Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Kimsufi/Soyoustart/OVH Rise New Price

1622623625627628662

Comments

  • @allthemtings said:

    @OhJohn said:
    They probably just named that KS-5-B because while they hold about 60 to 70% of the worldwide production of E3-1270v6 (KS-5), they also hold about 50 to 60% of E5-1650v4 (now KS-5-B)...

    KS-5 is just the "we dominate the world with that one" line...

    Makes you wonder how the fuck we got 2288g and EPYC from the mystery sale last year

    There must have been some to be able to call it mystery and say minimum 1650v4

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 5

    @allthemtings said: Makes you wonder how the fuck we got 2288g and EPYC from the mystery sale last year

    Just more orders than CPU model existence worldwide...

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @NotFoundException said:

    @allthemtings said:

    @OhJohn said:
    They probably just named that KS-5-B because while they hold about 60 to 70% of the worldwide production of E3-1270v6 (KS-5), they also hold about 50 to 60% of E5-1650v4 (now KS-5-B)...

    KS-5 is just the "we dominate the world with that one" line...

    Makes you wonder how the fuck we got 2288g and EPYC from the mystery sale last year

    There must have been some to be able to call it mystery and say minimum 1650v4

    There is definitely some as I have both but my point is how many mystery’s got ordered that day considering it was a 1 day sale thing for them to run out of the E5 1650 v3/v4

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @allthemtings said:

    @OhJohn said:
    They probably just named that KS-5-B because while they hold about 60 to 70% of the worldwide production of E3-1270v6 (KS-5), they also hold about 50 to 60% of E5-1650v4 (now KS-5-B)...

    KS-5 is just the "we dominate the world with that one" line...

    Makes you wonder how the fuck we got 2288g and EPYC from the mystery sale last year

    I wouldn't ask these questions, you might get baguetted by the french.

  • @allthemtings said: for them to run out of the E5 1650 v3/v4

    They didn't run out of. The whole point of the KS-MYSTERY was, that you could also get better CPUs, more RAM, more storage. It was like a lootbox with 80% 1650 and 20% better CPUs

    Thanked by 1OhJohn
  • @NotFoundException said: It was like a lootbox with 80% 1650 and 20% better CPUs

    Yes, but I will only believe that as soon as @allthemtings transfers a e2288g with 128GB and 2x2TB NVMe to my OVH account...

    (so far I have only ever had hands on those E5-1650v4 but none of the E2288g).

    Thanked by 1concept
  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad
    edited February 5

    @NotFoundException said:

    @allthemtings said: for them to run out of the E5 1650 v3/v4

    They didn't run out of. The whole point of the KS-MYSTERY was, that you could also get better CPUs, more RAM, more storage. It was like a lootbox with 80% 1650 and 20% better CPUs

    Im not sure…hundreds if not thousands of invoices got generated from this forum alone I can’t imagine world wide as I know a certain Chinese forum went crazy with this, and most orders got paid for and delivered that day with e5s sure majority got cancelled and refunded or even traded out but they don’t go straight back into the pool to reorder. I’m not sure how many e5s they have racked and available but I’m sure they found out that day, 99% of the upgraded CPUs came well after they stopped delivering the e5s as people kept invoices and paid them days after the sale ended (probably partly why you can’t do this anymore on these type of sales invoices expire within 1 day now and it was previously 2 weeks or more afaik) the same happened previous years with LE servers anyone who kept unpaid invoices after the sale ended was more likely to hit something big due to the “standard”

    Maybe you’re right but I’m pretty sure none of the big upgrades came the same day as the sale I would guess they didn’t want to have to cancel and refund hundreds of servers like they had to with KS-A or LE-B when they got wayyy over sold

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 5

    KS-Mystery sale was planned for France only and got way out of hand by those API buyers all over the world.

    So they got into the "all DC hands on deck" situation where they threw in anything they had in gear at those DCs.

    Thanked by 1allthemtings
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Anyway, please post YABS if someone has the balls to order one.

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 5

    As this is 3d delivery you would have to take a yabs for E5-1650v4 from KS-Mystery sale (for now or wait three days). What RAM amount would suite you?

  • # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Feb  5 19:44:02 UTC 2026
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 5 days, 2 hours, 58 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 1200.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 62.7 GiB
    Swap       : 16.0 GiB
    Disk       : 403.5 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-94-generic
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH SAS
    Location   : Roubaix, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country    : France
    Warning: Could not parse free space format for /: ''
    
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 431.03 MB/s (107.7k) | 463.47 MB/s   (7.2k)
    Write      | 432.17 MB/s (108.0k) | 465.91 MB/s   (7.2k)
    Total      | 863.20 MB/s (215.8k) | 929.38 MB/s  (14.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 447.11 MB/s    (873) | 460.01 MB/s    (449)
    Write      | 470.87 MB/s    (919) | 490.64 MB/s    (479)
    Total      | 917.99 MB/s   (1.7k) | 950.65 MB/s    (928)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 939 Mbits/sec   | 940 Mbits/sec   | 6.18 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 935 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 12.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 876 Mbits/sec   | 829 Mbits/sec   | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 820 Mbits/sec   | 774 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 711 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 885 Mbits/sec   | 784 Mbits/sec   | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 795 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 926 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec   | 6.13 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 923 Mbits/sec   | 924 Mbits/sec   | 12.7 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 866 Mbits/sec   | 820 Mbits/sec   | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 808 Mbits/sec   | 667 Mbits/sec   | 166 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 665 Mbits/sec   | 791 Mbits/sec   | 143 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 876 Mbits/sec   | 780 Mbits/sec   | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 601 Mbits/sec   | 689 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1274
    Multi Core      | 6123
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437466
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 41 sec
    

    Only difference is the 1G/1G network with this KS-Mystery (compared to 500mps on KS-5-B).

  • bdzbdz Member

    @OhJohn said:
    As this is 3d delivery you would have to take a yabs for E5-1650v4 from KS-Mystery sale (for now or wait three days). What RAM amount would suite you?

    I'd love to see a YABS from the KS-Mystery. Do you have one with 32GB RAM? (just like the one I ordered).

  • @bdz said: I'd love to see a YABS from the KS-Mystery.

    Just posted one (right at the same time with your post), see here: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4728829/#Comment_4728829 but that one is with 64GB - afaik there were no KS-Mystery w/ just 32GB....

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @OhJohn said:

    @bdz said: I'd love to see a YABS from the KS-Mystery.

    Just posted one (right at the same time with your post), see here: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4728829/#Comment_4728829 but that one is with 64GB - afaik there were no KS-Mystery w/ just 32GB....

    16GB too, kinda funny though.

  • @Neoon said: 16GB too, kinda funny though.

    December 2026: new dedicated servers w/ 512MB ram. Welcome new world.

    Thanked by 1barbarza
  • bdzbdz Member
    edited February 5

    @OhJohn said:
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2025-04-20 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Thu Feb 5 19:44:02 UTC 2026

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 5 days, 2 hours, 58 minutes
    Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores : 12 @ 1200.000 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 62.7 GiB
    Swap : 16.0 GiB
    Disk : 403.5 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel : 6.8.0-94-generic
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP : OVH SAS
    ASN : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host : OVH SAS
    Location : Roubaix, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country : France
    Warning: Could not parse free space format for /: ''


    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 431.03 MB/s (107.7k) | 463.47 MB/s (7.2k)
    Write | 432.17 MB/s (108.0k) | 465.91 MB/s (7.2k)
    Total | 863.20 MB/s (215.8k) | 929.38 MB/s (14.5k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 447.11 MB/s (873) | 460.01 MB/s (449)
    Write | 470.87 MB/s (919) | 490.64 MB/s (479)
    Total | 917.99 MB/s (1.7k) | 950.65 MB/s (928)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 939 Mbits/sec | 940 Mbits/sec | 6.18 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 935 Mbits/sec | 937 Mbits/sec | 12.8 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 829 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 820 Mbits/sec | 774 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 711 Mbits/sec | 809 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 885 Mbits/sec | 784 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 795 Mbits/sec | 801 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 926 Mbits/sec | 927 Mbits/sec | 6.13 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 923 Mbits/sec | 924 Mbits/sec | 12.7 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 866 Mbits/sec | 820 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 808 Mbits/sec | 667 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 665 Mbits/sec | 791 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 780 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 601 Mbits/sec | 689 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1274
    Multi Core | 6123
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437466

    YABS completed in 12 min 41 sec

    Only difference is the 1G/1G network with this KS-Mystery (compared to 500mps on KS-5-B).

