Tunneled IPv6 > No IPv6?
Curious about your thoughts on this question. Today I set up ipv6 via tunnel on our Denver node, and with HE having the server in Denver it's not a bad deal in my opinion. I'm curious as to how those of you who desire IPv6 feel about it being provided through a tunnel. Obviously direct allocation to the DC would be preferable, but do you consider this to be "better than nothing" or more of a shady method of claiming IPv6 support?
I know how I feel about it, but I couldn't care less about IPv6 as I'm still bitter about the refusal to crack down on unused and never to be used IPv4 allocations, so I'm interested in your thoughts.