Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


[Crunchbits.com] X-mas Event ➥200TB @ 10Gbps Instant Dedi ➥2.5Gbps Ryzen NVMe ➥15% Off for LET - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[Crunchbits.com] X-mas Event ➥200TB @ 10Gbps Instant Dedi ➥2.5Gbps Ryzen NVMe ➥15% Off for LET

13

Comments

  • CPU Model Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 V2 @ 3.30GHz
    CPU Cores Total 4 Cores, 8 Threads
    CPU Status Current Main Frequency 2185.410 MHz
    Memory size 15980 MB (170 MB used)
    Swap partition 3903 MB (0 MB used)

    1st hard drive 8 hours power on, model CT1000MX500SSD1
    2nd drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    3rd drive 17 hours power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    4th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    5th drive 17 hours power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    6th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    7th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    8th drive 4222 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    9th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    10th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    11th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    12th drive 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0
    Hard drive 13 17 hours of power on, model WDC WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0

    Cool~

    Thanked by 2raza19 greentea
  • PieHasBeenEatenPieHasBeenEaten Member, Host Rep

    An e3 is plenty for what I use it for. I did a zfs raidz2 so I have about 91 TB usable. The network is pretty decent for my use. Im starting to move my Plex library over. Still got along way to fill up this much storage.

    Thanked by 2greentea ThracianDog
  • jarjar Patron Provider, Top Host, Veteran

    That storage deal, Jesus. You landed on the LET map and planted your feet hard.

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • @TimboJones said:
    I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    Hoe can one say they are shuks?

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @jar said:
    That storage deal, Jesus. You landed on the LET map and planted your feet hard.

    Maybe we'll have to try and be the MXroute of storage. ;)

    @TimboJones said:
    I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    I believe you are correct and they were shucked. It's why it's not a "premium" or "primary" product for us. If I didn't make it clear on that point or anyone is unhappy with them, absolutely no problem refunding as I don't want to mislead at all. Figured it was a good match with those chassis and bang:buck ratio was solid.

    They were from an era when we colocated some Chia(i think? some hard drive proof-of-space-time-magic and something do with 'plotting') coin miners that eventually asked to pay their colo bill in unused hardware. It's not something we can (or would) deploy for our storage VPSes, but I thought it would be a good deal if anyone needed massive storage ready to go. If they become a huge service hassle I'll just let anyone on those migrate to our 12/16TB disks that we use and call it a day since it's so few overall.

    On the same token, anyone need RTX 3070's and 3080's? A few months worth of colocation bills paid in those too :D

    Thanked by 2jar greentea
  • @crunchbits said:
    Hmm, we are not ideally located (physically) for connectivity to Europe--much better for US/Asia but it shouldn't be that bad. I don't know too many German sites but mtr to bild.de looks okay (~175ms mtr, and no packets dropped). Checked from a some German providers looking glasses back to us and also came back fine. It's likely the issue is somewhere between home connection and ISP (filtering, peering, etc).

