Is Speedypage reliable? How does it compare with OVH/Hetzner cloud?

febryanvaldo

@labze said: For many people, location is important and these locations often come at a premium. You'd be hard pressed to find providers with the same performance at the same location as Speedypage.

Agreed, especially for the Singapore and Tokyo.

JasonM

@maverick said: 10G networking a must, and at a good price, too

even I'm looking for 10G servers in UK/Asia locations.

sayyiku

I purchased one of their 7950x and 5950x and had a very ok experience

EthanZou

@Carlin0 said:
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/183724/speedypage-upgrades-vps-without-cost-increase
@sayyiku said:
I purchased one of their 7950x and 5950x and had a very ok experience

Stable? what's the CPU usage?

Carlin0

@EthanZou said:
Stable? what's the CPU usage?

extremely stable
about CPU usage: I have never been interested in it, ask @speedypage

EthanZou

@Carlin0 said:

@EthanZou said:
Stable? what's the CPU usage?

extremely stable
about CPU usage: I have never been interested in it, ask @speedypage

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3646448/#Comment_3646448

Carlin0

@EthanZou said:

@Carlin0 said:

@EthanZou said:
Stable? what's the CPU usage?

extremely stable
about CPU usage: I have never been interested in it, ask @speedypage

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3646448/#Comment_3646448

My VPS hasn’t had a problem in months... maybe it’s on another server

PS: A problem can happen to everyone, but as you see they are very careful to quickly restore

EthanZou

https://kangserver.id/benchmark-vps-hetzner-2-core-amd-2gb-ram-harga-4-35-euro-2023/
Is this one good? for laravel or wordpress? @febryanvaldo

febryanvaldo

@EthanZou said: Is this one good? for laravel or wordpress? @febryanvaldo

It's above average, surely Hetzner is one of the best provider that i have benchmarked.

EthanZou

@febryanvaldo said:

@EthanZou said: Is this one good? for laravel or wordpress? @febryanvaldo

It's above average, surely Hetzner is one of the best provider that i have benchmarked.

Good enough for laravel or wordpress?

Advin

Having used both at some point of time, both are pretty great options. With SpeedyPage, you get way more personalized support and way better CPU performance than Hetzner. With Hetzner, you get access to their cloud platform with features like hourly billing, snapshots, block storage, etc. Both will be great options for whatever you plan on running on them.

If you want Ryzen or way better single core performance & don't care about the other cloud features, I would go with the SpeedyPage option. They use some very premium Ryzen CPU's. Both options will do fine with Laravel or Wordpress.

EthanZou

@Advin said: Both options will do fine with Laravel or Wordpress.

Many thanks for your guide! So Hetzner cloud is good enough for these PHP Web Apps?

EthanZou

@febryanvaldo said:

@a_username said: No, Speedypage is not comparable to professional companies like Hetzner Cloud.

Yes, ofcourse we cannot compare SpeedyPage with Hetzner, because Hetzner is one of the biggest hosting company, manage and also own a datacenters.

At least compare Hetzner with something like LeaseWeb.

It seems that SpeedyPage is bigger than LeaseWeb?

fluffernutter

@EthanZou said:

@febryanvaldo said:

@a_username said: No, Speedypage is not comparable to professional companies like Hetzner Cloud.

Yes, ofcourse we cannot compare SpeedyPage with Hetzner, because Hetzner is one of the biggest hosting company, manage and also own a datacenters.

At least compare Hetzner with something like LeaseWeb.

It seems that SpeedyPage is bigger than LeaseWeb?

this is just marketing bullshit, leaseweb has 10tbps of direct transit + peering. I'd be surprised if speedypage had more than 40gbit of bandwidth committed, they're just saying that their upstreams have a combined 14tbps of bandwidth (which IMO is dishonest). I love speedypage but this is a little weird.

speedypage

Thank you for the feedback.

We will update the About Us page to have more accurate information in the next couple of days. We mentioned earlier on that parts of the site need to be updated, and this is one of them.

Personally, that number is completely useless and isn't representative of anything in the real world. It was likely put there just to add something to the page when it was originally being made. Fully agree that it should be removed (and it will be). FYI, we have much more than 40G! @fluffernutter - our UK setup alone has 80Gbit of capacity.

fluffernutter

@speedypage said:
Thank you for the feedback.

We will update the About Us page to have more accurate information in the next couple of days. We mentioned earlier on that parts of the site need to be updated, and this is one of them.

Personally, that number is completely useless and isn't representative of anything in the real world. It was likely put there just to add something to the page when it was originally being made. Fully agree that it should be removed (and it will be). FYI, we have much more than 40G! @fluffernutter - our UK setup alone has 80Gbit of capacity.

Yeah I assume you have much more burst capacity, I was talking about committed bandwidth (unless you have 80g committed in UK, in which case congrats on the growth!!) Glad to see the honesty though, very happy with my services and I'll probably continue to be for a while.

EthanZou

@fluffernutter said: I'll probably continue to be for a while.

For what and why?

fluffernutter

@EthanZou said:

@fluffernutter said: I'll probably continue to be for a while.

For what and why?

I have a shared hosting plan in the UK, it works well.

nfn

I regret to post the previous comment in this thread ... they are not reliable (shared hosting) and this uptime is not acceptable:

EthanZou

@nfn said:
I regret to post the previous comment in this thread ... they are not reliable (shared hosting) and this uptime is not acceptable:

Oh, no, my pity!

sasslik

Also SG and US are not very good..