All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
HAZI.ro | VPS Servers cheaper than ever, even without a promotional code
FlorinMarian
Member, Host Rep
Hello!
There is not much to say, the new prices speak for themselves 
VPS Standard SSD
- Location: Romania
- CPU: 2x vCPU 2.40GHz ↗ 3.30GHz
- Memory: 4GB DDR4 ECC
- Storage: SSD 120GB
- Network: 1Gbps (Shared)
- Free Backups: Yes (Daily)
- Price: €7.50 €3.50 Monthly (+1€ for IPv4)
- URL: VPS Standard SSD
VPS Advanced SSD
- Location: Romania
- CPU: 4x vCPU 2.40GHz ↗ 3.30GHz
- Memory: 8GB DDR4 ECC
- Storage: SSD 240GB
- Network: 1Gbps (Shared)
- Free Backups: Yes (Daily)
- Price: €15.00 €8.00 Monthly (+1€ for IPv4)
- URL: VPS Advanced SSD
VPS Storage Basic
- Location: Romania
- CPU: 1x vCPU 2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz
- Memory: 1GB DDR4 ECC
- Storage: 1TB
- Network: 1Gbps (Shared)
- Price: €5.00 €3.00 Monthly (+1€ for IPv4)
- URL: VPS Basic Storage
VPS Storage Standard
- Location: Romania
- CPU: 2x vCPU 2.30GHz ↗ 3.60GHz
- Memory: 2GB DDR4 ECC
- Storage: 2TB
- Network: 1Gbps (Shared)
- Price: €10.00 €7.00 Monthly (+1€ for IPv4)
- URL: VPS Storage Standard
2vCPU - 4GB RAM - 40GB NVMe
- Location: Germany
- CPU: 2x vCPU 3.90GHz ↗ 4.50GHz
- Memory: 4GB DDR4 ECC
- Storage: 40GB SSD NVMe
- Network: 1Gbps (Shared)
- AntiDDoS: OVH Game
- **Take advantage of the power offered by AMD Ryzen processors.
- Price: €10.00 €8.00 Monthly
- URL: 2vCPU - 4GB RAM - 40GB NVMe
Included With all these plans:
- Root Access
- KVM Virtualization
- AntiDDoS Protection (Best-effort)
- Dedicated IPv4 + IPv6/64
- Redundant SSD Storage (RAID10) (VPS SSD)
- Redundant SAS Storage (RAIDZ-3) + SSD Caching (VPS Storage)
Operating Systems:
- AlmaLinux 8
- AlmaLinux 9
- CentOS 7 64bits
- CentOS 8 Stream 64bits
- CentOS 9 Stream 64bits
- Debian 10 64bits
- Debian 11 64bits
- Debian 12 64bits
- Ubuntu 18.04 64bits
- Ubuntu 20.04 64bits
- Ubuntu 22.04 64bits
- FreeBSD 12.x 32bits
- FreeBSD 12.x 64bits
- FreeBSD 13.x 32bits
- FreeBSD 13.x 64bits
Useful information:
Accepted payment methods:
- Credit/Debit Card (Visa / Maestro / Mastercard)
- Paysafecard
- Bitcoin
- Bitcoin Cash
- Ethereum
- Litecoin
- Monero
- ApeCoin
- Dogecoin
- Shiba Inu
- Polygon
Comments
How long is this price valid for?
Forever.
Forever&Ever™
Go go gazi!
Wasn't your last offer thread 5 days ago and is against the rules?
Last offer thread was on October 16.
If you found another one newer than that, please share with us that URL:)
Nevermind.
the rules has changed now
VPS Advanced should be priced less than 2x VPS Standard
10 days and this thread was posted on the 10th. Allowed after 10...nevermind
Thanks for the feedback, but that's not how we structure our prices.
@FlorinMarian
Would you provide OVH Singapore products? Some of my Chinese friends would like to consult
Hey!
I don't think so, OVH's offer is not on my taste.
60MB -> 500Mbps, it's unacceptable to share a 1Gbps port with other users and constantly use that much bandwidth, but some don't want to read the AUP (acceptable use policy) or try their luck with VPSs at 3 EUR but with resources consumed at the dedicated server level.
Two comments:
I was joking bruh! chill
You can find it in the "Terms of Service" under "Resource usage". So yes not in the AUP but the terms.
Hey!
After updating the Lagom version, we managed to restore payment through Stripe, especially for the automatic service extension feature.
Sorry the first basic VPS Standard SSD is showing 4.50 euros / month
Price: €7.50 €3.50 Monthly (+1€ for IPv4)
What's wrong?
Please check the price.
if you want price €3.50, you can select
no IPv4 -IPv6 onlyinIP AddressesoptionsEven though he wrote that Dedicated IPv4 + IPv6/64 is included in all plans, he charges separately for ipv4, this is an old Romanian trick, just ignore such providers
I mean, that still doesn't define "excessive use of resources".
