Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › DigitalOcean Singapore Datacentre is UP! - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

DigitalOcean Singapore Datacentre is UP!

24

Comments

  • DylanDylan Member

    rm_ said: now we have 1TB of bandwidth 512MB KVM VPS with 20GB SSD in Singapore...

    for $5/month.

    Not to mention those of us grandfathered into unlimited bandwidth! That's beyond unheard of for a location like this.

    Thanked by 1rm_
  • kyakykyaky Member

    @rm_ said:
    Their speedtest: http://speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com/

    now we have 1TB of bandwidth 512MB KVM VPS with 20GB SSD in Singapore...

    for $5/month.

    and that's with such awesome network benchmarks as posted above.

    Other SG providers need to rethink their pricing, or in general, how do they even plan to exist from now on.

    not very good idea to mess up with DO. They are invested with heavy funds!

  • rds100rds100 Member

    rm_ said: Other SG providers need to rethink their pricing, or in general, how do they even plan to exist from now on.

    The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Run, duck, hide! ;-)

  • trexostrexos Member

    @rm_ said:
    speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com has address 128.199.255.139

    I saw this adress, but I wanted a IP from a customer VPS.

  • Mark_RMark_R Member

    @trexos said:
    I saw this adress, but I wanted a IP from a customer VPS.

    It most likely will get flooded with udp packets if someone posts it here in the public.

  • eLohkCalbeLohkCalb Member

    tuguhost said: So far its the best singapore network result that i ever see

    The routing is still pretty bad though, hopefully they improve over time.

  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran
    edited February 2014

    @trexos said:
    I saw this adress, but I wanted a IP from a customer VPS.

    There are customer VPSes in 128.199.255.*, try a number and see if you win. Honestly though, just use the official speedtest, don't be paranoid, routing for the same /24 won't be different.

  • trexostrexos Member

    @rm_ said:
    Honestly though, just use the official speedtest, don't be paranoid, the routing for the same /24 won't be different.

    thanks man :P

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 2014

    ERASED

  • Mahfuz_SS_EHLMahfuz_SS_EHL Host Rep, Veteran
    edited February 2014

    Very Bad Routing from Bangladesh:

    Tracing route to sg1.--ERASED--.com [128.199.254.149]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:

    1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.42.129
    2 * * * Request timed out.
    3 113 ms 143 ms 113 ms 10.26.206.137
    4 120 ms 105 ms 101 ms 10.26.206.4
    5 112 ms 97 ms 99 ms 202.4.173.34
    6 145 ms 163 ms 193 ms 103.7.249.69
    7 167 ms 143 ms 159 ms xe-ig1-2-ag1-0-1-0.pico.net.bd [103.7.251.121]
    8 246 ms 221 ms 215 ms if-2-1-1.core1.IH4-Singapore.as6453.net [209.58.82.61]
    9 204 ms 225 ms 197 ms if-5-0-0-500.core2.IH4-Singapore.as6453.net [180.87.136.2]
    10 394 ms 385 ms 397 ms if-1-1-1-214.tcore2.SVW-Singapore.as6453.net [180.87.15.73]
    11 400 ms 399 ms 401 ms if-7-2.tcore2.LVW-LosAngeles.as6453.net [180.87.15.26]
    12 428 ms 439 ms 483 ms 216.6.84.66
    13 470 ms 437 ms 437 ms ae-2.r20.lsanca03.us.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.2.229]
    14 372 ms 377 ms 453 ms ae-6.r20.osakjp02.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.39]
    15 374 ms 395 ms 377 ms ae-4.r22.osakjp02.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.6.188]
    16 394 ms 399 ms 417 ms as-0.r20.sngpsi05.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.41]
    17 410 ms 565 ms 404 ms ae-2.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.3.147]
    18 417 ms 431 ms 431 ms 116.51.27.150
    19 412 ms 415 ms 423 ms 103.253.144.242
    20 415 ms 413 ms 421 ms sg1.--ERASED--.com [128.199.---.---]

    Trace complete.

