Leaseweb having troubles, vps offline for 2 days now

raza19

@arpanjot said:
raza, is your vps migrated to ssd node? what's the io like?

I think it is , gimme an io test to perform ?

arpanjot

dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

Maounique

joepie91 said: Really, this just reinforces the thing that several people on here (including me) have been repeating for a while now: technical failures happen, and relying on your provider is a bad idea. It doesn't really matter whether you're paying $5/mo or $50/mo.

You should always implement redundancy on the application level, involving multiple providers.

AWS failed just recently and they are the best ranked regarding uptime of all the top cloud providers.
Nothing is infallible, not even mountains, heck, we can't be sure the sun will come up tomorrow or the space-time continuum will still exist.

Not directed at you, joe, just in support of it.

Hax

System Information
------------------
Processor:  QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.2.1
CPU Cores: 2
Frequency:  2400.084 MHz
Memory: 2001 MB
Swap:  MB
Uptime:   17 days, 8:33,

OS: \S
Arch: x86_64 (64 Bit)
Kernel: 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7.x86_64
Hostname: ***


Speedtest IPv4 only
-------------------
Your public IPv4 is ***

CDN - nearest location:
Download speed from Cachefly: 49.3MB/s

America - United States:
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta, GA: 1.59MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 9.26MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 6.24MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 7.77MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 4.05MB/s

Asia:
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, Japan: 3.55MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.89MB/s

Europe:
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, Netherlands: 85.0MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, Netherlands: 54.3MB/s


Drive Speed:
------------
I/O (1st attempt):  84.3 MB/s
I/O (2nd attempt):  82.5 MB/s
I/O (3rd attempt):  94.0 MB/s
Average I/O: 86.9333 MB/s

Mine was migrated to SSD about 2 weeks ago, the downtime was 10-15 minutes.
Quite bad for SSD?

raza19

@arpanjot said:
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

dude i already posted it, look above !

arpanjot

sorry, my bad

scy

Sixell said: Quite bad for SSD?

SSD is interesting for IOPS.

I don't really understand why you guys focus on those numbers so much. The real question is when you look at your web app: is IO your bottleneck. If so and coding has been fixed already maybe you can complain. As long as it is not.. why bother?

Ok a few MB/s would be bad but here.. it's more than enough, isn't it?