Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Best Dedicated Server Companies for Price, Network & Support?

2

Comments

  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @jsg said: Current status to the best of my knowledge: everyone who played half-way fair in that thread and had a VPS at not ridiculously unsustainable price still has their VPS but likely has to pay more at renewal.

    IIRC, there are people who weren't even in the thread who found their VPSes suddenly terminated. You and I may still have functioning VPSes from them, but I honestly suspect that's an oversight on Eric's part and has nothing to do with your or my behavior towards him.

    @jsg said: I don't know about that and I want to make a clear statement: xHosts is one of my favourite providers (in the UK).

    tl;dr someone hosted something bad and xHosts, who is just a reseller for their shared hosting and is required to follow their reseller account's ToS, ended up forcing KYC on lifetime deals that had already been paid. Some people were terminated simply because the KYC platform didn't support their country, even after they had already purchased and used the service. That caused some real drama. I don't blame xHosts personally though, since they are just resellers for their shared hosting.

    @jsg said: Yep. The above two are particularly evil. I happen to know that they decide for themselves what their favourite colour is!!! (I respect and like both of them, no matter how much noise some make here)

    Me and jar are actually on good terms now. :)

    @concept said: I am personally interested in providers who run their own infrastructure and not just reselling other brands. Why should I buy yours if I can go direct?

    I agree. Dedicated server resellers make no sense. Owning their own infrastructure is always a hard requirement for me.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    We're especially interested in hearing about smaller or independent hosting providers rather than the large corporate brands. We want to understand what they're doing right, what keeps customers loyal, and where we can improve our own services to better meet the community's expectations.

    There are a lot of customers that want the best deals and lowest prices but its not always realistic.

    I am personally interested in providers who run their own infrastructure and not just reselling other brands. Why should I buy yours if I can go direct?

    There are some providers that run their own datacenter or have a private cage/full rack in a large datacenter. It has to be unique in some way. I like when providers serve regions or countries that less common or rare. It's a plus if you can do it at a reasonable price too.

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    @tanek said: We're especially interested in hearing about smaller or independent hosting providers rather than the large corporate brands. We want to understand what they're doing right, what keeps customers loyal, and where we can improve our own services to better meet the community's expectations.

    By and large, the people who come looking for dedicated servers are hit-and-run users. They come here because they have a project that needs certain requirements met, posts a request, buys a dedi, then disappears. They don't stick around to make themselves part of the community. The community itself, i.e. the regulars here who are are going to read any thread other than their own request thread, is primarily focused on low-cost VPSes. The overlap is not huge.

    That's not to say no one here is going to have a dedicated server, but the majority have far more experience with the VPS offerings than the dedicated server offerings of providers here, with the notable exception of VPS providers who use dedicated servers from another provider here.

    Gotcha so majority of users on LET are interested in VPS offers rather than dedicated machines.

    Thanked by 2concept forest
  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @tanek said: Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    Just beware that ColoCrossing has a bit of a bad reputation here, albeit for reasons generally unrelated to their network infra.

    @tanek said: Gotcha so majority of users on LET are interested in VPS offers rather than dedicated machines.

    Generally, yes. At least the majority of long-term users who stick around. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of hosts who sell dedis here, just that the people they sell to usually aren't going to be people collecting VPSes for small projects (or for idling).

    It is Low End Talk after all, and what's lower end than a dirty-cheap VPS on an overcrowded node?

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    @tanek said: Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    Just beware that ColoCrossing has a bit of a bad reputation here, albeit for reasons generally unrelated to their network infra.

    @tanek said: Gotcha so majority of users on LET are interested in VPS offers rather than dedicated machines.

    Generally, yes. At least the majority of long-term users who stick around. That's not to say that there aren't plenty of hosts who sell dedis here, just that the people they sell to usually aren't going to be people collecting VPSes for small projects (or for idling).

    It is Low End Talk after all, and what's lower end than a dirty-cheap VPS on an overcrowded node?

    Wdym by colocrossing has a bad rep? What seemed to have happened?

