Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


12GB RAM 500GB HDD OpenVZ | $5/m | Chicago, IL
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

12GB RAM 500GB HDD OpenVZ | $5/m | Chicago, IL

TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

TNAHosting is happy to offer the following deal to the LET community. We've been in business since 2012, providing a variety of reliable and cost effective services.

12GB OpenVZ
* 4x vCPU
* 500GB HDD
* 15TB Bandwidth
* 1 IPv4 (IPv6 Available Upon Request)
* $5/month or $55/year - Order Here

=====

Reviews:

https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3139017/#Comment_3139017
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3138438/#Comment_3138438
https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3119933/#Comment_3119933

=====

Virtual servers are setup instantly after payment.

Chicago Looking Glass: http://lg.chi2.tnahosting.net/

We accept PayPal, Major Credit/Debit Cards (Stripe), and Bitcoin (Bitpay).

Have questions or need something custom? Feel free to PM me or open a sales ticket.

Thanked by 1lanefu

Comments

  • OpenVZ 7, right?

  • TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

    @angstrom said:
    OpenVZ 7, right?

    Yup!

    Thanked by 1angstrom
  • yabs me baby

  • bruh21bruh21 Member, Host Rep

    @jugganuts said:
    yabs me baby

    i had one in the past and i re-bought it today
    the reason i cancelled last time was a long downtime right after i began using it. apparently there was more downtimes as well.
    im giving them another shot

    [root@te ~]# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-06-05                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sat Sep 18 15:34:33 CDT 2021
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3299.926 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 12.0 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 492.0 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 622.00 KB/s    (155) | 9.93 MB/s      (155)
    Write      | 654.00 KB/s    (163) | 10.47 MB/s     (163)
    Total      | 1.27 MB/s      (318) | 20.41 MB/s     (318)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 21.76 MB/s      (42) | 56.42 MB/s      (55)
    Write      | 23.41 MB/s      (45) | 60.97 MB/s      (59)
    Total      | 45.18 MB/s      (87) | 117.40 MB/s    (114)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 427 Mbits/sec   | 737 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 452 Mbits/sec   | 699 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 472 Mbits/sec   | 711 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 302 Mbits/sec   | 240 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 601 Mbits/sec   | 734 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 634 Mbits/sec   | 742 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 405 Mbits/sec   | 731 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 232 Mbits/sec   | 622 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 685
    Multi Core      | 2060
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/9916236
    

    @TNAHosting what is the raid configuration?

    Thanked by 1TNAHosting
  • TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

    @bruh21 said:
    @TNAHosting what is the raid configuration?

    RAID 10

  • @bruh21 said: fio Disk Speed > Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 622.00 KB/s (155) 9.93 MB/s (155)
    Write 654.00 KB/s (163) 10.47 MB/s (163)
    Total 1.27 MB/s (318) 20.41 MB/s (318)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 21.76 MB/s (42) 56.42 MB/s (55)
    Write 23.41 MB/s (45) 60.97 MB/s (59)
    Total 45.18 MB/s (87) 117.40 MB/s (114)

    @TNAHosting Do you intentionally have a ~150 IOPS limit for both reads and writes? Generally reads should be much faster than writes with RAID10, but this benchmark shows writes as faster which doesn't really make sense.

  • software raid 10 maybe?

  • TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

    @Daniel15 said:
    @TNAHosting Do you intentionally have a ~150 IOPS limit for both reads and writes?

    We don't have any IOPS limits in place

  • @Daniel15 said:

    @bruh21 said: fio Disk Speed > Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 622.00 KB/s (155) 9.93 MB/s (155)
    Write 654.00 KB/s (163) 10.47 MB/s (163)
    Total 1.27 MB/s (318) 20.41 MB/s (318)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 21.76 MB/s (42) 56.42 MB/s (55)
    Write 23.41 MB/s (45) 60.97 MB/s (59)
    Total 45.18 MB/s (87) 117.40 MB/s (114)

    @TNAHosting Do you intentionally have a ~150 IOPS limit for both reads and writes? Generally reads should be much faster than writes with RAID10, but this benchmark shows writes as faster which doesn't really make sense.

