Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


10Gbps Xeon V4 KVM - 1GB/2C/20GB/10Gbps £18/year! Free BGP sessions, unmetered B/W, 4Tbps DDoS prot - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

10Gbps Xeon V4 KVM - 1GB/2C/20GB/10Gbps £18/year! Free BGP sessions, unmetered B/W, 4Tbps DDoS prot

13»

Comments

  • Is there a Windows option?

  • @safakb said:
    Is there a Windows option?

    Yes

  • ID:871

    PLZ,Thx.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    UPDATE:

    After getting my VPS and installing it I of course ran a benchmark ... and the VPS crashed, or more precisely my SSH session did. I contacted @hostaris via PM and they said they'd look at it. After a short (constructive) to/fro via PM ... I've not gotten a response/didn't hear anything from them since days (Nov. 4).

    Is there a problem, hostaris?

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • @jsg said:
    UPDATE:

    After getting my VPS and installing it I of course ran a benchmark ... and the VPS crashed, or more precisely my SSH session did. I contacted @hostaris via PM and they said they'd look at it. After a short (constructive) to/fro via PM ... I've not gotten a response/didn't hear anything from them since days (Nov. 4).

    Is there a problem, hostaris?

    Hey. Not an easy thing to diagnose - we're also not very active on LET in terms of customer service. If you need a quicker response please email me instead at [email protected]

    Regarding the VM, we haven't had any other complaints regarding this, so it's going to take a while to replicate your issue. If you could let me know specifics regarding the benchmark you're using and your OS, that will help us diagnose the issue. It's likely an I/O issue which is not exactly easy to resolve as it could just be case of bad SSDs. If it is an SSD issue I'd be happy to move you temporarily to Ryzen until we can resolve it.

    Sorry about the wait though, we've been very busy recently working on Black Friday offerings, and the rewrite of our billing system.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • @Darkmoon said:
    ID:871

    PLZ,Thx.

    Done. Apologies for the wait.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited November 2023

    After giving @hostaris about a week to resolve the problem I now publish a review. I wish to expressly state that while I see no technical reason for the problem and am certainly not pleased by the communication (which basically didn't exist for the major part of the week) I do not want to accuse hostaris of ill will, ignorance, or other negatives.
    That said, at the end of the day the VPS is - and performs - the way it is/does. Hard data may have diverse reasons but they do not lie.

    This review is based on just 14 runs, which normally I'd consider too meager for a review - but oh well, that's all I've got during the whole week. Look at the data and you'll understand.

    First the system, processor & memory

    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    OS, version: FreeBSD 13.2, Mem.: 990 MB
    CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/79/1
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 25M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16
              pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave
              osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed
              adx smap umip syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm lzcnt
    
    AES? Yes
    Nested Virt.? Yes
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 117.2 - min 41.6 (35.5 %), max 218.7 (186.6 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 345.9 - min 310.1 (89.7 %), max 423.5 (122.4 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 355.3 - min 329.1 (92.6 %), max 406.1 (114.3 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 400.8 - min 334.2 (83.4 %), max 446.4 (111.4 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 49.9 - min 41.6 (83.3 %), max 63.8 (127.7 %)
    

    Please note that this is a dual core E5 v4. I'll be blunt: I've seen stone age E5 v2 and worse (low-power) machines performing significantly better than this VPS. And of course the crypto results are crappy too.

    Now the disk (remember this is an SSD, not spinning rust!)

    --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.20 - min 0.12 (60.2%), max 0.31 (155.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 0.19 - min 0.12 (62.5%), max 0.31 (161.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1.56 - min 0.90 (57.8%), max 3.41 (218.9%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 1.29 - min 0.53 (41.2%), max 2.52 (196.0%)
    --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.19 - min 0.10 (52.3%), max 0.30 (156.9%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 0.21 - min 0.12 (58.0%), max 0.30 (145.0%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1.89 - min 0.75 (39.6%), max 3.61 (190.8%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 1.62 - min 0.63 (38.8%), max 2.88 (177.3%)
    
