New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
That was not my intention and I apologize if it came off that way. You asked a question that I answered in my original post so to make it easier I just quoted the post.
No worries.
really not about the beta (was too late)
but it seems when browing for stuff, the secure transaction padlock is not found. (really small thing but that caught my eye) -
http://i.imgur.com/DqiaqQF.png
Having been looking for such plan for years. Interested in having one when you go production.
Weird. Seems to load here: https://www.evernote.com/l/AEBTRXXopexCYKsfdXcLvGYcpA2XAGtyiYg
Thanks for the heads up. Will try to reproduce it
Any word on stock being replenished? I'm interested.
Reading is fundamental
I read the thread. That quote is from yesterday. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask if there's an update.
Added some more stock
Thanks. Grabbed one
Just waiting for setup.
Logged in, and kicked off a FreeVPS bench. So far, it seems that as soon as you try and leave the US, the speeds drop, badly.
root@debian8template:~# bash bench.sh Benchmark started on Wed May 4 12:23:08 EDT 2016 Full benchmark log: /root/bench.log System Info Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v3 @ 2.40GHz CPU Cores : 2 Frequency : 2399.996 MHz Memory : 1000 MB Swap : 487 MB Uptime : 5 min, OS : Debian GNU/Linux 8 Arch : x86_64 (64 Bit) Kernel : 3.16.0-4-amd64 Hostname : harrystorage Speedtest (IPv4 only) Your public IPv4 is 172.110.xxx.xxx Location Provider Speed CDN Cachefly 65.0MB/s Atlanta, GA, US Coloat 1.01MB/s Dallas, TX, US Softlayer 44.3MB/s Seattle, WA, US Softlayer 98.8MB/s San Jose, CA, US Softlayer 64.0MB/s Washington, DC, US Softlayer 29.6MB/s Tokyo, Japan Linode 2.08MB/s Singapore Softlayer 1.77MB/s Rotterdam, Netherlands id3.net 5.52MB/s Haarlem, Netherlands Leaseweb 40.9MB/s Disk Speed I/O (1st run) : 807 MB/s I/O (2nd run) : 1.3 GB/s I/O (3rd run) : 1.4 GB/s Average I/O : 269.9 MB/s root@debian8template:~#root@debian8template:~# wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin --2016-05-04 12:28:23-- http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin Resolving speedtest.london.linode.com (speedtest.london.linode.com)... 176.58.107.39, 2a01:7e00::4b Connecting to speedtest.london.linode.com (speedtest.london.linode.com)|176.58.107.39|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: ‘100MB-london.bin’ 100MB-london.bin 100%[=====================>] 100.00M 17.3MB/s in 6.5s 2016-05-04 12:28:30 (15.3 MB/s) - ‘100MB-london.bin’ saved [104857600/104857600]Might want to format that to make it a tiny bit more readable :P
Doesn't seem that bad overall .Though its also possible that others are slamming the test servers. Bunch of benchmarks are being run now.
More interesting on price than testing applying for beta tester, how much it will cost?
All test will be great atm because only few people 'abuse' it.
Likely similar to our VDRs. With discounts offered at times. Final pricing will be announced at the end of the beta.
Might want to beta test then and provide some feedback. Those that do will get either a further discounted rate or something towards the plan when it launches in full.
couldn't resist and grabbed one.
geekbench in case of interest: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/6375580
looks very decent, everything is running smoothly so far, did install nginx, php-fpm and mysql and such, no problems wil check on transfer-rates and different backup techniques from us and europe later on.
very curious about what the pricing point will be.
My results
What's with all the "fake benchmarks"? Everyone's on the same network (if not the same server), those speeds won't be higher for you compared to another who has already done the test. Provide actual feedbacks if you can, stop wasting bandwidth on some useless tests.
This server in "Haarlem" is an Anycast CDN which will always give good results no matter where you are!
Aah. Makes so much sense now.
Oops, there's a problem...
Out of Stock
We are currently out of stock on this item so orders for it have been suspended until more stock is available. For further information, please contact us.
is there any chance for me to get in try?
now as promised I did some transfer tests with a 100MB random-filled dummy file between different servers and this box from ImpactVPS...
FTP from Hetzner: 230KB/s
SSH from Hetzner: 3.3MB/s
FTP from OVH (EU): 380 KB/s
SSH from OVH (EU): 4.4MB/s
FTP from Delimiter: 1.3MB/s
SSH from Delimiter: 13.9MB/s
so far the box is up and running smoothly over the last five days, not much more to say about.
maybe this would work out decently as a backup box for us locations... but depends heavily on the price I'd say ;-)
So is FTP limited? by port or protocol?
It is not
I can't tell, why it differs that much, but this result is something you can see in a lot of cases. ftp is told to have a much bigger overhead and be the slower protocol at all.
ssh comes with compression (which is why I use at least random-filled files for testing) and may gain advantage from that too.
if I do transfers via ftp between hetzner and OVH I see slow rates too, so would never work with it besides some small single file uploads... after all probably nothing special here with @Awmusic12635's product ;-)
Im not really surprised. Seattle is probably as far away as you can get from France and Germany. Perhaps when we expand to either Dallas or NYC with it it would have better transfer speeds to those providers
I already submitted a ticket on it with just a feedback update but so far it is working well with owncloud and ftp backups. Decent speeds on both, excellent node and to be honest event support was quick to catch the feedback ticket and get it escalated.
Definitely a company and service I would buy after the beta.
Thanks for the feedback, we appreciate and take into consideration all positive or negative feedback. We are leaving many of the feedback tickets as escalated for our reference, so we do not forget. (so if yours has not had a reply that is why)
Hope you decide to continue after the beta
I believe reinstalling is now working. If someone doesn't have anything important on their server could they give it a test and then post the results here. Main thing broken on reinstall was the network previously.
I submitted a reinstall. The page hung for a few seconds, then reloaded with: