Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › Nginx is 100x faster than Litespeed for WordPress
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Nginx is 100x faster than Litespeed for WordPress

qerdanqerdan Member
in General

hey guys I just want to stop by Lowend and share new benchmarks and the result are finally here that you have been waiting for after so much confusion.......

  • Nginx is 27x faster than Litespeed and OpenLitespeed for static files
  • Nginx is 50x faster than Litespeed for server-level caching (FastCGI cache is amazing)
  • Nginx is 100x faster than Litespeed for TTFB metric
  • Nginx has no htaccess file that can be hacked by malware or dumbass users
  • Nginx supports other open source software like PHP-FPM
  • Nginx is around 200x more secure, maybe 300x
  • Nginx powers 99% of Alexa Top 1000 websites cuz they don't need f*cking cPanel
  • Nginx is the GOAT and only losers who sell shared servers or want to feel cool from Litespeed guys featuring them on their Facebook page will not use Nginx

so it is very clear now that previous fake benchmarks shared by Litespeed fanbois are bullsh*t and Nginx is obviously much better for SEO results and faster speed and security too for winners

thanks and glad we could solve this together guys :*

Thanked by 5pike raindog308 ariq01 o_be_one emgh
«1

Comments

  • ViridWebViridWeb Member, Host Rep

    Nice Paint job.
    It inspiring.. we will drop litespeed from all our server by next morning.

    Thanked by 14qerdan donko mrTom Hotmarer typicalGtaTG taizi gapper themantra TheKiller imok o_be_one bacloud fluffernutter WebProject
  • TalistechTalistech Member

    Cool. I like the detailed benchmarks! Where can we buy nginx licenses?

    Thanked by 4qerdan mrTom taizi o_be_one
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    @qerdan said: so it is very clear now that previous fake benchmarks shared by Litespeed fanbois are bullsh*t and Nginx is obviously much better for SEO results and faster speed and security too for winners

    Congrats on your first post

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • qerdanqerdan Member

    @Talistech said:
    Cool. I like the detailed benchmarks! Where can we buy nginx licenses?

    Nginx is 100% free sir, welcome to winners club

    unlike Litespeed the free version is actually stable and no premium license is required

    during past 10 years Nginx never had any breaking changes either!!

  • ShakibShakib Member, Patron Provider

    Nginx will be 150% faster if you run on i9-11900K. :p

    Thanked by 5qerdan AXYZE cybertech Hotmarer Teko
  • jmgcaguiclajmgcaguicla Member

    Based and benchmarkpilled

    Thanked by 3qerdan AXYZE pike
  • qerdanqerdan Member

    @Shakib said:
    Nginx will be 150% faster if you run on i9-11900K. :p

    you are very correct sir but I think you mean to say around 250x faster or 350x faster............

    don't forget Litespeed team will make very fake numbers so always go bigger

    @jmgcaguicla said:
    Based and benchmarkpilled

    thank you sir

    Nginx is for freedom fighters in Europe and America and around the world

    Litespeed is Chinese businessmen who [maybe] want to create monopoly with cPanel team?

    choose now who you support

  • nickcnickc Member

    In all seriousness, are there any conclusive benchmarks on this? Does LET have a general consensus on nginx vs ols?

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • qerdanqerdan Member

    @nickc said:
    In all seriousness, are there any conclusive benchmarks on this? Does LET have a general consensus on nginx vs ols?

    sir this is the official benchmark for Lowend, Nginx is 100x faster than Litespeed

    Lowend guys already know this because Nginx is the poll winner

    https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/171638/openlitespeed-vs-nginx-for-static-caching

    Litespeed is bloatware for cPanel shared hosting

    https://securityheaders.com/?q=https://litespeedtech.com/&followRedirects=on

    expires Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:00:00 GMT
cache-control   no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
pragma  no-cache
etag    "1617313-1632501892;;;"
x-lsadc-cache   hit

    what the hell is this?? Litespeed

    • etag should be for static files (ex. photos) not HTML pages esp. if no-cache already and using the server to cache the HTML content instead of the browser
    • content expires in 2005.... umm ok
    • zero security policies / HSTS

    you think these guys are SEO expert or just resell the free Apache software to be premium??

    guys don't be losers, use Nginx for your money site

  • adwordsadwords Member
    edited September 2021

    100x fast is a little exaggerated

    In fact, it depends on computing, storage speed, network, CDN and so on

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    That you little bizzy?

  • pbxpbx Member

    Great benchmark, exactly the information I was looking for, thanks!

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • elliotcelliotc Member

    I coded a NginZ web server this morning when I am shitting. Written in Microsoft powerpoint. It is 30x faster than Nginx. PMed OP for a benchmark.

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • BoogeymanBoogeyman Member

    To me OP looks like an ex-CyberPanel user from IN/PK/BD that got somehow angry that OLS/LS Ent doesn't work for him. BTW some of his statements are true but I am not sure if all of these are true. LS is from mostly Chinese developers, they did throw fake benchmarks here and there, their FOSS softwares are not well tested and they choose shitty GPL so other corporate guys can't take it(but they choose library very carefully that they don''t need to public LS Ent code). LS, Cloudlinux, cPanel are really trying to create a monopoly.

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • Daniel15Daniel15 Veteran
    edited September 2021

    I don't understand all the benchmarks about WordPress being faster on particular servers. Are they talking about the admin panel? Because the actual site should be fully cached on disk (eg using WP Super Cache), and then it just becomes a competition of which server can serve plain HTML files the fastest (spoiler: they can all do that).

