Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › HostBrr | 1 Year celebration deals | EPIC EPYC DEALS + Storage | Flash deals - Page 8
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | 1 Year celebration deals | EPIC EPYC DEALS + Storage | Flash deals

1…5681011…21

Comments

  • KhadeercasinoKhadeercasino Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    So its a win rdp right, I'm gonna try it using another vps thus the rdp lag?

    Why are you using Windows RDP session to another RDP session?

    To connect windows vps we need rdp client

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited April 25

    @Khadeercasino said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    So its a win rdp right, I'm gonna try it using another vps thus the rdp lag?

    Why are you using Windows RDP session to another RDP session?

    To connect windows vps we need rdp client

    Windows RDP can be connected from chrome OS, Mac OS, Linux OS and of course from Windows OS

  • KhadeercasinoKhadeercasino Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    So its a win rdp right, I'm gonna try it using another vps thus the rdp lag?

    Why are you using Windows RDP session to another RDP session?

    To connect windows vps we need rdp client

    Windows RDP can be connected from chrome OS, Mac OS, Linux OS and of course from Windows OS

    For windows os mainly from personal PC, we need a separate rdp client which need to download separate, is there any way to connect winrdp without downloading rdp client using PC?

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @Khadeercasino said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @Khadeercasino said:

    So its a win rdp right, I'm gonna try it using another vps thus the rdp lag?

    Why are you using Windows RDP session to another RDP session?

    To connect windows vps we need rdp client

    Windows RDP can be connected from chrome OS, Mac OS, Linux OS and of course from Windows OS

    For windows os mainly from personal PC, we need a separate rdp client which need to download separate, is there any way to connect winrdp without downloading rdp client using PC?

    Remote Desktop Web Client

    https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/remote/remote-desktop-services/clients/remote-desktop-web-client

    Thanked by 1Khadeercasino
  • amaeva080amaeva080 Member

    @labze said:
    Next flash deal is up:

    IPv4 NAT Storage

    1 vCore Intel Xeon W-2145
    1 GB DDR4 ECC RAM 
    8 GB NVMe Gen4 Storage
    2500 GB HDD Raid-6 storage (NVMe Cached)
    10000 GB Bandwidth @ 1 Gbps
    IPv4 NAT (20 ports)
    IPv6/64 
    €22/year
    or
    $25/year

    Qty: 10 in each location, Germany and Finland.
    https://my.hostbrr.com/order/main/packages/anniversary/?group_id=59

    Amazing!
    But missed it :-(

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran

    @dev_vps said:

    @plumberg said:

    @dev_vps said:

    >

    Can I run Windows OS on this VPS with 8GB NVMe OS storage?
    Yes, I can.

    But.. why?

    depends on the use case ....

    example - running sql server express with rest api bot for telegram
    using the HDD for storage

    If you may not be aware...
    One can run sqlserver express on linux also. Not sure what stripped down version of windows would even install on the 8gb nvme boot...

    SQL Server on Linux <> SQL Server on Windows
    https://codingsight.com/sql-server-2019-windows-vs-linux-and-simple-test-scenario-to-spot-difference/

    I also mentioned in the same post that I personally prefer at least 30gb NVMe for OS drive

    if I have to pick a database server for Linux, I would go for PostgreSQL Server - totally free and pretty fast (especially for SELECT queries)

    There are subtle differences.,I agree. But here there was a comment that windows use case was for swl server on a limited space nvme disk (I know you said you prefer a bigger disk)... my comment was simply pointing that sqlserver is available on linux...
    You will be surprised to see so many people learn this new tidbit.

    @remy said:

    You're trying to convince a Windows fanatic.

    Hehe. Everyone has different tastes. Hell I even have a couple of KS boxes running win server 2k19 and serves my usecase for a box on the go...

    He has probably installed windows more times than all the members of LET put together. :p

    Hmm. I think I am a strong competitor to him. But you may be right...

    You really have to love Windows to try to use it on 8gb disk space.

    Everyone loves a challenge...

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @plumberg

    On Windows OS, it is easy to extend SQL Stored Procedure using SQL CLR , especially with c# based code.

    This option is not available for SQL Server on Linux.

    In addition, SSMS can be used on windows OS. Though Azure Data Studio is an option on Linux OS.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • ldcloverldclover Member

    Congrats!!

  • kendkend Member

    @DigiGoon said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    so, ryzen 7950x3d 5vcore is high performing than epyc 9534 6 vcore?

