Budget-Friendly VPS Hosting from €1.30: Germany Servers on Sale!

RayUres · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@RayUres said:
anyone able to do a Amazon Cloudfront test for me?

some .de providers are being country blocked via amazon cloudfront. (i.e. Hostaris)

curl api.bybit.com and let me know what it returns.
curl api.bybit.com
<html>
<head><title>301 Moved Permanently</title></head>
<body>
<center>

301 Moved Permanently

CloudFront

</body>
</html>

thanks! this means your ASN isnt geo blocked by bybit amazon cloudfront.

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS
Under stress test, 2GB memory is NOT the limiting factor
Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

@SebekVPS
Any feedback on my vps testing and observations ?

what feedback do you want on that?
it's your testing and I'm not supposed to comment on it.

dev_vps · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS
Under stress test, 2GB memory is NOT the limiting factor
Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

@SebekVPS
Any feedback on my vps testing and observations ?

Posting my observation again

Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

cpu resources are capped

overall this provider won't be on my recommended provider list.

lukast__ · April 29

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

dev_vps · April 29

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

if 40% resources are actually free, please explain this lower GB6 score
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

these VPS vCores are resource capped

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1659
Multi Core      | 2947
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

compared to GB6 score on another VPS (2vCore 7950x)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2744
Multi Core      | 4825
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5902439

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS

And this lower GB6 score is consistently in the same range

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1676
Multi Core      | 2754
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906294

.

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1672
Multi Core      | 2889
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906336

.

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1568
Multi Core      | 2727
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906413

Compare these GB6 score with this VPS with just 1vCore 7950X

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2509
Multi Core      | 2507
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5890737

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

if 40% resources are actually free, please explain this lower GB6 score
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

these VPS vCores are resource capped
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1659
Multi Core      | 2947
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193
compared to GB6 score on another VPS (2vCore 7950x)
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2744
Multi Core      | 4825
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5902439

Because it's not 100% free resources, it's only 40%.
You can check the % of CPU steal and I think you have already seen it because you don't show the result.
Although your words contradict your own words right now "if the performance of the VPS stays at 50-60% of raw GB6 score, then it is pretty good" , so I can't understand the objectivity of your testing.
You're comparing, not showing results.
Why are you comparing something where you don't know why the result is the way it is? I know, that's why I'm writing this.

hyperblast · April 29

if 1659 = 40 %
then 4148 = 100 % -> that would be a world record gb6 for this processor

malignify · April 29

4th page now. Should have just apologized and put the location in the thread

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:
@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

if 40% resources are actually free, please explain this lower GB6 score
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

these VPS vCores are resource capped
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1659
Multi Core      | 2947
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193
compared to GB6 score on another VPS (2vCore 7950x)
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2744
Multi Core      | 4825
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5902439
Because it's not 100% free resources, it's only 40%.

So are you implying that other VPS is on 100% free resources node.

In my further testing, vps is pretty good for running wireguard as data transfer rate is pretty good and it does not need lot of cpu resources

SebekVPS · April 29

@hyperblast said:
if 1659 = 40 %
then 4148 = 100 % -> that would be a world record gb6 for this processor

That's a strange comparison.
I said percentage of free CPU compute resource, you add that percentage to the benchmark result

SebekVPS · April 29

@malignify said:
4th page now. Should have just apologized and put the location in the thread

there's nothing wrong with that:)

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS said:
@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

if 40% resources are actually free, please explain this lower GB6 score
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

these VPS vCores are resource capped
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1659
Multi Core      | 2947
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193
compared to GB6 score on another VPS (2vCore 7950x)
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2744
Multi Core      | 4825
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5902439
Because it's not 100% free resources, it's only 40%.
So are you implying that other VPS is on 100% free resources node.

In my further testing, vps is pretty good for running wireguard as data transfer rate is pretty good and it does not need lot of cpu resources

I'm not insinuating, I'm just saying that on a free node the results are exactly the same, because I've done that too. So it seems to me that these results are obtained on an empty node.

