Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Anyone have a Kimsufi hard drive replaced due to old age?

I suspect this is kind of a funny question, given that we are talking about Kimsufi but, has anyone asked for a drive to be replaced after X number of power-on hours?

I'm at a point where I have moved some things off a couple of them but, am thinking of keeping them for other purposes. One has over 27,000 hours and the other more than 38,000. I was wondering if anyone has ever asked for their Kimsufi drives to be replaced, simply due to age.

Comments

  • I haven't asked, but I've been asked to do so, and will generally reject doing so if there's no actual problem with the drive. POH isn't a problem.

    Thanked by 1jaypeesmith
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    jaypeesmith said: I suspect this is kind of a funny question

    Yes it is.

    Thanked by 1Aidan
  • deankdeank Member, Troll

    I'd rather take old drives than new ones. They are proven after all. I've seen a HDD last 11 years. So, unless it's past 10 years mark, I wouldn't even bother even considering.

    Thanked by 1zevus
  • @deank said:
    I'd rather take old drives than new ones. They are proven after all. I've seen a HDD last 11 years. So, unless it's past 10 years mark, I wouldn't even bother even considering.

    0.o

  • deank said: I'd rather take old drives than new ones

    100%. Had way too many drives die in the first 1000 hours.

  • I heard of someone asking Kimsufi to change a ~25000 hour disk, and they finally managed to change the disk to a ~70000 hour one.

  • zevuszevus Member
    edited November 2017

    @deank said:
    I'd rather take old drives than new ones. They are proven after all. I've seen a HDD last 11 years. So, unless it's past 10 years mark, I wouldn't even bother even considering.

    Yeah, for these SATA, I'd much, much rather have a drive with tens of thousands of hours vs a brand new one.

    The SATA drives in my home system, one has 72080 hours, the other has 45332

  • MikeAMikeA Patron Provider, Veteran

    I have two SYS server with about 30K hours, never had a problem with the drives (4x 3TB I think).

  • lionlion Member
    edited November 2017

    @MikeA said:
    I have two SYS server with about 30K hours, never had a problem with the drives (4x 3TB I think).

    ...yet

  • The point being that you're less likely to have issues on an HDD with 30k hours in the next .... 1000 hours... vs a drive with zero hours.

    Now, I wouldn't want an SSD with a ton of hours. But it'd be much nicer to always get them with 4 digits.

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • LeeLee Veteran

    @lion said:

    @MikeA said:
    I have two SYS server with about 30K hours, never had a problem with the drives (4x 3TB I think).

    ...yet

    I have had more problems with new drives than ones that have been running thousands of hours.

    Thanked by 1Aidan
  • @lion said:

    @MikeA said:
    I have two SYS server with about 30K hours, never had a problem with the drives (4x 3TB I think).

    ...yet

    30k hours is only 1250 days - so like 3.4 years - most enterprise drives these days come with a 5 year warranty or even more in some cases - so 30k hours is nothing ;)

    /me looks at my Medion external drive bought in 2008 that still runs smoothly.

    I can see my current mail filtering server:

    Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
      number of hours powered up = 53936.63
    
    Vendor (Seagate/Hitachi) factory information
      number of hours powered up = 54264.13
    

    That's more than 6 years, still waiting for reallocated sectors :-)

  • Will for SATA Old is Gold!!! Unless its over 10 years old... as stated by @deank

    If the drive is working well dont bother changing it...

Sign In or Register to comment.