New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
https://seafile.de/en/important-infos-about-app-seafile-de-and-licensing-purchases-through-our-web-shops/
Good move on both their parts I'd say.
So now we may in full integrity be sneery about Paypal?
Well, not quite an admission of the accusations
I still would like to hear more about that. As far as integrity goes, I have no way of knowing if these people have any more than Jonny Nuggets.
There is an issue here: You cannot impose an NDA on someone you have no connection with, they have nothing to lose if they go full out and I am sure there were plenty of reporters asking questions to other people paypal still does business with.
As someone said, more of these stories would certainly reinforce the public paranoia about the spooks and censorship. The long history of impunity on strongarming telcos into breaking the law/constitution/human rights and do police/secret service/army/RIAA/etc work for them is about to come to an end when everyone knows what happens and safe means of communication emerge. At the end of the day, if it is as easy and even more free to communicate in safety than through the traditional easy to intercept ways, people WILL choose the former. Right now there is some inertia and the belief it is very complicated to be secure from government eyes, so, "I dont break the law therefore I have nothing to hide" kind of attitude prevails, until the consequences of what is happening will be understood by everyone and the fascist states will become invulnerable face tot heir own citizens.
@jarland just noticed that "allegedly" which you sneaked into my thread title -- without any note of "edited by jarland" anywhere in the post. Also I can't edit the post back, since the time-out has passed. You are rewrote my title to change its meaning, and I can't do anything to fix that. Please in the future mark any such cases of misrepresentation or censorship of other people's posts in a clear and obvious manner. As for this one, please either remove that "allegedly", or change the title to:
Thanks
Accusations without evidence get a less dramatic title. Been true for a long time. If you don't want it to happen to you, be more fair in your thread titles. Don't use them to draw conclusions that you can't back up.
I think my edit was more than fair and extremely factual given the situation. If you want click bait titles where the content doesn't justify the title, use Facebook. I hear it's popular there.
My request stands. There can be no justification for quietly rewriting people's opinion pieces behind their backs, in effect misusing moderator powers to forcibly attribute your own world views as though that has been posted and agreed with by someone else. Please either flip it back, or add a comment into the title that it has been changed by you. I don't oppose that you changed it, only that you did it quietly and with no note that it has been modified from original.
Thread title length will only allow 1 added character to what is currently there. Original post changed to indicate edit.
Then, I guess this should fit:
Would you prefer that or the edit I've just made to note the title change at the top of your post?
Yeah just set this entirely new one, in any case it'd be fair enough to note that this has been resolved.
Done