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

So are you implying that other VPS is on 100% free resources node.

In my further testing, vps is pretty good for running wireguard as data transfer rate is pretty good and it does not need lot of cpu resources

I'm not insinuating, I'm just saying that on a free node the results are exactly the same, because I've done that too. So it seems to me that these results are obtained on an empty node.

on @SebekVPS VPS with just WireGuard running ...

Updated -

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS said:
@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS said:
@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

@lukast__ said:

@dev_vps said: Data transfer rate is pretty good, but it seems that either cpu core resources are capped or host node is pretty busy

Do you see much steal or is steal time reporting disabled?

cpu resources are capped OR host node is super duper busy

you don't understand the question
linux can write the percentage of stolen cpu
You are just showing the system load, what is not good here?

I do understand the question.

Again, let me repeat, these VPS vCores are resource capped or the host server is super busy.

Actually no, 40% of CPU resources are free, so it would be better to show top output and st value

if 40% resources are actually free, please explain this lower GB6 score
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193

these VPS vCores are resource capped
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1659
Multi Core      | 2947
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5906193
compared to GB6 score on another VPS (2vCore 7950x)
Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 2744
Multi Core      | 4825
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5902439
Because it's not 100% free resources, it's only 40%.
So are you implying that other VPS is on 100% free resources node.

In my further testing, vps is pretty good for running wireguard as data transfer rate is pretty good and it does not need lot of cpu resources
I'm not insinuating, I'm just saying that on a free node the results are exactly the same, because I've done that too. So it seems to me that these results are obtained on an empty node.
on @SebekVPS VPS with just WireGuard running ...

stress --cpu 2
to accurately utilize resources and display % CPU stealing.
when the processor is loaded on a node, the turbo boost frequency drops, that's why the results are not the same as on an empty node
Benchmarking on empty nodes is not really a reality.

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

on @SebekVPS VPS with just WireGuard running ...

stress --cpu 2
to accurately utilize resources and display % CPU stealing.
when the processor is loaded on a node, the turbo boost frequency drops, that's why the results are not the same as on an empty node
Benchmarking on empty nodes is not really a reality.

How much is the monthly bandwidth?
I am about to get 1vCore VPS as I need one for setting up WireGuard and a use case that works for me.

SebekVPS · April 29

@dev_vps said:

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

on @SebekVPS VPS with just WireGuard running ...

stress --cpu 2
to accurately utilize resources and display % CPU stealing.
when the processor is loaded on a node, the turbo boost frequency drops, that's why the results are not the same as on an empty node
Benchmarking on empty nodes is not really a reality.

How much is the monthly bandwidth?
I am about to get 1vCore VPS as I need one for setting up WireGuard and a use case that works for me.

Just fair use so it doesn't interfere with other users.
There are users who use 5-10 tb for personal vpn on the cheapest plans with no problems whatsoever

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS said:

@dev_vps said:

How much is the monthly bandwidth?
I am about to get 1vCore VPS as I need one for setting up WireGuard and a use case that works for me.

Just fair use so it doesn't interfere with other users.
There are users who use 5-10 tb for personal vpn on the cheapest plans with no problems whatsoever

perfect. I don't need more than 2-3 TB per month.
Thank you for allowing me to use trial VPS to run testing.

_MS_ · April 29

The to and fro between @SebekVPS and @dev_vps gave the vibes of this scene. Could never guess if dev_vps was going to recommend the provider with all the fanfare or if SebekVPS was going to explode any moment by getting annoyed with all the GB6 numbers and comparisons.

dev_vps · April 29

MS said:
The to and fro between @SebekVPS and @dev_vps gave the vibes of this scene. Could never guess if dev_vps was going to recommend the provider with all the fanfare or if SebekVPS was going to explode any moment by getting annoyed with all the GB6 numbers and comparisons.

