Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Njal.la SCAM - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Njal.la SCAM

13

Comments

  • Domain is not my problem ,problem is my account fund.They not provide any service and i cant withdrawal the money from their account.

  • @sujeet said:
    Domain is not my problem ,problem is my account fund.They not provide any service and i cant withdrawal the money from their account.

    The problem is you hosting illegal content and making money from it. You are dirty.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited January 2023

    @LTniger said:

    @sujeet said:
    Domain is not my problem ,problem is my account fund.They not provide any service and i cant withdrawal the money from their account.

    The problem is you hosting illegal content and making money from it. You are dirty.

    He has not admitted to anything.
    His story appears to match with previous controversies of big porn sites which are not his problem. I would be careful with accusing people of crimes as serve without a proper evidence.

  • @sandoz said:

    @stefeman said:
    Revenge porn is good enough reason to get blocked. Its not plain DMCA that's easy to ignore. Theres almost always a law enforcement case or investigation ongoing, and they don't want to be part of it.. And its just vile.

    Njal.la is operated by thepiratebay guys, and thats all the reputation which they really need. I don't care about reviews myself and will continue to use them.

    Who uploaded for the first time the "revenge porn" is the guilty.

    Those investigation that are going on. Are probably people who shared and didn't know about that.

    Do you think ALL people knows when some photo or video is a revenge porn or not? We should be sued for that? That is ridiculous. I may understand the part the girl.

    But I don't agree to jail everyone or sue everyone who shared that. You can share something without knowing right? This happens a lot.

    Who doesn't have a group with friends and they share some photo of girl ? Even if is nudes or not you can't know if is revenge porn or not for each single photo they send.

    That is what I hate. Putting everyone in the same bag. The only guilty there is who leaked for the first time.

    I say more there are girls that know that are being recording and they don't care until they leak. That is also fault of the girl! No matter What. Use the fucking brain to know that they can and they might leak it sometime.

    Doesn't have nothing to do with trust. But yes from privacy and security. Who are the fucking retard girl or boy that doesn't know that someone can do screenshot? They know BOTH! But both act like a fool...

    It's the same as stolen property. If you buy something stolen and thought it was legit, it doesn't fucking matter, you're in possession of stolen item, it could never be legally sold to you or become your property.

    And then you end things with victim blaming. Fuck off.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited January 2023

    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

  • overall, we can conclude that Njal.la is not to be recommended.

  • @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    Thanked by 1treesmokah
  • @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

  • @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited January 2023

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    It doesen't make it any more legal lmao, youre just stealing their mirrors and using your own ads with your website. Hence why I said the OP was lazy.

    These websites do not benefit anything from other sites mirroring their uploads. Any ads shown in the embeded videoplayers belong to cryptolockers and filehosters, rather than the site you are sourcing the mirrors from. They too, use website ads to make revenue. They don't want you to mirror their content because the videoplayer links will just die faster due to DMCA bots which use your website.

    Only one that benefits is the cryptolocker hosting that video for both sites untill its taken down by DMCA. Meanwhile OP gets fucked in the ass by registant due to un-moderated content, and the original site will just delete the videos when reported.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least spend more money than just a domain and some 15 USD/m VPS. This entire operation of yours looks like some low quality indian cash grab. Youre outsourcing the video playback and content and you do nothing yourself. Of course it's gonna fucking fail lol. Next time it could be illegal content rather than revenge porn if you just copy everything from xvideos or xhamster.

    Don't cry if your not putting in any effort yourself.

  • sandozsandoz Veteran
    edited January 2023

    @stefeman said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    It doesen't make it any more legal lmao, youre just stealing their mirrors and using your own ads with your website. Hence why I said the OP was lazy.

    These websites do not benefit anything from other sites mirroring their uploads. Any ads shown in the embeded videoplayers belong to cryptolockers and filehosters, rather than the site you are sourcing the mirrors from. They too, use website ads to make revenue. They don't want you to mirror their content because the videoplayer links will just die faster due to DMCA bots which use your website.

