Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Okay, I have watched enough Delimiter drama...

2»

Comments

  • @shovenose said:
    Another nice SSD wasted on SATA2, bummer :'(

    I'd be interested to know what most people are doing in terms of Real world use where the SSD being bottlenecked by SATA2 actually causes a problem.

    I can understand if you are working with large files all day long but in most use cases it seems the faster random I/O is the primary reason to for an SSD not the peak transfer rate.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran

    dragon2611 said: I/O is the primary reason to for an SSD not the peak transfer rate.

    Yeah.
    In a multiuser environment like a hosting node, sure, buth count, but in a dedi for iops and a busy database, you dont really need large sequentials.

    Raid 0 should do 150 even with older drives if everything done right and nothing else runs then (such as swapping and other things, i mean only the sequential writing). If it does not, something is wrong, check the drives.

Sign In or Register to comment.