Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ $8.88/YR- 384MB ★★ $21.85/YR- 2.5GB ★ Instant ★ Japan Pre-order ★ & More

1300301303305306339

Comments

  • s12321s12321 Member
    edited July 2022

    @netrix said:

    @s12321 said:
    @VirMach LAXA024 has no internet for more than a week, looks like the gateway has not plugged in. :smiley:

    no problem at all with laxa024. my vps has 9 days uptime

    My subnet don't have internet at the moment. Most machines are "online" but not connecting internet. If I know there is a working gateway, i may manually point to that one.

  • foitinfoitin Member

    Tokyo NVMe improved a lot since the patch? maintenance?
    When will Tokyo storage get the same fix?

  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @JDMcPea - Sorry about that, I fat fingered the DALZ003 & DALZ008 DALZ006

    --

    @Ademan - I would not trust the "troubleshooting" on Ryzen. On a perfectly working VM I get the following. The O/S is not even correct.

    Main IP pings: true
    Node Online: false
    Service online: online
    Operating System: linux-debian-6.0.6-x86-min-gen2-v1
    Service Status:Active
    Registration Date:2021-09-14 
    

    @Ademan said: Thanks, tbh I can't keep up with the network management changes, take me back to ifupdown lol

    I so agree with you on this. :)

    Thanked by 2JDMcPea Ademan
  • netrixnetrix Member

    @s12321 said:

    @netrix said:

    @s12321 said:
    @VirMach LAXA024 has no internet for more than a week, looks like the gateway has not plugged in. :smiley:

    no problem at all with laxa024. my vps has 9 days uptime

    My subnet don't have internet at the moment. Most machines are "online" but not connecting internet. If I know there is a working gateway, i may manually point to that one.

    up & running and connected to internet for 9 full days rn. the gateway is: 149.57.138.1, os Debian 11 ryzen compatible.

    Thanked by 2FrankZ s12321
  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @foitin said: Tokyo NVMe improved a lot since the patch? maintenance?
    When will Tokyo storage get the same fix?

    I though this was done at the same time as the NVMe nodes on 7/18.
    Network looks a lot better to me then before, and with a lot less steal.
    I transferred 280 GB to this VM yesterday without a hitch.

    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    #             Benchy v2.0               #
    #    https://github.com/L1so/benchy     #
    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    #        21 Jul 2022 18:16 CDT          #
    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    
    Server Insight                                  Hardware Information
    ---------------------                           ---------------------
    OS         : AlmaLinux 8.6 (Sky Tiger)          Model       : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
    RHEL 7.6.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
    Location   : Japan                              Core        : 1 @ 3393.600 MHz
    Kernel     : 4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64       AES-NI      : ✔ Enabled
    Uptime     : 7 days, 22 hrs, 35 mins, 16 secs   VM-x/AMD-V  : ✔ Enabled
    Virt       : kvm                                Swap        : 1.5 GiB
    
    Disk & Memory Usage                             Network Data
    ---------------------                           ---------------------
    Disk       : 456.4 GiB                          ASN         : AS23959
    Disk Usage : 299.1 GiB (70% Used)               ISP         : Owl Limited
    Mem        : 1.4 GiB                            IPv4        : ✔ Enabled
    Mem Usage  : 0.1 GiB (8% Used)                  IPv6        : ✔ Enabled
    
    Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/vda1)
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Size | Read        | Write       | Total       |       IOPS (R,W,T)       |
    +===========================================================================+
    | 1    | Timeout     | Reached     | Retry       | Your   | Disk   | Bench  |
    | 64k  | 61.82 MB/s  | 62.22 MB/s  | 124.04 MB/s | 1.0k   | 1.0k   | 2.0k   |
    | 512k | 490.17 MB/s | 516.21 MB/s | 0.98 GB/s   | 1.0k   | 1.0k   | 2.0k   |
    | 1m   | 413.77 MB/s | 441.33 MB/s | 855.11 MB/s | 0.4k   | 0.4k   | 0.9k   |
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    
    Network Performance Test (Region: Asia)
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Prot. | Provider    | Location        | Send         | Receive      | Latency   |
    +=================================================================================+
    | IPv4  | Uztelecom   | Tashkent, UZ    |  511.8 MB/s  |  148.8 MB/s  |    0.0 ms |
    |       | Biznet      | Jakarta, ID     |  611.7 MB/s  |  247.9 MB/s  |   86.5 ms |
    

