Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New Contabo VPS Lineup: More Power, Lower Price for Under $8? Yep, We Got That - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

New Contabo VPS Lineup: More Power, Lower Price for Under $8? Yep, We Got That

13»

Comments

  • raviravi Member

    @barbarza said:
    Ordered a new VPS10 just to test some stuff on. YABS is very disappointing.

    if possible, please share yabs.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @jure12 said:

    @jsg said:

    @contabo_m said:
    Let us know what you think. Questions, feedback, suggestions, all welcome.

    @contabo_m

    How about a statement re your plans and actually responding here?

    He will never answer you here. He just comes to write an offer and doesn't enter LET again until the next offer he writes.

    In any case, one of the worst hosting companies on the market!!!! @contabo_m

    Yes, it looks like that. Sad story. But, oh well, if Contabo wants to make us not like them ...

    Thanked by 1jure12
  • MechanicWebMechanicWeb Member, Patron Provider

    Surprised that no one seems to be talking about their storage servers. Don't you use them?

    They have reduced storage from 4 TB to 1.4 TB and increased the price from $42 to $46 per month.

    That was a nice upgrade.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • RubbenRubben Member

    @jure12 said:

    @jsg said:

    @contabo_m said:
    Let us know what you think. Questions, feedback, suggestions, all welcome.

    @contabo_m

    How about a statement re your plans and actually responding here?

    He will never answer you here. He just comes to write an offer and doesn't enter LET again until the next offer he writes.

    In any case, one of the worst hosting companies on the market!!!! @contabo_m

    sue them

  • Any plans to offer HDD storage vps? (I don't need ssd storage vps)

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @BasToTheMax said:
    Any plans to offer HDD storage vps? (I don't need ssd storage vps)

    whats the point when their ssds are already hdd speed? do you want something even lower? just buy an SD card then

  • cu_ollycu_olly Member

    You might like to know that Contabo's "Cloud VPS 30", with 8 vCPU cores, performs worse than Hetzner's "CX22", with 2 vCPU cores.

    Contabo, your overprovisioning and overselling is ridiculous. For the sake of your brand and customers, stop doing it.

  • LBFLBF Member

    I've had the VPS for 5 days now, decided to run another Yabs.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon May 12 19:20:53 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 5 days, 6 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB)
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 3195.196 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 73.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-34-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Contabo GmbH
    ASN        : AS51167 Contabo GmbH
    Host       : Contabo GmbH
    Location   : Lauterbourg, Grand Est (GES)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 23.29 MB/s    (5.8k) | 334.98 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Write      | 23.30 MB/s    (5.8k) | 336.74 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Total      | 46.60 MB/s   (11.6k) | 671.73 MB/s  (10.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.51 GB/s     (8.8k) | 12.15 GB/s   (11.8k)
    Write      | 4.75 GB/s     (9.2k) | 12.96 GB/s   (12.6k)
    Total      | 9.27 GB/s    (18.1k) | 25.11 GB/s   (24.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 197 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 14.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 198 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 10.7 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 185 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 126 Mbits/sec   | 156 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 176 Mbits/sec   | 187 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 184 Mbits/sec   | 194 Mbits/sec   | 83.3 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 178 Mbits/sec   | 212 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 186 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 14.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 187 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 10.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 182 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 164 Mbits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 171 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 179 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 83.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 161 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1530
    Multi Core      | 3709
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11927236
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 17 sec
    
  • @Rubben said:

    @BasToTheMax said:
    Any plans to offer HDD storage vps? (I don't need ssd storage vps)

    whats the point when their ssds are already hdd speed? do you want something even lower? just buy an SD card then

    Mainly more storage

  • vitobottavitobotta Member

    I have kinda the impression that this thread has backfired

  • DyingcatDyingcat Member

    @LBF said:
    I've had the VPS for 5 days now, decided to run another Yabs.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon May 12 19:20:53 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 5 days, 6 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB)
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 3195.196 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 73.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-34-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Contabo GmbH
    ASN        : AS51167 Contabo GmbH
    Host       : Contabo GmbH
    Location   : Lauterbourg, Grand Est (GES)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 23.29 MB/s    (5.8k) | 334.98 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Write      | 23.30 MB/s    (5.8k) | 336.74 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Total      | 46.60 MB/s   (11.6k) | 671.73 MB/s  (10.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.51 GB/s     (8.8k) | 12.15 GB/s   (11.8k)
    Write      | 4.75 GB/s     (9.2k) | 12.96 GB/s   (12.6k)
    Total      | 9.27 GB/s    (18.1k) | 25.11 GB/s   (24.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 197 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 14.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 198 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 10.7 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 185 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 126 Mbits/sec   | 156 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 176 Mbits/sec   | 187 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 184 Mbits/sec   | 194 Mbits/sec   | 83.3 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 178 Mbits/sec   | 212 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 186 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 14.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 187 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 10.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 182 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 164 Mbits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 171 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 179 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 83.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 161 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1530
    Multi Core      | 3709
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11927236
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 17 sec
    

    It seems to be Milan, isn't it?

