Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


DigitalOcean Singapore Datacentre is UP! - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DigitalOcean Singapore Datacentre is UP!

13

Comments

  • @rm_ said:

    Thanks rm_ :)
    If at another dc, we may get unmetered, but in Singapore, bandwidth is expensive, so I just hope that they still take their words for it :)

  • Moved some comments from the other thread about this here.

  • 280ms manila

  • nimetsunimetsu Member
    edited February 2014

    Routing's pretty bad for Malaysia as well.
    Using TM Leased line

     >  7    36 ms    45 ms    36 ms  ae-5.r21.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.116]
    >   8    84 ms    83 ms    83 ms  p64-2-1-3.r23.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.56]
    >   9   111 ms   108 ms   116 ms  as-5.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.151]
    >  10   123 ms   122 ms   123 ms  ae-6.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.6.105]
    >  11   107 ms   108 ms   109 ms  116.51.27.150
    >  12   124 ms   122 ms   124 ms  103.253.144.242
    >  13   109 ms   123 ms   123 ms  speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com [128.199.255.139 

    Meanwhile my VPS with OAH

    >   7    11 ms    14 ms    11 ms  eqix-sg.sg.gs [202.79.197.159]
    >   8    12 ms    12 ms    11 ms  edge-2.v42.ntp.sg.gs [203.175.175.138]
    >   9    13 ms    12 ms    12 ms  core-2.v34.ntp.sg.gs [203.175.175.54]
    >  10    11 ms    11 ms    12 ms  ovz-01.oneasiahost.com [116.251.208.252]
    >  11    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  
    

    edit : goddamnit how do i use quote/code?
    edit 2 : oh so that's how

  • iwaswrongonceiwaswrongonce Member
    edited February 2014

    From my office downtown in Marina Bay Financial Center still goes through Tokyo:

    Tracing route to speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com [128.199.255.139]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
    1    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms 
    2    1 ms    1 ms    1 ms
    3     1 ms    1 ms    1 ms 
    4     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  203.92.81.7
    5     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  203.92.103.190
    6     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  203.116.7.233
    7     4 ms     3 ms     4 ms  203.118.15.173
    8     3 ms     3 ms     3 ms  203.118.2.25
    9     5 ms     4 ms     6 ms  anutsint10-ancorets01.starhub.net.sg [203.118.15.38]
    10    68 ms    69 ms    68 ms  xe-0-2-0-2.r01.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [61.213.145.201]
    11    67 ms    68 ms   104 ms  ae-13.r24.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.240]
    12   132 ms   132 ms   132 ms  as-0.r20.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.91]
    13    70 ms    69 ms    68 ms  ae-1.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.143]
    14    68 ms    68 ms    69 ms  116.51.27.150
    15    70 ms    67 ms    67 ms  103.253.144.242
    16    81 ms    69 ms    70 ms  speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com [128.199.255.139]
    Trace complete.
    
  • johnlth93johnlth93 Member
    edited February 2014

    7 11 ms 14 ms 11 ms eqix-sg.sg.gs [202.79.197.159] 8 12 ms 12 ms 11 ms edge-2.v42.ntp.sg.gs [203.175.175.138] 9 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms core-2.v34.ntp.sg.gs [203.175.175.54] 10 11 ms 11 ms 12 ms ovz-01.oneasiahost.com [116.251.208.252]

    I don't deny OAH having better route then DO however this quote is showing nothing, OAH is using sg.gs

  • Uh.. it shows that it doesnt go up to Japan and go down back to Singapore?

    @johnlth93 said:

    I don't deny OAH having better route then DO however this quote is showing nothing, OAH is using sg.gs

  • deployvmdeployvm Member, Host Rep

    I am living in Australia and the routes for me is good. Just about 60ms. My ISP has a PoP in SG and has transit via NTT.

    It looks like international routes is not the best as DO does not have local peering with multiple ISPs. Traffic only mainly flows from NTT and Telia.

