Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › ★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ $8.88/YR- 384MB ★★ $21.85/YR- 2.5GB ★ Instant ★ Japan Pre-order ★ & More - Page 205
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

★ VirMach ★ RYZEN ★ NVMe ★★ $8.88/YR- 384MB ★★ $21.85/YR- 2.5GB ★ Instant ★ Japan Pre-order ★ & More

1…202203205207208…339

Comments

  • xprebounxpreboun Member

    @VirMach said:
    I really need to go through and make some time for updating templates to set password requirements and change default SSH port.

    But then everyone would reinstall their OS via either netboot or dd after the service has been provisioned, and continue on their merry way...

  • passwapasswa Member

    @ElonMusk said:

    @xpreboun said:

    @ElonMusk said: I think I get it, my password is simple: 12345678

    This password without SSH CA or Pubkey auth? That's simpler than my home smart lock entry password lmao

    Maybe Musk is too kind

    Maybe the SpaceX Falcon launch code is also 12345678

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @xpreboun said:

    @VirMach said:
    I really need to go through and make some time for updating templates to set password requirements and change default SSH port.

    But then everyone would reinstall their OS via either netboot or dd after the service has been provisioned, and continue on their merry way...

    I mean at that point I'm OK with it because it means they know how to do something other than clicking a re-install button.

    I'd wager that most people who know how to even install from ISO know not to set an insecure password.

    Thanked by 1skorous
  • passwapasswa Member

    @VirMach said:

    @xpreboun said:

    @VirMach said:
    I really need to go through and make some time for updating templates to set password requirements and change default SSH port.

    But then everyone would reinstall their OS via either netboot or dd after the service has been provisioned, and continue on their merry way...

    I mean at that point I'm OK with it because it means they know how to do something other than clicking a re-install button.

    I'd wager that most people who know how to even install from ISO know not to set an insecure password.

    Most people are for the convenience of mobile client to connect to ssh, easy to remember, such as me

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @passwa said:

    @VirMach said:

    @xpreboun said:

    @VirMach said:
    I really need to go through and make some time for updating templates to set password requirements and change default SSH port.

    But then everyone would reinstall their OS via either netboot or dd after the service has been provisioned, and continue on their merry way...

    I mean at that point I'm OK with it because it means they know how to do something other than clicking a re-install button.

    I'd wager that most people who know how to even install from ISO know not to set an insecure password.

    Most people are for the convenience of mobile client to connect to ssh, easy to remember, such as me

    Copying from a password manager should be more convenient than setting an insecure password.

    Thanked by 4AlwaysSkint FrankZ skorous Xrmaddness
  • xprebounxpreboun Member
    edited May 2022

    @VirMach said:
    Copying from a password manager should be more convenient than setting an insecure password.

    Or SSH Keys, especially when 1Password have direct support for SSH Key and there's also Small step hosted SSH CA that can replace single pubkey with SSH CA...

    On a side note, I've yet to discover how to use Small step or 1Password with xShell, so any suggestions on that is appreciated.

    Thanked by 2FrankZ lemoncube
  • qwerttaaqwerttaa Member

    test your p/w
    https://zxcvbn-ts.github.io/zxcvbn/demo/

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • ElonMuskElonMusk Member

    @VirMach said:

    @tototo said: It's almost always pointless to explain that "I didn't do anything". Instead, it is better to explain exactly what you did.

    Yep, I guess that usually works with other hosts so we get that a lot but it indicates the complete opposite of what people think.

    Actual mistakes/misunderstandings that can usually be resolved have a very detailed explanation and that's the type of unsuspension that has lowest risk of re-abuse. Highest risk is always the "I didn't do anything" crowd. I mean of course I still feel bad for them but ...

    @ElonMusk said:

    @VirMach said:

    @ElonMusk said:
    @VirMach
    I didn't do anything~
    then i was suspended
    I have absolutely no idea what's going on
    please help me check
    View Ticket #565410

    Sounds like you probably got hacked. What was your password? I mean no need to say it here but think about it.

