Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Check Hetzner AX101 benchmark and tell is it good?
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Check Hetzner AX101 benchmark and tell is it good?

ahrtahrt Member
in General

Check Hetzner AX101 benchmark and tell is it good?

https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14622276

Single-Core Score - 910

Multi-Core Score - 8689

Comments

  • reb0rnreb0rn Member

    reinstall system and check again, its not ok

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep

    Single core far too low

  • ahrtahrt Member

    @reb0rn said:
    reinstall system and check again, its not ok

    Thanks for letting me know. I will do and recheck

  • ahrtahrt Member

    @bruh21 said:
    Single core far too low

    That's what i am thinking too.

  • ErisaErisa Member
    edited April 2022

    Both values are around half what they should be on a properly functioning Linux system.

    I notice you use Windows. Windows gives lower bench results because of the funny ways that Geekbench runs, but they should be nowhere near as low as that.

    For reference my own Ryzen 9 5900X computer running Windows spat out this https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14439283
    (Linux for reference to see what I mean about differences: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14441864)
    And that isn't even 5950X, so yours should be higher multi.

    Try fiddling with power management settings in WIndows, or try benching from rescue system if you think the hardware might be at fault.

  • brejskibrejski Member

    Definitely too low
    My AX101:

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1662
    Multi Core | 14882
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14624316

  • TeYroXTeYroX Member

    Switch plan to High Performance. And also make sure your cpu is boosting properly.
    If you want to get better results, will be worth to get IPMI/KVM and play with PBO settings as well as memory :)

    My home rig : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14161582

  • ahrtahrt Member
    edited April 2022

    @TeYroX said:
    Switch plan to High Performance. And also make sure your cpu is boosting properly.
    If you want to get better results, will be worth to get IPMI/KVM and play with PBO settings as well as memory :)

    My home rig : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14161582

    How to switch to high performance at hetzner?

  • ahrtahrt Member

    @Erisa said:
    Both values are around half what they should be on a properly functioning Linux system.

    I notice you use Windows. Windows gives lower bench results because of the funny ways that Geekbench runs, but they should be nowhere near as low as that.

    For reference my own Ryzen 9 5900X computer running Windows spat out this https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14439283
    (Linux for reference to see what I mean about differences: https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14441864)
    And that isn't even 5950X, so yours should be higher multi.

    Try fiddling with power management settings in WIndows, or try benching from rescue system if you think the hardware might be at fault.

    Thanks. I will check the system further.

  • ahrtahrt Member

    @brejski said:
    Definitely too low
    My AX101:

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1662
    Multi Core | 14882
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14624316

    I am getting only half of the speed it seems. Thanks. I will dig further.

  • TeYroXTeYroX Member

    @ahrt said:

    @TeYroX said:
    Switch plan to High Performance. And also make sure your cpu is boosting properly.
    If you want to get better results, will be worth to get IPMI/KVM and play with PBO settings as well as memory :)

    My home rig : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14161582

    How to switch to high performance at hetzner?

    Since you are using Windows...
    Click search area: Type powercfg.cpl and change to High Performance

  • ahrtahrt Member

    @TeYroX said:

    @ahrt said:

    @TeYroX said:
    Switch plan to High Performance. And also make sure your cpu is boosting properly.
    If you want to get better results, will be worth to get IPMI/KVM and play with PBO settings as well as memory :)

    My home rig : https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14161582

    How to switch to high performance at hetzner?

    Since you are using Windows...
    Click search area: Type powercfg.cpl and change to High Performance

    Thanks. Now it seems it improved.
    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14633475

    Single Core | 1521
    Multi Core | 14256

  • ezethezeth Member, Patron Provider

    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member
    edited April 2022

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    Bruh you literally came here just to flex XD

    It has nothing to do with his AX101 and his problem is already fixed (Windows powerplan)

    Thanked by 3ezeth dahartigan TODO
  • dahartigandahartigan Member
    edited May 2022

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

  • ezethezeth Member, Patron Provider

    @dahartigan said:

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

    This is not my geekbench

  • TeYroXTeYroX Member

    @ezeth said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

    This is not my geekbench

    so you are flexing with stolen Geekbench? Good job "provider"

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • dahartigandahartigan Member

    @ezeth said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

    This is not my geekbench

    The more you say the worse it gets.

    Thanked by 2Peppery9 msallak1
  • cpsdcpsd Member

    My bench using @Liso benchmark script

    # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
#            Benchy v1.6            #
#   https://github.com/L1so/benchy  #
#        AIO Benchmarking tool      #
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #
#      03 May 2022 06:55 CEST        #
# # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # #

Server Information
---------------------
OS          : Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS
Uptime      : 0 Days, 7 Hours, 53 Minute, 56 Seconds
Location    : Germany
CPU         : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
Core        : 32 @ 2187.43 MHz
AES-NI      : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V  : ✔ Enabled
Virt        : none

Disk & Memory Usage
---------------------
Disk        : 3.43 TiB
Disk Usage  : 103.73 GiB (4% Used)
Mem         : 125.89 GiB
Mem Usage   : 11363 MB (9% Used)
Swap        : 3.99 GiB

