1.92 GB/s (1.8k)
    Write 1.98 GB/s (3.8k) 2.05 GB/s (2.0k)
    Total 3.86 GB/s (7.5k) 3.97 GB/s (3.8k)

    8x MB/s vs 5x MB/s looks strange
    in fact, im not looking for something crazy fast, but something close to 100MB is what i was looking for

    Different host nodes could be running different disks, that's sometimes why a host node could be faster than the other. It's still in line with SATA/NVMe SSD performance, regardless of the difference.

  • sleepcoroesleepcoroe Member

    I LOVE FREE SERVERS ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • eijileijil Member

    I LOVE CHEAP SERVERS 😮😮😮😮😮😮

  • xieshangxieshang Member

    My invoice number is 9504. And I'd like to get "DOUBLE BANDWIDTH". Thanks. :)

  • pan21pan21 Member

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:

    @Advin said:

    @pan21 said:
    @Advin
    is it SSD? or just something wrong with my node?
    4K performance looks very bad, doesn't appear to be SSD

    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 50.57 MB/s (12.6k) | 727.27 MB/s (11.3k)
    Write | 50.64 MB/s (12.6k) | 731.10 MB/s (11.4k)
    Total | 101.21 MB/s (25.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.7k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 1.53 GB/s (2.9k) | 1.76 GB/s (1.7k)
    Write | 1.61 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.88 GB/s (1.8k)
    Total | 3.14 GB/s (6.1k) | 3.64 GB/s (3.5k)

    The performance you have shown is quite normal for an NVMe, I don't see where the problem is. You can search online for similar benchmarks of NVMe SSD performance if you would like, it is in line with expectations (and way above a standard SATA SSD).

    The 4k result for an HDD would be ~10-20 MB/s, definitely not 100+ MB/s.

    I actually have another server with NVME

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 787.06 MB/s (196.7k) 2.55 GB/s (39.9k)
    Write 789.14 MB/s (197.2k) 2.57 GB/s (40.1k)
    Total 1.57 GB/s (394.0k) 5.12 GB/s (80.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 2.00 GB/s (3.9k) 2.72 GB/s (2.6k)
    Write 2.10 GB/s (4.1k) 2.90 GB/s (2.8k)
    Total 4.11 GB/s (8.0k) 5.63 GB/s (5.5k)

    the 4k performance gap looks huge

    Your other server is likely using some type of RAID with a lot of disks in RAID10/RAID0/etc, or is using some sort of caching (i.e. RAM caching) in order to achieve that 4K disk result.

    You can see that in reviews like these, the 4K speed is usually 50-100 MB/s for single Gen3 NVMe SSD's:
    https://appuals.com/samsung-970-evo-plus-m-2-nvme-ssd-review/
    That performance seems in line with expectations.

    I would also take a look at HDD benchmarks or other Yabs benchmarks from other VPS providers that use Gen3 NVMe SSD or standard SATA SSD. If it was not SSD, the 4k performance would be 1/10th the speed that you are seeing.

    A lot of our host nodes are running pure Gen3/Gen4 NVMe SSD, and your benchmark seems in line with expectations.

    thanks for prompt reply first.

    im a little confused, cause my other advin server has better 4k performance,

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 82.29 MB/s (20.5k) 1.23 GB/s (19.3k)
    Write 82.50 MB/s (20.6k) 1.24 GB/s (19.4k)
    Total 164.79 MB/s (41.1k) 2.48 GB/s (38.7k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.88 GB/s (3.6k) 1.92 GB/s (1.8k)
    Write 1.98 GB/s (3.8k) 2.05 GB/s (2.0k)
    Total 3.86 GB/s (7.5k) 3.97 GB/s (3.8k)

    8x MB/s vs 5x MB/s looks strange
    in fact, im not looking for something crazy fast, but something close to 100MB is what i was looking for

    Different host nodes could be running different disks, that's sometimes why a host node could be faster than the other. It's still in line with SATA/NVMe SSD performance, regardless of the difference.

    Understood,
    can I have double bandwidth on this new service please
    Invoice #9542
    thanks

  • aquaaqua Member, Host Rep

    Man I remember seeing when Advin first started, and now it's to this. Ngl I'm proud.

  • muffinmuffin Member

    @Advin said:

    @muffin said:
    Do the beta servers run raid 1? I remember the previous one didn't

    A lot of our beta host nodes do not run RAID, sadly. Some do run RAID1/RAID5/RAID10, but no guarantees.

    Ah... in that case, could you cancel invoice 9541?

  • suusuu Member

    Invoice #9566
    Double BW! thank you

  • wuckwuck Member
    edited December 2022

    @Advin can you check Ticket #096423 ? I see people that ordered after me already provisioned but somehow paying with PayPal is always staying at pending Invoice #9497

  • eijileijil Member

    The benchmark score is not that good.
    I've opened a ticket, Ticket #287644

  • loger8loger8 Member

    I LOVE FREE SERVERS ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

    DOUBLE BANDWIDTH Invoice #9533

  • shalu12shalu12 Member

    I LOVE FREE SERVERS ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • suusuu Member

    @suu said:
    Invoice #9566
    unmetered 40gbps and upgrade to 5.1Ghz thanks! thank you

  • kanchuanqikanchuanqi Member

    Invoice #9573 LA UNMETERED BANDWIDTH please

  • pointedhatpointedhat Member

    Invoice #9574 LA UNMETERED BANDWIDTH
    Invoice #9538 DOUBLE BANDWIDTH

    Thank you for your assistance!

  • rabbirrabbir Member

    Invoice #9575 LA UNMETERED BANDWIDTH

    Thank you for your assistance!

  • TanXSTanXS Member

    @corbpie said:
    8823, 8982 and 9207 unmetered 40gbps and upgrade to 5.1Ghz thanks 👍

    Do they support this service? I don't think so. He didn't mentioned before.

Sign In or Register to comment.