New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Purchased Pack 2
The second vCore seems strictly throttled
------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 24 2018 18:17:15 - 18:45:21 2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 31176381.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4008.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2966.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 486823.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 132075.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1314961.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 760569.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 16130.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 4893.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5653.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 780.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 597028.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 31176381.4 2671.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4008.7 728.9 Execl Throughput 43.0 2966.5 689.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 486823.8 1229.4 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 132075.3 798.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1314961.4 2267.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 760569.1 611.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16130.2 40.3 Process Creation 126.0 4893.7 388.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5653.9 1333.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 780.2 1300.3 System Call Overhead 15000.0 597028.7 398.0 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 721.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Sat Nov 24 2018 18:45:21 - 19:13:18 2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32180223.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4193.5 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2858.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 410685.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 112749.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1192782.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 785012.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 136854.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 6560.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5819.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 788.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 594783.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32180223.2 2757.5 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4193.5 762.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 2858.3 664.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 410685.0 1037.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112749.4 681.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1192782.4 2056.5 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 785012.9 631.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 136854.5 342.1 Process Creation 126.0 6560.5 520.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5819.5 1372.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 788.2 1313.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 594783.9 396.5 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 859.8 ======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======I will try. I had already filled an ISO url in the order form of vps, though.
We don't it just the numa Technology just hit the ticket we will got it disabled.
How exactly test the BBox ? it limtied to 100MB/s which enough, the network it capped to 100Mbps to avoid flooding you can hit ticket for both iso and network speed we will take alook i'm not sure were you got 200KB/s ?
it can be missed in the setup , You know we pretty busy at the moment so just hit ticket we will handle it for you.
Yeah, I also put a URL for an ISO in the order form, but this didn't work. I suspect that it requires manual intervention in any case.
The best thing to do is to open a ticket for a custom ISO.
???
NUMA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-uniform_memory_access
I double checked Thanks for reporting this. The ( Write throughput to Ceph 55 MB/s ), Your VPS were configured at different pool which not supposed to be, i don't know what your VPS is but this report give us attention to check everyone and yes Your Block Storage configured at NFS which not should be it only for remotely ISO . we will migrated everyone who configured at this pool and any new Block will at the right one.
No we don't set IOps anymore.
1 - Speedtest i wouldn't recommended The problem is the software you are using to test. SPEED-TEST is not a program you would wanna use to test speeds because the speeds are base on where you are pulling from. This is why you get different speeds per location. Look we are LA network and you did test with ""Hosted by CenturyLink, Inc (Cheyenne, WY) ""
SPeed-Test is not good to test connection problems because the speeds are base on local machine load, resources, source, and capacity both ends allow. This is why for networking most places won't relied speedtest as solid proof to slow network issues.
Here's what they can do,
go here https://www.centos.org/download/mirrors/ and chose any random URL and follow the patterns below.
wget -O /dev/null http://mirror.steadfast.net/centos/7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1804.iso
wget -O /dev/null http://mirrors.ocf.berkeley.edu/centos/7/isos/x86_64/CentOS-7-x86_64-DVD-1804.iso
@key900
The network rate i mentioned was listed in
Portal Home / Client Area / My Products & Services / Product Details / Server Information
Network Rate 100 MB/s (800 Mbps)
I know it is not important for real use, just curious how the value came from.
For receiving 200KB/s traffic, multicast and arp which the interface does not belong to. Aren't there some misdirection on the router side? The traffic is also displayed in the network graph (it says 190KB/s) of the server information.
Does anything need to be done for this to take effect? A quick dd test for me:
NVMe: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.04817 s, 524 MB/s
Block storage: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 28.0334 s, 38.3 MB/s
Did you have any data on the Block Storage? if you don't just re-add it again it will be fixed! I can see there is like 15 people at wrong place! we working into it one by one.
I loaded about 100GB onto it. If it is possible to fix without deleting and re-adding, that would be better, even if it takes a day or two for it to happen.
However, I can re-create and re-copy the data instead if you prefer. Thanks for the reply.
Could you please let us know in this thread when you've moved all of the affected people to the right place?
@key900 any 4Gb deals on this BF?
You have no worry leave it to us We will moving it out. No downtime it’s live migrate.
Do you plan on restocking again?
Recreated vdb. Got ~100MB/s write.
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/vdb bs=1M count=1K
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 10.4826 s, 102 MB/s
@key900 sorry for newbie question.
Does it mean we all receive 30gb nvme + 256GB HDD space also to store data?
I got you it’s Cluster private connection there is no effect on your VPs after all. And the 800Mbps thing will be fixed as soon as possible
Yes NVMe as main Disk and Block Storage as second Disk and can be used for anything you want to!
Thanks
If I plan to install a web panel and host site then how it will workout? as I will have 2 disk?
Order Number: 7407097793... Forget to disconnect my vpn
Why do you think that anyone is interested in your order number on the fourth day of the sale?Edit: See my comment below.
Hopefully
Hello,
You can do the backup of your website at the Block Storage or if your website have attachment staff or anything els!
Why not? Anyone are welcome in any time
Please following the ticket
Thanks
I now realize that his order was rejected and he wanted help.
I thought that he gave his order number because he imagined that his order was among the first ten orders (i.e., he wanted the credit).
(My apology to @arest for reacting too quickly.)
Got a Pack1 yesterday, setup today. Excellent experience, everything works exactly as expected. Well done @key900