Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

2016 Black Friday/Cyber Monday Promotions List

1…1011131516…46

Comments

  • seikanseikan Member

    mov3 said: What is the VPS node specs?

    Here is my benchmark result for Hosting 1.

    System Info
-----------
Processor   : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores   : 2
Frequency   : 2666.760 MHz
Memory      : 1000 MB
Swap        : 0 MB
Uptime      : 7 min,

OS      : Debian GNU/Linux 8
Arch        : x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel      : 3.16.0-4-amd64


Speedtest (IPv4 only)
---------------------
Your public IPv4 is 185.22.172.x

Location        Provider    Speed
CDN         Cachefly    3.55MB/s

Atlanta, GA, US     Coloat      1.43MB/s
Dallas, TX, US      Softlayer   3.15MB/s
Seattle, WA, US     Softlayer   2.54MB/s
San Jose, CA, US    Softlayer   3.08MB/s
Washington, DC, US  Softlayer   2.90MB/s

Tokyo, Japan        Linode      1.89MB/s
Singapore       Softlayer   2.48MB/s

Rotterdam, Netherlands  id3.net     4.22MB/s
Haarlem, Netherlands    Leaseweb    4.62MB/s


Disk Speed
----------
I/O (1st run)   : 334 MB/s
I/O (2nd run)   : 376 MB/s
I/O (3rd run)   : 401 MB/s
Average I/O : 370.333 MB/s
  • mov3mov3 Member

    @seikan said:

    mov3 said: What is the VPS node specs?

    Here is my benchmark result for Hosting 1.

    > System Info
> -----------
> Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
> CPU Cores : 2
> Frequency : 2666.760 MHz
> Memory        : 1000 MB
> Swap      : 0 MB
> Uptime        : 7 min,
> 
> OS        : Debian GNU/Linux 8
> Arch      : x86_64 (64 Bit)
> Kernel        : 3.16.0-4-amd64
> 
> 
> Speedtest (IPv4 only)
> ---------------------
> Your public IPv4 is 185.22.172.x
> 
> Location      Provider    Speed
> CDN           Cachefly    3.55MB/s
> 
> Atlanta, GA, US       Coloat      1.43MB/s
> Dallas, TX, US        Softlayer   3.15MB/s
> Seattle, WA, US       Softlayer   2.54MB/s
> San Jose, CA, US  Softlayer   3.08MB/s
> Washington, DC, US    Softlayer   2.90MB/s
> 
> Tokyo, Japan      Linode      1.89MB/s
> Singapore         Softlayer   2.48MB/s
> 
> Rotterdam, Netherlands    id3.net     4.22MB/s
> Haarlem, Netherlands  Leaseweb    4.62MB/s
> 
> 
> Disk Speed
> ----------
> I/O (1st run) : 334 MB/s
> I/O (2nd run) : 376 MB/s
> I/O (3rd run) : 401 MB/s
> Average I/O   : 370.333 MB/s
>

    Network look like bad.
  • seikanseikan Member

    mov3 said: Network look like bad.

    Weird, big different from the result by @Saragoldfarb.

    Let me try with other network card.

  • seikanseikan Member

    Network result still bad. Any idea, @vStoike?

  • VeespVeesp Member

    @mov3 said:
    Network look like bad.

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @seikan said:

    mov3 said: Network look like bad.

    Weird, big different from the result by @Saragoldfarb.

    Let me try with other network card.

    Ran another on to make sure. Results are about the same as my previous benchmark. Weird.

  • windytime90windytime90 Member

    @vStoike said:

    @mov3 said:
    Network look like bad.

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"

    What is the limitation set on the cpu? How much cpu can I use continually?

  • mov3mov3 Member

    @vStoike said:

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"


    I think you should investigate why have the two big difference result.
  • VeespVeesp Member

    @windytime90 said:

    @vStoike said:

    @mov3 said:
    Network look like bad.

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"

    What is the limitation set on the cpu? How much cpu can I use continually?

    not more than 75% for a long period of time (>6h) Its documented in ToS.

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @vStoike said:

    @mov3 said:
    Network look like bad.

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"

    I was pleasantly surprised by the results actually. Anyway, if you want to look into it lemme know and I'll PM you the account details.

  • tenperatenpera Member

    @vStoike IPV6?

  • VeespVeesp Member

    @mov3 said:

    @vStoike said:

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"


    I think you should investigate why have the two big difference result.

    2 things - these results are anonymous(hard to investigate) and none of the results are lower than expected.
    Plus I know nothing about this test and it could be many things

  • VeespVeesp Member

    @tenpera said:
    @vStoike IPV6?

    Sure, /64 per VPS.

    Thanked by 1tenpera
  • VeespVeesp Member

    @Saragoldfarb said:

    @vStoike said:

    @mov3 said:
    Network look like bad.

    1. We are located in west Russia (Saint Petersburg) and 4.62MB/s to Netherlands (which is 50mbit sec) is fine.
    2. As you can see there are 2 tests from 2 different people and first client (Saragoldfarb ) tested :
      Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 32.0MB/s
      Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 39.8MB/s

    Im still not sure why there is a 10times difference in network speed between these 2 tests %) but even "lowest" result are good and "as-expected"

    I was pleasantly surprised by the results actually. Anyway, if you want to look into it lemme know and I'll PM you the account details.

