Online.net dedibox choose

Oldky

Hi,

Dedibox XC SSD 2016 or Dedibox XC SSD 2015, which one to choose?

Config on both is good for my requirements.

I need more than 120 gb storage.

Thanks

Void_Whisperer

If they both fit your reqs, choose the cheaper one..?

Oldky

I know, but

Dedibox XC SSD 2015 Intel C2750 2.40GHz 8 GB 1 x 120 GB SSD 1 Gbit/sec

and

Dedibox XC SSD 2016 Intel C2750 2.40GHz 16 GB 1 x 250 GB SSD 2,5 Gbit/s

Both cost 15.99 € pre-tax

cassa

Then go for the 2016 one?

Oldky

@cassa said:
Then go for the 2016 one?

Yes, I thought about that one. I wanted you guys to here your opinion / experience with this servers

boernd

The only disadvantage of the 2016 one is, that it has no IPMI, so if you don't need this go with the 2016 one.

Oldky

@boernd said:
The only disadvantage of the 2016 one is, that it has no IPMI, so if you don't need this go with the 2016 one.

How important is IPMI for servers ?

hawkjohn7

IPMI not very important.
Just use tty or jodel for installation windows

hawkjohn7

XC ssd 2016 just got 175MBps on DD test

Oldky

@hawkjohn7 said:
IPMI not very important.
Just use tty or jodel for installation windows

I am using only linux.

Ok, what about Dedibox XC SSD 2015?

Oldky

Any other?

Winne

Well, their XC 2016 runs in SATAII because of a BIOS bug.

Just be aware if you get the SSD version.

Oldky

@Winne said:
Well, their XC 2016 runs in SATAII because of a BIOS bug.

Just be aware if you get the SSD version.

Is there any report of fixing it ? I have, ssd version Dedibox XC SSD 2016 Intel C2750 2.40GHz 16 GB 1 x 250 GB SSD 2,5 Gbit/s

Winne

They're working on an update, but last time I asked they had no ETA.

Oldky

@Winne said:
They're working on an update, but last time I asked they had no ETA.

Oh, ok. Thanks. What should you choose, keep 2016 or take 2015?

Spacedust

2016:

• bigger SSD than advertised (256 GB Samsung PM871)
• more RAM
• better bandwidth
• no ECC RAM
• no KVM (just TTY)
• SATA2 and sometimes speeds slower than SATA1 (SATA3 in progress)
• no CentOS 6.7 or FreeBSD support

2015:

• ECC RAM
• real KVM with an option to mount ISO
• top class SuperMicro hardware
• SATA3 on Samsung PM871 SSD (sometimes Intel 320 SATA2 or Intel DC S3500 160 GB SATA2)
• full CentOS 6.7 and FreeBSD support

Oldky

@Spacedust said:

Which one will you choose?

pedagang

centos

Oldky

@pedagang said:
centos

??

Spacedust

CentOS 6.7 is the best

Oldky

@Spacedust said:
CentOS 6.7 is the best

To this we can agree. But I'm here sought the opinion of the members of which configuration is better and experience as well as the possible problems that they have.

hawc

OVH

Oldky

@hawc said:
OVH

Okay. Give me a reason and comparison of these two from online of OVH

hawc

OVH dont go round calling people wankers in french, and randomly accusing them of DDoS. OVH have a better network than Online, that is a lot faster and has a lot more PoPs.

akhfa

@hawc said:
OVH dont go round calling people wankers in french, and randomly accusing them of DDoS. OVH have a better network than Online, that is a lot faster and has a lot more PoPs.

And more price