    traceroute to 193.149.164.1 (193.149.164.1), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    
    1  54.38.222.252 (54.38.222.252)  0.307 ms  0.402 ms  0.524 ms
    2  10.17.241.114 (10.17.241.114)  0.413 ms 10.17.241.60 (10.17.241.60)  0.583 ms 10.17.241.58 (10.17.241.58)  0.432 ms
    3  10.73.40.26 (10.73.40.26)  0.090 ms 10.73.40.46 (10.73.40.46)  0.142 ms 10.73.40.48 (10.73.40.48)  0.125 ms
    4  * 10.73.249.68 (10.73.249.68)  4.993 ms *
    5  fra-fr5-sbb2-nc5.de.eu (94.23.122.246)  1.701 ms  1.831 ms fra-fr5-sbb1-nc5.de.eu (91.121.215.116)  1.516 ms
    6  be102.rbx-g3-nc5.fr.eu (54.36.50.243)  8.957 ms be103.rbx-g1-nc5.fr.eu (178.33.100.158)  9.764 ms be102.rbx-g4-nc5.fr.eu (54.36.50.233)  9.193 ms
    7  lon-thw-sbb1-nc5.uk.eu (54.36.50.240)  13.239 ms lon-drch-sbb1-nc5.uk.eu (54.36.50.230)  12.827 ms  12.954 ms
    8  nyc-ny1-sbb2-8k.nj.us (192.99.146.133)  81.937 ms  81.990 ms lon-drch-sbb1-nc5.uk.eu (54.36.50.230)  13.360 ms
    9  nyc-ny1-sbb2-8k.nj.us (192.99.146.133)  81.994 ms  81.886 ms  81.962 ms
    10  be102.bhs-g2-nc5.qc.ca (192.99.146.138)  88.721 ms  89.695 ms be100-1320.chi-1-a9.il.us (198.27.73.207)  103.687 ms
    11  be103.pdx-prt1-sbb1-nc5.oregon.us (142.44.208.161)  150.898 ms be100-1324.chi-5-a9.il.us (192.99.146.141)  109.227 ms be103.pdx-prt1-sbb1-nc5.oregon.us (142.44.208.161)  152.809 ms
    12  10.200.1.5 (10.200.1.5)  234.635 ms be103.pdx-prt1-sbb1-nc5.oregon.us (142.44.208.161)  156.569 ms  152.589 ms
    13  10.200.1.5 (10.200.1.5)  165.600 ms  165.570 ms wholesail.nwax.net (198.32.195.120)  154.641 ms
    14  cr2-hlboorxh-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.119)  164.723 ms wholesail.nwax.net (198.32.195.120)  151.133 ms cr2-hlboorxh-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.119)  160.585 ms
    15  cr2-smrworxa-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (137.83.81.1)  162.887 ms cr2-hlboorxh-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.119)  168.908 ms  163.440 ms
    16  cr2-smrworxa-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (137.83.81.1)  162.875 ms cr2-bvtnorxb-a-be-11.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.121)  163.184 ms cr2-smrworxa-b-be-13.bb.as20055.net (137.83.81.1)  166.696 ms
    17  cr2-bvtnorxb-b-be-14.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.96)  161.910 ms cr2-bvtnorxb-a-be-11.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.121)  162.201 ms cr2-bvtnorxb-b-be-14.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.96)  165.291 ms
    18  lr1-umtloraz-a-be-10.bb.as20055.net (198.179.52.203)  162.839 ms  163.386 ms cr2-bvtnorxb-b-be-14.bb.as20055.net (107.191.236.96)  165.446 ms
    19  lr1-umtloraz-b-be-10.bb.as20055.net (198.179.53.13)  164.690 ms  164.462 ms  164.568 ms
    20  cr2-knwcwaxa-a-be-18.bb.as20055.net (198.179.53.19)  159.956 ms  163.728 ms lr1-umtloraz-b-be-10.bb.as20055.net (198.179.53.13)  166.022 ms
    21  cr2-knwcwaxa-a-be-18.bb.as20055.net (198.179.53.19)  165.685 ms cr2-knwcwaxa-b-be-16.bb.as20055.net (198.179.54.55)  160.524 ms cr2-knwcwaxa-a-be-18.bb.as20055.net (198.179.53.19)  165.610 ms
    22  cr2-knwcwaxa-b-be-16.bb.as20055.net (198.179.54.55)  164.768 ms  160.471 ms lr1-plmnwaxx-b-be-11.bb.as20055.net (204.11.64.39)  165.621 ms
    23  lr1-plmnwaxx-b-be-11.bb.as20055.net (204.11.64.39)  168.273 ms  167.491 ms cr2-cralidxx-b-be21.bb.as20055.net (198.179.54.61)  160.073 ms
    24  cr2-cralidxx-a-be-13.bb.as20055.net (137.83.80.160)  167.997 ms cr2-cralidxx-b-be-21.bb.as20055.net (198.179.54.61)  162.677 ms  162.620 ms
    25  transit-100ge-ziply-a.cda.id.as16584.net (205.174.153.1)  161.699 ms cr2-cralidxx-a-be-13.bb.as20055.net (137.83.80.160)  170.108 ms  165.394 ms
    26  193.149.164.1.crunchbits.us (193.149.164.1)  161.515 ms  163.187 ms transit-100ge-ziply-a.cda.id.as16584.net (205.174.153.1)  164.698 ms
    

    Thank you for your test! Anyway, I've missed the 120T deal due to the holiday plan. damn!

  • Dare I say I have been waiting years for a host like @crunchbits :) I have been using their kvm ssd vps for few days now & so far the performance has been top notch. 480Gb with all the bells & whistles in a price that no one can ignore. In fact I completely agree with Jar about crunchbits having made a mark here in the LET world, I honestly wish I cud get more. I am thinking of retiring my ovh server & signing up for ssd packages with crunchbits instead bcoz so far they look a very reliable alternative . The only thing I wud luv to see from them are storage vps deals, maybe use few of these 120tb servers for that? & beat hosthatch in the pricing, that wud be so awesome ? I bet u can get more than $99 a month from the vps deals. I wud pay biannually or even triennially for something like that.

