New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
i have issued @ErawanArifNugroho another vps on another node, let see how this one goes
CPU Info :
Memory Info
Freevps.sh
Network Test
Inodes
Disk Space
IOPING
Traceroute and Ping
UnixBench
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ###### # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # # # # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # # Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith, Sunnyvale, CA, USA January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com 1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Process Creation 1 2 3 1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3 4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Process Creation 1 2 3 4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3 4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3 ======================================================================== BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3) System: LET: GNU/Linux OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5xen -- #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 05:38:01 EST 2012 Machine: i686 (i386) Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8") CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz (8252.6 bogomips) MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization 18:22:11 up 20 min, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.24, 0.19; runlevel 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 15 2012 18:22:11 - 18:50:24 4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 15898451.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 2875.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 2158.0 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 234803.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 58789.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 816300.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 300478.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 82862.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 5099.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5462.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1264.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 653060.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 15898451.2 1362.3 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2875.6 522.8 Execl Throughput 43.0 2158.0 501.9 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 234803.6 592.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 58789.4 355.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 816300.8 1407.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 300478.9 241.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 82862.3 207.2 Process Creation 126.0 5099.3 404.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5462.2 1288.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1264.1 2106.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 653060.1 435.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 607.7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Wed Aug 15 2012 18:50:24 - 19:18:54 4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 53514974.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 11033.3 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5385.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 172177.3 KBps (30.1 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 45223.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 630421.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 833670.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 206380.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 7685.4 lps (30.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10125.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1518.4 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2359811.8 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 53514974.5 4585.7 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11033.3 2006.0 Execl Throughput 43.0 5385.9 1252.5 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 172177.3 434.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 45223.5 273.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 630421.9 1086.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 833670.2 670.2 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 206380.2 516.0 Process Creation 126.0 7685.4 610.0 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10125.3 2388.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1518.4 2530.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2359811.8 1573.2 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1095.4I/O is much better.
what did you do?
its my 2nd node, i guess should not have issued on my first node ( which has the amount of vps that jerland saw) the 2nd node is dedicated to linux boxes. i issued on the wrong node, now that i am aware of
apologies.
You're on the right track, just don't cut corners on disk, it'll turn around to bite you later
Yes, disk is the worst bottleneck. For xen or KVM not so much so because it provides better isolation and CPU can keep things under control, but for OVZ is the real killer.
A node is built from the disk up. If you have poor disk, 32 gb is the max because it will never fill before the disk becomes unusable.
M
can anyone verify that those xen templetes are working? http://xentemplates.com/#
their site seems broken ( a sub site of vps6.net)
That website has never worked.
Failed. i guess they are trying to get publicity?
Yeah I think it's part of their SEO strategy. Their blog is good stuff though.
Why don't you use stacklet?
why don't you use your own templates? using templates from outside sources = security issue
there is no templates @fly
Use your own, you could also update them with your timezone and customize some other way.
M
?
These aren't the droids you're looking for.
would have to buy them that is the easy way out
thats the annoying part with xen.
Not really, install one basic debian and derive different templates from it, one for hosting, one bare, one for minecraft, whatever.
I am not sure how this will playout in SolusVM as I dont use that to play with at work, however it should be simpler than in XCP, even.
M
i will try that soon, i am kinda mad to migrate to WHMCS manually from CE , its crazy
Lol no. Full name Tazwar. I like it short
and then why not using War?
Edited out. No harm intended.
TazMahal
that just remind me the Guns 'N Roses vocalist,, William Axl Rose (W.A.R.)
edited as taz requested by pm
HAAHA!
http://desene-animate.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/taz.jpg
M
Tazmanian Devil. LOLS