    Unrelated to WordPress, but I did get around a 10x improvement in response times (and a huge improvement in maintainability) of one of my sites by migrating from PHP to C#. That's an API with dynamic content though, so not I can't simply cache it.

    Thanked by 5vyas11 angstrom bulbasaur pbx ariq01
  • vyas11vyas11 Member

    $7 !

  • AXYZEAXYZE Member

    @Daniel15 said:
    I don't understand all the benchmarks about WordPress being faster on particular servers. Are they talking about the admin panel? Because the actual site should be fully cached on disk (eg using WP Super Cache), and then it just becomes a competition of which server can serve plain HTML files the fastest (spoiler: they can all do that).

    Unrelated to WordPress, but I did get around a 10x improvement in response times (and a huge improvement in maintainability) of one of my sites by migrating from PHP to C#. That's an API with dynamic content though, so not I can't simply cache it.

    .NET Core right? Awesome performance, I'm using this too. There's still some better performance ones built with Go, Rust or C++ but I found .Net ecosystem to work awesome, great IDE for free, lots of guides and Microsoft really care about it

  • ArkasArkas Moderator

    This is the kind of graph and data that should be taken immediately to the UN for discussion!

    Thanked by 3qerdan jsg Daniel15
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    One doesn't need to be a fan of LS in order to see that the OP is/was trolling

    I suspect that the OP is/was simply a troll passing in the night

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • pedagangpedagang Member

    don't touch the running system, except ......

  • comXyzcomXyz Member

    regarding word press, I use autohotkey to auto press a word, and it's thousands of times faster

  • BlaZeBlaZe Member, Host Rep

    I like your data interpretation chart skills. Can I hire you for my projects?

    Thanked by 2ViridWeb qerdan
  • desperanddesperand Member
    edited September 2021

    I did fast and weird bench.
    1.) same VPS in same DC, same unixbench, same ram, same CPU, same everything, but 2 different VPS working at the same time.
    2.) I've made 1 WP with generated content, images, posts, comments, trash files, ~20 plugins, and so on.
    3.) I tested without and with cache (fastcgi for LEMP, and LSCache for OpenLiteSpeed).
    4.) results pretty surprised me damn a lot.

    tl;dr: OLS faster nginx+php-fpm in ~2x+ times.

    Images here: https://imgur.com/a/1wzng82

    Without cache, OLS ~2x faster nginx+php-fpm default out the box.
    With OLS cache (for nginx fastcgi cache enabled). OLS faster nginx+php7.4-fpm in 2+ times..

    This is extremely stupid test, can be wrong, and bla bla bla.
    But all that i did - i set up LEMP & OLS with same maridb version, same operating system, same resources, even same PHP versions. The only difference - IPs, and web server...



    🤷‍♀️🤷‍♂️

    I have just 1 question: WTF happened to LEMP in last 5 years?

    Thanked by 2_MS_ ariq01
  • gianggiang Veteran

    OpenLiteSpeed will have http/3 + Quic, Brotli compression out of the box, if you are serving your website via https, it will be faster for sure.

  • desperanddesperand Member

    @giang said: OpenLiteSpeed will have http/3 + Quic, Brotli compression out of the box, if you are serving your website via https, it will be faster for sure.

    My bench incorrect above. But not "falsified". Just setup out the box like most of the users of these products has.

    I always thought that nginx+php-fpm faster, always.
    But stupid bench above show me that it's not. Even WP site feels much lightweight with OLS for some unknown reasons.

  • bshbsh Member

    @giang said:
    OpenLiteSpeed will have http/3 + Quic, Brotli compression out of the box, if you are serving your website via https, it will be faster for sure.

    Caddy too...

    In 2020, there was a post about enabling HTTP/3 for Nginx: https://www.grottedubarbu.fr/nginx-quic-http3/

    :) if working on IPv9 of @yoursunny a Caddy server will won at all

  • _MS__MS_ Member
    edited September 2021

    Did LiteSpeed cancel OP's license for hosting pr0n?

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • deankdeank Member, Troll

    A simple Q.

    If it's 100x faster, will it die 100x earlier?

    Thanked by 1Boogeyman
  • angstromangstrom Moderator

    One can argue back and forth about speed, but the following claim is golden!

    Nginx is around 200x more secure, maybe 300x

    Thanked by 1qerdan
  • qerdanqerdan Member

    @adwords said:
    100x fast is a little exaggerated

    In fact, it depends on computing, storage speed, network, CDN and so on

    sir you are correct 100x is too small estimate

    the real number is 500x faster than Litespeed but we don't shock the newbies too much

    @elliotc said:
    I coded a NginZ web server this morning when I am shitting. Written in Microsoft powerpoint. It is 30x faster than Nginx. PMed OP for a benchmark.

    holy shit NginZ is faster than NginX guys that is why no public source code yet

    thank u bro for sharing the alien tech I will protect it as my child

    @Boogeyman said:
    To me OP looks like an ex-CyberPanel user from IN/PK/BD that got somehow angry that OLS/LS Ent doesn't work for him. BTW some of his statements are true but I am not sure if all of these are true. LS is from mostly Chinese developers, they did throw fake benchmarks here and there, their FOSS softwares are not well tested and they choose shitty GPL so other corporate guys can't take it(but they choose library very carefully that they don''t need to public LS Ent code). LS, Cloudlinux, cPanel are really trying to create a monopoly.

    HAIL BOOGEY

    we must fight the CCP-PANEL COMMUNIST MONOPOLY

    OLS is fake FOSS bullshit for Chinese propaganda to enslave stupid shared hosting noobs

Sign In or Register to comment.