However, only a month ago, Florian posted this offer: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/189011/hazi-ro-vps-ssd-2-15-eur-mo-vps-storage-3-00-eur-mo-unlimited-bandwidth
Even aside from the title including "UNLIMITED" in capitals, the offer starts with:
In this photo, someone has been using approximately half of maximum capacity for a few hours. According to the clearest rules he's posted so far, they aren't breaking any rules.
Of course, I agree these rules are stupid but so is his advertising. He has an extremely constrained uplink, but he's advertising it as if every VPS has 1G available to it. He's also boasted that he has 300 customers sharing this 1G port, so in reality each user only has 3Mbps fair share. He's just been lucky so far that nobody is really using his VPS for anything serious and just idling instead.
Also, rather than passive-aggressive posting a screenshot of bandwidth usage and expecting sympathy, maybe he should learn the basics of traffic shaping. One simple example: give every user a guaranteed 10Mbps and any packets in excess of that end up in some pool that gets fair share based on what's left over. Less simple: one pool for "unrestricted" that gets priority over another pool for "high users". Anyone who uses e.g. over 250Mbps for more than 5 minutes gets moved to the low priority pool and they move back after 5 minutes of lower bandwidth usage.
But the reality is that his planning is predicated on only having idlers. Even if you ignore that top user, the next 4 of his 300 customers are using about 100Mbps each. If that doubles his pipe will be full, even if he's already got rid of the customer he's complaining about.
Or you know, just re-instate the sensible traffic limit of 10TB/month. There's a reason almost every provider does it this way.
Thanks for heads up.
It is clearly stated in this topic what you pay for what, where is the trick?
That makes sense. I agree with you. There is lack of clarity regarding bandwidth usage.
@ralf Bandwidth is a very complex subject because probably 90% of the providers on the LET would disappear if each customer used 100% of the allocated resources (even those that are sold as dedicated such as vCPU or guaranteed bandwidth).
I was amazed to find out that even the DC where I had colocation only has 20Gbps, although they only have direct clients with over 2000 VPS servers, and that bandwidth is also very expensive at 3000 EUR for 10Gbps RCS-RDS.
How could you allow someone to consume monthly traffic of 125 EUR when in the 5-10 EUR you pay you have to cover other expenses and make a profit?
In the case of the client above, we do not cancel his service, but we also cannot tolerate such consumption for how much money he pays.
Isn't this a problem with all providers? Why abuse the terms and offer something where you have no control or mislead customers?
Is it customers fault to learn there is unlimited offerings (with no clarity in tos/ aup) and then play the cost card that one cannot expect to abuse it?
How is it abuse if the advertisement is not listing anything?
All providers need to be more prudent and make life easy for themselves and customers by having clear policy
Else there will not be anything good left for anyone.
My goal is not to deceive my clients, that's why we currently offer equal rates for both monthly and annual payments, so you don't have to regret paying for a service you can't enjoy as you would hoped
Then, why do we providers do this.. well, how to express in simple words "it's a problem if for 3 EUR you consume traffic of 10 EUR month after month, but there is no problem if you pay 50 EUR monthly and consume traffic of 100 of euros occasionally"?
I answered earlier.
The terms and conditions + AUP induce the previously mentioned idea, as I said before, it is not easy to express in simple words that you rely on the good faith of your clients.
It would be nice, but at least at this moment I haven't found a happier formula to express the basic idea.
This directly contradicts the way you open that offer though.
You don't. You give them a sensible limit, like the 10TB you had before, you don't tell them "it's unlimited, do whatever you like".
You even told someone in the same thread it was OK to run a seedbox. Why would you do that, if you're then going to quibble as soon as someone using half of what you'd said was fine.
Sure, most people don't use anywhere near their bandwidth allowance. But this is why you have a sensible limit per customer. Sure, they might max out the 1G port occasionally, but as long as they stay within their 10TB allowance, you can cope with 33 people doing that on a 1G port, but knowing that realistically it's probably fine for 50 or 100 people.
The difference between their situation and yours though, is that you are advertising that all clients can use unlimited data on a 1G port, but you only have a 1G uplink yourself, so you have no contingency.
With their 20G uplink, they probably keep 10% spare capacity to handle peak loads, so if a couple of clients suddenly maxed out at 1G, nobody else would be affected. And if their clients were sticking within their agreed limits but the spare capacity was always close to being used up, they could increase their uplink capacity a little (maybe another 1-2G) and not have it cost the Earth for the size of their customer base.
The point is that YOU know there is a limit at what you think is reasonable. Advertise that, or a lower limit, don't say it's unlimited and then whine about it when people use more than you think they should. You won't do that, of course, because you know the deal sounds better when you say unlimited.