Thank you.
I needed this for Monday at 5pm.

Coming back to the topic -
I can't recommend VPS for Windows OS as the cpu feels about 30-35% weaker at all times. Therefore I was using the term capped with cpu resources.

The data rate is pretty good and this is excellent for running wireguard with my specific use case. I don't need much cpu resources.

And for $1.40 / month, this VPS is much much much much much much ...... much better than 10 euro/year vps from that premier data center.

dev_vps · April 29

@SebekVPS

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core Processor
 CPU Cores          : 1 @ 3094.186 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 512 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 12.0 GB (1.1 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 976.4 MB (69.3 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 17 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-8-amd64
 TCP CC             : cubic
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS216129 SEBEK sp. z o.o
 Location           : Amsterdam / NL
 Region             : North Holland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 440 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.1 GB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 965 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 843.8 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency
 Speedtest.net    897.09 Mbps       849.95 Mbps          10.25 ms
 Los Angeles, US  507.49 Mbps       855.29 Mbps         174.42 ms
 Dallas, US       586.46 Mbps       839.39 Mbps         147.17 ms
 Montreal, CA     838.75 Mbps       842.41 Mbps         100.28 ms
 Amsterdam, NL    904.22 Mbps       856.04 Mbps          11.24 ms
 Mumbai, IN       686.99 Mbps       819.32 Mbps         116.73 ms
 Singapore, SG     57.24 Mbps       117.45 Mbps         325.48 ms

SebekVPS · April 29

MS said:
The to and fro between @SebekVPS and @dev_vps gave the vibes of this scene. Could never guess if dev_vps was going to recommend the provider with all the fanfare or if SebekVPS was going to explode any moment by getting annoyed with all the GB6 numbers and comparisons.

seems like an insult.
as I am not making excuses and I write what really happens in real operating conditions

dev_vps · April 29

@dev_vps said:
@SebekVPS

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core Processor
 CPU Cores          : 1 @ 3094.186 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 512 KB
 AES-NI             : ✓ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✓ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 12.0 GB (1.1 GB Used)
 Total Mem          : 976.4 MB (69.3 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 17 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-8-amd64
 TCP CC             : cubic
 Virtualization     : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6          : ✓ Online / ✓ Online
 Organization       : AS216129 SEBEK sp. z o.o
 Location           : Amsterdam / NL
 Region             : North Holland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I/O Speed(1st run) : 440 MB/s
 I/O Speed(2nd run) : 1.1 GB/s
 I/O Speed(3rd run) : 965 MB/s
 I/O Speed(average) : 843.8 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Node Name        Upload Speed      Download Speed      Latency
 Speedtest.net    897.09 Mbps       849.95 Mbps          10.25 ms
 Los Angeles, US  507.49 Mbps       855.29 Mbps         174.42 ms
 Dallas, US       586.46 Mbps       839.39 Mbps         147.17 ms
 Montreal, CA     838.75 Mbps       842.41 Mbps         100.28 ms
 Amsterdam, NL    904.22 Mbps       856.04 Mbps          11.24 ms
 Mumbai, IN       686.99 Mbps       819.32 Mbps         116.73 ms
 Singapore, SG     57.24 Mbps       117.45 Mbps         325.48 ms

This GB5 score is actually pretty good.

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1198
Multi Core      | 1189
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22439169

.
And GB6 single-core score is actually pretty close to single core score of 7950x VPS

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1455
Multi Core      | 1243
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5907430

dev_vps · April 30

@SebekVPS

VPS is excellent for my use case (WireGuard VPN)

dwight · May 1

The promotion code entered has expired

SebekVPS · May 1

Yes, the offer has expired

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Budget-Friendly VPS Hosting from €1.30: Germany Servers on Sale!

Comments

301 Moved Permanently

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Budget-Friendly VPS Hosting from €1.30: Germany Servers on Sale!

Comments

301 Moved Permanently