    Thanked by 2crunchbits greentea
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @raza19 said:
    Dare I say I have been waiting years for a host like @crunchbits :) I have been using their kvm ssd vps for few days now & so far the performance has been top notch. 480Gb with all the bells & whistles in a price that no one can ignore. In fact I completely agree with Jar about crunchbits having made a mark here in the LET world, I honestly wish I cud get more. I am thinking of retiring my ovh server & signing up for ssd packages with crunchbits instead bcoz so far they look a very reliable alternative . The only thing I wud luv to see from them are storage vps deals, maybe use few of these 120tb servers for that? & beat hosthatch in the pricing, that wud be so awesome ? I bet u can get more than $99 a month from the vps deals. I wud pay biannually or even triennially for something like that.

    I really do appreciate this a lot, thank you for the feedback.

    There has been a lot of demand for the storage VPSes, and we're likely going to push them out with a little bonus for LET when they're ready. I just have a hard rule that nothing will be allowed to be ordered until it's been built, tested, racked, and we've spun it up/down a few times. If you can order it on our website, you should have it as soon as the payment completes. Unfortunately, we have 2 pallets full of HDDs and chassis missing since Dec 19th holding this up. We have some additional stuff coming as an emergency backup, but I'm extremely hesitant to make any promises on dates as logistics have been a real challenge over the last year.

    The 120TB are just LET-only specials on some excess gear we have that can't be pushed into our core line-up. Whenever we get odd/mismatched hardware I'll likely throw up one-time deals like that to the LET community.

    Thanked by 3raza19 netfliq greentea
  • @crunchbits said:

    @raza19 said:
    Dare I say I have been waiting years for a host like @crunchbits :) I have been using their kvm ssd vps for few days now & so far the performance has been top notch. 480Gb with all the bells & whistles in a price that no one can ignore. In fact I completely agree with Jar about crunchbits having made a mark here in the LET world, I honestly wish I cud get more. I am thinking of retiring my ovh server & signing up for ssd packages with crunchbits instead bcoz so far they look a very reliable alternative . The only thing I wud luv to see from them are storage vps deals, maybe use few of these 120tb servers for that? & beat hosthatch in the pricing, that wud be so awesome ? I bet u can get more than $99 a month from the vps deals. I wud pay biannually or even triennially for something like that.

    I really do appreciate this a lot, thank you for the feedback.

    There has been a lot of demand for the storage VPSes, and we're likely going to push them out with a little bonus for LET when they're ready. I just have a hard rule that nothing will be allowed to be ordered until it's been built, tested, racked, and we've spun it up/down a few times. If you can order it on our website, you should have it as soon as the payment completes. Unfortunately, we have 2 pallets full of HDDs and chassis missing since Dec 19th holding this up. We have some additional stuff coming as an emergency backup, but I'm extremely hesitant to make any promises on dates as logistics have been a real challenge over the last year.

    The 120TB are just LET-only specials on some excess gear we have that can't be pushed into our core line-up. Whenever we get odd/mismatched hardware I'll likely throw up one-time deals like that to the LET community.

    That's a very solid stance. I have a hunch that I may have landed a great deal, almost like the feeling of being friends with a famous actor before they became famous :smiley: I wish you success in all ur future ventures & look forward to your storage vpses whenever they land here.

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • @crunchbits your service not allow download from torrent, right?

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • @crunchbits said:

    @raza19 said:
    Dare I say I have been waiting years for a host like @crunchbits :) I have been using their kvm ssd vps for few days now & so far the performance has been top notch. 480Gb with all the bells & whistles in a price that no one can ignore. In fact I completely agree with Jar about crunchbits having made a mark here in the LET world, I honestly wish I cud get more. I am thinking of retiring my ovh server & signing up for ssd packages with crunchbits instead bcoz so far they look a very reliable alternative . The only thing I wud luv to see from them are storage vps deals, maybe use few of these 120tb servers for that? & beat hosthatch in the pricing, that wud be so awesome ? I bet u can get more than $99 a month from the vps deals. I wud pay biannually or even triennially for something like that.

    I really do appreciate this a lot, thank you for the feedback.

    There has been a lot of demand for the storage VPSes, and we're likely going to push them out with a little bonus for LET when they're ready. I just have a hard rule that nothing will be allowed to be ordered until it's been built, tested, racked, and we've spun it up/down a few times. If you can order it on our website, you should have it as soon as the payment completes. Unfortunately, we have 2 pallets full of HDDs and chassis missing since Dec 19th holding this up. We have some additional stuff coming as an emergency backup, but I'm extremely hesitant to make any promises on dates as logistics have been a real challenge over the last year.

    The 120TB are just LET-only specials on some excess gear we have that can't be pushed into our core line-up. Whenever we get odd/mismatched hardware I'll likely throw up one-time deals like that to the LET community.

    I am waiting your vps storage.!