    --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.49 - min 0.91 (60.9%), max 2.25 (150.7%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1.77 - min 1.23 (69.3%), max 2.77 (156.1%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 361.16 - min 100.93 (27.9%), max 818.22 (226.6%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 15.69 - min 7.67 (48.9%), max 31.66 (201.8%)
    --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.12 - min 0.86 (76.6%), max 1.56 (139.0%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1.08 - min 0.70 (64.9%), max 1.47 (136.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 347.68 - min 102.91 (29.6%), max 744.41 (214.1%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 15.87 - min 5.90 (37.2%), max 38.71 (243.9%)
    
    --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.76 - min 1.32 (74.9%), max 2.71 (153.7%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 3.42 - min 2.03 (59.3%), max 5.19 (151.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 303.62 - min 162.65 (53.6%), max 666.79 (219.6%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 92.80 - min 41.75 (45.0%), max 153.88 (165.8%)
    --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.68 - min 1.06 (62.9%), max 2.40 (142.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 3.15 - min 1.99 (63.1%), max 4.43 (140.5%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 328.15 - min 104.87 (32.0%), max 636.72 (194.0%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 90.62 - min 51.78 (57.1%), max 154.69 (170.7%)
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct - 4k/4t) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.39 - min 0.27 (69.5%), max 1.33 (342.2%)
    IOps             : avg 99.52 - min 67.95 (68.3%), max 341.75 (343.4%)
    

    Pardon me? That kind of performance would be kind of acceptable for an old IDE CF, but even for an old USB2 stick it would not be acceptable; for an "SSD" it's just ridiculous! Hell, each and every crappy "super cheap storage VPS with HDD" I've ever had, including pre Xeon v2 based ones with ridiculously poor spinning rust, were Speed daemons compared to this abomination of a "SSH".

    Finally, connectivity

    --- Europe ---
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 240.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1114.7 (464.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 6.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 8.5 (142.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 229.6 (689.5%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.ams1.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 311.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1538.4 (493.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 6.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 12.2 (182.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 32.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 90.8 (275.9%)
    
    FR PAR ipv4.paris.testdebit.info [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 610.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 744.6 (122.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 15.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 28.6 (187.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 16.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 29.3 (179.7%)
    
    NO OSL ftp.uninett.no [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 262.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 339.8 (129.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 28.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 34.2 (121.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 45.7 (138.0%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 614.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 860.2 (140.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 11.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 17.5 (153.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 18.8 (156.8%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2791.0 - min 1661.3 (59.5%), max 4129.4 (148.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 2.4 - min 0.9 (37.6%), max 13.5 (564.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 19.8 - min 0.9 (4.6%), max 228.2 (1155.4%)
    
    UK LON ftp.uk.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 774.1 - min 607.3 (78.5%), max 859.5 (111.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 0.9 - min 0.6 (66.1%), max 3.3 (363.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 1.1 - min 0.8 (70.0%), max 3.3 (288.7%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 162.6 - min 38.1 (23.4%), max 263.6 (162.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 22.3 - min 22.0 (98.7%), max 23.2 (104.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 25.3 - min 22.3 (88.3%), max 28.0 (110.8%)
    
    RO BUC mirrors.m247.ro [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 140.3 (395.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 47.9 (126.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 39.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.3 (162.0%)
    
    RO BUC mirror.efect.ro [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 199.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 314.2 (157.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 48.4 - min 40.3 (83.3%), max 63.6 (131.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 119.2 - min 40.5 (34.0%), max 604.0 (506.6%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 146.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 225.4 (154.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 37.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 57.1 (154.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 167.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1003.0 (598.8%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 208.0 - min 180.1 (86.6%), max 233.2 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 52.7 - min 45.4 (86.1%), max 55.4 (105.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 63.6 - min 52.8 (83.1%), max 72.3 (113.8%)
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 97.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 116.4 (119.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 87.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.4 (114.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 121.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 254.6 (209.3%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    US NYC nyc.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 81.7 (116.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 70.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 81.7 (116.5%)
    
    US NYC mirror.clarkson.edu [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 15.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.7 (274.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 82.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 103.3 (125.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 86.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 121.1 (140.1%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc2.us.leaseweb.net [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 89.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.0 (161.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 63.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.8 (126.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 90.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 175.1 (193.4%)
    