    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

  • AdairAdair Member

    Hi, when will San Jose SJCZ004 be back up? He's been offline for 5 days now

  • @FrankZ said:

    Hi @FrankZ, can you please guide me where can I get the information in the picture? I open the Graphs function in the Whmcs but only the network information

  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    Hi @haynhat that graph is not from Whmcs it is from a home grown monitoring panel. I was just showing foitin the before and after for when I though VirMach fixed the networking for the Tokyo storage node.

    Thanked by 1haynhat
  • foitinfoitin Member

    @FrankZ said:

    I though this was done at the same time as the NVMe nodes on 7/18.
    Network looks a lot better to me then before, and with a lot less steal.
    I transferred 280 GB to this VM yesterday without a hitch.

    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    #             Benchy v2.0               #
    #    https://github.com/L1so/benchy     #
    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    #        21 Jul 2022 18:16 CDT          #
    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
    
    Server Insight                                  Hardware Information
    ---------------------                           ---------------------
    OS         : AlmaLinux 8.6 (Sky Tiger)          Model       : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
    RHEL 7.6.0 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
    Location   : Japan                              Core        : 1 @ 3393.600 MHz
    Kernel     : 4.18.0-372.16.1.el8_6.x86_64       AES-NI      : ✔ Enabled
    Uptime     : 7 days, 22 hrs, 35 mins, 16 secs   VM-x/AMD-V  : ✔ Enabled
    Virt       : kvm                                Swap        : 1.5 GiB
    
    Disk & Memory Usage                             Network Data
    ---------------------                           ---------------------
    Disk       : 456.4 GiB                          ASN         : AS23959
    Disk Usage : 299.1 GiB (70% Used)               ISP         : Owl Limited
    Mem        : 1.4 GiB                            IPv4        : ✔ Enabled
    Mem Usage  : 0.1 GiB (8% Used)                  IPv6        : ✔ Enabled
    
    Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/vda1)
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Size | Read        | Write       | Total       |       IOPS (R,W,T)       |
    +===========================================================================+
    | 1    | Timeout     | Reached     | Retry       | Your   | Disk   | Bench  |
    | 64k  | 61.82 MB/s  | 62.22 MB/s  | 124.04 MB/s | 1.0k   | 1.0k   | 2.0k   |
    | 512k | 490.17 MB/s | 516.21 MB/s | 0.98 GB/s   | 1.0k   | 1.0k   | 2.0k   |
    | 1m   | 413.77 MB/s | 441.33 MB/s | 855.11 MB/s | 0.4k   | 0.4k   | 0.9k   |
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    
    Network Performance Test (Region: Asia)
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    | Prot. | Provider    | Location        | Send         | Receive      | Latency   |
    +=================================================================================+
    | IPv4  | Uztelecom   | Tashkent, UZ    |  511.8 MB/s  |  148.8 MB/s  |    0.0 ms |
    |       | Biznet      | Jakarta, ID     |  611.7 MB/s  |  247.9 MB/s  |   86.5 ms |
    

    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

    You're sure about that?
    I can burst up to 900+ Mbps both uplink and downlink on NVMe VPS while it's less than 500Mbps on Tokyo storage. Steal is still a problem, just not as horrible as before.

    Why did you have 611.7 MB/s send speed to Jakarta? Yours is 10Gbps?

    Can you even access your Tokyo storage at the moment?

  • Benchy misprints speeds as MB/s when it's really Mbps

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @foitin said: Can you even access your Tokyo storage at the moment?

    Yes as shown by the timestamp on the Benchy above. Although the network was unreachable for me for about two hours earlier today, between 3 & 5 pm CDT, VPS was up just not the network.

    EDIT: I saw that it just went down again 7 minutes before I posted this.

