New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Sorry about the lack of communication from our side, we've been super busy working on getting a release out.
That's sad to hear, we hope you will change your mind when you're able to see the platform for your self instead of just taking our word for it - if you're willing to give it a few minutes of your time of-course.
not to complain but OVZ is... near dead.
My only dedi was an OVH dedi from month ago, until I cancelled it (to save some $$$). I found that deploying development instances/applications was more efficient with ex. Docker than deploying copies on OVZ instances.
Not to mention, if I wanted to play with the kernel, OVZ wasn't a choice.
(Right now, I'm waiting for OVH TO though. 50ms latency within the city will be A LOT better than going a few thousand KMs.)
tl;dr OVZ isn't really that useful unless you're going to let it idle
So whmcs / solusvm / virtualizor / every licensed & encrypted is crap according to you
can't help but laugh. How would Nick license his software by making it opensource ?
Decryption is easy. I decrypted SolusVM easily.
If you just want to hide your source code, there are options like EncloseJS and NExe. But it's going to run MUCH slower.
Another option is to write critical parts in C/C++ and compile it into asm.js with Emscripten. Performance in browser is roughly comparable to native code.
Not for the everyday user for most of that software. As mentioned before, what Blesta did was acceptable.
If you don't agree, you're incompetent, duh! Simply clicking the "encrypt" button immediately makes your software insecure garbage that .001% of the population can't inspect and fix (if they use it, find a problem and then have time/motivation to fix said problem - it's the thought that counts).
No use arguing when point of observation is different ty anyway.
Encryption is shit, since as already said, no one can fix any critical bugs.
Also just google, you find a lot of WHCMS... zips arround the web decrypted.
It dosen't matter if you encrypt or decrypt, your thing will be in the Web sooner or later. But it does matter in the view of the Admin, he can fix bugs himself.
Just add a domain check and a license system, users can report these sites, this can limit this a bit but you can never reach all of these Systems.
Or go OpenSource and Provide Paid Support + Addons.
Yeah but if you add paid addons that means they will be encrypted :P
Nicholas has showed me the inside of the panel and it looks great and very promising!
I'm parodying the ridiculous mindset of rabid open source drones.
I would not encrypt them, you can charge a reasonable fee for it.
Why am I getting the feeling that the majority of you guys don't believe in encryption? For the amount of posts I have gotten about SSL for encryption and security. So we want our messages to be somewhat safe and secure in one context but owners of software don't want their software to be safe and secure in their own context?
And to think that most people on LET would pay anything near premium for unecrypted software???
Do you really think 50 dollars a month (far beyond the low end range) is anything near the development cost to develop software???
Profit from software uses the same logic as vps.. you only make profit when masses buy it..
If its open sourced... the odds of that dramatically drops.
And if that wasn't crazy enough, to think that software which takes a whole lot longer to build should be priced on par with the price of a vps which usually takes much less time to set up.
We want people to pay us for services but the ones who are building the platforms shouldn't be compensated.
When does this crazy logic end?
Only devs like us know the paid, thank you for venting it out.
Shall we give this thread back to @MSPNick ....
@MSPNick any new screenshots?
Hi,
A few more updates, mainly cosmetic stuff; but still; a bit more has been done.
http://prntscr.com/d5hfw0
Admin control functions
http://prntscr.com/d5hgny
Networking tab, will add the network speed accordingly here, so it can be adjusted.
http://prntscr.com/d5hgzn
Some logs
The IP's page has changed cosmetically.
http://prntscr.com/d5hhi9
Just a few updates, still working on this to let it have a bit more functionality.
Hi, Nick, my ticket #465730 on myserverplanet opened at Oct. 5th has not making any progress eversince but told me to wait and "we're looking into it".
I also PMed you but there's no response either.
Is myserverplanet deadpooled?
.....
Any help?
So how can they be deadpooled when they are building a control panel?
My best advise is you update your ticket, i'm sure you'll receive a response and i'm sure there is a reason you haven't received a response yet.
Well I should add a smile emoji after the last line because I didn't mean by real.
I have been asking about updates several times and yes they reply me several times saying they are looking into it. Finger crossed. :-/
I'm all for any new panel in development. That said, this to me looks like a panel being developed "on the fly" without any actual planning done beforehand. Is that the case? If so - would you consider halting development for a day to plan out what it is you are trying to accomplish?
From a development standpoint, the "on the fly"-approach has very little success rate, and I'd really like to see projects like these succeed.
I dont think you get the Point, Virtwire Deadpooled, which hosted a lot of LES Containers, some could be migrated to MSP.
And now he seem to deadpool also, bad times.
Just thought I'd give an update to the panel development;
http://prntscr.com/d8m66o
Pretty cool new buttons
There is a few more but I'll update you as time goes on.
Could you have an enable Fuse button. Also what checks do you perform to ensure that the TUN/TAP kernel module is enabled? Does the installer add it for every boot?
I don't see an enable gre+sit/fuse
Not in there yet, but it's built into the classes to be put in.
It'll be there!
Would be nice if you had a cheaper (or free :P ) plan for personal use (not for commercial services / hosting business) like proxmox!