    Tracing route to 103.253.144.1 over a maximum of 30 hops

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms router.asus.com [192.168.1.1]
    2 16 ms 15 ms 16 ms lns20.per2.on.ii.net [150.101.0.207]
    3 15 ms 16 ms 14 ms te0-1-0.lns20.per2.on.ii.net [150.101.33.184]
    4 15 ms 19 ms 16 ms ae0.cr1.per1.on.ii.net [150.101.33.12]
    5 62 ms 63 ms 73 ms pos-0-3-1.bdr1.sin1.on.ii.net [150.101.33.176]
    6 64 ms 63 ms 63 ms 116.51.27.45
    7 62 ms 63 ms 62 ms 103.253.144.1

  • Pretty terrible from Thailand. TH -> HK -> JP -> SG

  • udkudk Member
    edited February 2014

    My routing goes: UK -> FRANCE -> UK -> SINGAPORE

    5. xe-11-1-0.edge3.London2.Level3.net 0.0% 24 18.8 21.1 18.1 72.7 11.0 6. ae-3-3.ebr1.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 24 25.4 25.7 24.9 27.3 0.6 7. ae-61-61.csw1.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 23 25.0 25.5 24.9 27.4 0.5 8. ae-1-60.edge4.Paris1.Level3.net 0.0% 23 25.2 25.3 24.9 25.6 0.2 9. NTT-level3-2x10G.Paris.Level3.net 0.0% 23 27.7 45.3 27.2 214.7 41.5 10. ae-4.r04.parsfr01.fr.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 205.6 205.9 205.0 206.8 0.4 11. ae-3.r20.parsfr01.fr.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 26.5 26.9 26.4 27.4 0.3 12. as-2.r23.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 40.3 31.6 27.1 57.6 8.9 13. ae-0.r22.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 43.0 30.2 26.2 48.1 6.6 14. as-4.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 207.2 207.2 205.7 221.0 3.1 15. ae-6.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net 0.0% 23 207.5 207.5 206.5 209.0 0.5 16. 116.51.27.150 0.0% 23 206.4 207.4 206.2 211.6 1.3 17. 103.253.144.242 0.0% 23 207.0 206.8 205.9 208.2 0.5 18. speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com 0.0% 23 208.2 208.0 206.7 211.3 1.1

  • So... they're not multi-homed? Latest test results shows that it has to go through NTT.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    @black still Telia + NTT.

  • Was excited to signup @digitalocean but because of the routing issues people reported, I am still considering...

  • @MichaelBui said:
    Was excited to signup digitalocean but because of the routing issues people reported, I am still considering...

    Regardless of the routing issue, DigitalOcean's sg location is still a nice place though, you can still find a KVM vps with SSD for $5 per month at US or Netherlands, but it is pretty hard to find a vps provider out there at Singapore for a vps with $5/month with 512mb and SSD(OAH's 128mb kvm is $7 monthly).

    Although, I wonder when will they peer with more SEA ISPs as they're not exactly fast on rolling out new features/fixing existing bugs and problems.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    wcypierre said: (OAH's 128mb kvm is $7 monthly).

    OAH no longer offer KVM.

  • @rm_ said:
    OAH no longer offer KVM.

    I know, I'm just mentioning it for the sake of comparison(its better to compare vps that uses the same virtualization method, no?) :)

  • halczyhalczy Member
    edited February 2014

    From China Telecom:

    Japan NTT --> Singapore NTT 160ms

  • wcypierre said: comparison

    Simplercloud has the $10 for 1GB plan, but they do not seem to be interested in offering 512MB plan at all.

  • @eLohkCalb said:
    Simplercloud has the $10 for 1GB plan, but they do not seem to be interested in offering 512MB plan at all.

    they had offered it before and it is a one time thingy, and I think that they won't offer it anymore since it is as what you've said, they are pretty reluctant on providing it(probably due to the IP costs and availability at Asia).

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited February 2014

    wcypierre said: I know, I'm just mentioning it for the sake of comparison(its better to compare vps that uses the same virtualization method, no?) :)

    Not if one is no longer offered for sale and the wording implies it will never be available again.

    eLohkCalb said: Simplercloud has the $10 for 1GB plan

    Simplecloud network is truly horrible, like 5-10 Mbit/sec at most, to anywhere.

  • wcypierrewcypierre Member
    edited February 2014

    @rm_ said:
    Not if one is no longer offered for sale and the wording implies it will never be available again.

    well, my comparison is made based on the point of the general pricing for a vps of such specs at singapore to imply that vps of such specs and price are not so easy to find, and not availability, so basically, that's that.