    And its disk is always well locked.

  • Pat116Pat116 Member

    4k disk iops is worse than on my 2,40€/y netcup server :D
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4319723#Comment_4319723

  • LBFLBF Member

    @Dyingcat said:

    @LBF said:
    I've had the VPS for 5 days now, decided to run another Yabs.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon May 12 19:20:53 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 5 days, 6 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC Processor (with IBPB)
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 3195.196 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 73.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-34-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Contabo GmbH
    ASN        : AS51167 Contabo GmbH
    Host       : Contabo GmbH
    Location   : Lauterbourg, Grand Est (GES)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 23.29 MB/s    (5.8k) | 334.98 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Write      | 23.30 MB/s    (5.8k) | 336.74 MB/s   (5.2k)
    Total      | 46.60 MB/s   (11.6k) | 671.73 MB/s  (10.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 4.51 GB/s     (8.8k) | 12.15 GB/s   (11.8k)
    Write      | 4.75 GB/s     (9.2k) | 12.96 GB/s   (12.6k)
    Total      | 9.27 GB/s    (18.1k) | 25.11 GB/s   (24.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 197 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 14.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 198 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 10.7 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 185 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 126 Mbits/sec   | 156 Mbits/sec   | --
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 176 Mbits/sec   | 187 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 184 Mbits/sec   | 194 Mbits/sec   | 83.3 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 178 Mbits/sec   | 212 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 186 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 14.1 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 187 Mbits/sec   | 197 Mbits/sec   | 10.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 182 Mbits/sec   | 190 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 164 Mbits/sec   | 176 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 171 Mbits/sec   | 186 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 179 Mbits/sec   | 192 Mbits/sec   | 83.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 161 Mbits/sec   | 172 Mbits/sec   | 211 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1530
    Multi Core      | 3709
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11927236
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 17 sec
    

    It seems to be Milan, isn't it?

    And its disk is always well locked.

    No, it's in Germany.

  • DyingcatDyingcat Member

    No, it's in Germany.

    I meant CPU type.

  • LBFLBF Member

    @Dyingcat said:

    No, it's in Germany.

    I meant CPU type.

    Oh lol. I have no idea which generation of CPU it is.

  • wenruowenruo Member

    :D

  • mawrfimawrfi Member

    good price
    poor support
    worse stability
    (on experience of 4 servers. last one canceled today)

    Thanked by 1zerriath
  • @LBF said:

    @Dyingcat said:

    No, it's in Germany.

    I meant CPU type.

    Oh lol. I have no idea which generation of CPU it is.

    I thought Germany was getting the Turin CPU, but the data says otherwise.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    As for the very negative judgements re Contabo:

    • Yes, it's a disgrace that they just dump their offer, blather about "listening" and "interested in feedback" - but do not respond. At all.
    • Yes, some (most?) of their locations still have hardware that isn't exactly attractive, even calling it old or - for today's standards - weak would not be out of place.
    • But No, it's not as simple as "Contabo is crap". My recent benchmarks clearly show that their german VPS is attractive and good value for money. And kindly note that that node was upgraded by them without any input of myself and without me requesting it; they just did it, during what I guess was a modernization effort by Contabo. Yep, the drive isn't exactly fast but about 10 MB/s and 2500 IOps is damn good enough for most use cases. And Yep again their 200 Mb/s network BW limit is somewhat low but IMO within what can be considered reasonable, albeit on the lower end. All in all, four cores on a seriously fast Epyc and a large albeit not exactly fast drive along with 32 TB traffic on a decently connected albeit somewhat BW limited network for something like €5 per month is a good deal!

    Most importantly though and why I decided to post this IMO is the fact that they upgraded their german DC(s?) and significantly so, because it clearly shows that Contabo does care and does move, albeit not as fast as many - probably rightfully - desire.

    So, feel free and go ahead and complain about this or that but calling Contabo a careless shitshow or similar obviously is not justified. (I myself am not always exactly happy with what I see there but tend to not complain when I feel I get good bang per buck).