    Now since I have VPS for both the cpu cores, here are my observations.

    • Single core of epyc 9534 is about 65-70% as powerful as compared to 7950x3d.
    • However this VPS has more memory, that means tasks are memory intensive will not look to slower swap storage

    Make an informed decision based on this.

    do u have 6core epyc vps to compare? here's my 5core 7950xd...maybe @labze can create a temp 6core epyc kvm slice for the sake of comparing.. 😋

     # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
 #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
 #                     v2024-04-22                    #
 # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
 # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
 Wed Apr 24 22:56:30 BST 2024
 
 Basic System Information:
 ---------------------------------
 Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
 Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
 CPU cores  : 5 @ 4192.136 MHz
 AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
 RAM        : 7.7 GiB
 Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
 Disk       : 145.3 GiB
 Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
 Kernel     : 5.15.0-105-generic
 VM Type    : KVM
 IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
 
 fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
 ---------------------------------
 Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
 Read       | 240.65 MB/s  (60.1k) | 3.95 GB/s    (61.7k)
 Write      | 241.28 MB/s  (60.3k) | 3.97 GB/s    (62.1k)
 Total      | 481.93 MB/s (120.4k) | 7.92 GB/s   (123.8k)
            |                      |                     
 Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
 Read       | 4.49 GB/s     (8.7k) | 4.20 GB/s     (4.1k)
 Write      | 4.73 GB/s     (9.2k) | 4.48 GB/s     (4.3k)
 Total      | 9.23 GB/s    (18.0k) | 8.68 GB/s     (8.4k)
 
 Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
 ---------------------------------
 Test            | Value                         
                 |                               
 Single Core     | 2748                          
 Multi Core      | 9597                          
 Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5847169

    Your 5-core scores are better than my 8-core scores, same 7950X3D.

  • aaxaaaaxaa Member
    edited April 25

    2 vCore - 10 GB DDR5 RAM

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-04-22                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Thu Apr 25 11:37:17 +03 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9534 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2446.324 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 9.7 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 77.5 GiB
Distro     : Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
Kernel     : 5.15.0-105-generic
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 226.61 MB/s  (56.6k) | 1.60 GB/s    (25.1k)
Write      | 227.21 MB/s  (56.8k) | 1.61 GB/s    (25.2k)
Total      | 453.83 MB/s (113.4k) | 3.22 GB/s    (50.4k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 3.10 GB/s     (6.0k) | 2.21 GB/s     (2.1k)
Write      | 3.27 GB/s     (6.3k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)
Total      | 6.38 GB/s    (12.4k) | 4.57 GB/s     (4.4k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.59 Gbits/sec  | 341 Mbits/sec   | --
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 7.35 Gbits/sec  | 665 Mbits/sec   | 8.95 ms
Telia           | Helsinki, FI (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 26.7 ms
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 92.1 ms
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 420 Mbits/sec   | 734 Kbits/sec   | 287 ms
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 503 Mbits/sec   | 193 ms
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.44 Gbits/sec  | 81.7 ms
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.18 Gbits/sec  | 150 ms

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 1661
Multi Core      | 3609
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5852049

YABS completed in 14 min 13 sec
    Thanked by 1maverick
  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member

    @kend said:
    Your 5-core scores are better than my 8-core scores, same 7950X3D.

    share your YABS. :tongue:

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited April 25

    how to run yabs von windows console?

  • kvz12kvz12 Member

    @hyperblast said:
    how to run yabs von windows console?

    WSL2

  • nick_nick_ Member

    My RAM is halved in WSL2. Not sure if a Windows yabs result is accurate compared to Linux.

  • lukast__lukast__ Member

    @nick_ said: My RAM is halved in WSL2

    I think that you can configure the memory.

    @nick_ said: Not sure if a Windows yabs result is accurate compared to Linux.

    With WSL2 - no, AFAIK it's nested virtualisation (VM inside of Windows), with an ancient kernel.

    Thanked by 1nick_
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @hyperblast said:
    how to run yabs von windows console?

    the best option is run GB6 on Linux OS and then install Windows OS.

    There is already GB6 score posted for 2vCore and 6 vCore VPS with EPYC in this thread.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited April 25

    @DigiGoon said:

    @kend said:
    Your 5-core scores are better than my 8-core scores, same 7950X3D.

    share your YABS. :tongue:

    GB6 score refers as a snapshot of VPS at that moment. Based on host server load and other factors, GB6 score can vary at different times.

    if the host server load factor is same, 8 vCore VPS should outperform 5 vCore VPS for the same CPU kind.

