Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Skhron hosting provider: Review
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Skhron hosting provider: Review

remyremy Member
edited March 1 in Reviews

Hello :)

Disclaimer:
This VPS was loaned to me free of charge for 3 months.
However, I have nothing to gain from posting positive review.
No promotion, no gift, nothing.

Hosting provider: Skhron @tentor

Specs of the VPS tested:
XSIG-2
2 vCPU (full utilization allowed, continuous usage of 50% for FUP)
2GB DDR4 ECC RAM
72GB RAID10 SSD
1Gbit/s (8TB traffic)
location: Poland, Warsaw

At the time of writing, I've had the server for 75 days.
I used it mainly to test a tool I'm developing. I needed servers in several locations.

Yabs (when I got the server)

Sun Dec 17 05:44:04 PM CET 2023

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
Processor  : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.992 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 71.9 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : HZ Hosting Ltd
ASN        : AS59711 HZ Hosting Ltd
Host       : Skhron
Location   : Warsaw, Mazovia (14)
Country    : Poland

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 169.59 MB/s  (42.3k) | 1.71 GB/s    (26.7k)
Write      | 170.04 MB/s  (42.5k) | 1.72 GB/s    (26.9k)
Total      | 339.64 MB/s  (84.9k) | 3.43 GB/s    (53.7k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 2.17 GB/s     (4.2k) | 2.46 GB/s     (2.4k)
Write      | 2.29 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.62 GB/s     (2.5k)
Total      | 4.47 GB/s     (****8.7k) | 5.08 GB/s     (4.9k)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 961
Multi Core      | 1614
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/4028695

YABS completed in 10 min 1 sec

Yabs (Now)

Fri Mar  1 07:04:46 PM CET 2024

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 75 days, 1 hours, 7 minutes
Processor  : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2199.992 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 3.0 GiB
Disk       : 71.9 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-16-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : HZ Hosting Ltd
ASN        : AS59711 HZ Hosting Ltd
Host       : Skhron
Location   : Warsaw, Mazovia (14)
Country    : Poland

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 174.31 MB/s  (43.5k) | 1.47 GB/s    (23.0k)
Write      | 174.77 MB/s  (43.6k) | 1.48 GB/s    (23.1k)
Total      | 349.08 MB/s  (87.2k) | 2.95 GB/s    (46.2k)
           |                      |
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
Read       | 1.74 GB/s     (3.3k) | 1.83 GB/s     (1.7k)
Write      | 1.83 GB/s     (3.5k) | 1.95 GB/s     (1.9k)
Total      | 3.57 GB/s     (6.9k) | 3.78 GB/s     (3.6k)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 888
Multi Core      | 1534
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/5132906

Network speed

---------------------------- network-speed.xyz ----------------------------
      A simple script to test network performance using speedtest-cli
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Version            : v2024.02.29
 Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash
 Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- network-speed.xyz | bash -s -- -r <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2199.992 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ❌ Disabled
 Total Disk         : 71.9 GB (7.0 GB Used)
 Total RAM          : 1.9 GB (281.6 MB Used)
 Total Swap         : 3.0 GB (5.0 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 75 days, 1 hour 35 min
 Load average       : 0.14, 0.37, 0.74
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 6.1.0-16-amd64
 Virtualization     : KVM
 TCP Control        :
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Primary Network    : IPv6
 IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
 IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
 ISP                : HZ Hosting Ltd
 ASN                : AS59711 HZ Hosting Ltd
 Host               : Skhron
 Location           : Warsaw, Mazovia-14, Poland
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 ISP: HZ Hosting

 Nearest          0.75 ms     0.0%    908.82 Mbps    906.00 Mbps    Skynet DC - Warsaw

 Kochi, IN        270.12 ms   0.0%    543.98 Mbps    408.50 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin
 Bangalore, IN    172.01 ms   0.0%    512.21 Mbps    462.57 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
 Chennai, IN      179.58 ms   N/A     616.73 Mbps    11.43 Mbps     Jio - Chennai
 Mumbai, IN       132.95 ms   0.0%    878.80 Mbps    578.72 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
 Delhi, IN        285.90 ms   0.0%    135.89 Mbps    293.60 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi

 Seattle, US      171.43 ms   N/A     670.65 Mbps    537.82 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA
 Los Angeles, US  150.53 ms   0.0%    824.26 Mbps    599.18 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
 Dallas, US       128.38 ms   0.0%    671.16 Mbps    542.34 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
 Miami, US        FAILED
 New York, US     92.11 ms    0.0%    972.05 Mbps    876.08 Mbps    GSL Networks - New York, NY
 Toronto, CA      103.89 ms   0.0%    889.00 Mbps    818.09 Mbps    Rogers - Toronto, ON
 Mexico City, MX  203.54 ms   N/A     877.84 Mbps    365.75 Mbps    INFINITUM - Mexico City

 London, UK       29.09 ms    0.0%    925.90 Mbps    911.08 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London
 Amsterdam, NL    FAILED
 Paris, FR        FAILED
 Frankfurt, DE    20.91 ms    0.0%    914.04 Mbps    912.15 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
 Warsaw, PL       0.96 ms     0.0%    914.97 Mbps    911.02 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
 Bucharest, RO    36.59 ms    0.0%    908.29 Mbps    915.87 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest
 Moscow, RU       69.57 ms    0.0%    905.97 Mbps    665.76 Mbps    MegaFon - Moscow