    Thanked by 1BasToTheMax
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    P.S. For those who are interested, here are the results of 15 runs during my recent "who's the bestest" shootout for my old (but meanwhile upgraded) Contabo DE VPS (both the St. Louis and the SGP VPS were significantly worse i.e. obviously not upgraded yet) to show what my judgement is based on:

    Version 2.5.0a, (c) 2018+ jsg (->lowendtalk.com)
    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: AMD EPYC 7282 16-Core Processor                
    OS, version: FreeBSD 14.0, Mem.: 7.991 GB
    CPU - Cores: 4, Family/Model/Stepping: 23/1/2
    Cache: 32K/64K L1d/L1i, 512K L2, 8M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 htt sse3 pclmulqdq ssse3 fma cx16
              sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes xsave osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm cmp_legacy
              cr8_legacy lzcnt sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw topoext
    
    AES? Yes
    InNested Virt.? No
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 418.1 - min 128.1 (30.6 %), max 723.4 (173.0 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 1906.0 - min 1540.0 (80.8 %), max 2410.0 (126.4 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 2075.3 - min 1670.0 (80.5 %), max 2420.0 (116.6 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 1549.8 - min 1472.8 (95.0 %), max 1579.8 (101.9 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 156.6 - min 128.1 (81.8 %), max 167.8 (107.1 %)
    
    --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 14.01 - min 11.45 (81.7%), max 15.97 (114.0%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 14.78 - min 12.78 (86.5%), max 16.19 (109.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 32.86 - min 27.50 (83.7%), max 37.26 (113.4%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 30.84 - min 26.43 (85.7%), max 33.77 (109.5%)
    --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 14.54 - min 11.97 (82.3%), max 16.54 (113.8%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 14.66 - min 12.03 (82.1%), max 15.87 (108.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 33.42 - min 29.44 (88.1%), max 35.52 (106.3%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 30.98 - min 26.58 (85.8%), max 35.56 (114.8%)
    
    --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 93.51 - min 76.06 (81.3%), max 111.12 (118.8%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 165.62 - min 140.12 (84.6%), max 177.36 (107.1%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 3267.28 - min 2645.36 (81.0%), max 3598.32 (110.1%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 430.08 - min 317.53 (73.8%), max 469.44 (109.2%)
    --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 20.07 - min 18.77 (93.5%), max 21.33 (106.3%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 10.85 - min 10.04 (92.5%), max 11.19 (103.1%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 3217.35 - min 2787.05 (86.6%), max 3519.49 (109.4%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 414.07 - min 349.62 (84.4%), max 460.49 (111.2%)
    
    --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 106.08 - min 105.83 (99.8%), max 106.34 (100.2%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 228.39 - min 227.39 (99.6%), max 229.78 (100.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 6403.20 - min 5466.22 (85.4%), max 6848.71 (107.0%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 2268.75 - min 1824.60 (80.4%), max 2461.57 (108.5%)
    --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 59.28 - min 51.48 (86.8%), max 66.34 (111.9%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 43.49 - min 42.35 (97.4%), max 44.49 (102.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 6297.51 - min 5821.58 (92.4%), max 6625.13 (105.2%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 2298.35 - min 1847.03 (80.4%), max 2502.44 (108.9%)
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 9.61 - min 9.55 (99.4%), max 9.62 (100.1%)
    IOps             : avg 2460.34 - min 2444.84 (99.4%), max 2461.53 (100.0%)
    
    --- Europe ---
    
    NO OSL mirror.terrahost.no [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 165.2 - min 140.5 (85.0%), max 176.9 (107.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 27.0 - min 9.1 (33.7%), max 28.5 (105.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 29.2 - min 28.2 (96.7%), max 31.6 (108.3%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 183.8 - min 161.6 (88.0%), max 187.5 (102.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 17.6 - min 7.0 (39.8%), max 20.5 (116.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 20.2 - min 15.1 (74.8%), max 22.1 (109.4%)
    
    NL AMS mirrors.xtom.nl [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 186.9 - min 184.4 (98.7%), max 188.0 (100.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 15.7 - min 6.9 (44.1%), max 16.4 (104.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 17.4 - min 15.8 (90.7%), max 19.9 (114.3%)
    
    DE FRA mirror.plusline.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 189.4 - min 187.5 (99.0%), max 189.9 (100.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 13.4 - min 13.3 (99.2%), max 13.5 (100.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 13.4 - min 13.3 (98.9%), max 13.7 (101.9%)
    
    FR PAR mirror.in2p3.fr [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 156.6 - min 107.9 (68.9%), max 181.8 (116.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 19.4 - min 8.0 (41.3%), max 21.3 (109.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 49.9 - min 21.3 (42.7%), max 143.9 (288.2%)
    
    CH GEN pkg.adfinis-on-exoscale.ch [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 162.6 - min 131.0 (80.5%), max 176.3 (108.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 27.2 - min 10.6 (39.0%), max 32.9 (121.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.6 - min 30.7 (91.4%), max 42.6 (126.8%)
    
    IT MIL it1.mirror.vhosting-it.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 167.1 - min 90.0 (53.8%), max 186.2 (111.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 23.4 - min 23.3 (99.6%), max 23.5 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 52.7 - min 23.3 (44.2%), max 457.9 (868.7%)
    