    Only one that benefits is the cryptolocker hosting that video for both sites untill its taken down by DMCA. Meanwhile OP gets fucked in the ass by registant due to un-moderated content, and the original site will just delete the videos when reported.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least spend more money than just a domain and some 15 USD/m VPS. This entire operation of yours looks like some low quality indian cash grab. Youre outsourcing the video playback and content and you do nothing yourself. Of course it's gonna fucking fail lol. Next time it could be illegal content rather than revenge porn if you just copy everything from xvideos or xhamster.

    Don't cry if your not putting in any effort yourself.

    Stop being a little boy. Those hoes are recording and sending to their crap boyfriend or friend. Then she realizes that have been leaked. And uses a fucking excuse of "they are criminals they leaked my content" for each owner of websites.

    Who did the photo? That is the first question. If she did the photo and send to people like friends or close friends or boyfriend who is the fault?

    Stop your shitting arguments. Both have responsabilities. Now a days most girls want to escape from their responsabilities. That make me laugh.

    Which excuse they use? Non-sense excuses. Ohhh Dear Stefeman sorry if your hoes that you care soo much doesn't know What is a recording and screenshots. That must be a old generation.

    Smartphones are new in 2022. Sorry I didn't know about that :(

    One thing is something recording her without permission, another is she recording herself and sending it to someone or a bunch of friends (this happens a lot) how you think that will end?

    You live in a fantasy world. Where all people are good and doesn't go leak anything. Wake up stefeman, take the red pill.

    Your arguments are stupid and Non-sense. Go cry. Don't take this personally. I can draw a meme for you. Could be more easy?


    Sorry to tell you the truth. I know it hurts. But Maybe you should stay in your red pills.
    Ok stefemale, stayaman.. Stefeman. My keyword have some issues sometimes.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited January 2023

    Go watch more Andrew Tate :D

    The issue is not revenge porn, its the fact that the OP is an idiot and could be displaying child porn next time because his operation methods are retarded and he has no control over his own website because he is lazy and wants to get rich fast.

  • @stefeman said:
    Go watch more Andrew Tate :D

    The issue is not revenge porn, its the fact that the OP is an idiot and could be displaying child porn next time because his operation methods are retarded and he has no control over his own website because he is lazy and wants to get rich fast.

    Embeding of xvideos is completly legal and not against their tos or the embed they offer would be pretty pointless wouldn't it be? If the content itself is illegal that is the problem of the uploader and hoster and not of a site embeding stuff.
    So the idiot in this case is you and LTniger because you seem to have no clue what you are talking about.

  • @treesmokah said: He was proxying videos from big porn sites, most of which require KYC to post.

    Its not OP's problem, but the "upstream

    agree. Also, even if it is revenge porn, domain registrar like Njal.la has no right to block funds of their customers' account. They can de-activate a domain but why account? This shows Njal.la could be a scam in certain peoples pov.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited January 2023

    @user54321 said:

    @stefeman said:
    Go watch more Andrew Tate :D

    The issue is not revenge porn, its the fact that the OP is an idiot and could be displaying child porn next time because his operation methods are retarded and he has no control over his own website because he is lazy and wants to get rich fast.

    Embeding of xvideos is completly legal and not against their tos or the embed they offer would be pretty pointless wouldn't it be? If the content itself is illegal that is the problem of the uploader and hoster and not of a site embeding stuff.
    So the idiot in this case is you and LTniger because you seem to have no clue what you are talking about.

    Its OPs problem because hes so fucking lazy that he embedds the stuff in the first place and is therefore not in control of what hes displaying.

    Did you even read before typing?

    You either host and manage your own library, or then you get ur domain from PRD or Rebel.com if you want to mirror revenge porn and cheese pizza from xhamster and xvideos as they dont seem to care about abuse at all.

    If you want to do it proper way, use your own files which you have double checked to be reputable, and use some open source html5 player that you can host ur own ads in it.