  • foitinfoitin Member
    edited July 2022

    @FrankZ said:

    @foitin said: Can you even access your Tokyo storage at the moment?

    Yes as shown by the timestamp on the Benchy above. Although the network was unreachable for me for about two hours earlier today, between 3 & 5 pm CDT, VPS was up just not the network.

    I noted VNC connection info and I cant connect via VNC either.
    VLAN reconfig? Storage VPS will have the IP changed as well? :s

  • AdemanAdeman Member

    @FrankZ said: @Ademan - I would not trust the "troubleshooting" on Ryzen. On a perfectly working VM I get the following. The O/S is not even correct.

    Main IP pings: true
    Node Online: false
    Service online: online
    Operating System: linux-debian-6.0.6-x86-min-gen2-v1
    Service Status:Active
    Registration Date:2021-09-14

    Thanks! Good to know.

    Any thoughts on next steps I should take? Like I said my ticket has been open for over 2 weeks now with no response. 2 weeks+ of downtime would be awfully painful on its own, but with zero communication that's something else entirely. I realize VirMach is a budget service, but I don't feel I'm asking too much to at least get some status within 2 weeks of unplanned outage.

    I filed my current ticket as a "ryzen issue", should I file one as an outage report instead? DALZ004 has never been included on the network status page so far.

  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @Ademan - I am seeing comments that DALZ004 was working on July 7th and I have messaged the poster to see if his VM on DALZ004 is still working at this time. Figure we can make sure the node is up first then go from there. Am I correct in assuming that you do not wish to attempt to reinstall the VPS?

    Don't add or bump tickets, as I expect they will just be merged and dropped to the bottom of the queue.

    Thanked by 1Ademan
  • foitinfoitin Member

    @FrankZ said:

    @foitin said: Can you even access your Tokyo storage at the moment?

    Yes as shown by the timestamp on the Benchy above. Although the network was unreachable for me for about two hours earlier today, between 3 & 5 pm CDT, VPS was up just not the network.

    EDIT: I saw that it just went down again 7 minutes before I posted this.

    It's up now but the speed is still not as good as NVMe VPS.

    https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/3376d3ae-2be5-43ca-a87a-68afc94f237e

  • what was the price for tokyo storage? damn im now HDDHUNGRY

  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @foitin said: It's up now but the speed is still not as good as NVMe VPS.

    I would assume that there would be a bit more traffic on a storage node then a NVMe one. So I would not expect the bandwidth availability to improve much until the 10gb NIC is installed. But what do I know, VirMach could have something up his sleeve.

    Side note: I transferred that 280 GB yesterday with a ~20mb/s speed limit, so I am compelled to ask why do you find 400 mb/s to be restrictive?

    --

    @cybertech said: what was the price for tokyo storage? damn im now HDDHUNGRY

    Pre-order sale price I paid was 465GB storage $40 for 2 years. It is more now.

    Thanked by 1cybertech
  • foitinfoitin Member
    edited July 2022

    @FrankZ said:

    Side note: I transferred that 280 GB yesterday with a ~20mb/s speed limit, so I am compelled to ask why do you find 400 mb/s to be restrictive?

    My local network is symmetrical 1Gbps best effort.
    10:30 AM is off peak hour so the speed is usually 700Mbps +
    Plus the 150Mbps upload speed is what bothers me the most.

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • riofredinandriofredinand Member
    edited July 2022

    Tokyo storage is dead for a short while, it isn't stable, can you check it.

  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @foitin said: My local network is symmetrical 1Gbps best effort.

    I can now see why this makes more of a difference to you than me. Living in a backwater small city of a 3rd world county, I only have asymmetrical 10mb/s down, 500kb/s up. And my backups move between servers at 20 mb/s.

    I hope that VirMach gets that 10 Gb/s NIC in for you soon. Not much else I can say.


    @riofredinand said: Tokyo storage is dead for a short while, it isn't stable, can you check it.

    Not dead. It has not even rebooted. Network is just flapping in and out.

  • foitinfoitin Member
    edited July 2022

    @FrankZ said:

    @foitin said: My local network is symmetrical 1Gbps best effort.