    Right now for unsuspensions we're only accepting ones where password is provided on the ticket, looks secure, and we can log in and see what happened. Too many of these, I guess a lot of people setting up their VM and then not securing it since it's new.

    I just did look at your ticket since you're Elon Musk, and it doesn't look like you were hacked based on the usual abuse that goes on when people are but it's even worse, 50%+ I/O util for a day plus. Your VM was the one causing major problems on TYOC036. So I'll let other people on TYOC036 chime in on if you should be unsuspended but normally in this case it would be permanent because the $25 abuse fee is greater than the plan cost and no one usually wants to pay that.

    I think I get it, my password is simple: 12345678

    Can you help me recover?
    thanks

    Looks like Elon Musk has been disqualified from using virmach?
    Fortunately, I'm still using Starlink

  • rhinoduckrhinoduck Member

    ...

    Thanked by 2FrankZ randomq
  • elliotcelliotc Member

    @xpreboun said: 1Password have direct support for SSH Key

    WOW, don't know that. May consider migerate to 1password.

  • YYSDYYSD Member

    @J0rmo said:
    It seems that the network of TYOC029 is getting worse again.

    Ps：Take your time. No rush for me.

    It's been good for a few days but it exploded again, please fix it.

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @YYSD said:

    @J0rmo said:
    It seems that the network of TYOC029 is getting worse again.

    Ps：Take your time. No rush for me.

    It's been good for a few days but it exploded again, please fix it.

    On the todo list. I’ll see if I can just return networking to normal again right now within the next hour and then focus on figuring out why it’s crashing. Probably has to do with CPU lockups. Seems to be an issue with both 5950X servers but it might be causing this one to crash.

  • louiejordanlouiejordan Member

    @VirMach I waited two months, why is it "sold out" now?

  • totototototo Member

    @louiejordan said:
    @VirMach I waited two months, why is it "sold out" now?

    It would just show the current status on the sales page.
    https://billing.virmach.com/cart.php?a=add&pid=199

    Thanked by 1FrankZ
  • DursDurs Member

    @louiejordan said:
    @VirMach I waited two months, why is it "sold out" now?

    I have the same, but i have found out a delivery date ~21.05.2022

    you see at the main page services

  • louiejordanlouiejordan Member

    @tototo said: It would just show the current status on the sales page.

    it means that this current status has nothing to do with me at all, good job!

  • itoito Member, Host Rep

    LAKVM26
    This node appears to have lost its connection.

  • ElonMuskElonMusk Member

    @ElonMusk said:

    @VirMach said:

    @tototo said: It's almost always pointless to explain that "I didn't do anything". Instead, it is better to explain exactly what you did.

    Yep, I guess that usually works with other hosts so we get that a lot but it indicates the complete opposite of what people think.

    Actual mistakes/misunderstandings that can usually be resolved have a very detailed explanation and that's the type of unsuspension that has lowest risk of re-abuse. Highest risk is always the "I didn't do anything" crowd. I mean of course I still feel bad for them but ...

    @ElonMusk said:

    @VirMach said:

    @ElonMusk said:
    @VirMach
    I didn't do anything~
    then i was suspended
    I have absolutely no idea what's going on
    please help me check
    View Ticket #565410

    Sounds like you probably got hacked. What was your password? I mean no need to say it here but think about it.

    Right now for unsuspensions we're only accepting ones where password is provided on the ticket, looks secure, and we can log in and see what happened. Too many of these, I guess a lot of people setting up their VM and then not securing it since it's new.

    I just did look at your ticket since you're Elon Musk, and it doesn't look like you were hacked based on the usual abuse that goes on when people are but it's even worse, 50%+ I/O util for a day plus. Your VM was the one causing major problems on TYOC036. So I'll let other people on TYOC036 chime in on if you should be unsuspended but normally in this case it would be permanent because the $25 abuse fee is greater than the plan cost and no one usually wants to pay that.

