New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Yes sir, the 2GB bonus is available for the high and medium frequency packages.
They're asking for a Geekbench 5 benchmark to show the CPU difference between the 2 offerings. You can get one by running yabs.sh if you'd like to provide benchmarks for the community. Just run
and post the output for both packages
You're not very clear about reoccurring discount. 12 billing cycle is a year? You might want to say reoccurring for life? So what is it. Discount for one year?
Order number: 4957924498
Thank you!
Order Number: 5991351213
Thank you!
Test IPv4: 198.255.78.87
Test file: http://198.255.20.4/100MBtest.zip
Connect not secure? That's not good?
That's new interpretation of LEB/LET rules. That's not and it never was recurring discount per LEB/LET standards. It's still time limited discount.
Even general rules say clearly: "List the final recurring price after any discounts."
What isn't clear about the offer as stated?
I am not complaining, but that's not recurring discount per LEB/LET standards. It never was. 1 billing cycle or 12 billing cycles, It's still time limited discount. As simple as that.
Bear in mind that discounted offers on LET don't need to be recurring at all.
What is crucial is that if a discount isn't recurring, the offer should say so, and similarly, if a discount is recurring, the offer should say so, and if the recurring discount is limited in time, the offer should say for how long.
All that's clear and non-recurring full price of this offer still within LET rules. I am not objecting this.
All what I am saying is that time-limited discounts don't fall under recurring price category. Discounted price for a limited term is not recurring price per LET/LEB standards.
ie. "Mod edit (just my example): The offers are valid (or limited to) for 12 billing cycles and then full price."
Sorry for nitpicking
Now I'll nitpick in return: please remove "Mod edit (angstrom):" from your post because people will think that I edited your post!
Just to clarify that LET's rules do not form an audited legal document. They've arisen over time, and some of the formulations aren't as clear as they could be. In addition, they don't explicitly cover every case that may arise in practice. In particular, they don't prescribe how the word recurring may or may not be used.
Following ordinary usage in English, it's perfectly fine and coherent to say that a discount is recurring for n billing cycles.
In contrast, if it's said that a discount is recurring (full stop), then we understand that the discount isn't limited in time.
Linguistically yes, but you're here long enough to know people's perception when we're talking about deals and what we - LEB buyers consider as recurring discount (backed by rules) on the contrary to the time limited discounts.
But okay, I'll see myself out
Order number: 1758054271
Thank you!
Order Number: 9595255104
Thanks for the promotion!
I wish your payment system was manual like most. Using PayPal. I don't like subscription model. Month to month should be just that. I don't like automatic.
Hmm, maybe it should be a LET rule that the poster of offer threads should be hammered.
I can't find my order num.Just found Invoice #5155,can use this?
Any yabs?
you can find it in you email
Order Number: 1047266641
Thanks.
Order Number: 1986500492
The network of this vps is terrible for me and I don't want to use it anymore, can I get a refund?
Sure, just open a billing ticket.
4G Medium Frequency:
[root@VPS4GM ~]# wget -qO- yabs.sh | bash
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Yet-Another-Bench-Script
v2022-05-06
https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Sun May 8 14:05:07 EDT 2022
Basic System Information:
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 8 minutes
Processor : Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS)
CPU cores : 2 @ 2792.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 3.7 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 39.3 GiB
Distro : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
Kernel : 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 412 Mbits/sec | 68.1 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 298 Mbits/sec | 2.47 Gbits/sec
Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 593 Mbits/sec | 2.41 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 3.38 Gbits/sec | 3.78 Gbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 376 Mbits/sec | 2.61 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 400 Mbits/sec | 2.50 Gbits/sec
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 412 Mbits/sec | 62.4 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 370 Mbits/sec | 1.96 Gbits/sec
Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 470 Mbits/sec | 2.42 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 2.96 Gbits/sec | 2.61 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 356 Mbits/sec | 2.48 Gbits/sec
Running GB5 benchmark test... cue elevator music
4G High Frequency:
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Yet-Another-Bench-Script
v2022-05-06
https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Sun May 8 14:07:31 EDT 2022
Basic System Information:
Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
Processor : Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS)
CPU cores : 2 @ 3299.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 3.7 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 39.3 GiB
Distro : CentOS Linux 7 (Core)
Kernel : 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 438 Mbits/sec | 63.7 Mbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 465 Mbits/sec | 2.43 Gbits/sec
Hybula | The Netherlands (40G) | 432 Mbits/sec | 2.38 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 3.86 Gbits/sec | 2.17 Gbits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 531 Mbits/sec | 2.16 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 411 Mbits/sec | 2.46 Gbits/sec
Ok,thanks.
You didn't let the benchmark finish lol. People wanted YABS for the GB5 scores.