    I can now see why this makes more of a difference to you than me. Living in a backwater small city of a 3rd world county, I only have asymmetrical 10mb/s down, 500kb/s up. And my backups move between servers at 20 mb/s.

    Well. 1Gbps is the default symmetrical speed for FTTB. There's 2Gbps 5Gbps and even 10Gbps but the area is very limited.

    It's decent at off peak hours but equally congested at peak time.
    Some dodgy ISP can be as slow as 5Mbps from 7:00 PM to midnight. It's not cheap either, market price is usually 6k yen/mon. Even at this historically low weak yen era, it's still about 45 USD/mon plus stupid "construction fee and labor cost" in installment.

    I hope that VirMach gets that 10 Gb/s NIC in for you soon. Not much else I can say.

    10Gbps is also an overkill for me. Just wish the congestion and CPU steal issue could be completely fixed like the NVMe VPS.

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • loleelolee Member

    $20.57/YR $16.46/YR (RECURRING)
    ORDER: https://virmach.com/special-offers/

    2.5GB RAM -- Limit 800 Quantity
    50GB NVMe
    2 vCore Ryzen* CPU
    6TB @ 1Gbps Bandwidth
    1x IPv4 Address

    Will this VPS be available again?

  • @FrankZ said:
    Hi @haynhat that graph is not from Whmcs it is from a home grown monitoring panel. I was just showing foitin the before and after for when I though VirMach fixed the networking for the Tokyo storage node.

    Thanks, @FrankZ

  • @lolee said:
    $20.57/YR $16.46/YR (RECURRING)
    ORDER: https://virmach.com/special-offers/

    2.5GB RAM -- Limit 800 Quantity
    50GB NVMe
    2 vCore Ryzen* CPU
    6TB @ 1Gbps Bandwidth
    1x IPv4 Address

    Will this VPS be available again?

    The first post says "This will be the lowest prices we will offer for Ryzen, over the next 12 months." and this deal is no longer available. So check back March 2023.

  • @drizbo said:
    Did you try to unmount any iso you might have? as that is one of the issues

    Yes, I already unmount any ISO. I double checked from SolusVM.
    Try to boot from SolusVM as well, but the state remain OFFLINE.

    In SolusVM, my node shown as : RYZE.AMS-D026.VMS

  • what are you using for monitoring? that graph looks nice.

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • FrankZFrankZ Barred
    edited July 2022

    @jholycloud said: In SolusVM, my node shown as : RYZE.AMS-D026.VMS

    I can confirm that node AMSD026 is currently working, as my VM on this node has been up for 18 days.

    --

    @lemoncube said: what are you using for monitoring? that graph looks nice.

    I roll my own monitoring systems, and most other things. The graph above is done using Apex charts which is open source.

    Thanked by 1lemoncube
  • @FrankZ said:

    @jholycloud said: In SolusVM, my node shown as : RYZE.AMS-D026.VMS

    I can confirm that node AMSD026 is currently working, as my VM on this node has been up for 18 days.

    --

    @lemoncube said: what are you using for monitoring? that graph looks nice.

    I roll my own monitoring systems, and most other things. The graph above is done using Apex charts which is open source.

    Thanks for your confirmation @FrankZ. Maybe it is specifically occurred on my VM. I think only @VirMach could help for now because I already follow all suggestion, except reinstall my OS, which is not in my plan.

    I created a Ticket #563890

  • TottiTotti Member

    @FrankZ my ip:185.97.146.236, Can't access control center,
    The page says "Operation Timed Out After 90001 Milliseconds With 0 Bytes Received",

  • drizbodrizbo Member

    @jholycloud said:

    @drizbo said:
    Did you try to unmount any iso you might have? as that is one of the issues

    Yes, I already unmount any ISO. I double checked from SolusVM.
    Try to boot from SolusVM as well, but the state remain OFFLINE.

    In SolusVM, my node shown as : RYZE.AMS-D026.VMS

    Did you try to vnc even if it says offline? One of my VMs shows as offline but is actually booted up and works for past 2 weeks

This discussion has been closed.