    I think I get it, my password is simple: 12345678

    Can you help me recover?
    thanks

    Looks like Elon Musk has been disqualified from using virmach?
    Fortunately, I'm still using Starlink

    I have purchased vps from dozens of merchants but this is the first time I have been banned. The reason is that I used a weak password!

    Please be warned!

    Please be warned!

  • ben47955ben47955 Member

    Someone should tag Musk on twitter asking if it's really him.

  • pddpdd Member

    @ben47955 said:
    Someone should tag Musk on twitter asking if it's really him.

    Of course not. I can't believe you're asking that.

  • ben47955ben47955 Member

    @pdd said:

    @ben47955 said:
    Someone should tag Musk on twitter asking if it's really him.

    Of course not. I can't believe you're asking that.

    I know it's not him. ( or he is really trolling us) Still, it can be fun to ask him.

    Thanked by 1pdd
  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @ito said:
    LAKVM26
    This node appears to have lost its connection.

    This has been down for a very long time. We've scheduled a migration here (without data for now) and we're going to recreate services on Ryzen and add additional months of service for the long outage.

  • totototototo Member

    @ElonMusk said:
    I have purchased vps from dozens of merchants but this is the first time I have been banned. The reason is that I used a weak password!

    Please be warned!

    Please be warned!

    No. You're wrong and VirMach told you the reason.

    @VirMach said: Your VM was the one causing major problems on TYOC036

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @VirMach said:

    @YYSD said:

    @J0rmo said:
    It seems that the network of TYOC029 is getting worse again.

    Ps：Take your time. No rush for me.

    It's been good for a few days but it exploded again, please fix it.

    On the todo list. I’ll see if I can just return networking to normal again right now within the next hour and then focus on figuring out why it’s crashing. Probably has to do with CPU lockups. Seems to be an issue with both 5950X servers but it might be causing this one to crash.

    Emergency maintenance completed and it's looking a lot better. This was due to the 5950X issue I described a long long time ago that I feared, but it was easy to fix because the BIOS was on the wrong settings; it had reset at some point in time during setup. I don't remember but perhaps it was updated or CMOS was removed. So it's not that it's performing bad or worse at the datacenter, it was actually already doing way better with the real-world usage versus my extreme simulated testing, and had a minor version of those temperature issues.

    Anyway, it was trying to do the thing it does where it "overclocks" itself except this ends up overheating it and then it starts thermal throttling and creating a chain reaction of spikes that may be to blame for the CPU soft lockups and the crashes.

    I've loaded in the correct settings and CPU temps are 20-30 degrees less. Of course this also means the clockrate is now ~3.9-4.0GHz instead of ~4.3-4.4GHz but still above base clock of 3.4GHz and it actually looks like CPU usage also dropped by about 5% but we'll need more time to see if that's actually the case or if it's just temporarily lower right now.

    I'll try to keep a closer eye on this throughout th day and if it crashes again we'll look into the other possibilities.

    Thanked by 7FrankZ AlwaysSkint bakageta fan FAT32 Xrmaddness J0rmo
  • CheneryChenery Member

    @VirMach This is the current RYZE.SJC-Z004.VMS node in SAN Jose. It's so bad. I'm crazy about it!

  • ElonMuskElonMusk Member
    edited May 2022

    @tototo said:

    @ElonMusk said:
    I have purchased vps from dozens of merchants but this is the first time I have been banned. The reason is that I used a weak password!

    Please be warned!

    Please be warned!

    No. You're wrong and VirMach told you the reason.

    @VirMach said: Your VM was the one causing major problems on TYOC036

    ok i installed v2ray and i used a weak password,
    Am I suddenly a super hacker?

    I just don't want more people to suddenly become super hackers like me~ lose access, even if it's just a cup of coffee~

    Goodbye, I'm going to drive~

  • risturizristuriz Member

    @ElonMusk said:
    I have purchased vps from dozens of merchants but this is the first time I have been banned. The reason is that I used a weak password!

    Please be warned!

    Please be warned!

    So, you use weak password everywhere?... Pay your $25 noob fee and don't blame the provider!