    Im just dissing OP for getting the absolute cheapest and most lazy setup and then complaining cuz he paid to njal.la thats only used for warez sites mostly as the admins are all far left and unpredictable outside warez and/or privacy focused stuff.

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited January 2023

    @JasonM said:

    @treesmokah said: He was proxying videos from big porn sites, most of which require KYC to post.

    Its not OP's problem, but the "upstream

    agree. Also, even if it is revenge porn, domain registrar like Njal.la has no right to block funds of their customers' account. They can de-activate a domain but why account? This shows Njal.la could be a scam in certain peoples pov.

    Njal.la owns the domain as per their terms of service. They can do absolutely anything with it. Youre just paying for them to be a shield and handle the domain. You only have usage rights to A record for as long as they allow you to.

    Its basically donation where you buy them a domain. Allegedly this is some kind of way to dodge some stuff which you cannot do with private whois.

    Their ToS is batshit insane, so whatever you host needs to match their ideals.

    If you want to stay in control but still have max privacy, use https://sarek.fi/ instead. This is from Peter Sunde, founder of Thepiratebay, not the current crew which operates njal.la

  • @stefeman said:
    If you want to stay in control but still have max privacy, use https://sarek.fi/ instead. This is from Peter Sunde, founder of Thepiratebay, not the current crew which operates njal.la

    I don't see anything special in Sarek's TOS https://sarek.fi/tos/ which could differentiate them from another registrar, what in your opinion makes Sarek interesting?

  • DPDP Administrator, The Domain Guy

    @quicksilver03 said:

    @stefeman said:
    If you want to stay in control but still have max privacy, use https://sarek.fi/ instead. This is from Peter Sunde, founder of Thepiratebay, not the current crew which operates njal.la

    I don't see anything special in Sarek's TOS https://sarek.fi/tos/ which could differentiate them from another registrar, what in your opinion makes Sarek interesting?

    Well, they're two separate registrars, owned by brokep, so there might not be anything "special" about Sarek as compared to Njal.la.

    Njal.la for gTLDs and Sarek is what they use for ccTLDs.

    I could be wrong but that's how I've always thought about it.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited January 2023

    @DP said:

    @quicksilver03 said:

    @stefeman said:
    If you want to stay in control but still have max privacy, use https://sarek.fi/ instead. This is from Peter Sunde, founder of Thepiratebay, not the current crew which operates njal.la

    I don't see anything special in Sarek's TOS https://sarek.fi/tos/ which could differentiate them from another registrar, what in your opinion makes Sarek interesting?

    Well, they're two separate registrars, owned by brokep, so there might not be anything "special" about Sarek as compared to Njal.la.

    Njal.la for gTLDs and Sarek is what they use for ccTLDs.

    I could be wrong but that's how I've always thought about it.

    Njalla uses a mix of Sarek(Enom) and Enom. Njalla is basically a tucows reseller.
    They had problems caused by it in the past when someone forged a court order and sent it directly to tucows which turned domains to the scammer.
    https://njal.la/blog/hijack/

    These domains were onion.live and dark.fail (Tor resources).

  • inlandinland Member
    edited January 2023

    @DRamza said:

    @sandoz said:

    @inland said:

    I really want to know what kind of content you have to host in order to rack up enough abuse reports to permaban your entire account within 15 days of registering the domain.

    Do you work for Njal.la? One guy also come to a forum saying what the OP did... Not surprised if someone of njal.la comes here and tells the truth.

    To think that on the other side of the world, there is a piss-poor MJJ so obsessed about a random fucking kid from the Netherlands that his own brain's recollection of events got wiped clean and replaced by tinyweasel's trivia. This is batshit insane. I sincerely hope you find the help you need.

  • @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    That's textbook copyright infringement. Were you a hardcore plagiarist in school?

  • @user54321 said:

    @stefeman said:
    Go watch more Andrew Tate :D

    The issue is not revenge porn, its the fact that the OP is an idiot and could be displaying child porn next time because his operation methods are retarded and he has no control over his own website because he is lazy and wants to get rich fast.