    US DAL mirror.lstn.net [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 82.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 109.3 (133.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 103.0 - min 102.5 (99.5%), max 107.7 (104.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 114.9 - min 102.7 (89.4%), max 246.0 (214.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 65.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.9 (118.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 139.2 - min 134.3 (96.5%), max 150.7 (108.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 143.2 - min 139.5 (97.4%), max 150.7 (105.3%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 70.4 (146.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 129.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 161.2 (124.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 161.2 (121.8%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 36.7 (190.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 190.6 - min 190.3 (99.8%), max 191.6 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 192.7 - min 190.4 (98.8%), max 197.5 (102.5%)
    
    --- Asia, Oceania ---
    IQ UNK mirror.earthlink.iq [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 69.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 118.5 (169.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 78.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.4 (128.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 142.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 550.4 (386.5%)
    
    IN MUM mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 54.3 - min 40.4 (74.3%), max 58.7 (108.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 201.3 - min 196.6 (97.7%), max 210.7 (104.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 258.9 - min 196.6 (75.9%), max 961.9 (371.5%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.aktkn.sg [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 261.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 310.2 (118.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 261.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 310.2 (118.8%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 25.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.7 (182.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 254.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 415.8 (163.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 265.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 415.8 (156.5%)
    
    CN HK mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.6 (132.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 206.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 246.6 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 305.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1358.9 (444.3%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 225.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 273.4 (121.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 273.4 (121.1%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 6]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 38.2 (191.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 193.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 361.1 (186.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 199.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 361.1 (181.1%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    NG LAG mirror.web4africa.ng [F: 12]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 5.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 65.8 (1300.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 95.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 116.3 (122.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 96.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 127.5 (132.5%)
    
    KE UNK centos.mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.0 (159.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 137.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 165.0 (120.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 207.1 (133.0%)
    

    Finally something not crappy, in fact even really decent. UK, LON almost 2.8 Gb/s, that's really nice (but then within the same city, maybe even within DC, but still, a really nice result). DE, FRA and FR, PAR about 600 Mb/s, nice indeed. Towards the south - and funnily again NL,AMS - performance drops significantly, but still, nothing to complain about and pretty much every target in the 3 digits Mb/s, incl. RU, MOS. And well noted, with a not even €2/month VPS.

    As for across the Atlantic, OK, noticeably below 100 Mb/s to WDC isn't exactly great, but otoh nearly the same to DAL and still about 65 Mb/s to LAX is something I can live well with, especially for the low price.

    As for Asia, oh well, not worth a letter to mom and Africa neither although about 50 Mb/s to Kenia looks quite acceptable.

    TL;DR

    Besides connectivity which for the price one pays is really nice I have a hard time to find a nicer, but still matching the reality, adjective than "crappy" and I wouldn't see a base on which one could argue against a "horribly" being put in front of "crappy", sorry.

    And of bloody course one tries to find an explanation. For one, let's be realistic, there's only so much one can reasonably expect for a bit over €20 (or sth. like $25) per year. That's OK and expected and don't hold it against hostaris that there is a very significant difference between their OP/promo and what one actually gets.

    What I do hold against them though is that it seems they've gone way too far with oversell, uhm, overcrowding that poor node to a, pardon me, brutal extent. The result (also of squeezing way too many VMs on way too few disks) is what the results śhow: A VPS that is so crappy that it's barely usable.

    Unless it turns out that the node has a weird problem and they seriously try - and succeed - to fix it, hostaris is on my (quite short btw) black list of "no renewal, never again" providers, sorry.

  • @jsg said:
    After giving @hostaris about a week to resolve the problem I now publish a review. I wish to expressly state that while I see no technical reason for the problem and am certainly not pleased by the communication (which basically didn't exist for the major part of the week) I do not want to accuse hostaris of ill will, ignorance, or other negatives.
    That said, at the end of the day the VPS is - and performs - the way it is/does. Hard data may have diverse reasons but they do not lie.

    This review is based on just 14 runs, which normally I'd consider too meager for a review - but oh well, that's all I've got during the whole week. Look at the data and you'll understand.