    Thanked by 1AlwaysSkint
  • XratzhXratzh Member

    Hello.
    I payed 3$ without data to migrate to AMS.
    But Node AMSD029 cann't be reached.
    I have tried reinstall and cann't get any access.
    What should I do?
    Please help.

  • VirMachVirMach Member, Patron Provider

    @Chenery said:
    @VirMach This is the current RYZE.SJC-Z004.VMS node in SAN Jose. It's so bad. I'm crazy about it!

    Thanks for reporting this with some information. We did get 1-2 tickets about this but they were very vague.

    I do see some weird packet spikes here, I'll work on this next.

    Thanked by 1dudulu
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate
    edited May 2022

    @Chenery said:
    @VirMach This is the current RYZE.SJC-Z004.VMS node in SAN Jose. It's so bad. I'm crazy about it!

    SJCZ006 is almost as bad.
    From what I can tell from the diagnostics below, the problem is on the link around edge2.xe-2-0-10.dedipath-63.sje011.pnap.net or dedipath-63.edge1.sje011.pnap.net.

    MTR between VirMach Ryzen SJC and Nexril DAL

    Egress direction:

    sunny@vps1:~$ mtr -c 50 -z -w 161.129.153.xxx
Start: 2022-05-08T15:33:02+0000
HOST: vps1                                                  Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS35913  45.82.253.1                                   10.0%    50    8.9 323.5   0.3 1241. 409.0
  2. AS12182  edge2.xe-2-0-10.dedipath-63.sje011.pnap.net   12.0%    50   21.8 322.5   0.4 1101. 384.5
  3. AS12182  core1.t6-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net                18.0%    50    1.6 289.5   1.3 1203. 381.1
  4. AS1299   sjo-b21-link.ip.twelve99.net                  18.0%    50  113.2 309.3   1.4 1244. 401.7
  5. AS1299   sjo-b23-link.ip.twelve99.net                  16.0%    50  223.7 399.4   1.2 1488. 507.3
  6. AS1299   level3-ic333037-sjo-b21.ip.twelve99-cust.net  12.0%    50   45.2 292.1   1.5 1172. 378.5
  7. AS3356   ae2.3609.edge2.Dallas2.level3.net             12.0%    50   43.7 377.7  39.7 1236. 411.8
  8. AS13830  te0-1-0-12.cr01.dal.nexril.net                12.0%    50  209.4 375.5  45.1 1195. 404.6
  9. AS13830  po1.eor01.dal.nexril.net                      20.0%    50  174.3 317.1  44.9 1024. 359.4
 10. AS13830  161.129.153.xxx                                6.0%    50   78.7 380.5  44.6 1231. 405.4

    Ingress direction:

    sunny@vps6:~$ mtr -c 50 -z -w 213.59.116.xx
Start: 2022-05-08T10:33:02-0500
HOST: vps6                                                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS13830  vlan10.eor01.dal.nexril.net                           0.0%    50    0.6   0.9   0.5   4.7   0.6
  2. AS13830  be10.cr01.dal.nexril.net                              0.0%    50    0.8   0.9   0.6   1.2   0.1
  3. AS13830  te0-3-1-12.rcr51.b059724-0.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com   0.0%    50    1.2   1.1   0.8   1.6   0.1
  4. AS174    be2362.ccr32.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50    1.8   1.7   1.3   2.2   0.2
  5. AS174    be2433.ccr22.mci01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50   11.7  17.2  11.1  83.2  16.5
  6. AS174    be3036.ccr22.den01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50   23.0  25.8  22.6  57.8   8.5
  7. AS174    be3038.ccr32.slc01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50   33.0  33.1  32.8  33.9   0.2
  8. AS174    be3110.ccr22.sfo01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50   47.4  47.4  46.8  47.8   0.2
  9. AS174    be3179.ccr22.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com                 0.0%    50   48.6  48.7  48.2  50.3   0.3
 10. AS174    be2360.rcr51.b023785-1.sjc01.atlas.cogentco.com       0.0%    50   48.2  48.4  48.1  48.9   0.2
 11. AS174    38.104.134.70                                         0.0%    50   50.9  49.1  48.5  51.2   0.7
 12. AS12182  border7.sje011-bbnet1.sje011.pnap.net                 0.0%    50   44.8  45.3  44.5  58.2   2.1
 13. AS12182  dedipath-63.edge1.sje011.pnap.net                     0.0%    50   47.8  45.4  44.3  66.3   3.2
 14. AS35913  213.59.116.xx                                         8.0%    50  114.2 400.8  44.6 1302. 412.3