  • nadiar429nadiar429 Member

    @tuguhost said:
    we dont provide hosting in indonesia :)

    Any traceroute from indonesia? I can't open DO for now.

  • ChumbiChumbi Member

    Someone mentioned it before... droplet creation is very slow, compared to creating droplets in other locations. It got stuck on my screen saying "Approximately 60 seconds remaining" without nothing moving. I thought something broke... but it worked after all:

    Droplet History

    Event Initiated Execution Time
    Create 13 minutes ago 12 minutes 29 seconds

    IP: 128.199.253.168

    wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.0
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 1999.999 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 497 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 3 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 39.3MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 5.66MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 8.77MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.99MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.59MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 284KB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 91.5MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 11.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.63MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.1MB/s
    I/O speed : 344 MB/s

  • wcypierrewcypierre Member

    @Chumbi said:
    Someone mentioned it before... droplet creation is very slow, compared to creating droplets in other locations. It got stuck on my screen saying "Approximately 60 seconds remaining" without nothing moving. I thought something broke... but it worked after all:

    Droplet History

    Event Initiated Execution Time
    Create 13 minutes ago 12 minutes 29 seconds

    IP: 128.199.253.168

    wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.0
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 1999.999 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 497 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 3 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 39.3MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 5.66MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 8.77MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.99MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.59MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 284KB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 91.5MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 11.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.63MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.1MB/s
    I/O speed : 344 MB/s

    It'd be best to not to disclose your ip address to prevent members of LET from pinging it for the next few hours :)

  • GaNiGaNi Member

    Indeed bad routing

  • blackblack Member

    @Chumbi said:
    Someone mentioned it before... droplet creation is very slow, compared to creating droplets in other locations. It got stuck on my screen saying "Approximately 60 seconds remaining" without nothing moving. I thought something broke... but it worked after all:

    Droplet History

    Event Initiated Execution Time
    Create 13 minutes ago 12 minutes 29 seconds

    IP: 128.199.253.168

    wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
    CPU model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.0
    Number of cores : 1
    CPU frequency : 1999.999 MHz
    Total amount of ram : 497 MB
    Total amount of swap : 0 MB
    System uptime : 3 min,
    Download speed from CacheFly: 39.3MB/s
    Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 5.66MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 8.77MB/s
    Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 4.99MB/s
    Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 4.59MB/s
    Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 284KB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 91.5MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 11.0MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 9.63MB/s
    Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 11.1MB/s
    I/O speed : 344 MB/s

    I don't think these are accurate in terms of real world routing. They have a contract with softlayer in Singapore. 5 of those speedtest script locations are on the softlayer network.

  • wcypierrewcypierre Member
    edited February 2014

    @GaNi said:
    Indeed bad routing

    agreed. Malaysia is just beside Singapore(I usually get 10-30ms) but now I'm getting 170+ms.

    Traceroute: Flying to japan instead of going to Singapore directly

    wcypierre@host:~$ traceroute 128.199.253.16
    traceroute to 128.199.253.16 (128.199.253.16), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 4.842 ms 4.831 ms 4.836 ms
    2 10.74.128.218 (10.74.128.218) 36.075 ms 10.74.128.222 (10.74.128.222) 87.765 ms 10.74.128.218 (10.74.128.218) 36.809 ms
    3 10.74.128.221 (10.74.128.221) 29.383 ms 30.102 ms 30.148 ms
    4 10.74.130.10 (10.74.130.10) 87.681 ms 87.691 ms 87.684 ms
    5 klg-57-169.tm.net.my (210.186.57.169) 45.850 ms 48.031 ms 50.988 ms