    Single core EPYC performance is about 65-70% of Ryzen 7950x , though in multi core the difference shrunk further

    Here EPYC VPS has 6 vCores, vs Ryzen VPS with 5 vCores

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2023  (vs 2748 in 5 vCore Ryzen 7950x3D VPS)
Multi Core  | 8464  (vs 9597 in 5 vCore Ryzen VPS)
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/581717
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @noisycode said:

    @labze said:

    @noisycode said:

    @remy said:

    @sliix said:

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2071
    Multi Core | 8728
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5817097

    YABS completed in 10 min 0 sec

    What a beast :o

    imho, 9004 is not quite charming when it is fully filled. the performance seems no drastically better than a 7003.

    It'll take a lot to fill up this beast with 128 Cores, 256 Threads :-)

    sure, just wanted to share my experience with some really famous provider here. anyway, i have got 5 VPSes with hostbrr and all of them work like a charm.

    +1 for @labze HostBrr VPS
    VPS with excellent performance and A+ support

    Thanked by 1labze
  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

  • nobizzlenobizzle Member

    @labze what to expect from today's flash sale? Dedicated IPv4 and crazy specs like two days ago? 🙂

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    so what do you suggest? 5core 7950xd or 6core epyc?

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited April 25

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    Because there are only few apps (algorithms) that can utilize beyond 8 cores.

    The performance of 6 vCore EPYC is pretty similar to 5 vCore Ryzen 7959x.

    Even the YouTube 4k test in RDP session is super smooth with 6vCore EPYC.

    VPS from majority of other providers fail miserably in this test.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @labze
    Even in dev/integration SQL Server at work we use 8vCore machine.

    This is to illustrate how much powerful 8vCore virtual machine is.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @DigiGoon said:

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    so what do you suggest? 5core 7950xd or 6core epyc?

    I don't know your use case. 5 core 7950XD definetively offers more performance, especially in single core. Many applications benefits from higher single core speeds. If your current plan offers enough RAM then it is the most performant option. If you need more RAM and faster networking then the EPYC offer could be better.

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member

    @labze said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    so what do you suggest? 5core 7950xd or 6core epyc?

    I don't know your use case. 5 core 7950XD definetively offers more performance, especially in single core. Many applications benefits from higher single core speeds. If your current plan offers enough RAM then it is the most performant option. If you need more RAM and faster networking then the EPYC offer could be better.

    I'll be hosting multiple WordPress websites, Docker, Laravel, etc.

  • DigiGoonDigiGoon Member
    edited April 25

    @labze
    Also, can you create any custom plan for me? For Android ROM compilation?
    Ryzen 7950XD - 10 core or above
    32GB RAM
    1 TB NvME

    What might be the price of it?

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @DigiGoon said:

    @labze said:

    @DigiGoon said:

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    so what do you suggest? 5core 7950xd or 6core epyc?

    I don't know your use case. 5 core 7950XD definetively offers more performance, especially in single core. Many applications benefits from higher single core speeds. If your current plan offers enough RAM then it is the most performant option. If you need more RAM and faster networking then the EPYC offer could be better.

    I'll be hosting multiple WordPress websites, Docker, Laravel, etc.

    PHP and WordPress benefits greatly from single core performance, so 7950XD is probrably the better choice

    Thanked by 2DigiGoon dev_vps
  • kendkend Member

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    That is something I've noticed as well, though I was not sure of this before seeing your input.

  • PorlamPorlam Member

    @hyperblast said: whois behind this script?

    It's me. And, I already fixed it problem.

    Thanked by 2hyperblast labze
  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @kend said:

    @labze said:
    Just to add to the Geekbench discussion, do note that Geekbench 5 is a much better indicator for multi-core performance than Geekbench 6. As soon as you go above 4 cores, Geekbench 6 scales terribly.

    Geekbench 5 is more tailored towards server workloads whereas Geekbench 6 was tailored towards desktop PCs and workloads associated with this.

    Fun fact, this 128 core / 256 core beast only barely beats a 16 core / 32 thread 7950XD in Geekbench 6.

    That is something I've noticed as well, though I was not sure of this before seeing your input.

    There are more details about this here http://support.primatelabs.com/discussions/geekbench/81947-lets-talk-about-gb6-mc-benchmark

    Thanked by 2dev_vps kend
Sign In or Register to comment.