New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Check Hetzner AX101 benchmark and tell is it good?
Check Hetzner AX101 benchmark and tell is it good?
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14622276
Single-Core Score - 910
Multi-Core Score - 8689
Comments
reinstall system and check again, its not ok
Single core far too low
Thanks for letting me know. I will do and recheck
That's what i am thinking too.
Both values are around half what they should be on a properly functioning Linux system.
I notice you use Windows. Windows gives lower bench results because of the funny ways that Geekbench runs, but they should be nowhere near as low as that.
For reference my own Ryzen 9 5900X computer running Windows spat out this https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14439283
(Linux for reference to see what I mean about differences: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14441864)
And that isn't even 5950X, so yours should be higher multi.
Try fiddling with power management settings in WIndows, or try benching from rescue system if you think the hardware might be at fault.
Definitely too low
My AX101:
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1662
Multi Core | 14882
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14624316
Switch plan to High Performance. And also make sure your cpu is boosting properly.
If you want to get better results, will be worth to get IPMI/KVM and play with PBO settings as well as memory
My home rig : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14161582
How to switch to high performance at hetzner?
Thanks. I will check the system further.
I am getting only half of the speed it seems. Thanks. I will dig further.
Since you are using Windows...
Click search area: Type powercfg.cpl and change to High Performance
Thanks. Now it seems it improved.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14633475
Single Core | 1521
Multi Core | 14256
Probably not.
It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261
Bruh you literally came here just to flex XD
It has nothing to do with his AX101 and his problem is already fixed (Windows powerplan)
You say 768GB but your geekbench shows
Memory 251.80 GB
.Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?
Asking for your future victims.
This is not my geekbench
so you are flexing with stolen Geekbench? Good job "provider"
The more you say the worse it gets.
My bench using @Liso benchmark script
Ah yes. A good provinser would run a bench script on a hypervisor with 100s of VMs..
Good logic..
You said you'd be splitting it into VMs in May, implying it would be a future date. You wouldn't presumably have 100's of VMs if you haven't done that yet.
You also literally said it was your server, yet you deny that it was your GB. Is that because you'd then have to admit the "768GB of RAM" is indeed 256GB plus 512GB of swap?
I assume "provinser" is a typo for provider, which I would argue you aren't a good provider and I wouldn't put that past you to run a geekbench on a loaded node.
So what is it boom? You're either lying about the RAM, lying about the GB being yours or you're just really not very smart?
Whatever
That's what I thought.