    First the system, processor & memory

    Machine: amd64, Arch.: amd64, Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v4 @ 2.40GHz
    OS, version: FreeBSD 13.2, Mem.: 990 MB
    CPU - Cores: 2, Family/Model/Stepping: 6/79/1
    Cache: 32K/32K L1d/L1i, 256K L2, 25M L3
    Std. Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat
              pse36 cflsh mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss sse3 pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16
              pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline aes xsave
              osxsave avx f16c rdrnd hypervisor
    Ext. Flags: fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed
              adx smap umip syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm lahf_lm lzcnt
    
    AES? Yes
    Nested Virt.? Yes
    HW RNG? Yes
    
    ProcMem SC [MB/s]: avg 117.2 - min 41.6 (35.5 %), max 218.7 (186.6 %)
    ProcMem MA [MB/s]: avg 345.9 - min 310.1 (89.7 %), max 423.5 (122.4 %)
    ProcMem MB [MB/s]: avg 355.3 - min 329.1 (92.6 %), max 406.1 (114.3 %)
    ProcMem AES [MB/s]: avg 400.8 - min 334.2 (83.4 %), max 446.4 (111.4 %)
    ProcMem RSA [kp/s]: avg 49.9 - min 41.6 (83.3 %), max 63.8 (127.7 %)
    

    Please note that this is a dual core E5 v4. I'll be blunt: I've seen stone age E5 v2 and worse (low-power) machines performing significantly better than this VPS. And of course the crypto results are crappy too.

    Now the disk (remember this is an SSD, not spinning rust!)

    --- Disk 4 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.20 - min 0.12 (60.2%), max 0.31 (155.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 0.19 - min 0.12 (62.5%), max 0.31 (161.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1.56 - min 0.90 (57.8%), max 3.41 (218.9%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 1.29 - min 0.53 (41.2%), max 2.52 (196.0%)
    --- Disk 4 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.19 - min 0.10 (52.3%), max 0.30 (156.9%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 0.21 - min 0.12 (58.0%), max 0.30 (145.0%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 1.89 - min 0.75 (39.6%), max 3.61 (190.8%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 1.62 - min 0.63 (38.8%), max 2.88 (177.3%)
    
    --- Disk 64 KB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.49 - min 0.91 (60.9%), max 2.25 (150.7%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1.77 - min 1.23 (69.3%), max 2.77 (156.1%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 361.16 - min 100.93 (27.9%), max 818.22 (226.6%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 15.69 - min 7.67 (48.9%), max 31.66 (201.8%)
    --- Disk 64 KB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.12 - min 0.86 (76.6%), max 1.56 (139.0%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 1.08 - min 0.70 (64.9%), max 1.47 (136.3%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 347.68 - min 102.91 (29.6%), max 744.41 (214.1%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 15.87 - min 5.90 (37.2%), max 38.71 (243.9%)
    
    --- Disk 1 MB - Buffered ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.76 - min 1.32 (74.9%), max 2.71 (153.7%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 3.42 - min 2.03 (59.3%), max 5.19 (151.6%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 303.62 - min 162.65 (53.6%), max 666.79 (219.6%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 92.80 - min 41.75 (45.0%), max 153.88 (165.8%)
    --- Disk 1 MB - Sync/Direct ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 1.68 - min 1.06 (62.9%), max 2.40 (142.5%)
    Write rnd. [MB/s]: avg 3.15 - min 1.99 (63.1%), max 4.43 (140.5%)
    Read seq. [MB/s]:  avg 328.15 - min 104.87 (32.0%), max 636.72 (194.0%)
    Read rnd. [MB/s]:  avg 90.62 - min 51.78 (57.1%), max 154.69 (170.7%)
    --- Disk IOps (Sync/Direct - 4k/4t) ---
    Write seq. [MB/s]: avg 0.39 - min 0.27 (69.5%), max 1.33 (342.2%)
    IOps             : avg 99.52 - min 67.95 (68.3%), max 341.75 (343.4%)
    

    Pardon me? That kind of performance would be kind of acceptable for an old IDE CF, but even for an old USB2 stick it would not be acceptable; for an "SSD" it's just ridiculous! Hell, each and every crappy "super cheap storage VPS with HDD" I've ever had, including pre Xeon v2 based ones with ridiculously poor spinning rust, were Speed daemons compared to this abomination of a "SSH".