  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @tanek said: Wdym by colocrossing has a bad rep? What seemed to have happened?

    Four main reasons:

    1. An extremely severe data breach that occurred (I think that happened a few times)
    2. Lots of blacklisted IPs
    3. They're popular, so many of the crappiest resellers are CC resellers
    4. Severe conflict of interest involving the LET owner censoring negative reviews of CC resellers

    The issues don't really matter for your use case, but it will have an effect on people's perception.

    Thanked by 3rpqu Mainfrezzer jsg
  • conceptconcept Member

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    I gotcha, I do see how some people will post these crazy good vps deals and I don't know how they manage to do that as there can't be like any $ made from the hosts side of things.

  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    @tanek said: Wdym by colocrossing has a bad rep? What seemed to have happened?

    Four main reasons:

    1. An extremely severe data breach that occurred (I think that happened a few times)
    2. Lots of blacklisted IPs
    3. They're popular, so many of the crappiest resellers are CC resellers
    4. Severe conflict of interest involving the LET owner censoring negative reviews of CC resellers

    The issues don't really matter for your use case, but it will have an effect on people's perception.

    I gotcha and yeah ive heard about the blacklisted ips and stuff.

  • forestforest Member

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    DDoS protection can matter if others on the same network are hosting game servers. It sucks to have your VPS go down because someone else is getting DDoSed. It protects you even if no one is out to get you specifically.

    Of course, that usually requires only light protection. There are definitely hosts who advertise hardcore DDoS protection that is capable of handling extremely high-bandwidth attacks with custom routing rather than just software-side scrubbing.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @forest said: They're popular, so many of the crappiest resellers are CC resellers

    In fact, I just sent out a support ticket to the CC reseller that practically owns LET because my VPS with them is showing 80% CPU steal. :D

    Obviously I know that's not ColoCrossing's fault directly, but rather a reseller of theirs who has strong ties to them, but it does create a negative impression when, of my 48 VPSes, the only one to be having this problem is with ColoCrossing.

    LES, a spinoff forum of LET, actually bans ColoCrossing resellers. So sure, they have a good network, but you'll have to make a name out of yourself so people don't think you're "yet another crappy CC reseller", even if you aren't. ;)

    I do suspect that the folks who are most likely to buy dedicated servers aren't going to care as much, though, since most of the crappy resellers only sell VPSes and as such are of primary interest to the regulars in the community.

  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    @forest said: They're popular, so many of the crappiest resellers are CC resellers

    In fact, I just sent out a support ticket to the CC reseller that practically owns LET because my VPS with them is showing 80% CPU steal. :D

    Obviously I know that's not ColoCrossing's fault directly, but rather a reseller of theirs who has strong ties to them, but it does create a negative impression when, of my 48 VPSes, the only one to be having this problem is with ColoCrossing.

    LES, a spinoff forum of LET, actually bans ColoCrossing resellers. So sure, they have a good network, but you'll have to make a name out of yourself so people don't think you're "yet another crappy CC reseller", even if you aren't. ;)

    Yeah understandable, were trying our hardest to grow with sales in really any way we can but I see a lot of people on here need stuff in like Europe and Asia and anything that's in the US they want to really cheap out on.

    If you need any VPS's or anything let me know as well!

    Also what is LES?

  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @tanek said: Also what is LES?

    LowEndSpirit. It's a spinoff of LowEndTalk, often referred to as OGF ("Other Green Forum"). They're much smaller.

    @tanek said: If you need any VPS's or anything let me know as well!

    If you have any VPSes outside of the US, NL, or DE, I'd be interested. I see that you have offerings in the UK but it's currently unavailable. Also, you'd have to accept cryptocurrency payments (lots of people here only pay with, or prefer to pay with, cryptocurrency. There are plenty of easy-to-use payment gateways like Cryptomus/Heleket).

    Thanked by 1concept
  • conceptconcept Member

    @forest said:

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    DDoS protection can matter if others on the same network are hosting game servers. It sucks to have your VPS go down because someone else is getting DDoSed. It protects you even if no one is out to get you specifically.

