New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
We have a lot of fraud here too in India. Sometimes the total amount involved in the fraud is more than some countries' total GDP.
biased to who?
here where?
That's all too distant for using RFC 2549 as backup in case server connection is broken.
Another problem is that Chinese seem to have forgotten about the Serbian brothers - requiring phone registration, while there's no Serbian phone allowed.
You can read affidavits yourself from the civil cases and judge them yourself. Lawyers present the evidence and control the narrative, they don't make the evidence themselves. When you say shit like the thing about the sun, you try really hard to contort your reality. Saying the sun revolved around the Earth was never a fact (no air quotes needed). Saying something that isn't true isn't a fact just because you believe it.
You trust this third party to validate software loads for some 150 telecoms worldwide, over years and across different equipment, is naive at best. If you think this is bullet proof, you're mistaken. It's just approvals, which the larger the project, the more exceptions that are made. Don't put so much faith in the process.
As usual you bend and turn and ignore just as you need it. It is a FACT that a courts ruling sometimes gets overturned and affidavits may enhance credibility but they are not proof (in the scientific meaning), hence your argumentation is broken.
(source: http://origins.osu.edu/milestones/february-2016-400-years-ago-catholic-church-prohibited-copernicanism)
Btw, they took a couple of hundred years to walk back on that and to accept that the sun does not turn around the earth. Until then however plenty of people were punished for disagreeing.
But hey, feel free to - as usual - just brush off reality and facts not suiting your narrative.
No, many companies trust in software verified by a credible and capable third party, not me. In fact, some of those companies, e.g. insurance companies, insist on conformity with such third parties, e.g. NIST.
anyone is free to check himself too.
So you are wrong on both.
Have a nice weekend
I directed you to look at all the evidence and make your own judgement. I don't think you've even done a basic Google search and just arguing to argue. Take your hands off your ears.
I have no clue what you're getting on with about the sun and Catholic church. They are the shadiest fucks around and fought science and progress since the start. But what seals it for me that you don't know what facts are, you quoted something referencing a theory, not facts.
Or were you just providing an example for when I said, "Saying something that isn't true isn't a fact just because you believe it." ? Because then you're just being redundant.
And again, you keep talking about trust of testing, but don't understand the limitation of that testing and how it doesn't prevent or guarantee against malicious code. Insurance companies deal with risk and blame. Others care about interoperability and standards. They are not state sponsored level hackers or coders capable of reviewing latest technology in short time. That shit is hard and requires elite developers. It's also like you've never seen a magician work.
You literally just made an argument (without defending it either) and called it a fact.
Get your facts straight.
Edit — just to be clear, a fact is something that we ALL agree is true.
Tell that to the Flat Earth Society, who think Earth is flat
@TimboJones
I give up on you as you obviously are mercilessly stubborn and ignorant and actually don't care at all about discussing but only about keeping your "I'm right" alive at all cost.
Apologies, in my world it is accepted that logic is self-evident. What I said can be easily verified. Court rulings are sometimes overturned which creates a contradiction, which again actually is proof ("reductio ad contradictionem", a classical logical device).
No. That ("all agree something to be true") is a usual consequence of a fact.
A fact is objectively and verifiably true, and btw independent of peoples acceptance.
The closest (to a fact) we humans can offer is a ruling by authority. The vatican, for example, simply declared that the sun turns around the earth and punished and threatened people into accepting it as a "fact".
But maybe our problem here is in different perspectives. Mine is scientific where the term "fact" has a certain definition, whereas others may look from another perspective where "fact" has a less stringent meaning and may include e.g. what the new york times or the president or some judge states. Well noted, I do accept that e.g. a judges ruling is binding; It's just not a fact (in the scientific meaning).
You actually did contribute to the discussion with that, albeit highly likely without knowing it. Thank you for that.
Reason: you provided a good example why @doghouch 's statement is not correct. If it where a fact could only be something ALL agree to. Unfortunately there are precious few things ALL can agree to. You provided an example for that. Another example would be the "gender issue". TL;DR: There is almost nothing ALL can agree to, hence - according to doghouch's definition there could be virtually no facts.
The bold part is contradictory.
Anyone catch Howard Stern this week where they play a clip of an NFL player saying "you know what I'm saying?" every other sentence and is making no sense?
On-topic...
Has anyone actually been able register successfully? They don't seem to accept US registrations for mobile verification and any of my non-US SMS verification services doesn't work with Hauwei.
After a lot of posts Im still trying to find a review about Huawei Cloud... lot of shit above... LOL
same here. Seems nobody on LET used it.
I'll give it a try later
I got somthing interesting from HuaweiCloud: 32vCPUs (Intel Xeon Gold 6151 @ 3GHz) | 128GB | GPU huawei-atlas600x16 | ai1.8xlarge.4 (in Shanghai, China) @ 0.01CNY/Hour(1.04USD/Month). It must be a bug but it has been running for 22 days.
Bench(from hostloc):
And this(Maybe a bug too? Anyway, I've been using it for more than a month and everything is fine.): 32vCPUs (Huawei Kunpeng 916 @ 2.4GHz Arm) | 116GB | rc3.8xlarge.4 (in Beijing, China) @ 0.01CNY/Hour(1.04USD/Month).
Bench(from hostloc):
The guy has convinced me.
I am moving my selfhosted email and nextcloud to whoawe servers.
Also, there's nothing happening in Donbas.
FAKE NEWS !
deep state gay frog pizza told me.
huawei cloud is ban about sex website.
We'll just call it the fediverse. :-)
You're checking your credit card bill for a heart attack, right?
no this is old bug and now they fixed it. : Huawei is a big company and often during beta testing something like this is always happening
No, it's still 0.01 CNY per hour.
Is there any way to register if you are not from Zimbabwe, Laos or Ghana? I need access to Hong Kong data center
there is one hosting who give free 7 months trial for Hong Kong vps. No credit card required. But I won't tell anyone.
I'll test
Wonder how much they care about DMCA since USA already hates Huawei and the feelings are probably mutual. Now they just need to accept cryptocurrencies!
Congrats on your first post
I need exactly huawei cloud, Hong Kong dc.
Oh thank you so much
I wouldnt trust the company, just my opinion