    MTR between VirMach Ryzen SJC and VirMach ColonCrossing Atlanta

    Egress direction:

    sunny@vps1:~$ mtr -c 50 -z -w 107.175.115.176
Start: 2022-05-08T15:42:02+0000
HOST: vps1                                                 Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS35913  45.82.253.1                                  14.0%    50  127.1  97.9   0.3 493.5 138.1
  2. AS12182  edge2.xe-2-0-10.dedipath-63.sje011.pnap.net   8.0%    50  147.8 121.0   0.3 512.9 153.1
  3. AS12182  core1.t6-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net                6.0%    50  170.4 120.9   1.3 532.0 157.2
  4. AS1299   sjo-b21-link.ip.twelve99.net                 12.0%    50  196.5 110.5   1.2 631.7 161.0
  5. AS1299   sjo-b23-link.ip.twelve99.net                  4.0%    50  378.9 243.9   1.1 691.8 250.2
  6. AS1299   palo-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net                 14.0%    50  183.1 125.4   2.2 571.3 168.2
  7. AS1299   palo-b1-link.ip.twelve99.net                  6.0%    50  191.8 125.7   2.3 513.9 163.6
  8. AS3257   ae2.cr0-pao1.ip4.gtt.net                      6.0%    50  204.3 134.3   3.1 543.7 168.8
  9. AS3257   ae6.cr5-atl2.ip4.gtt.net                     10.0%    50  425.3 181.3  57.4 683.7 172.1
 10. AS3257   78.152.59.153                                 8.0%    50  293.1 172.3  58.0 694.4 168.1
 11. AS???    ???                                          100.0    50    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
 12. AS36352  107-175-115-176-host.colocrossing.com         4.0%    50  520.1 301.2  57.9 825.5 246.3

    Ingress direction:

    sunny@vps7:~$ mtr -c 50 -z -w 213.59.116.xx
Start: 2022-05-08T11:42:02-0400
HOST: vps7                                           Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS???    10.4.0.209                              0.0%    50    3.5  46.8   1.2 314.3  92.9
  2. AS???    10.4.1.73                               0.0%    50    0.9   1.0   0.6   4.2   0.6
  3. AS3257   78.152.59.152                           0.0%    50    0.9   2.6   0.8  29.2   4.4
  4. AS3257   ae0.cr3-sjc1.ip4.gtt.net                0.0%    50   55.6  58.5  55.3  96.8   7.0
  5. AS1828   e0-16.cr1.sjc1.us.unitasglobal.net      0.0%    50   64.9  61.4  60.8  69.4   1.3
  6. AS1828   ae40.cr1.sjc2.us.unitasglobal.net       0.0%    50   61.2  61.2  60.7  63.3   0.4
  7. AS1828   inap.cust.sjc2.us.unitasglobal.net      0.0%    50   61.0  61.0  60.7  63.8   0.4
  8. AS12182  border7.sje011-bbnet1.sje011.pnap.net   0.0%    50   61.4  60.7  57.8  71.3   3.6
  9. AS12182  dedipath-63.edge1.sje011.pnap.net       0.0%    50   58.5  59.7  57.5  83.7   4.1
 10. AS35913  213.59.116.xx                           8.0%    50  517.7 292.3  58.0 751.0 247.6