    Of course, that usually requires only light protection. There are definitely hosts who advertise hardcore DDoS protection that is capable of handling extremely high-bandwidth attacks with custom routing rather than just software-side scrubbing.

    I guess that is fair. Personally, I wouldn't go for a provider that put a big focus on DDoS protection because that means people who are big targets of DDoS will often go for them over others and if they can't stop it then my stuff is going down too. Also I'm pretty annoyed by the DDoS Protection community drama that shows up here like the Path stuff.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • conceptconcept Member

    @tanek said:

    Yeah understandable, were trying our hardest to grow with sales in really any way we can but I see a lot of people on here need stuff in like Europe and Asia and anything that's in the US they want to really cheap out on.

    Yeah there are lots of LET members that are looking for EU services as they are either from EU or prefer EU because of the privacy laws. Asia is also in high demand because there aren't a lot of options available as hardware and bandwidth costs are very high.

  • tanektanek Member, Patron Provider

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah understandable, were trying our hardest to grow with sales in really any way we can but I see a lot of people on here need stuff in like Europe and Asia and anything that's in the US they want to really cheap out on.

    Yeah there are lots of LET members that are looking for EU services as they are either from EU or prefer EU because of the privacy laws. Asia is also in high demand because there aren't a lot of options available as hardware and bandwidth costs are very high.

    Yeah I get that, well thank you for the info.

    Thanked by 2concept forest
  • rpqurpqu Member

    It is drama. Provider discontinuing deals is controversial because depending on the interpretation, it might be rules violation.

    It's the truth. I hope dartday 2027 will be much better with better queue, livestream system. And resource hoggers moved to containment nodes.

    @PulsedMedia said:

    Absolutely, true.

    The more you sell, the more there is drama, guaranteed.

    That Celebrating Väinämöinen has got us shadow banned in LET. Yet another thread seems to have been deleted in manner of minutes (Zero AI use).

    We got all the pages archived tho, should release one of these days. I guess it's time to let go of our provider tag since we are not allowed to post anything that provider tag should allow us to do by the looks of it.

    I can't comment on the latter part. But sales at certain volume is guaranteed to generate drama based on the probability. It could be HW, DDoS, human error and unknown factors.

    @xHosts said:
    Perfect to know you consider a someone being taken into hospital without warning with serve chest pains a cause of your "drama"

    Sorry, next time I will book in advance with you :wink:

    At that time, I infer there's no xHosts DR, if you got incapacitated i.e renewing IPXO lease.
    Stress -> gastric problem -> heart problem

    @forest said:

    @rpqu said: Here's the list of drama that I remembered for roughly 7 months

    Don't forget C-servers terminating everyone on a NAT node because one person spammed and he couldn't figure out who did it, so punished everyone collectively. Also FOSSVPS needing to blacklist NS clients because MJJs abused the free service.

    Yes. I have forgotten that @alfatarsos. If I wasn't wrong, they also demand KYC for those who want to continue on.
    @msatt is unfortunate because of the legacy NS user (mjj) abusing the fossvps Moldova (@alexhost) which led to temporary suspension

    And, of course, the never-ending MJJ complaints about sub-standard providers who become known for frequent downtime or extremely slow ticket responses. That's not really a single drama event though but a series of mini-dramas always centered around the same set of providers who are generally well-intentioned but naïve and overwhelmed with the reality of business.

    That's right. Large amount of drama happened because of mjj abusing cheap plans and raising so much tickets. I don't even understand how these providers sees >90% steal and doesn't try to solve it.

    Thanked by 1DartNode
  • forestforest Member
    edited June 30

    @forest said: In fact, I just sent out a support ticket to the CC reseller that practically owns LET because my VPS with them is showing 80% CPU steal. :D

    @rpqu said: That's right. Large amount of drama happened because of mjj abusing cheap plans and raising so much tickets. I don't even understand how these providers sees >90% steal and doesn't try to solve it.

    What's funnier is that they said they could move me to another node, but only by destroying and recreating my VM. They don't even know how to migrate, and are unwilling to even look into the cause of the high steal (currently 88%).