    Not sure why I expected higher single/multi core scores! But you run it on 1.2Ghz, would surely be higher if set to it's max of 4Ghz, would it not?

    Thanks for providing the YABS though!

  • @bdz said:

    @OhJohn said:
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2025-04-20 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Thu Feb 5 19:44:02 UTC 2026

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 5 days, 2 hours, 58 minutes
    Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores : 12 @ 1200.000 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 62.7 GiB
    Swap : 16.0 GiB
    Disk : 403.5 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel : 6.8.0-94-generic
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP : OVH SAS
    ASN : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host : OVH SAS
    Location : Roubaix, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country : France
    Warning: Could not parse free space format for /: ''


    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 431.03 MB/s (107.7k) | 463.47 MB/s (7.2k)
    Write | 432.17 MB/s (108.0k) | 465.91 MB/s (7.2k)
    Total | 863.20 MB/s (215.8k) | 929.38 MB/s (14.5k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 447.11 MB/s (873) | 460.01 MB/s (449)
    Write | 470.87 MB/s (919) | 490.64 MB/s (479)
    Total | 917.99 MB/s (1.7k) | 950.65 MB/s (928)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 939 Mbits/sec | 940 Mbits/sec | 6.18 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 935 Mbits/sec | 937 Mbits/sec | 12.8 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 829 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 820 Mbits/sec | 774 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 711 Mbits/sec | 809 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 885 Mbits/sec | 784 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 795 Mbits/sec | 801 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 926 Mbits/sec | 927 Mbits/sec | 6.13 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 923 Mbits/sec | 924 Mbits/sec | 12.7 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 866 Mbits/sec | 820 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 808 Mbits/sec | 667 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 665 Mbits/sec | 791 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 780 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 601 Mbits/sec | 689 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1274
    Multi Core | 6123
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437466

    YABS completed in 12 min 41 sec

    Only difference is the 1G/1G network with this KS-Mystery (compared to 500mps on KS-5-B).

    Not sure why I expected higher single/multi core scores! But you run it on 1.2Ghz, would surely be higher if set to it's max of 4Ghz, would it not?

    Thanks for providing the YABS though!

    The 1.2Ghz is whatever speed the CPU was running at when the script was started, during the benchmark the cpu is at full speed.

  • Yepp, and remember: gb6 multicore is pretty broken and max cpu is 4000 Mhz for E5-1650v4 while e.g. the (KS-5) E3-1270v6 has 4200 Mhz (but only 4 cores instead of 6 so lower multicore).

  • bdzbdz Member

    @fredo1664 said:

    @bdz said:

    @OhJohn said:
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2025-04-20 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Thu Feb 5 19:44:02 UTC 2026

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 5 days, 2 hours, 58 minutes
    Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores : 12 @ 1200.000 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 62.7 GiB
    Swap : 16.0 GiB
    Disk : 403.5 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel : 6.8.0-94-generic
    VM Type : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP : OVH SAS
    ASN : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host : OVH SAS
    Location : Roubaix, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country : France
    Warning: Could not parse free space format for /: ''


    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 431.03 MB/s (107.7k) | 463.47 MB/s (7.2k)
    Write | 432.17 MB/s (108.0k) | 465.91 MB/s (7.2k)
    Total | 863.20 MB/s (215.8k) | 929.38 MB/s (14.5k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 447.11 MB/s (873) | 460.01 MB/s (449)
    Write | 470.87 MB/s (919) | 490.64 MB/s (479)
    Total | 917.99 MB/s (1.7k) | 950.65 MB/s (928)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 939 Mbits/sec | 940 Mbits/sec | 6.18 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 935 Mbits/sec | 937 Mbits/sec | 12.8 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 829 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 820 Mbits/sec | 774 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 711 Mbits/sec | 809 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 885 Mbits/sec | 784 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 795 Mbits/sec | 801 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 926 Mbits/sec | 927 Mbits/sec | 6.13 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 923 Mbits/sec | 924 Mbits/sec | 12.7 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 866 Mbits/sec | 820 Mbits/sec | 97.9 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 808 Mbits/sec | 667 Mbits/sec | 166 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 665 Mbits/sec | 791 Mbits/sec | 143 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 876 Mbits/sec | 780 Mbits/sec | 78.9 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 601 Mbits/sec | 689 Mbits/sec | 224 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1274
    Multi Core | 6123
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437466

    YABS completed in 12 min 41 sec

    Only difference is the 1G/1G network with this KS-Mystery (compared to 500mps on KS-5-B).