    PM me please with the VPS IP address and some info about this test :
    1) always this result?
    2) this test uses ipv4 or ipv6?
    Thank you !

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    @Saragoldfarb @seikan which OS distros do you use? For the bad result, did you try with Debian 8 x64?

  • nguyennguyen Barred

    Just checked and noticed that Ramnode have offer also:
    https://clientarea.ramnode.com/announcements.php?id=412

    LIMITED TIME BLACK FRIDAY DEAL!

    Coupon: BLACKFRIDAY25

    25% OFF NEW ORDERS OF THE FOLLOWING SERVICES:

    New York City Standard SSD KVM (NYC SKVMS)
    New York City Premium OpenVZ (NYC SVZ)
    Los Angeles Standard SSD OpenVZ (LA SVZS)
    Seattle Standard SSD OpenVZ (SEA SVZS)
    Seattle Premium SSD OpenVZ (SEA SVZ)
    Seattle Premium SSD KVM (SEA SKVM)

    Stock is limited! Applies only to new VPS orders.

  • VeespVeesp Member
    edited November 2016

    @rm_ said:
    @Saragoldfarb @seikan which OS distros do you use? For the bad result, did you try with Debian 8 x64?

    I wasnt questioned but still :) Sorry.
    I see that they both use same template - Deb 8

  • deadbeefdeadbeef Member

    @vStoike: Is any kind of anti-ddos included with those kvms?

  • GalaxyHostPlusGalaxyHostPlus Member

    We have discounted our prices for KVM Servers https://galaxyhostplus.com/kvm/

    We probably do more discounts in next few hours with OpenVZ, Webhosting, Domains, Hosted Tab

  • NekkiNekki Veteran
    edited November 2016

    So it's @vstoike first out of the gates with the first FUCKING MENTAL offer of the year? Who would have thought it!

    Who's going to beat it? Can anyone beat it?

    Thanked by 12rm_ deadbeef Veesp ehab jenkki KillaKev bersy Harambe Falzo BeardyUnixGuy ManofServer kingpin
  • VeespVeesp Member

    @deadbeef said:
    @vStoike: Is any kind of anti-ddos included with those kvms?

    No, sorry, not for these servers. If there will be big attack on your IP we will just blackhole it for some time.

    Thanked by 1deadbeef
  • ehabehab Member

    yeah very much surprised i'll get one from @vstoike , super offer :) thank you.

    Thanked by 1Veesp
  • NekkiNekki Veteran

    Ramnode offer is decent, not 'shit-the-fucking-bed' quality but it's Ramnode so it doesn't need to be. Only second place tho, @vstoike still sitting pretty at the top of the league table.

    There's a fucking idea, I'm going to run a LET deals league table over the 24 hours of US Black Friday.

    Who will win? I don't fucking care, I just want more cheap shit.

    Thanked by 3deadbeef Harambe user123
  • jenkkijenkki Member

    vStoike become #1 on Black Friday challenge :)

  • Shot2Shot2 Member
    edited November 2016

    According to ovh_fr twitter account, what to expect for Black Friday:

    • 1€ .fr and .com registration

    • 50% discount on the VPS line (annual only)

    • 60€ for their dedicated SP-64-S

    +tax

    Thanked by 1postcd
  • NekkiNekki Veteran

    @Shot2 said:
    According to ovh_fr twitter account, what to expect for Black Friday:

    • 1€ .fr and .com registration

    • 50% discount on the VPS line (annual only)

    • 60€ for their dedicated SP-64-S

    +tax

    To all of which LET gives the finger. Not even going on the league table. Cunts.

    Thanked by 1jenkki
  • HaxHax Member

    Apparently LeaseWeb's deals are shit as well, just discounted old dedis.

  • wokenwollwokenwoll Member

    Hi there,

    OVH.com will also do a Black Friday :)
    on VPS, Dedicated servers, Private Cloud, Domain names VDI, ...

    I'll post tomorrow, awaiting LET staff approval

    Basically, it will be 50% off on all new orders on VPS (all ranges, all countries)
    (if you chose 12months commitment)

    ==> ovh.blackfriday, starting at 00h00 FR time

    Thanked by 2ManofServer Master_Bo
  • NekkiNekki Veteran

    @wokenwoll said:
    Hi there,

    OVH.com will also do a Black Friday :)
    on VPS, Dedicated servers, Private Cloud, Domain names VDI, ...

    I'll post tomorrow, awaiting LET staff approval

    Basically, it will be 50% off on all new orders on VPS (all ranges, all countries)
    (if you chose 12months commitment)

    ==> ovh.blackfriday, starting at 00h00 FR time

    When we think OVH, we think Dedi. Do us something mental on a handful of servers, limited LET special or something, we love you long time.

    You've got a rabid, loyal audience here, give'em something to get all frothy over.

    Thanked by 2alown Junkless
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited November 2016

    50% off on the VPS-SSD is a solid deal as is. Only if they would make it recurring, and if each VPS had an IPv6 /64 like at vStoike, then it'd be perfect.

    Secondly, OVH doesn't really need black fridays to put out crazy deals (remember KS3C, KS4C, SP64D anyone?:)

Sign In or Register to comment.