    Thanked by 2Mainfrezzer jsg
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited June 30

    @tanek said:

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    I gotcha, I do see how some people will post these crazy good vps deals and I don't know how they manage to do that as there can't be like any $ made from the hosts side of things.

    It's promotional. So, provider actually losing money

    @tentor said:

    @x1arch said:
    I wanna your $5 offer, take any nudes whatever you want here >>> pornhub.com

    Yeah everyone wants but my financial advisor called me slurs after seeing €5/year orders

    ---

    @layer7 said:
    Hi,

    with 7 USD per YEAR the requirement is actually that the customer wont open tickets. No matter what it is. Just dont open a ticket.

    If you do ( and in case a human is answering that ) you already runied profit ( that anyway never existed ) for the next decades ( +/- 1-2 years ).

    So with this budget, there are more requirements on customer side than on hoster side actually ;-)

    But of course, under normal circumstances the story should have followed your playbook ( at least ) but this requires actually a normal budget. And not... well what ever this 7 USD thing is...

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/214598/reality-check-why-7-y-vps-and-2-tb-storage-is-fantasy-in-2026/p1

    @forest said:

    @forest said: In fact, I just sent out a support ticket to the CC reseller that practically owns LET because my VPS with them is showing 80% CPU steal. :D

    @rpqu said: That's right. Large amount of drama happened because of mjj abusing cheap plans and raising so much tickets. I don't even understand how these providers sees >90% steal and doesn't try to solve it.

    What's funnier is that they said they could move me to another node, but only by destroying and recreating my VM. They don't even know how to migrate, and are unwilling to even look into the cause of the high steal (currently 88%).

    Remember this?
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/214646/the-7-year-technical-eviction-dedirocks-ceo-says-im-too-advanced-for-them/p1
    I think resellers of colocrossing grew too fast to the point they are hiring anyone that could answer ticket and neglecting the technical knowledge. And that's to be expected since the margin is paper thin. At this point LowEndSupport should do volunteer work to optimize the infrastructure

    Thanked by 1forest
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @forest said:

    @jsg said: Current status to the best of my knowledge: everyone who played half-way fair in that thread and had a VPS at not ridiculously unsustainable price still has their VPS but likely has to pay more at renewal.

    IIRC, there are people who weren't even in the thread who found their VPSes suddenly terminated. You and I may still have functioning VPSes from them, but I honestly suspect that's an oversight on Eric's part and has nothing to do with your or my behavior towards him.

    @jsg said: I don't know about that and I want to make a clear statement: xHosts is one of my favourite providers (in the UK).

    tl;dr someone hosted something bad and xHosts, who is just a reseller for their shared hosting and is required to follow their reseller account's ToS, ended up forcing KYC on lifetime deals that had already been paid. Some people were terminated simply because the KYC platform didn't support their country, even after they had already purchased and used the service. That caused some real drama. I don't blame xHosts personally though, since they are just resellers for their shared hosting.

    I didn't know that nor do I care about shared hosting, i.e. I only look at VxS and dedis. The way you describe it (what happened) I see the reseller guilty, not @xHosts, but maybe I misunderstood something. Either way I fully stand by what I wrote wrt xHosts.

    @jsg said: Yep. The above two are particularly evil. I happen to know that they decide for themselves what their favourite colour is!!! (I respect and like both of them, no matter how much noise some make here)

    Me and jar are actually on good terms now. :)

    Great.

    @concept said: I am personally interested in providers who run their own infrastructure and not just reselling other brands. Why should I buy yours if I can go direct?

    I agree. Dedicated server resellers make no sense. Owning their own infrastructure is always a hard requirement for me.

    I agree as well, but there are exceptions.

  • dbadudedbadude Member

    colocrossing and ovh are my favorite dedi providers they offer < 20 dollar per month dedis

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @forest said:

    @concept said:

    @tanek said:

    Yeah 100% understand. We run out of colocrossing facilities but have our own racks with our own custom network setup with a enterprise grade DDOS protection as we host quite a few larger gaming communities so we understand DDOS protection is a big thing for many people.