    Not sure why I expected higher single/multi core scores! But you run it on 1.2Ghz, would surely be higher if set to it's max of 4Ghz, would it not?

    Thanks for providing the YABS though!

    The 1.2Ghz is whatever speed the CPU was running at when the script was started, during the benchmark the cpu is at full speed.

    Yeah I was kinda thinking that myself since the script is pretty heavy on the server load. But yeah, I kind of expected higher numbers. But it is a 10 year old CPU so maybe a bit naive of me!

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 5

    Still good horses to pull a carriage but not to win a horse race but the KS-5-B is not that good esp. with the 500mps. On the other side you won't find that power for that price at e.g. Hetzner or anywhere in the UK.

  • bdzbdz Member

    @OhJohn said:
    Still good horses to pull a carriage but not to win a horse race but the KS-5-B is not that good esp. with the 500mps. On the other side you won't find that power for that price at e.g. Hetzner.

    Yeah that's true. To be honest, for my use case it will be more than enough. I host a few game servers for a game that is ~23 years old and a few smaller websites, so it will be plenty of resources for that.

    I will use this while I search for something better, newer that is reasonably priced.

    I have a really good VPS from a summer deal, but nothing really beats dedicated resources!

  • And for the record:

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4000.000 MHz
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1276
    Multi Core      | 6166
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437994
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 20 sec
    

    no difference with performance governor as explained by @fredo1664 before.

    Thanked by 1bdz
  • @allthemtings said:

    @OhJohn said:
    They probably just named that KS-5-B because while they hold about 60 to 70% of the worldwide production of E3-1270v6 (KS-5), they also hold about 50 to 60% of E5-1650v4 (now KS-5-B)...

    KS-5 is just the "we dominate the world with that one" line...

    Makes you wonder how the fuck we got 2288g and EPYC from the mystery sale last year

    It's a Mystery?

    Thanked by 1OhJohn
  • @OhJohn said:
    And for the record:

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4000.000 MHz
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1276
    Multi Core      | 6166
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437994
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 20 sec
    

    no difference with performance governor as explained by @fredo1664 before.

    For record, this is my 2024 KS-LE-E (I thought v4 would be better than v3) :

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 3800.000 MHz
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1316
    Multi Core      | 6265
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15072517
    
  • @bingo_jake said:

    @OhJohn said:
    And for the record:

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4000.000 MHz
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1276
    Multi Core      | 6166
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437994
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 20 sec
    

    no difference with performance governor as explained by @fredo1664 before.

    For record, this is my 2024 KS-LE-E (I thought v4 would be better than v3) :

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 3800.000 MHz
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1316
    Multi Core      | 6265
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15072517
    

    The stars must have been in alignment

    Thanked by 2bingo_jake OhJohn
  • remyremy Member
    edited February 5

    @bingo_jake said:

    @OhJohn said:
    And for the record:

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4000.000 MHz
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1276
    Multi Core      | 6166
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/16437994
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 20 sec
    

    no difference with performance governor as explained by @fredo1664 before.

    For record, this is my 2024 KS-LE-E (I thought v4 would be better than v3) :

    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v3 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 3800.000 MHz
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1316
    Multi Core      | 6265
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15072517
    

    The kernel version matters as well, which could explain the difference.
    That said, it's essentially the same CPU, just with about a 200 MHz higher boost.
    So there 1650v4 is probably slighly more performant but not that much.

    Geekbench v4 is far more accurate for 12 vcores
    Stop using geekbench 6, it's crap... except to compare single core performance

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited February 6

    But still with less Mhz max the bingo_jake v3 outperforms the v4 in single core gb6. Debian with newer kernel?

    v4 should be about 10% better in single and multi core:

    https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/2389vs2838/Intel-Xeon-E5-1650-v3-vs-Intel-Xeon-E5-1650-v4

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Any deliveroooo today? YABS?

  • bdzbdz Member

    @Neoon said:
    Any deliveroooo today? YABS?

    Just got mine 2mins ago! Will post a YABS here shortly.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @bdz said:

    @Neoon said:
    Any deliveroooo today? YABS?

    Just got mine 2mins ago! Will post a YABS here shortly.

Sign In or Register to comment.