    Finally, connectivity

    --- Europe ---
    NL AMS mirror.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 240.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1114.7 (464.6%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 6.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 8.5 (142.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 229.6 (689.5%)
    
    NL AMS mirror.ams1.nl.leaseweb.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 311.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1538.4 (493.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 6.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 12.2 (182.9%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 32.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 90.8 (275.9%)
    
    FR PAR ipv4.paris.testdebit.info [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 610.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 744.6 (122.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 15.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 28.6 (187.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 16.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 29.3 (179.7%)
    
    NO OSL ftp.uninett.no [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 262.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 339.8 (129.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 28.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 34.2 (121.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 33.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 45.7 (138.0%)
    
    DE FRA fra.lg.core-backbone.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 614.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 860.2 (140.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 11.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 17.5 (153.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 12.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 18.8 (156.8%)
    
    UK LON lon.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 2791.0 - min 1661.3 (59.5%), max 4129.4 (148.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 2.4 - min 0.9 (37.6%), max 13.5 (564.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 19.8 - min 0.9 (4.6%), max 228.2 (1155.4%)
    
    UK LON ftp.uk.freebsd.org [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 774.1 - min 607.3 (78.5%), max 859.5 (111.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 0.9 - min 0.6 (66.1%), max 3.3 (363.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 1.1 - min 0.8 (70.0%), max 3.3 (288.7%)
    
    IT MIL speedtest.mil01.softlayer.com [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 162.6 - min 38.1 (23.4%), max 263.6 (162.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 22.3 - min 22.0 (98.7%), max 23.2 (104.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 25.3 - min 22.3 (88.3%), max 28.0 (110.8%)
    
    RO BUC mirrors.m247.ro [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 140.3 (395.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 38.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 47.9 (126.0%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 39.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 64.3 (162.0%)
    
    RO BUC mirror.efect.ro [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 199.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 314.2 (157.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 48.4 - min 40.3 (83.3%), max 63.6 (131.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 119.2 - min 40.5 (34.0%), max 604.0 (506.6%)
    
    GR UNK speedtest.ftp.otenet.gr [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 146.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 225.4 (154.2%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 37.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 57.1 (154.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 167.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1003.0 (598.8%)
    
    RU MOS speedtest.hostkey.ru [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 208.0 - min 180.1 (86.6%), max 233.2 (112.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 52.7 - min 45.4 (86.1%), max 55.4 (105.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 63.6 - min 52.8 (83.1%), max 72.3 (113.8%)
    
    RU SIB mirror.truenetwork.ru [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 97.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 116.4 (119.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 87.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.4 (114.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 121.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 254.6 (209.3%)
    
    --- Americas ---
    US NYC nyc.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 70.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 81.7 (116.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 70.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 81.7 (116.5%)
    
    US NYC mirror.clarkson.edu [F: 7]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 15.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 43.7 (274.4%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 82.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 103.3 (125.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 86.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 121.1 (140.1%)
    
    US WDC mirror.wdc2.us.leaseweb.net [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 89.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 145.0 (161.3%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 63.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.8 (126.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 90.5 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 175.1 (193.4%)
    
    US DAL mirror.lstn.net [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 82.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 109.3 (133.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 103.0 - min 102.5 (99.5%), max 107.7 (104.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 114.9 - min 102.7 (89.4%), max 246.0 (214.1%)
    
    US LAX la.speedtest.clouvider.net [F: 1]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 65.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 77.9 (118.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 139.2 - min 134.3 (96.5%), max 150.7 (108.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 143.2 - min 139.5 (97.4%), max 150.7 (105.3%)
    
    US SJC speedtest.sjc01.softlayer.com [F: 3]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 48.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 70.4 (146.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 129.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 161.2 (124.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 132.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 161.2 (121.8%)
    
    BR SAO speedtest.sao01.softlayer.com [F: 5]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 36.7 (190.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 190.6 - min 190.3 (99.8%), max 191.6 (100.5%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 192.7 - min 190.4 (98.8%), max 197.5 (102.5%)
    
    --- Asia, Oceania ---
    IQ UNK mirror.earthlink.iq [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 69.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 118.5 (169.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 78.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 100.4 (128.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 142.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 550.4 (386.5%)
    
    IN MUM mirrors.piconets.webwerks.in [F: 0]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 54.3 - min 40.4 (74.3%), max 58.7 (108.1%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 201.3 - min 196.6 (97.7%), max 210.7 (104.7%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 258.9 - min 196.6 (75.9%), max 961.9 (371.5%)
    
    SG SGP mirror.aktkn.sg [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 261.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 310.2 (118.8%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 261.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 310.2 (118.8%)
    