    On LET, DDoS protection isn't a necessity for many as most people are buying servers to self host small projects for personal use or small group of friends/family so there is no need. Price, Uptime, Customer Service are some things that are more important than some DDoS protection. There isn't a big gaming community here, sometimes we get people asking but not common.

    DDoS protection can matter if others on the same network are hosting game servers. It sucks to have your VPS go down because someone else is getting DDoSed. It protects you even if no one is out to get you specifically.

    Of course, that usually requires only light protection. There are definitely hosts who advertise hardcore DDoS protection that is capable of handling extremely high-bandwidth attacks with custom routing rather than just software-side scrubbing.

    I personally go a step further and try to avoid gaming hosters because I experienced some ugly effects of gamer nodes. The bubble related to DDOS is just one factor. While I value DDOS protection all in all a decent non-gaming node w/o protection is more attractive to me than a node with Anti-DDOS with a gaming hoster.
    To be fair I also once had good experience with a gaming hoster (with Jordy in the mix).


    re MJJs - I try to avoid hosters with significant MJJ drama.

    re "$7/year VPS" - As a benchmarker & reviewer I'm intentionally not picky and look at pretty much anything and everything including those toys for a set of reasons. What I don't get though is when such a provider consistently follows that path.
    Because I get it, entering the market one needs to gain visibility and some customers, but why the hell continuing that path and offer C, D, E, etc. series after A and B series?

    In a private capacity (just a normal customer) I strongly tend to stay away from anything < $18/yr (ca. $ 1.50/mo) because going lower tends to be problematic sooner (crappy HW and/or connectivity) or later (not enough profit to reinvest and become decent and stable).

    Thanked by 1Mainfrezzer
  • @jsg said:

    In a private capacity (just a normal customer) I strongly tend to stay away from anything < $18/yr (ca. $ 1.50/mo) because going lower tends to be problematic sooner (crappy HW and/or connectivity) or later (not enough profit to reinvest and become decent and stable).

    Bit too harsh imo, you do have or probably more had at this point, some excellent opportunities in the past. I would factor in who is offering instead of a generalisation. I have a dirt cheap server running for years at this point by a huge provider and only had once an issue for a couple hours that was fixed in no time(ipv6 routing was down).

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Mainfrezzer said:

    @jsg said:

    In a private capacity (just a normal customer) I strongly tend to stay away from anything < $18/yr (ca. $ 1.50/mo) because going lower tends to be problematic sooner (crappy HW and/or connectivity) or later (not enough profit to reinvest and become decent and stable).

    Bit too harsh imo, you do have or probably more had at this point, some excellent opportunities in the past. I would factor in who is offering instead of a generalisation. I have a dirt cheap server running for years at this point by a huge provider and only had once an issue for a couple hours that was fixed in no time(ipv6 routing was down).

    Of course there are exceptions but it's the nature of thumb times Pi rules to focus on the 90% or 95% of cases rather than on the few exceptions.

    Thanked by 1Mainfrezzer
  • alexhostalexhost Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 30

    @tanek said: @alexhost AMS downtime because of they are sub-tenant to a tenant whose rack got shutdown

    Yeah, Downtime was very bad. That's the truth. But we fixed everything.
    And some customers and even users really doubt that we had "any backup", most of them was think that everything is lost.

    They cutted off the power in the racks and we had trouble with restoring the power during days, it was refused. However, we always do backup of our customers and this showed the opposite.

    We aren't just random hosting provider, we did everything for our customers.
    There were many very difficult days in the conversations, but everything turned out right, fortunately.

    Alexhost

    Thanked by 2rpqu nikosa
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest both of us forgot the @Cloudcone vibe-coded ransomware

    Thanked by 1forest
  • forestforest Member

    I remember. That one kind of blew my mind, but the fact that DediRock remained in the thread even with all the criticism was a good sign. Not many providers would take such heavy criticism with such good cheer.

