New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Cheap dedicated server, Please and Thank you.
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Fuck you
And go back to hackforums
https://www.softlayer.com
Ok, not that high for pricing
https://www.vpb.com
http://www.colocros ... Wait. Would that go too far? Not intending to get banned tonight.
Every time we insult CC, we get banned
So in term, yes, that'd be going too far
CC fixed the blacklisted IPs, and I'm in no mood to have the 23.x range destroyed again because someone spammed.
Why do you need spoofing?
He's done with goofing, looking for new horizons.
"For VPN's"
"For legitimate network security testing"
"BGP sessions"
"I promise I will handle every abuse complaint I get for spoofing".
etc, are all excuses i've heard for it. It's actually the same excuses ecatel uses to justify allowing spoofing.
Francisco
CC will happily allow you to spoof any traffic you want 24/7 in BUF.
Are you telling the truth?
We all never lie
/S
I NEED MORE SUGGESTIONS GUYS!!!
Nobody is going to allow you to modify packet headers (or known as 'spoofing') for your applications.
@Jarland, want to give this guy a gentle nudge back to HackForums?
I, for one, find it entertaining
Well im reading your tags there, i honestly just asked a question lol
I'll edit my title, sorry for any inconvience
You're welcome here, just know that we do not support DDOS here and this is the most common reason to spoof traffic.
Ah, ok then, my bad

If nobody allowed it the Internet would be a nicer place, but plenty of ISPs do.
Well, I should of been more specific. Any decent or established member/provider on this forum, would not allow it.
Indeed, there are quite a few ISPs that do not care and allow modification to the transmission of packets from a server.
What is cheap to you @hello ?
Speaking of decency...
CC should kick out resellers who allow sales of servers they know are going to be used for spoofing
CC should not allow spoofing end of
Yes. @jbiloh and the other idiots have zero excuse for this - Their core, ToR and rack switches all support a solid, many years tested, BCP38 implementations that someone just needs to enable, they even have VLANs indicating there is a list of allowed IPs per port somewhere enabling a 100% secure configuration (else one can spoof with IPs from other DC customers in same VLAN).
It's like IPv6. We'll never see that.
Just to confirm, you allow spoofing on your servers? In all locations?
I wouldn't put it past him...
@IgniteServers, 20-50 should be good
I know a guy that sells good softlayer for $25 dollars, so yea.