    Embeding of xvideos is completly legal and not against their tos or the embed they offer would be pretty pointless wouldn't it be? If the content itself is illegal that is the problem of the uploader and hoster and not of a site embeding stuff.
    So the idiot in this case is you and LTniger because you seem to have no clue what you are talking about.

    From xvideos Terms of Service:

    you will use the Website solely for personal and non-commercial purposes;

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited January 2023

    @TimboJones said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    That's textbook copyright infringement. Were you a hardcore plagiarist in school?

    Its not. Have you been around when Warez was popular and copycucks were harmless?

  • @sandoz said:

    @stefeman said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    It doesen't make it any more legal lmao, youre just stealing their mirrors and using your own ads with your website. Hence why I said the OP was lazy.

    These websites do not benefit anything from other sites mirroring their uploads. Any ads shown in the embeded videoplayers belong to cryptolockers and filehosters, rather than the site you are sourcing the mirrors from. They too, use website ads to make revenue. They don't want you to mirror their content because the videoplayer links will just die faster due to DMCA bots which use your website.

    Only one that benefits is the cryptolocker hosting that video for both sites untill its taken down by DMCA. Meanwhile OP gets fucked in the ass by registant due to un-moderated content, and the original site will just delete the videos when reported.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least spend more money than just a domain and some 15 USD/m VPS. This entire operation of yours looks like some low quality indian cash grab. Youre outsourcing the video playback and content and you do nothing yourself. Of course it's gonna fucking fail lol. Next time it could be illegal content rather than revenge porn if you just copy everything from xvideos or xhamster.

    Don't cry if your not putting in any effort yourself.

    Stop being a little boy. Those hoes are recording and sending to their crap boyfriend or friend. Then she realizes that have been leaked. And uses a fucking excuse of "they are criminals they leaked my content" for each owner of websites.

    Who did the photo? That is the first question. If she did the photo and send to people like friends or close friends or boyfriend who is the fault?

    Stop your shitting arguments. Both have responsabilities. Now a days most girls want to escape from their responsabilities. That make me laugh.

    Which excuse they use? Non-sense excuses. Ohhh Dear Stefeman sorry if your hoes that you care soo much doesn't know What is a recording and screenshots. That must be a old generation.

    Smartphones are new in 2022. Sorry I didn't know about that :(

    One thing is something recording her without permission, another is she recording herself and sending it to someone or a bunch of friends (this happens a lot) how you think that will end?

    You live in a fantasy world. Where all people are good and doesn't go leak anything. Wake up stefeman, take the red pill.

    Fucking incel.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited January 2023

    @TimboJones said:

    @user54321 said:

    @stefeman said:
    Go watch more Andrew Tate :D

    The issue is not revenge porn, its the fact that the OP is an idiot and could be displaying child porn next time because his operation methods are retarded and he has no control over his own website because he is lazy and wants to get rich fast.

    Embeding of xvideos is completly legal and not against their tos or the embed they offer would be pretty pointless wouldn't it be? If the content itself is illegal that is the problem of the uploader and hoster and not of a site embeding stuff.
    So the idiot in this case is you and LTniger because you seem to have no clue what you are talking about.

    From xvideos Terms of Service:

    you will use the Website solely for personal and non-commercial purposes;

    Changes nothing in terms alleged "revenge porn" on Xvideos main site.
    Maybe let their HQ people in Panama know.

  • @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    That's textbook copyright infringement. Were you a hardcore plagiarist in school?

    Its not. Have you been around when Warez was popular and copycucks goons were harmless?

    I don't know what you just said, just that it was stupid and nonsense. Keep your shit off LET.

  • @TimboJones said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @treesmokah said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @iKeyZ said:

    @stefeman said:
    If your hosting a porn site, at least verify the stuff yourself. Don't be a lazy and manage the library manually if you want to do quality website. It's pirated anyway, regardless where you source it. Manually verifying the stuff ensures that you don't accidently approve leaked home videos there.

