Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › 1,99€ dedicated server ? - Page 41
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

1,99€ dedicated server ?

1…3839414344…81

Comments

  • J1021J1021 Member
    edited October 2014

    Infinity580 said: nah, only 15-25% of the Costumers are using the 1Gbit and burning TB's of Data, so at the end its okay. I dont need to go to sleep with bad dreams. There was some statistics how many costumers are really using there resources and its quite low. Otherwise LEB would not work when you selling 512MB for 5$ per Year and everyone would use there 0,5GB.

    Where are you getting your statistics from?

    Combined usage for 2 Nanos totalling 39.15TB.

    root@*****:~# iperf -c ping.online.net
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to ping.online.net, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local ***.***.***.** port 57774 connected with 62.210.18.40 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec   874 MBytes   733 Mbits/sec
root@*****:~#
    root@*****:~# iperf -c ping.online.net
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to ping.online.net, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local ***.***.***.*** port 57285 connected with 62.210.18.40 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec   722 MBytes   605 Mbits/sec
root@*****:~#
  • J1021J1021 Member

    What does this mean?

  • AmitzAmitz Member
    edited October 2014

    @kcaj said:
    What does this mean?

    That you are bad at Tetris. ;-)

    Thanked by 9sc754 Profforg sandro tux user123 hausarzt DalComp hostnoob elflord
  • TarZZ92TarZZ92 Member

    ^^ means you got alot of errors in a short timeframe :D

    and your pinching all the bandwidth :D, i noticed a huge drop in traffic other day. From 70/120Mb to now peaking at 60Mbps

  • rauppe31rauppe31 Member, Host Rep

    Does somebody know how much a failover IP for the kidéchire will cost?

  • mike0000mike0000 Member

    I think it's an extra €1.99/mo for failover IP.

    Thanked by 1rauppe31
  • rauppe31rauppe31 Member, Host Rep

    @mikeyur
    Thank you

  • trexostrexos Member

    @rauppe31 yeah 1,99€. I had a failover IP for a month.

    Thanked by 1rauppe31
  • sodasoda Member

    now , this offer is gone , i get 404 error ,lol

    http://www.anonymz.com/?http://www.online.net/en/dedicated-server/dedibox-kidechire

    people are greedy , they think if they pay 2 euro they can run tor to saturate uplink and abuse their network. i wish i could grab one before its gone , now its totally gone , what a shame ....

  • TarZZ92TarZZ92 Member
    edited October 2014

    soda said: now , this offer is gone , i get 404 error ,lol

    this has been the case for 2 weeks. and it was one off promo apparently

    Thanked by 1soda
  • tommytommy Member

    Just wow

    ------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to ping.online.net, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local xxxx port 53697 connected with 62.210.18.40 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.07 GBytes   916 Mbits/sec
root@cimpeng:~# date; iperf -c ping.online.net
Sat Oct 11 15:36:40 CEST 2014
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to ping.online.net, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local xxxx port 53698 connected with 62.210.18.40 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0-10.0 sec  1.06 GBytes   914 Mbits/sec

    Client connecting to iperf.testdebit.info, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 23.5 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[  3] local xxxxx port 35878 connected with 89.84.127.55 port 5001
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0- 2.0 sec   119 MBytes   501 Mbits/sec
[  3]  2.0- 4.0 sec   143 MBytes   599 Mbits/sec
[  3]  4.0- 6.0 sec   206 MBytes   862 Mbits/sec
[  3]  6.0- 8.0 sec   196 MBytes   824 Mbits/sec
[  3]  8.0-10.0 sec   208 MBytes   873 Mbits/sec
[  3] 10.0-12.0 sec   203 MBytes   853 Mbits/sec
[  3] 12.0-14.0 sec   200 MBytes   837 Mbits/sec
[  3] 14.0-16.0 sec   199 MBytes   834 Mbits/sec
[  3] 16.0-18.0 sec   202 MBytes   846 Mbits/sec
[  3] 18.0-20.0 sec   201 MBytes   844 Mbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-20.0 sec  1.83 GBytes   787 Mbits/sec
  • J1021J1021 Member

    tommy said: Just wow

    I regularly see high speeds on mine but others report slowdowns sometimes.

  • SadySady Member

    What uploading speed you guys are getting ?

    Trying to seed a torrent on windows (btitorrent) but it's not going to more than 100Kb/s

  • J1021J1021 Member

    StephenIzzy said: What uploading speed you guys are getting ?

    Trying to seed a torrent on windows (btitorrent) but it's not going to more than 100Kb/s

    Average around 60Mb/s and peak at ~180Mb/s. I find it depends on the torrents you're seeding, I generally seed things that have a high leecher to seeder ratio.

  • SadySady Member

    @kcaj said:
    Average around 60Mb/s and peak at ~180Mb/s. I find it depends on the torrents you're seeding, I generally seed things that have a high leecher to seeder ratio.

    Are you using transmission ? Or rutorrent ?

  • esandraesandra Member
    edited October 2014

    404 Page.

  • J1021J1021 Member

    StephenIzzy said: Are you using transmission ? Or rutorrent ?

    Transmission.

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    My 2 boxes are idling :p will use them soon, though.

  • hostnoobhostnoob Member

    @netomx said:
    My 2 boxes are idling :p will use them soon, though.

    I just use mine for the 160GB storage/backup - I don't see the point running tor to waste bandwidth and help criminals

    Thanked by 2netomx iKeyZ
  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    @hostnoob said:
    I just use mine for the 160GB storage/backup - I don't see the point running tor to waste bandwidth

    That's what I thanked

  • J1021J1021 Member

    Looks like Online.net are trialling some sort of 'cloud' offering.

  • WilliamWilliam Member

    Each C1 server has a CPU with 4 dedicated ARM cores, the best CPU for horizontal scalability with predictable performances.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/36031/online-labs-4-arm-cores-deployed-in-10-secs/p1

  • sc754sc754 Member

    @netomx said:
    My 2 boxes are idling :p will use them soon, though.

    Me too, although one is pretty good as a openvpn server xD

  • TripleflixTripleflix Member

    seedboxing is the shizzle, getting nice ratio for my private trackers :P

  • robohostrobohost Member



    anyone get this problem?all of my kidéchire said same problem,and i can't open ticket,btw my service is still online just can't manage

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited October 2014

    My servers have lost IPv6, some also lost IPv4 (or went down entirely), the panel does not work, also can't submit a ticket about all of this.

    Error: There has been an error when sending your ticket. Please try again later.

    Thanked by 1Spirit
  • SpiritSpirit Member

    rm_ said: My servers have lost IPv6

    So it's not only me.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited October 2014

    Back alive now, looks like first the DHCPv6 server went down, and then some of my servers got locked for "packet flood", due to DHCPv6 client retrying multiple times per second.
    http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765453
    Why all DHCPv6 clients are such crap.

  • trexostrexos Member
    edited October 2014

    Somehow the connection from my ISP to online.net has some problems at the moment. Normally, it's about 40ms.

    Ping wird ausgeführt für myserver.online.net [195.154.xxx.xx] mit 32 Bytes Daten:
Antwort von 195.154.xxx.xx: Bytes=32 Zeit=128ms TTL=51
Antwort von 195.154.xxx.xx: Bytes=32 Zeit=120ms TTL=51
Antwort von 195.154.xxx.xx: Bytes=32 Zeit=123ms TTL=51
Antwort von 195.154.xxx.xx: Bytes=32 Zeit=128ms TTL=51

Ping-Statistik für 195.154.xxx.xx:
    Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0
    (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
    Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 128ms, Mittelwert = 124ms
Sign In or Register to comment.