    JP TOK speedtest.tokyo2.linode.com [F: 4]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 25.6 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.7 (182.8%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 254.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 415.8 (163.4%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 265.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 415.8 (156.5%)
    
    CN HK mirrors.xtom.hk [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 35.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 46.6 (132.9%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 206.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 246.6 (119.6%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 305.8 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 1358.9 (444.3%)
    
    CN HK mirror.hk.leaseweb.net [F: 13]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 0.0 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 0.0 (0.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 225.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 273.4 (121.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 225.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 273.4 (121.1%)
    
    AU MEL speedtest.c1.mel1.dediserve.com [F: 6]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 19.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 38.2 (191.7%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 193.9 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 361.1 (186.2%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 199.4 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 361.1 (181.1%)
    
    --- Africa ---
    NG LAG mirror.web4africa.ng [F: 12]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 5.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 65.8 (1300.0%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 95.3 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 116.3 (122.1%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 96.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 127.5 (132.5%)
    
    KE UNK centos.mirror.liquidtelecom.com [F: 2]
      DL [Mb/s]:      avg 50.2 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 80.0 (159.5%)
      Ping [ms]:      avg 137.1 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 165.0 (120.3%)
      Web ping [ms]:  avg 155.7 - min 0.0 (0.0%), max 207.1 (133.0%)
    

    Finally something not crappy, in fact even really decent. UK, LON almost 2.8 Gb/s, that's really nice (but then within the same city, maybe even within DC, but still, a really nice result). DE, FRA and FR, PAR about 600 Mb/s, nice indeed. Towards the south - and funnily again NL,AMS - performance drops significantly, but still, nothing to complain about and pretty much every target in the 3 digits Mb/s, incl. RU, MOS. And well noted, with a not even €2/month VPS.

    As for across the Atlantic, OK, noticeably below 100 Mb/s to WDC isn't exactly great, but otoh nearly the same to DAL and still about 65 Mb/s to LAX is something I can live well with, especially for the low price.

    As for Asia, oh well, not worth a letter to mom and Africa neither although about 50 Mb/s to Kenia looks quite acceptable.

    TL;DR

    Besides connectivity which for the price one pays is really nice I have a hard time to find a nicer, but still matching the reality, adjective than "crappy" and I wouldn't see a base on which one could argue against a "horribly" being put in front of "crappy", sorry.

    And of bloody course one tries to find an explanation. For one, let's be realistic, there's only so much one can reasonably expect for a bit over €20 (or sth. like $25) per year. That's OK and expected and don't hold it against hostaris that there is a very significant difference between their OP/promo and what one actually gets.

    What I do hold against them though is that it seems they've gone way too far with oversell, uhm, overcrowding that poor node to a, pardon me, brutal extent. The result (also of squeezing way too many VMs on way too few disks) is what the results śhow: A VPS that is so crappy that it's barely usable.

    Unless it turns out that the node has a weird problem and they seriously try - and succeed - to fix it, hostaris is on my (quite short btw) black list of "no renewal, never again" providers, sorry.

    Hey,

    We aren't overselling on these, I have attached a screenshot of our allocation on the node you're on. We've checked usage on the hypervisor and it is considerably low. As I said in my previous comment it does look like the hypervisor has an issue - we're going to replace the drives on Saturday via migration to another machine at around 6PM - you'll get the info via email. Hopefully this will fix the issues you're experiencing.

    Very sorry for the inconvenience and miscommunication regarding this, it's been a very busy week for us.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @hostaris said:
    We aren't overselling on these, I have attached a screenshot of our allocation on the node you're on. We've checked usage on the hypervisor and it is considerably low. As I said in my previous comment it does look like the hypervisor has an issue - we're going to replace the drives on Saturday via migration to another machine at around 6PM - you'll get the info via email. Hopefully this will fix the issues you're experiencing.

    Very sorry for the inconvenience and miscommunication regarding this, it's been a very busy week for us.

    [screenshot]

    Well, I can only test what I've got and I had and have zero ill will.

    And while I'm somewhat bewildered by a provider running a node with, serious it seems, hypervisor problems, I'm certainly willing and would in fact be pleased to restart my testing once you tell me that the node is fully (and well, I hope) working.

    No sweat, just do what needs to be done. I'll just wait a few more days ;)

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
Sign In or Register to comment.