    The limitation could comes from the HW, and HDD performs pretty much same IOPS for random reads and writes.

  • itoito Member, Host Rep

    have special dedicated server now ? Please DM me if so

  • @mayli said:

    @Daniel15 said:

    @bruh21 said: fio Disk Speed > Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 622.00 KB/s (155) 9.93 MB/s (155)
    Write 654.00 KB/s (163) 10.47 MB/s (163)
    Total 1.27 MB/s (318) 20.41 MB/s (318)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 21.76 MB/s (42) 56.42 MB/s (55)
    Write 23.41 MB/s (45) 60.97 MB/s (59)
    Total 45.18 MB/s (87) 117.40 MB/s (114)

    @TNAHosting Do you intentionally have a ~150 IOPS limit for both reads and writes? Generally reads should be much faster than writes with RAID10, but this benchmark shows writes as faster which doesn't really make sense.

    The limitation could comes from the HW, and HDD performs pretty much same IOPS for random reads and writes.

    155 IOPS is pretty bad performance even for a HDD...

  • @Daniel15 said: 155 IOPS is pretty bad performance even for a HDD...

    You're assuming 15k drives. ;-)

  • i agree bad iops otherwise i would of tried it out. my local raid 6 with old sas 3tb drives read atleast 6-10Mbps @ 4k random

  • @jugganuts said:
    i agree bad iops otherwise i would of tried it out. my local raid 6 with old sas 3tb drives read atleast 6-10Mbps @ 4k random

    Mbps != MB/s

  • edited September 2021

    @Daniel15 said:

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 622.00 KB/s (155) 9.93 MB/s (155)
    Write 654.00 KB/s (163) 10.47 MB/s (163)

    >

    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    Read 21.76 MB/s (42) 56.42 MB/s (55)
    Write 23.41 MB/s (45) 60.97 MB/s (59)

    but this benchmark shows writes as faster which doesn't really make sense.

    Not a lot faster. Perhaps the host has hardware RAID with battery backup, so is reporting the operation as complete before the data is fully written to disk (which is safe with a good controller that has battery backed or non-volatile cache, as writes lost to power issues can be replayed on startup). Even without early completion responses, a write cache can improve speed by allowing write re-ordering.

    Could also mean they have a write cache without battery backup enabled of course, which is much less safe in a power-out situation, especially if write reordering is involved.

  • @Adam1 said:

    @jugganuts said:
    i agree bad iops otherwise i would of tried it out. my local raid 6 with old sas 3tb drives read atleast 6-10Mbps @ 4k random

    Mbps != MB/s

    Congratulations on correcting my autocorrected keyboard. We've doubled your uptime!

  • What happens if you go over your traffic?

  • AdvinAdvin Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2021

    Is this actual RAM? Amazing deal!

  • TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

    @hgooch1984 said:
    What happens if you go over your traffic?

    If monthly bandwidth limit is reached, the server is auto suspended until it resets the following month.

    @Advin said:
    Is this actual RAM? Amazing deal!

    Yup!

  • I got issues to order. You there?

  • Tna very good. only thing I wanted was free ingress bandwith

  • I submitted a ticket and speeds are much better now:

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 3.19 MB/s (799) 50.11 MB/s (783)
    Write 3.21 MB/s (804) 50.39 MB/s (787)
    Total 6.41 MB/s (1.6k) 100.50 MB/s (1.5k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 74.72 MB/s (145) 102.88 MB/s (100)
    Write 78.70 MB/s (153) 109.74 MB/s (107)
    Total 153.42 MB/s (298) 212.62 MB/s (207)
  • My orders are flaged as franked,please help me

  • TNAHostingTNAHosting Member, Patron Provider

    @haveyuner said:
    My orders are flaged as franked,please help me

    Please drop a ticket or DM me and we should be able to approve your order.

Sign In or Register to comment.