Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Looking for Tor VPS

2»

Comments

  • Little bit offtopic
    How can I know if I have a non-US ip?

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited March 2013

    OK so first of all, anyone who doesn't see a difference between a Tor RELAY node and EXIT node, is a f*cking retard. Hint: you do NOT get any abuse reports on RELAY nodes, never ever, it is not technically possible.

    Second, 500 GB of bandwidth is ...nothing. I am not sure it is even worth paying $20/yr for. 5-10TB is where you should even begin to consider to be bothered to run a node. OK it might be more expensive; but not by much, and if you pay 2-3x and receive 20x more bandwidth, it doesn't sound like a bad deal, no?

    Sooo just be on lookout for 5+TB transfer offers or "traffic flat rate" ones (1-2TB/mo + unmetered 10 Mbit afterwards); there are quite a lot of those, I did not try any of the recent ones personally, so don't have anything to suggest to you at the moment.

    Keep in mind Tor will also use quite a bit of CPU, if the host doesn't have AES acceleration. The RAM is non issue, recent versions using updated OpenSSL can fit in ~128 MB, but consider you need 256 just to be safe.

  • mikhomikho Member

    A few rotten tomatoes can ruin a usially perfect soup.

    By the writing here and other TOR threads I get the general idea of whats different (no need to explain it more, thank you) but I do not like being called a f*cking retard, because I have other interests.

  • FranciscoFrancisco Top Host, Host Rep, Veteran

    @Voss said: I'm guessing that e-mails will be sent out concerning the change in the TOS/AUP?

    TL;DR - it's all in the clients favor and should give them more control over bad situations

    Yep. The changes actually relax a lot of things, addresses resource abuse cases and finally outlines our full stance on user privacy.

    This week/next week we're rolling out our new monitoring platform that will automatically handle resource abuse, namely:

    • Compromised container (auto suspend, ticket user, help them clean up)
    • Malicious scripts (suspend, ticket user, wait for permission to login to CT to confirm who launched said app)
    • Running resource intensive scripts (cap CPU to reasonable level or renice process and email users stallion email )
    • super high loads (stallion email messaged once past a certain thresh, stopping the VPS once past a 'too high' mark and again, another email informing them)

    Once we have a .32 kernel we're happy with we'll be able to introduce proper I/O monitoring for users as well as capping for way over the top users.

    All of the above would have ended with users getting suspended, ticketed, and a strike marked against them for being abusive.

  • @FRCorey said: Problem with relays is that it's a config change and a restart to turn it into a exit.

    That's what the public TOR node list is for.

Sign In or Register to comment.