    6 10.74.130.26 (10.74.130.26) 53.198 ms 23.429 ms 26.257 ms
    7 10.55.208.52 (10.55.208.52) 74.729 ms 89.882 ms 90.366 ms
    8 203.131.245.157 (203.131.245.157) 91.098 ms 91.134 ms 92.597 ms
    9 ae-5.r21.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.116) 101.685 ms 117.468 ms 102.421 ms
    10 p64-2-1-2.r22.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.36) 159.353 ms p64-2-1-3.r23.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.56) 164.486 ms 166.697 ms
    11 as-6.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.157) 186.407 ms 187.871 ms as-5.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.151) 184.601 ms
    12 ae-6.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.105) 206.503 ms 204.475 ms 171.953 ms
    13 116.51.27.150 (116.51.27.150) 192.595 ms 192.587 ms 192.555 ms
    14 103.253.144.242 (103.253.144.242) 189.800 ms 200.863 ms 197.201 ms
    15 (128.199.253.169) 188.057 ms 191.963 ms 200.105 ms

  • arleyarley Member
    edited February 2014

    traceroute to 128.199.253.33 (128.199.253.33), 64 hops max

    1 192.168.1.254 2.176ms 1.763ms 1.883ms

    2 58.71.244.89 4.889ms 58.71.244.113 3.963ms 58.71.244.89 4.552ms

    3 58.71.244.114 4.590ms 3.225ms 2.347ms

    4 58.71.243.53 5.802ms 3.890ms 4.877ms

    5 58.71.243.49 7.396ms 6.052ms 5.878ms

    6 58.71.244.254 8.523ms 6.871ms 6.906ms

    7 58.71.241.57 35.055ms 7.271ms 6.967ms

    8 58.71.241.30 7.564ms 6.334ms 5.462ms

    9 202.151.241.178 8.128ms 5.488ms 6.839ms

    10 203.78.193.17 49.625ms 47.788ms 130.064ms

    11 129.250.2.197 49.852ms 47.890ms 48.990ms

    12 129.250.6.105 48.674ms 46.112ms 46.762ms

    13 116.51.27.150 62.282ms 62.510ms 60.801ms

    14 103.253.144.242 64.304ms 62.537ms 62.903ms

    15 128.199.253.33 47.913ms 45.784ms 45.264ms

    this what i getting

  • ChumbiChumbi Member

    @wcypierre said:
    It'd be best to not to disclose your ip address to prevent members of LET from pinging it for the next few hours :)

    Heh, it's been already destroyed. I wasn't planning on keeping it.

  • wcypierrewcypierre Member

    @Chumbi said:
    Heh, it's been already destroyed. I wasn't planning on keeping it.

    I had only realized that after I've finish posting my post. I was a bit disappointed though, but anyway, with this move from DO, it'll somehow change the game for South East Asia's hosting industry.

  • ErawanArifNugrohoErawanArifNugroho Member

    I wonder, as a grandfathered user, will we still get the unmetered bandwidth in Singapore? :)

  • johnlth93johnlth93 Member

    the routing is kinda disappointing

    i am getting >150ms from Malaysia, usually it should be around 60ms from Malaysia to Singapore

  • NetxonsNetxons Member

    We was getting 200ms +/- with Maxis Fiber or Unifi TM no good at all. However the amazon got the better performance in term of latency.

  • smile93smile93 Member

    From Malaysia, I think it routes to HK, Japan, then Singapore... Not direct to Singapore. That is why more than 150 ms.

    If 1T Transfer only 5 per month, that is damp cheap.

  • NetxonsNetxons Member

    Yeah, its pretty cheap! I've raised a ticket to DO and will see what I got later.

    @smile93 said:
    From Malaysia, I think it routes to HK, Japan, then Singapore... Not direct to Singapore. That is why more than 150 ms.

    If 1T Transfer only 5 per month, that is damp cheap.

