New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
If you didn't want a refund, then what request of yours did HostHatch refuse? You quoted HostHatch referring to the LET thread where they promised refunds for late deliveries.
Alas, I have to repeat it again: HH did not stipulate or quantify the IO performance in the rules, so I used the same model and the same area product that I have used in HH in the past as a reference for purchase. I did not expect that the performance difference would be 3 -4 times that much before I said I felt emotions.
Whatever, ok ok I admire you, I love you.
OP is complaining yet not being able to tell what he is complaining about.
Disk performance is low. So what should done by HH in this case?
You talked about refund then wrote
It's on 6 pages but I've yet to decipher what exactly OP wants.
What else can I do in this situation? Do we live in the same world? Why do you always do things in such a binary manner, and do you really deal with other people in such black-and-white ways in your life?
I have a jury sitting behind me and all I said was that I am not making a claim, so I expected them to smile at one another and throw me out of court. At least then I could leave with some dignity.
May I remind you that you guys are creating an echo chamber? Most consumers of VPS are half-baked mortals who contribute most of the profit to the providers. Elites and experts have their own high-availability solutions, are smart enough to dodge, and can do so at any time. Who do you all think will suffer in the end?
Disk performance is not low. As many posters pointed out there is no issue with VPS performance.
Even from ticket history
And HH replied straight to the point
Also, since VPS was delivered within 2 weeks ETA, it is not eligible for refund (only applies when VPS is not delivered in two weeks ETA)
And someone mentioned as well
Lastly, for optimal MySQL performance, it is recommended to use zero swap space
You all might as well just brand me a heretic and close my thread. I promise to never say another word in here again. I was born stupid.
ok
I have not forwarded a binary question.
What I asked was, what you want since disk performance, even if not up your expectation, but it doesn't break any terms and conditions.
You can either keep using it or transfer it to someone else. This particular statement is binary because the whole aspect is binary (Either you keep it or you don't keep it).
Choosing a grey area solves nothing. You can complain upto unlimited pages here yet situation will still remain same.
OMG, You and who are just like two sides of a coin.
BYE BYE, GUYS!
I feel sorry for you. You were just trying to put your experience with a provider.
lets all feel sorry for @i12h
Right, I'm out. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
Look dude, in this forum, people know me as someone who complaints about HH. So in order to raise grievance against HH, I'll more often support you if I feel it is somewhat fault of HH.
But in this case, I see no wrong doing for HH and I'll be among the first to say that, HH has nothing to do in your case.
You bought a vps but it doesn't meet your expectations. Just take it as a loss and move on.
@i12h your arguments are good, right or wrong does not matter. Be around here.
Hopefully you enjoyed the party
my sides
Yes, this post was comedy gold: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4260165/#Comment_4260165
indeed.
and this quote
There is a lack of sufficient attention to the user's problem, as well as inadequate time spent investigating it. Also, there is insufficient focus on user satisfaction.
When a provider offers a service, it is essential to engage in appropriate and meaningful interaction with the user regarding the service being provided.
Do we? I mean, you complain non stop. But do we? And yes, although I don't have to, the last post you replied to was violating the rules of 'being a dick' and receiving non stop flags from members. Yes, consider it an official and binding warning to violating LET rules.
@Arkas
Have you actually read the whole post?
It is unfortunate that I am being warned for this post yet abusive messages are not being addressed even after being flagged. One can see many abusers such as below will probably flag my posts due to some personal vendetta.
Quote from one veteran user which got unaddressed even after flagging
And as per your own post,
Many members had posted much severe than what I have ever posted in the forum, yet it wasn't addressed and chapter was closed. That thread did also include user who multiple times tried to trigger a reaction from me calling me a liar multiple times yet I avoided replying.
On the basis of this, I feel this warning is unfair in my case and I'll request review of the above from any other admin/moderator. I would have hoped to make this in private but since, warning was publicly made, thus I am also unwillingly had to address in public domain.
If found guilty of breaching of any rule by any other moderator, I'll accept that decision.
Thank you. I have made this decision multilaterally as I do not wish for you to get a ban. Warning issued. Ban imminent?
A warning has no real effect other than to give you a heads up you're heading towards a ban. It sounds like you're ignoring the warning and going full annoying and getting banned.
Do you have any siblings? If so, ever get in a squabble and your mom yells at you to stop it, and you're like, "don't yell at me, s/he started it!". To your mom, she doesn't give a shit, just wants you both to STFU and stop annoying her.
Hey ma, that Canadian weirdo is at it again! Come on Mah, he's not from a real country!