    @jsg said: I didn't know that nor do I care about shared hosting, i.e. I only look at VxS and dedis. The way you describe it (what happened) I see the reseller guilty, not @xHosts, but maybe I misunderstood something. Either way I fully stand by what I wrote wrt xHosts.

    The main criticism I have is that they didn't have the foresight to not give lifetime plans on a reseller account and wouldn't at least refund people who were unable to complete KYC. But I'm not against xHosts at all. I have a VPS from them and it's one of the most solid and performant ones I have, and I often recommend them when people are looking for a VPS in the UK.

    @rpqu said: @forest both of us forgot the @Cloudcone vibe-coded ransomware

    Oh yeah, that was funny. I love how they couldn't even write proper ransomware and just nuked the first and last 512 MiB of the drive and called it a day. Like really? Is it too hard to just open a device with dm-crypt then dd from the original to the encrypted block device?

    That incident even caused some panic on the Tor relay mailing list due to some of the victims being relay operators.

    Thanked by 3jsg rpqu DediRock
  • rpqurpqu Member

    @forest said:

    I remember. That one kind of blew my mind, but the fact that DediRock remained in the thread even with all the criticism was a good sign. Not many providers would take such heavy criticism with such good cheer.

    @DediRock is by far the lower lowend provider with the best PR. He doesn't counter-claim, but took it as a lesson. I truly hope other hosts, especially colocrossing reseller, learned something.

    @rpqu said: @forest both of us forgot the @Cloudcone vibe-coded ransomware

    Oh yeah, that was funny. I love how they couldn't even write proper ransomware and just nuked the first and last 512 MiB of the drive and called it a day. Like really? Is it too hard to just open a device with dm-crypt then dd from the original to the encrypted block device?

    That incident even caused some panic on the Tor relay mailing list due to some of the victims being relay operators.

    Yes, targeted individuals will feel restless when a sizable part of network went down.

    Thanked by 1DediRock
  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @forest said:

    I remember. That one kind of blew my mind, but the fact that DediRock remained in the thread even with all the criticism was a good sign. Not many providers would take such heavy criticism with such good cheer.

    @jsg said: I didn't know that nor do I care about shared hosting, i.e. I only look at VxS and dedis. The way you describe it (what happened) I see the reseller guilty, not @xHosts, but maybe I misunderstood something. Either way I fully stand by what I wrote wrt xHosts.

    The main criticism I have is that they didn't have the foresight to not give lifetime plans on a reseller account and wouldn't at least refund people who were unable to complete KYC. But I'm not against xHosts at all. I have a VPS from them and it's one of the most solid and performant ones I have, and I often recommend them when people are looking for a VPS in the UK.

    @rpqu said: @forest both of us forgot the @Cloudcone vibe-coded ransomware

    Oh yeah, that was funny. I love how they couldn't even write proper ransomware and just nuked the first and last 512 MiB of the drive and called it a day. Like really? Is it too hard to just open a device with dm-crypt then dd from the original to the encrypted block device?

    That incident even caused some panic on the Tor relay mailing list due to some of the victims being relay operators.

    Thanks @forest,

    That was a good learning experience really, just have to make adjustments when necessary :)

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    @rpqu said:

    @forest said:

    I remember. That one kind of blew my mind, but the fact that DediRock remained in the thread even with all the criticism was a good sign. Not many providers would take such heavy criticism with such good cheer.

    @DediRock is by far the lower lowend provider with the best PR. He doesn't counter-claim, but took it as a lesson. I truly hope other hosts, especially colocrossing reseller, learned something.

    @rpqu said: @forest both of us forgot the @Cloudcone vibe-coded ransomware

    Oh yeah, that was funny. I love how they couldn't even write proper ransomware and just nuked the first and last 512 MiB of the drive and called it a day. Like really? Is it too hard to just open a device with dm-crypt then dd from the original to the encrypted block device?

    That incident even caused some panic on the Tor relay mailing list due to some of the victims being relay operators.

    Yes, targeted individuals will feel restless when a sizable part of network went down.

    Thanks @rpqu :) Greatly appreciated

Sign In or Register to comment.