 Jeddah, SA       81.75 ms    0.0%    939.43 Mbps    870.90 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
 Dubai, AE        FAILED
 Fujairah, AE     FAILED
 Istanbul, TR     71.46 ms    0.0%    922.02 Mbps    850.56 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul
 Tehran, IR       101.22 ms   0.0%    667.13 Mbps    212.91 Mbps    Asiatech - Tehran

 Tokyo, JP        FAILED
 Shanghai, CU-CN  FAILED
 Nanjing, CT-CN   FAILED
 Hong Kong, CN    241.57 ms   N/A     32.67 Mbps     356.20 Mbps    STC - Hong Kong
 Singapore, SG    179.23 ms   0.0%    657.61 Mbps    491.58 Mbps    i3D.net - Singapore
 Jakarta, ID      211.71 ms   0.0%    815.82 Mbps    376.80 Mbps    PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia - Jakarta
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 743.70 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 603.26 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 23.30 GB
 Total UL Data      : 17.43 GB
 Total Data         : 40.73 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 11 min 53 sec
 System Time        : 01/03/2024 - 19:45:06 CET
 Total Script Runs  : 36911
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.network-speed.xyz/r/1709317221_FBJO0P_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

As I said, I didn't have a constant and heavy workload on this server over the period.
But I've had spikes in usage that don't show any CPU steals. (Hetrix monitoring)

Server stability was very good throughout the period. The server has never restarted since I got it.
However, network uptime has not been perfect, but very good too.
The server has been monitored with hextrixtools, which currently indicates an uptime of 99.9886% (including maintenance window).

This could have been much better, as maintenance was carried out recently. It was scheduled and I was notified by email.
This had an impact on the current month's SLA and an extra day was automatically added.
No need to complain, it's fair play.
99.988%, almost 99.99%. Let's face it, that's pretty good for a service at this price.

What I like:

  • Premium facility: Equinix WA3.
  • Virtfusion panel - Best SaaS panel from my point of view
  • Good support of custom ISOs
  • CPU / RAM disk space ratio. BIG plus point.
  • The founder is quite active in the community. You only have to read a few of his posts to see that he knows what he's doing.
    And above all, he doesn't post just for the sake of his company. That's cool.

  • Stability

What I think could be improved:
Offer a wider range of products
More powerful VPS, the largest plan having only 4Gb of ram. Storage VPS / storage space?

VM-x/AMD-V CPU flags
Not really a problem with cheap offer like this one
But I like to have it on VPS with 8Gb of RAM.

The website could be improved.
Even if this has nothing to do with product quality. It could give more confidence. In my opinion, it's an investment worth making.

I'd love to see Poland moved further west, it would be closer to my audience.
All kidding aside... I mean having more locations.But all that will come in time, I guess.

Definitely recommend if you're looking for a server in this part of Europe.
It's rare to find such recent companies offering such high-quality services.

Comments

  • jenkkijenkki Member

    Reviewing a free VPS is a job requiring self-denial.

  • remyremy Member

    @jenkki said:
    Reviewing a free VPS is a job requiring self-denial.

    I think it's pretty obvious.
    That said, I've tried to be as transparent as possible.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    Deleted @jenkki crap and tidied up the thread.

    Thanked by 4emgh remy shruub xvps
  • zGatozGato Member

    Can vouch for Skhron's reliability for the past few months I've been using them (Since September).

    Only 1 outage which was notified and everyone affected got their service extended (I think it was automatic? didn't bother tbh, shit happens).

    No issues since then. Have only monitored network, as the server is just a proxy and has low CPU and RAM. 20s TCP checks, rock solid.

    Thanked by 2tentor remy
  • tentortentor Member, Patron Provider

    @remy, we are grateful you for serious and responsible attitude to the evaluation of our service. Thank you for taking the time to help us become better.

    What I think could be improved:

    • The website could be improved

    Custom design for our website is currently under development.

    • Offer a wider range of products

    Growing the services list is indeed an important goal, however in our opinion it is much more important to consummate (or get as close as possible to it) for the existing one. Each new product or service has its own aspects that must be accounted as early as at a planning stage.

    • VM-x/AMD-V CPU flags

    Initially, it was planned to add the support for the nested virtualization with an introduction of VDS tariff plan line. This is due to the most common usage scenarios imply constantly high or frequently high load, which could easily violate current Fair use Policy and cause severe performance degradation leading to poor service quality.

    • more locations

    Launching new sites will grant our customers tons of new possibilities, including new services requiring anycast.

    Given that our key priority is reliability, we can't accept risks related to dedicated servers lease, which would enable us to grow Points of Presence amount rapidly. Our guiding principle is quality, not quantity.

    We are glad that in your advice we saw exactly the goals and objectives we have already set for ourselves. This means that we understand our customers correctly and are moving in the right direction.

  • yoyekyoyek Member

    This review helped me to find this service when I was searching for a new VPS in PL. Premium network location (great peerings in PL, stable ping), support responsive and helpful, good performance and stability. Been with them only one month, but so far very happy, especially for the price.

    Thanked by 1remy
  • remyremy Member

    @yoyek said:
    This review helped me to find this service when I was searching for a new VPS in PL. Premium network location (great peerings in PL, stable ping), support responsive and helpful, good performance and stability. Been with them only one month, but so far very happy, especially for the price.

    Glad it was helpful :)

Sign In or Register to comment.