Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

MJ12 NODE

24khost24khost Member
edited April 2013 in General

Would any other host allow this to be ran on a leb using 3-4 ghz consistantly?

«1

Comments

  • What the heck is a MJ12 node?

  • mikhomikho Member

    Are they using more resources then advertised?

  • Looks like something that will kill CPU and IOPS.

  • well we don't specify a limit on cpu usage other than fair usage and cores. Well wouldn't be so bad but one of our server the ssd cache drive went bad and waiting for a replacement to arrive and he was on that node.

  • No. That's abusing 4Ghz, and most providers don't allow crawlers anyway o.O

  • @jarland @MannDude what would your policy be.

  • thanks @eastonch. Really if it was bursting even for 10 minutes every hour I wouldn't care but. Wanted to see others opinions.

  • @24khost does it negatively impact other users? Is he a client on a LEB deal, or is he somebody on a little bit more of a 'premium' plan with extra RAM (2>+)? If he's paying a nice sum, it may be worth keeping him there if he contributes somewhat to the end of the month.

  • It was a leb deal. I wouldn't have even noticed but the ssd on that server died and we are waiting for a replacement. It drove the load nuts.

  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    If I were approached with it I would give them a free trial run to see what I think of it first hand. I'd probably ultimately say no unless they wanted it limited to the lowest io priority and 20% of a CPU core of something.

  • @24khost said: @jarland @MannDude what would your policy be.

    Depends. I think our definition of abuse would be anything container above 5.0 CPU load for an extended period of time.

  • DomainBopDomainBop Member
    edited April 2013

    MJ12 NODE

    MJ12 Majestic SEO Bot is blocked from all of our websites. It's a poorly programmed SEO bot that doesn't obey robots.txt rules and can put extremely high loads on the sites that it assaults

    http://whatis.riskyinternet.com/what-is/web-robot/mj12-bot-4994/

    Would any other host allow this to be ran on a leb using 3-4 ghz consistantly?

    If he's running MJ12 he should be hunted down and hung from the nearest lamppost by his balls. :P

  • @DomainBop wow you feel that strongly about it. Thank you all for your opinions. I have limited him to 1 cpu right now and waiting for him to respond. not against this project just looks like it is poorly distributed.

  • Need to rewrite my aup a little. With the fair usage wording. Going to reword jaguarpc's knowledge base wording

    http://www.jaguarpc.com/support/kbase/814.html

  • The project sounds interesting but the fact that they don't actually have the web search engine piece online yet seems really redundant. I'm not going to set up a node just to crunch through building up their SEO DB.

  • Some people run these for one or two days on our nodes!

  • I would do people run these? I could never understand

  • DerekDerek Member

    This is prefect to run on my PytoHost VPS!

    -
    To be honest, it seems like a waste of resources to donate to a for-profit company.

  • @Damian then they get booted?

  • @24khost said: then they get booted?

    Suspended... so far I haven't had one of these clients that complain that they should be able to peg a CPU core for <$15/month because they paid for it.

  • taronyutaronyu Member
    edited April 2013

    @Damian said: Suspended... so far I haven't had one of these clients that complain that they should be able to peg a CPU core for <$15/month because they paid for it.

    I want to run Minecraft on my 96M server, is it allowed?

    It was a joke, don't worry :p

  • @taronyu said: I want to run Minecraft on my 96M server, is it allowed?

    Actually, you can run a minecraft server on a 32mb VPS.

    @MrAndroid did it I believe a while back.

  • @HalfEatenPie didnt he use a different compile of it though?

  • @taronyu said: I want to run Minecraft on my 96M server, is it allowed?

    Yep... newer versions of MC server don't spike CPU core, so it's allowed because it properly responds to nice.

  • @HalfEatenPie said: Actually, you can run a minecraft server on a 32mb VPS.

    @MrAndroid did it I believe a while back.

    @HalfEatenPie Show me your secrets! I wasn't able to create a server any lowever than 96M (or 64M for a vanilla server)

    @Damian said: Yep... newer versions of MC server don't spike CPU core, so it's allowed because it properly responds to nice.

    @Damian Wait... what? Care to explain more? Because I don't see any difference in cpu usage a year ago and now.

  • MrAndroidMrAndroid Member
    edited April 2013

    @HalfEatenPie said: @MrAndroid did it I believe a while back.

    Yes, it was incredibly painful. As soon as you rendered over a few couple thousand blocks you would run out of memory.

  • @taronyu said: Wait... what? Care to explain more? Because I don't see any difference in cpu usage a year ago and now.

    I guess I don't really know how to explain more... on our nodes, processes using excessive CPU are automatically renice'd progressively to 5, 10, 19 as written in our AUP/TOS. The MC server processes usually get reniced to 5, and then I don't see it progress further, and we don't receive complaints from the MC server operators.

  • @Damian said: I guess I don't really know how to explain more... on our nodes, processes using excessive CPU are automatically renice'd progressively to 5, 10, 19 as written in our AUP/TOS. The MC server processes usually get reniced to 5, and then I don't see it progress further, and we don't receive complaints from the MC server operators.

    You wrote a script to automate this?

  • @MrAndroid said: You wrote a script to automate this?

    @Damian has tons of scripts to automate everything. He even has automated script written to help trim his fantastic beard with nothing but a toothbrush and a chipmunk.

Sign In or Register to comment.