    ES MAD mirror.es.stackscale.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 122.9 - min 85.4 (69.5%), max 155.7 (126.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 37.1 - min 14.5 (39.1%), max 40.8 (109.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 45.0 - min 40.5 (90.0%), max 61.4 (136.4%)
    
    RO  almalinux.mirrors.orange.ro [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 140.7 - min 84.9 (60.4%), max 159.9 (113.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 30.3 - min 10.9 (36.0%), max 33.8 (111.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 36.8 - min 33.1 (89.9%), max 61.2 (166.2%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 125.3 - min 83.5 (66.6%), max 155.7 (124.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 39.5 - min 13.9 (35.2%), max 43.7 (110.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 50.7 - min 44.2 (87.1%), max 64.7 (127.5%)
    
    --- Asia / Oceanina ---
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 119.7 - min 96.9 (81.0%), max 136.8 (114.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 80.5 - min 28.8 (35.8%), max 84.8 (105.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 92.6 - min 84.8 (91.6%), max 101.7 (109.8%)
    
    IR TEH mirror.mobinhost.com [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 82.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 116.9 (141.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 86.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.0 (115.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 89.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.0 (111.5%)
    
    IN MUM mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 80.6 - min 54.7 (67.9%), max 89.3 (110.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 99.8 - min 42.7 (42.8%), max 151.8 (152.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 136.0 - min 125.6 (92.4%), max 162.5 (119.5%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.jingk.ai [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 61.8 - min 32.9 (53.3%), max 67.0 (108.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 167.4 - min 166.4 (99.4%), max 178.6 (106.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 206.0 - min 186.5 (90.5%), max 262.1 (127.2%)
    
    CN HKG mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 51.7 - min 42.3 (81.7%), max 61.3 (118.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 181.6 - min 180.2 (99.2%), max 198.9 (109.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 214.4 - min 180.4 (84.1%), max 250.4 (116.8%)
    
    CN BEJ mirrors.bfsu.edu.cn [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 40.5 - min 30.4 (75.1%), max 74.3 (183.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 287.9 - min 109.6 (38.1%), max 341.1 (118.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 321.6 - min 240.4 (74.8%), max 341.1 (106.1%)
    
    JP OSA mirrors.xtom.jp [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 44.0 - min 42.8 (97.2%), max 45.6 (103.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 247.0 - min 243.7 (98.7%), max 249.3 (100.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 248.4 - min 245.5 (98.8%), max 251.1 (101.1%)
    
    AU SYD mirror.internet.asn.au [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 41.7 - min 40.6 (97.5%), max 42.3 (101.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 268.4 - min 267.7 (99.7%), max 276.7 (103.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 270.5 - min 268.2 (99.2%), max 276.7 (102.3%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    
    ZA JOB mirror.datakeepers.co.za [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 59.9 - min 40.0 (66.9%), max 65.5 (109.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 167.3 - min 58.2 (34.8%), max 177.9 (106.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 178.4 - min 171.7 (96.2%), max 229.7 (128.7%)
    
    KE NAI mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 81.0 - min 78.2 (96.6%), max 83.9 (103.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 130.9 - min 45.2 (34.5%), max 138.6 (105.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 137.1 - min 136.3 (99.5%), max 138.6 (101.1%)
    
    --- America ---
    
    US NYC mirrors-nyj.hawkhost.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 64.5 - min 36.9 (57.3%), max 80.5 (124.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 83.3 - min 83.2 (99.9%), max 83.4 (100.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 85.3 - min 83.3 (97.6%), max 89.1 (104.4%)
    
    US CHI ord.mirror.rackspace.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 102.6 - min 66.4 (64.7%), max 108.1 (105.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 107.0 - min 106.6 (99.6%), max 111.2 (103.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 109.6 - min 106.7 (97.3%), max 114.4 (104.3%)
    
    US LAX mirror.alma.lax1.serverforge.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 66.9 - min 31.8 (47.5%), max 75.8 (113.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 155.3 - min 154.5 (99.5%), max 159.5 (102.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 157.5 - min 154.5 (98.1%), max 168.4 (107.0%)
    

    P.S. Most locations for which I had multiple test targets (incl Iran!) showed very similar results to the chosen one (best result).

    Plus: 200 Mb/s or 10Gb/s, me care little, at the end of the day I care about connectivity which for this DE VPS is good in terms of "reaches nearly every target" and acceptable or even decent in terms of speed when considering the 200 Mb/s limit.

  • damaodamao Member

    Last year I purchased 10 of your Black Friday VPSs, and after I used them for 3 consecutive months, you raised the price for me.

  • WhiteRoseGWhiteRoseG Member
    edited May 14

    Not trustfull, change prices every week, not viable for professional use.

Sign In or Register to comment.