Too little storage on /dev/md1
Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/md2)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Size | Read        | Write       | Total       |       IOPS (R,W,T)       |
+===========================================================================+
| 4k   | 560.20 MB/s | 561.68 MB/s | 1.09 GB/s   | 143.4k | 143.8k | 287.2k |
| 64k  | 1.14 GB/s   | 1.14 GB/s   | 2.28 GB/s   | 18.7k  | 18.8k  | 37.5k  |
| 512k | 1.12 GB/s   | 1.18 GB/s   | 2.31 GB/s   | 2.3k   | 2.4k   | 4.7k   |
| 1m   | 1.16 GB/s   | 1.24 GB/s   | 2.41 GB/s   | 1.2k   | 1.3k   | 2.5k   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Too little storage on /dev/md1
Disk Performance Check (ext4 on /dev/md2)
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Size | Read        | Write       | Total       |       IOPS (R,W,T)       |
+===========================================================================+
| 4k   | 560.20 MB/s | 561.68 MB/s | 1.09 GB/s   | 143.4k | 143.8k | 287.2k |
| 64k  | 1.14 GB/s   | 1.14 GB/s   | 2.28 GB/s   | 18.7k  | 18.8k  | 37.5k  |
| 512k | 1.12 GB/s   | 1.18 GB/s   | 2.31 GB/s   | 2.3k   | 2.4k   | 4.7k   |
| 1m   | 1.16 GB/s   | 1.24 GB/s   | 2.41 GB/s   | 1.2k   | 1.3k   | 2.5k4k|563.44 MB/s|564.93 MB/s|1.10 GB/s|144.2k|144.6k|288.9k |
| 64k  | 1.15 GB/s   | 1.15 GB/s   | 2.31 GB/s   | 18.9k  | 19.0k  | 37.9k  |
| 512k | 1.08 GB/s   | 1.13 GB/s   | 2.22 GB/s   | 2.2k   | 2.3k   | 4.5k   |
| 1m   | 1.17 GB/s   | 1.25 GB/s   | 2.42 GB/s   | 1.2k   | 1.3k   | 2.5k   |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Network Performance Test (Region: Europe)
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Prot. | Provider    | Location        | Send            | Receive         | Latency  |
+======================================================================================+
| IPv4  | Online.net  | Paris, FR       | 948 Mbits/sec   | 936 Mbits/sec   | 14 ms    |
|       | Clouvider   | London, UK      | 946 Mbits/sec   | 928 Mbits/sec   | 22 ms    |
|       | Hybula      | Amsterdam, NL   | 948 Mbits/sec   | 936 Mbits/sec   | 12 ms    |
|       | Wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE     | 948 Mbits/sec   | 938 Mbits/sec   | busy     |
|       | OVH         | Roubaix, FR     | 947 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 13 ms    |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| IPv6  | Online.net  | Paris, FR       | busy            | busy            | busy     |
|       | Clouvider   | London, UK      | 932 Mbits/sec   | 899 Mbits/sec   | 22 ms    |
|       | Hybula      | Amsterdam, NL   | busy            | 923 Mbits/sec   | 12 ms    |
|       | Wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE     | 934 Mbits/sec   | 923 Mbits/sec   | busy     |
|       | OVH         | Roubaix, FR     | 937 Mbits/sec   | 924 Mbits/sec   | 13 ms    |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------+
| Geekbench 5.4.4 Tryout for Linux x86 (64-bit) |
+===============================================+
| Single Core        | 1703                     |
| Multi Core         | 15266                    |
+-----------------------------------------------+
| https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14687640 |
+-----------------------------------------------+
| Benchy time spent  | 9 Minutes 32 Seconds     |
+-----------------------------------------------+
| Benchy result      | http://sprunge.us/mq4dQY |
+-----------------------------------------------+
  • ezethezeth Member, Patron Provider

    @TeYroX said:

    @ezeth said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

    This is not my geekbench

    so you are flexing with stolen Geekbench? Good job "provider"

    Ah yes. A good provinser would run a bench script on a hypervisor with 100s of VMs..

    Good logic..

  • dahartigandahartigan Member

    @ezeth said:

    @TeYroX said:

    @ezeth said:

    @dahartigan said:

    @ezeth said:
    Probably not.

    It’s on par with my 768GB ram server I’ll be splitting up into VMs in May.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/14602261

    You say 768GB but your geekbench shows Memory 251.80 GB.

    Is this because you have configured a 512GB SWAP?

    Asking for your future victims.

    This is not my geekbench

    so you are flexing with stolen Geekbench? Good job "provider"

    Ah yes. A good provinser would run a bench script on a hypervisor with 100s of VMs..

    Good logic..

    You said you'd be splitting it into VMs in May, implying it would be a future date. You wouldn't presumably have 100's of VMs if you haven't done that yet.

    You also literally said it was your server, yet you deny that it was your GB. Is that because you'd then have to admit the "768GB of RAM" is indeed 256GB plus 512GB of swap?

    I assume "provinser" is a typo for provider, which I would argue you aren't a good provider and I wouldn't put that past you to run a geekbench on a loaded node.

    So what is it boom? You're either lying about the RAM, lying about the GB being yours or you're just really not very smart?

  • ezethezeth Member, Patron Provider

    Whatever

  • dahartigandahartigan Member

    @ezeth said:
    Whatever

    That's what I thought.

Sign In or Register to comment.