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @raza19 said:
    That's a very solid stance. I have a hunch that I may have landed a great deal, almost like the feeling of being friends with a famous actor before they became famous :smiley: I wish you success in all ur future ventures & look forward to your storage vpses whenever they land here.

    Haha :D I just approach it from the perspective of how I would want to be treated as the customer.

    @jazz1611 said:
    @crunchbits your service not allow download from torrent, right?

    We don't have a problem with you using your server however (within our ToS/AUP). If we get legitimate DMCA's we will have to discuss them with you and come to a solution since we are US-based, so just keep that in mind for any public activities you may or may not be doing. Many of our users love to host their gigantic collection of linux ISOs ;)

    Thanked by 2raza19 greentea
  • Too bad, I need a storage server in a US location for backup, but when I saw your promotion, it was sold out, very sad.

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • @danblaze said:
    Too bad, I need a storage server in a US location for backup, but when I saw your promotion, it was sold out, very sad.

    ditto. keeping an eye out for the storage vps to pop in stock too

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited December 2022

    @plumberg said:

    @TimboJones said:
    I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    Hoe can one say they are shuks?

    I googled the model number.

    I've bought 16 or 18TB shucks before when price was much cheaper and the drive inside was a known internal Gold model just repackaged.

    But it's mostly that they'll sell them for cheaper despite higher packaging, power supply and enclosure costs with shorter warranty that makes me suspect AF. It comes down to luck, hoping they're just filling external USB orders at a loss.

    For some reason, the WD Red Plus drives that should only be 3 year warranty show 5 years for me, so that's where I'm buying mostly.

    Thanked by 2plumberg greentea
  • @TimboJones said:

    @plumberg said:

    @TimboJones said:
    I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    Hoe can one say they are shuks?

    I googled the model number.

    I've bought 16 or 18TB shucks before when price was much cheaper and the drive inside was a known internal Gold model just repackaged.

    But it's mostly that they'll sell them for cheaper despite higher packaging, power supply and enclosure costs with shorter warranty that makes me suspect AF. It comes down to luck, hoping they're just filling external USB orders at a loss.

    I see. Thanks for sharing. Are these with decent reliability?

  • @plumberg said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @plumberg said:

    @TimboJones said:
    I feel like that many drives will end up with many service requests to replace drives over time. Given most are brand new, hopefully that doesn't start happening for 3+ years. But these are USB shucks with voided 1-year warranty, so I always wonder if the drives they put in the USB enclosures are gimped in some way that didn't pass as the internal drive version (e.g. can't hit peak speeds that don't matter with USB limited transfers).

    Hoe can one say they are shuks?

    I googled the model number.

    I've bought 16 or 18TB shucks before when price was much cheaper and the drive inside was a known internal Gold model just repackaged.

    But it's mostly that they'll sell them for cheaper despite higher packaging, power supply and enclosure costs with shorter warranty that makes me suspect AF. It comes down to luck, hoping they're just filling external USB orders at a loss.

    I see. Thanks for sharing. Are these with decent reliability?

    I think it's the kind of thing too small scale for one to say with authority, best to check Reddit datahoarders. My takeaway is that the price needs to make up for statistical failure over a few years to make it worth it.

    I stick with ones that are just repackaged internal drives. Ones modified for cheaper Power adapter or need mods are too much hassle.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • Order Number: 1734471721

    Thanks~

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • Great platform. Enjoy the service so far.

    Order #6596728488. Triple bandwidth please.

    Thank you.

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • @crunchbits
    Triple bandwidth pretty please :smile:
    Order Number: 4087515965

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • 2050810995

    I'm late to the 3x party, hope it still going

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @acidpuke said:
    2050810995

    I'm late to the 3x party, hope it still going

    Yep, coupon for the SSDs is still working--will still honor it.

    Thanked by 1greentea
  • shafireshafire Member
    edited January 2023

    What is the difference between 3.1 to 3.8GHz EPYC NVMe VPS 2GB and 3.4 to 4.9GHz Ryzen 5950X VPS 2GB in terms of cpu performance and features?

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @shafire said:
    What is the difference between 3.1 to 3.8GHz EPYC NVMe VPS 2GB and 3.4 to 4.9GHz Ryzen 5950X VPS 2GB in terms of cpu performance and features?

    Ryzen 5950X is generally going to be faster as it can boost much higher. Especially in single-threaded stuff. EPYCs will usually have more memory bandwidth, higher maximum memory, bigger L1/L3 cache, and some niche features. We do use ECC memory on both.

    Thanked by 1nick_
  • Order Number: 9820492037
    Triple bandwidth pretty please

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • Are the EPYCs still available?

  • Order 5755731124 - triple bandwidth please :)

  • Order 2937 triple bandwidth please

  • Any Xmas events coming up?

This discussion has been closed.