    Network tests between VirMach Ryzen SJC and Clouvider Los Angeles

    MTR egress direction:

    sunny@vps1:~$ mtr -c 50 -z -w la.speedtest.clouvider.net
Start: 2022-05-08T15:44:11+0000
HOST: vps1                                                 Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1. AS35913  45.82.253.1                                   0.0%    50    2.0 106.8   0.3 508.3 135.6
  2. AS12182  edge2.xe-2-0-10.dedipath-63.sje011.pnap.net  14.0%    50    8.0  88.2   0.3 507.3 125.7
  3. AS12182  core2.t6-1-bbnet1.sje.pnap.net               14.0%    50    6.4  87.6   1.5 495.6 133.8
  4. AS701    xe-4-0-1.GW4.SJC7.ALTER.NET                   2.0%    50    1.2 224.6   0.9 665.9 226.5
  5. AS???    ???                                          100.0    50    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
  6. AS701    204.148.55.178                               10.0%    50    7.4 201.8   2.0 570.5 209.5
  7. AS3257   ae1.cr8-lax2.ip4.gtt.net                     14.0%    50   14.5  87.2   9.9 399.6 108.2
  8. AS3257   ip4.gtt.net                                  10.0%    50   10.1  90.2   9.9 341.8 105.8
  9. AS62240  77.247.126.3                                 12.0%    50   12.4 219.7  11.0 620.2 217.6
 10. AS62240  77.247.126.4                                 20.0%    50   25.2 212.7  10.6 678.7 212.6
 11. AS62240  77.247.126.223                               16.0%    50   10.0  91.6   9.9 502.6 125.2

    MTR ingress direction is infeasible.

    iperf3 egress direction:

    sunny@vps1:~$ iperf3 -c la.speedtest.clouvider.net -p 5206 -u -b 10M
Connecting to host la.speedtest.clouvider.net, port 5206
[  5] local 213.59.116.xx port 47351 connected to 77.247.126.223 port 5206
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Total Datagrams
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  864
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  864
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  863
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.9 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  0.000 ms  0/8632 (0%)  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  11.9 MBytes  9.98 Mbits/sec  4.715 ms  6/8619 (0.07%)  receiver

iperf Done.

    iperf3 ingress direction:

    sunny@vps1:~$ iperf3 -c la.speedtest.clouvider.net -p 5206 -u -b 10M -R
Connecting to host la.speedtest.clouvider.net, port 5206
Reverse mode, remote host la.speedtest.clouvider.net is sending
[  5] local 213.59.116.xx port 35480 connected to 77.247.126.223 port 5206
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  5]   0.00-1.00   sec   929 KBytes  7.61 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms  279/936 (30%)
[  5]   1.00-2.00   sec   530 KBytes  4.34 Mbits/sec  2.921 ms  338/713 (47%)
[  5]   2.00-3.00   sec  1.04 MBytes  8.73 Mbits/sec  0.004 ms  166/920 (18%)
[  5]   3.00-4.00   sec  1.03 MBytes  8.61 Mbits/sec  0.003 ms  222/965 (23%)
[  5]   4.00-5.00   sec   602 KBytes  4.94 Mbits/sec  1.941 ms  198/624 (32%)
[  5]   5.00-6.00   sec  1012 KBytes  8.29 Mbits/sec  0.022 ms  285/1001 (28%)
[  5]   6.00-7.00   sec  1.03 MBytes  8.64 Mbits/sec  0.007 ms  202/949 (21%)
[  5]   7.00-8.00   sec   991 KBytes  8.14 Mbits/sec  0.012 ms  176/877 (20%)
[  5]   8.00-9.00   sec  1.19 MBytes  9.95 Mbits/sec  0.011 ms  12/871 (1.4%)
[  5]   9.00-10.00  sec  1.19 MBytes  10.0 Mbits/sec  0.002 ms  0/864 (0%)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval           Transfer     Bitrate         Jitter    Lost/Total Datagrams
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  12.0 MBytes  10.1 Mbits/sec  0.000 ms  0/8720 (0%)  sender
[  5]   0.00-10.00  sec  9.45 MBytes  7.93 Mbits/sec  0.002 ms  1878/8720 (22%)  receiver

iperf Done.
This discussion has been closed.