  • @MichaelBui said:
    Was excited to signup digitalocean but because of the routing issues people reported, I am still considering...

    Specs and pricing wise no doubt the best! But if you worry bout performance and not pissing users of your service, I suggest you wait a bit till they fix the routing issue. I have a forum and some of my members in Australia and Philippines were complaining about "Super" slow loading when I switch to DO (2GB Ram droplet). Lucky i haven't terminated my OAH yet and reverted back to them. Im thinking of trying simplercloud, maybe they have good connectivity to my member base.

  • @aolee said:
    Specs and pricing wise no doubt the best! But if you worry bout performance and not pissing users of your service, I suggest you wait a bit till they fix the routing issue. I have a forum and some of my members in Australia and Philippines were complaining about "Super" slow loading when I switch to DO (2GB Ram droplet). Lucky i haven't terminated my OAH yet and reverted back to them. Im thinking of trying simplercloud, maybe they have good connectivity to my member base.

    Btw I've emailed DO support about the bad routing, they said they will be fixing these coming weeks. Once network issue is fix i guess we can expect them to rule the Asia region. :)

  • @aolee said:
    Btw I've emailed DO support about the bad routing, they said they will be fixing these coming weeks. Once network issue is fix i guess we can expect them to rule the Asia region. :)

    I'm looking forward to this. Will get a speedtest vps there when they fix the routing :)

  • I'm deploying a new droplet at DO Singapore, and move my blog for testing. Ping results in 40ms which is quite fast, compared to OAH. While some local/Indonesian VPS Provider could achieve about 20ms. :)

  • 103.253.144.1

    traceroute

     7  180.240.190.13 (180.240.190.13)  56.098 ms  57.645 ms  58.875 ms
     8  116.51.26.37 (116.51.26.37)  61.871 ms xe-0-1-0-4.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (116.51.17.225)  63.597 ms 116.51.26.33 (116.51.26.33)  65.358 ms
     9  103.253.144.1 (103.253.144.1)  67.476 ms  68.451 ms  70.440 ms
    

    **ping **

    PING 103.253.144.1 (103.253.144.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=56.7 ms
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=55.0 ms
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=55.1 ms
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=55.7 ms
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=56 time=55.4 ms
    64 bytes from 103.253.144.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=56 time=54.8 ms
    
    --- 103.253.144.1 ping statistics ---
    6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5007ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 54.890/55.525/56.772/0.673 ms
    
    

    128.199.255.139

    traceroute

     8  xe-0-1-0-4.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (116.51.17.225)  63.749 ms  65.305 ms 116.51.26.37 (116.51.26.37)  67.097 ms
     9  116.51.27.150 (116.51.27.150)  69.943 ms  72.849 ms  73.252 ms
    10  103.253.144.242 (103.253.144.242)  73.623 ms  76.284 ms  55.379 ms
    11  speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139)  55.926 ms  55.559 ms  55.238 ms
    

    **Ping **

    PING 128.199.255.139 (128.199.255.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=55.0 ms
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=54.8 ms
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=54.5 ms
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=4 ttl=54 time=54.9 ms
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=5 ttl=54 time=55.2 ms
    64 bytes from 128.199.255.139: icmp_seq=6 ttl=54 time=55.2 ms
    
    --- 128.199.255.139 ping statistics ---
    6 packets transmitted, 6 received, 0% packet loss, time 5006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 54.578/54.981/55.271/0.311 ms
    

    103.253.144.1 using less hop.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    tommy said: using less hop.

    I assume because it's the gateway router, not a VPS on a node behind the router.
    Do not use the 103.253.144.1 IP for testing anymore, as far as I can tell the end-user VPSes do not get IPs out of that range.

  • @rm_ said:
    Do not use the 103.253.144.1 IP for testing anymore, as far as I can tell the end-user VPSes do not get IPs out of that range.

    just got reply

    Hello,
             Ip's are assigned dynamically on creation so it is not possible to specify a specific range upon creation
    

    so we chance get IP from 103.253.144.0 - 103.253.147.255 range :D

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    @tommy This doesn't confirm that the 103 range is even at all in distribution for VPS/droplet clients.

    Thanked by 1tommy
  • @ftpit said:
    87.76.16.10

    geolocation: united kingdom (sanity networks) ??

Sign In or Register to comment.