  • nockernocker Member

    traceroute to speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 gx-kmi-c0fe.mdn.nusa.net.id (202.162.192.254) 0.107 ms 0.127 ms 0.138 ms
    2 gw.nusa.net.id (202.162.199.238) 0.226 ms 0.425 ms 0.418 ms
    3 118.97.5.213 (118.97.5.213) 12.456 ms 12.449 ms 12.437 ms
    4 118.subnet118-98-56.astinet.telkom.net.id (118.98.56.118) 37.179 ms 37.173 ms 12.596 ms
    5 30.subnet118-98-58.astinet.telkom.net.id (118.98.58.30) 22.917 ms 22.909 ms 23.089 ms
    6 180.240.190.109 (180.240.190.109) 87.248 ms 86.488 ms 86.478 ms
    7 116.51.26.37 (116.51.26.37) 23.188 ms 116.51.26.33 (116.51.26.33) 22.924 ms 116.51.26.37 (116.51.26.37) 23.304 ms
    8 116.51.27.150 (116.51.27.150) 22.935 ms 23.193 ms 23.453 ms
    9 103.253.144.242 (103.253.144.242) 23.320 ms 23.171 ms 23.162 ms
    10 speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139) 30.031 ms 27.685 ms 28.837 ms

  • merkuriusmerkurius Member
    edited February 2014

    From Indonesia :

    [root@cencored ~]# wget http://speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com/10mb.test
    --2014-02-12 08:18:15-- http://speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com/10mb.test
    Resolving speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com... 128.199.255.139
    Connecting to speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com|128.199.255.139|:80... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 10485760 (10M) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: `10mb.test'

    100%[======================================>] 10,485,760 49.3K/s in 3m 0s

    2014-02-12 08:21:20 (56.8 KB/s) - `10mb.test' saved [10485760/10485760]

    and the ping result :

    [root@cencored ~]# ping speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com
    PING speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=13.6 ms
    64 bytes from speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=14.4 ms
    64 bytes from speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=13.6 ms
    64 bytes from speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=13.7 ms

    Traceroute :

    traceroute to 128.199.255.139 (128.199.255.139), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
    1 119.235.251.162 (119.235.251.162) 0.051 ms 0.026 ms 0.018 ms
    2 119.235.248.1 (119.235.248.1) 2.551 ms 2.645 ms 2.514 ms
    3 ip-host.239.221 (119.82.239.221) 8.852 ms 8.832 ms 8.812 ms
    4 IP-122-33.MCS.napinfo.net (119.110.122.33) 8.798 ms 8.781 ms 8.868 ms
    5 IP-112-226.MCS.napinfo.net (119.110.112.226) 17.181 ms 18.125 ms 18.320 ms
    6 116.51.26.205 (116.51.26.205) 18.631 ms 28.294 ms 28.374 ms
    7 as-4.r20.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.59) 29.252 ms as-3.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.57) 13.005 ms 14.330 ms
    8 ae-6.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.105) 13.274 ms 22.877 ms 13.497 ms
    9 116.51.27.150 (116.51.27.150) 13.281 ms 22.834 ms 22.821 ms
    10 103.253.144.242 (103.253.144.242) 22.815 ms 22.810 ms 22.798 ms
    11 speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com (128.199.255.139) 23.222 ms 32.730 ms 34.967 ms

  • maelzxmaelzx Member

    It was better for me (from Malaysia on Maxis Fibre line)

    to Digital Ocean Singapore

    C:\Users\maelzx>ping 128.199.2**.1**

Pinging 128.199.2**.1** with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 128.199.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=42
Reply from 128.199.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=42
Reply from 128.199.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=42
Reply from 128.199.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=42

Ping statistics for 128.199.2**.1**:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 72ms, Maximum = 86ms, Average = 76ms

    Though OneAsiaHost is the best so far

    C:\Users\maelzx>ping 116.251.2**.1** -t

Pinging 116.251.2**.1** with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=51
Reply from 116.251.2**.1**: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 116.251.2**.1**:
    Packets: Sent = 7, Received = 7, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 36ms

    I think it is fast enough for me :)

  • klikliklikli Member
    edited February 2014

    It seems to me that it is only announcing prefixes to NTT:3 Outbound do have Telia though.
    Considering the pricing, though, it is perfectly alright.