    If you wanna do a porn site, at least do it correctly you idiots. OP was lazy and got fucked in the ass by the registant. End of story.

    If you're embedding it from other tube sites, it's not pirated. A lot of the major tube sites allow you to embed the content and earn commision based on views. The checking and verification of content lays on the site where it was uploaded to, not embedded. It's the whole linking to content/hosting content debate.

    It is. Please show us the xhamster link to their embedded video referral program. (There isn't one).

    All I see mentioned is the programs for content creators.

    All you do is embed the video and serve ads on your own page.
    That's how many "legit smaller sites" operate, in fact - most of them are owned by goons like Pornhub or Xvideos (massive companies, as "ethical" as vpn providers).

    That's textbook copyright infringement. Were you a hardcore plagiarist in school?

    Its not. Have you been around when Warez was popular and copycucks goons were harmless?

    I don't know what you just said, just that it was stupid and nonsense. Keep your shit off LET.

    I don't know who you are or who you think you are.
    But you are dangerously retarded.

  • @hyperblast said:
    NJAL.LA is just as dubious and not to be recommended as FLOKINET.IS. behind both services are leftist / party activists who don't care about their customers. they talk about "Privacy as a Service" but in the end they are just opportunists who want to make dollars under this banner.

    Are you saying that about flokinet because of the covid controversy? Was it really a left wing vs right wing thing? Seemed more like a rational human vs retard thing to me.

  • treesmokahtreesmokah Member
    edited January 2023

    @neverain said:

    @hyperblast said:
    NJAL.LA is just as dubious and not to be recommended as FLOKINET.IS. behind both services are leftist / party activists who don't care about their customers. they talk about "Privacy as a Service" but in the end they are just opportunists who want to make dollars under this banner.

    Are you saying that about flokinet because of the covid controversy? Was it really a left wing vs right wing thing? Seemed more like a rational human vs retard thing to me.

    "Human" does not mean anything.
    It was not a "moral" or "ethical" decision either - they are supposed to not react to unlawful threats and guard your speech. They failed at that miserably and folded even without court orders. For a provider that praises "free speech", they are fucking dogshit.
    They are hardcore lefties, just like Njalla - but it does not change anything, they should put their political believes far away from their business and should not be "directed" by them.

    Who is getting hurt with "vax misinformation"? Its not ordinary people, but companies manufacturing vax. As we all know, covid vax does not reduce spreading, so at the end of the day nothing fucking matters.
    And if vax does not reduce spreading, why would you go after your way to "advertise" it to others? Its their "problem" and their right to do whatever they think is right.

  • neverainneverain Member
    edited January 2023

    @treesmokah said:

    @neverain said:

    @hyperblast said:
    NJAL.LA is just as dubious and not to be recommended as FLOKINET.IS. behind both services are leftist / party activists who don't care about their customers. they talk about "Privacy as a Service" but in the end they are just opportunists who want to make dollars under this banner.

    Are you saying that about flokinet because of the covid controversy? Was it really a left wing vs right wing thing? Seemed more like a rational human vs retard thing to me.

    "Human" does not mean anything.
    It was not a "moral" or "ethical" decision either - they are supposed to not react to unlawful threats and guard your speech. They failed at that miserably and folded even without court orders. For a provider that praises "free speech", they are fucking dogshit.
    They are hardcore lefties, just like Njalla - but it does not change anything, they should put their political believes far away from their business and should not be "directed" by them.

    Who is getting hurt with "vax misinformation"? Its not ordinary people, but companies manufacturing vax. As we all know, covid vax does not reduce spreading, so at the end of the day nothing fucking matters.

    I didn't disagree, I was just wondering how it was related to left/right wing?

    Edit: Just read your edit, you still dont explain how it has anything to do with left/right wing politics.

    Who is getting hurt with "vax misinformation"? Its not ordinary people, but companies manufacturing vax.

    You really dont have to reply, i got my answer.

Sign In or Register to comment.