Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Pacificrack new scam

2»

Comments

  • @cybertech said:

    @lowendclient said:
    Any evidence on what kind of Scam they did?
    3-year payment is not a good model however they didn't escape for now.
    200MB/s limitation on SSD is not a proof of your argument, any node server have a max IOPS, you can not occupy all node resources. Each provider have their own way of limitation.

    feel free to try them, i welcome your new evidence

    I've never used them before, any conclusive scam activities, please show me, will avoid.

  • @Billyham07 said:

    Sorry but I can not believe what people said on that forum, they unsatisfied with nearly every provider in market. You may know conformity effect, people trend to follow others said to make themselves gregarious. If clients post some evidences here, it may be more persuasive.

  • @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

  • @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Again, welcome to LET :D

  • @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Not that your view was valid or not, you came to LET not understanding how LET operates. In short, being cheap is not an acceptable excuse for being shit.

  • @TimboJones said:

    @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Not that your view was valid or not, you came to LET not understanding how LET operates. In short, being cheap is not an acceptable excuse for being shit.

    Nice to see that can explain their view without expletives :D It maybe cheap but you cannot really expect a world class service when paying peanuts. The old saying "You get what you pay for" rings true. How can you expect a full-speed SSD server for $20 a year with the specifications listed, the IP and bandwidth allowance offered would cost more than that in the real world.

  • @TechDude said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Not that your view was valid or not, you came to LET not understanding how LET operates. In short, being cheap is not an acceptable excuse for being shit.

    Nice to see that can explain their view without expletives :D It maybe cheap but you cannot really expect a world class service when paying peanuts. The old saying "You get what you pay for" rings true. How can you expect a full-speed SSD server for $20 a year with the specifications listed, the IP and bandwidth allowance offered would cost more than that in the real world.

    Because there needs to be a minimum amount of stability and support and no price (even free) is worth added headaches. It's more the point that the offering isn't sustainable for provider or customers.

    Lastly, many of us here at LET have similar price/performance ratio or loss leader servers and still experience support from a functional organization. So no, we don't agree there's much benefit of low price for shit product.

  • @add_iT said:
    Better take boomer.host deal at this price range

    ROFL. Scams everywhere.

  • PR,dogs even don't use

  • @TechDude said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Not that your view was valid or not, you came to LET not understanding how LET operates. In short, being cheap is not an acceptable excuse for being shit.

    Nice to see that can explain their view without expletives :D It maybe cheap but you cannot really expect a world class service when paying peanuts. The old saying "You get what you pay for" rings true. How can you expect a full-speed SSD server for $20 a year with the specifications listed, the IP and bandwidth allowance offered would cost more than that in the real world.

    Again, repeating myself for the third time here. Welcome to LET. Clearly you continue to miss the intent of the entire community here :lol:

  • @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @TechDude said:

    @KermEd said:

    @TechDude said:

    ... you seem to complain about $10 & $20 VPS a year being limited to 200MB which really people spend more then $20 on lunch

    Welcome to your first day on LET :lol:

    Wow, a new user cannot have a valid view? How lame.

    Not that your view was valid or not, you came to LET not understanding how LET operates. In short, being cheap is not an acceptable excuse for being shit.

    Nice to see that can explain their view without expletives :D It maybe cheap but you cannot really expect a world class service when paying peanuts. The old saying "You get what you pay for" rings true. How can you expect a full-speed SSD server for $20 a year with the specifications listed, the IP and bandwidth allowance offered would cost more than that in the real world.

    Again, repeating myself for the third time here. Welcome to LET. Clearly you continue to miss the intent of the entire community here :lol:

    To be clear, even if the service is $1/year - unless it has 99.99% uptime, automated backups, instant chat support, accepts crypto, provides IPv4 and IPv6, allows for anonymous users and ignores takedowns - your service is going to get dragged the forum by someone at some point. And a hell of a lot of other people with a $1 budget are going to talk about it.

    If cheap with high expectations isn't your thing - LET is probably not the place to be.

  • More like Alpharacks. There is similarity with some old summer hosts deals.

Sign In or Register to comment.