New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
I think we can use NextDNS for just that and it comes with 300k queries in free tier - https://nextdns.io/
Sure, that's why we enjoy browsing LET via cURL or straight up netcat or telnet. Read those headers like a man!
this looks great, will it be usable on a 2gb machine?
I'm not sure, but minimum requirements per their documentation:
CPU 2 cores
Memory 4GB
Storage 50GB (SSD)
Sync between multiple devices, e.g. computer, tablet, phone, family (via the group feature)
Guide pls
For tailscale or hosting a tor bridge ?
Pm you
I am in the same boat, so doing Keepass + sync the file across devices. I guess one way to self-host it would be to host it at home + limited access (maybe tailscale) but there is a redundancy issue here. It is probably possible to tweak hosting on a remote server security-wise but I decided not to do it.
He complaining about Unraid Synology and Qnap but in the end use Windows 11 Xd
(No offense @fzorb I also use Windows
I'm really happy with Netbird at the moment: https://docs.netbird.io/
It's a Mesh VPN like Tailscale, but it integrates with a self-hosted Identity Provider so you can setup really granular permissions for what should be able to access what, with 2FA for client access etc. The only thing that sucks about it is the Android client, which still doesn't have the Exit Node selector or Quantum Resistance yet.
oh god.. someone spend some money today
I switched to unraid, and I love using it, and it's a lot easier to manage apps compared to what I was doing before.
You can try that one, you own your database and not store on there cloud.
Same here.
Also guys I wanted to share with you my homeserver YABS, did it from HDD:
LE: Added IO test from SSD too.
I am self-hosting VaultWarden at home with very limited access but perhaps it's good to know that the Bitwarden apps and browser extensions keeps functioning while you're unable to connect to your VaultWarden server.
So, in my experience if your main goal is to have access to your credentials anywhere anytime (cross-platform) without mutating data (changing passwords/adding or removing credentials) while you're out and about it will be sufficient.
You have to make sure that the VaultWarden server has a valid certificate (not self-signed) otherwise you can't connect via app or extension.
May i ask if your homeserver is minipc or not?
Unraid's Slackware , a pretty uncommon YABS
Had Unraid several years on a QNAP TS-453D, and now running it on HP Microserver Gen10 Plus. Install, run and forget with nearly no maintenance required, never had any issue, loving it.
>
Yes, thanks. I tried to self-host Vaultwarden but just decided to stop it. Using keepass + syncing it across devices works good for me but I understand that certain people want more comfort, in that case Vaultwarden will work but then if your home connection goes down or something, you are kind of stuck.
Hi @quaego,
My homeserver is an ex-office PC, I bought it with 90 EUR from a guy on an marketplace from Romania, it came with 512GB SSD NVMe and I added later my other storage units:
1x SATA SSD 128GB
2x 2TB HDD
2x 1TB HDD (might change later cause I want more storage)
There is a photo where I installed last HDD, I will come back later when I get home with a picture with the case.
Ah, i see! Love that slackware
. Maybe i would try UnRaid some day. But i just dont like a having Proprietary linux in my house 
How so? If I saw correctly, the app or extension are still accessible? I'm thinking to switch from bitwarden to vaultwarden and host it locally. There would be 2 devices as clients. If I edit data in the app on the mobile while away from home, once I get back, it should automatically sync the second client (once turned on) with the new data or not?
>
I have not explored bit/vault warden deeply but I guess mobile apps + browsers extensions will work if the server goes down but obviously you will not be able to sync until the servers goes back up. It all comes to your personal preferences/habits etc. Personally, I prefer to have a single Keepass file rather than the whole infrastructure.
You can still use it if you can't connect to the server, but you can't add anything new or edit something.
Has anyone found a webmail interface as good as Fastmail's?
Hm, so, for example, I go on a business trip and while there decide to register on some website or add a new note or edit existing one, you saying bitwarden app won't be able to do that?
If you can't connect to the server during that time, at least the firefox browser extension can't do that, so yes.
For me it's not that relevant though as I simply use a VPN to get into my internal network, but if you can't/don't want to do that, it can be a bit problematic.
UptimeKuma to monitor the same server
Yeah, tailscale for me would be an option (as my network is behind CGNAT), but I thought there wouldn't be a problem to add/edit data while away from a server and then sync it once you are back.