    But for those Mainland Chinese users, it might be a pain to use a VPN hosted on such a network.

    It just seems to me that the network is really saturated..

    root@testdrive:~# ping -c5 hk.vr.org && ping -c5 hk.edis.at
PING hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11): icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=199 ms
64 bytes from hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11): icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=199 ms
64 bytes from hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11): icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=185 ms
64 bytes from hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11): icmp_seq=4 ttl=47 time=186 ms
64 bytes from hk.vr.org (103.6.84.11): icmp_seq=5 ttl=47 time=184 ms

--- hk.vr.org ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 184.952/191.217/199.960/7.024 ms
PING hk.edis.at (158.255.208.12) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 12-208-255-158.static.edis.at (158.255.208.12): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=234 ms
64 bytes from 12-208-255-158.static.edis.at (158.255.208.12): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=244 ms
64 bytes from 12-208-255-158.static.edis.at (158.255.208.12): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=241 ms
64 bytes from 12-208-255-158.static.edis.at (158.255.208.12): icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=231 ms
64 bytes from 12-208-255-158.static.edis.at (158.255.208.12): icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=240 ms

--- hk.edis.at ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 231.516/238.445/244.021/4.610 ms
  • rm_rm_ IPv6 Advocate, Veteran

    ErawanArifNugroho said: I wonder, as a grandfathered user, will we still get the unmetered bandwidth in Singapore?

    What's there to "wonder" about? We already got it, and there's nothing to imply they're going to take it away. They recently have added some well defined restrictions in https://www.digitalocean.com/tos 2.7, that the users who have unmetered b/w can't run torrents, Tor, host adult content, and can't in any other way "distribute the
    bandwidth to others" (I think this was said to include running a public CDN or VPN/proxy service). So they are well prepared to deal with any b/w abuse if it becomes a problem, not just in this DC but in any of them.

  • daviddavid Member

    The routing has changed now, for the better.

     3  119.93.255.201 (119.93.255.201)  20.016 ms  21.840 ms  22.104 ms
 4  210.213.130.106.static.pldt.net (210.213.130.106)  37.436 ms 210.213.130.110.static.pldt.net (210.213.130.110)  24.924 ms  25.743 ms
 5  210.213.128.61.static.pldt.net (210.213.128.61)  26.123 ms  29.572 ms  29.726 ms
 6  210.213.133.21.static.pldt.net (210.213.133.21)  29.457 ms  18.402 ms  20.128 ms
 7  203.131.246.237 (203.131.246.237)  46.180 ms  43.237 ms  43.364 ms
 8  ae-1.r21.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.128)  42.809 ms  44.933 ms  45.196 ms
 9  p64-2-1-2.r22.tokyjp01.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.4.36)  105.310 ms  105.079 ms  106.864 ms
10  as-6.r21.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.157)  143.297 ms  135.783 ms  135.872 ms
11  ae-6.r00.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.6.105)  137.260 ms  144.725 ms  136.049 ms
12  103.253.144.1 (103.253.144.1)  123.034 ms  123.906 ms  114.438 ms

    PH -> Hong Kong -> Japan -> Singapore

    This compares to Linode in Japan at 100ms, and California at 170ms.

    I'm able to max out my residential DSL line with the speed test.

    # wget http://speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com/10mb.test
--2014-02-12 12:39:42--  http://speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com/10mb.test
Resolving speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com... 128.199.255.139
Connecting to speedtest-sgp1.digitalocean.com|128.199.255.139|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 10485760 (10M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: “10mb.test”

100%[============================>] 10,485,760   629K/s   in 17s     

2014-02-12 12:39:59 (619 KB/s) - “10mb.test” saved [10485760/10485760]
Sign In or Register to comment.