Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Netcup RS 2000 G9 WSV22 - 16GB Ram for €11,20 month
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Netcup RS 2000 G9 WSV22 - 16GB Ram for €11,20 month

nfnnfn Veteran
edited February 2022 in General

https://www.netcup.de/bestellen/produkt.php?produkt=2882

4x AMD EPYC™ 7702
16 GB Ram
320 SSD Disk

€11.20 (incl. 19% VAT)
Minimum Contract Period 12 months
Billing Period 3 months

«1

Comments

  • I don't use netcup at all because they force non residents to pay VAT as well

  • Probably clearing stock for their gen 10 RS.

  • nfnnfn Veteran

    @Astro said:
    I don't use netcup at all because they force non residents to pay VAT as well

    Welcome to Europe 😉

  • @nfn said:

    @Astro said:
    I don't use netcup at all because they force non residents to pay VAT as well

    Welcome to Europe 😉

    A lot of other German providers don't do this though.

  • nfnnfn Veteran

    @Astro said:

    @nfn said:

    @Astro said:
    I don't use netcup at all because they force non residents to pay VAT as well

    Welcome to Europe 😉

    A lot of other German providers don't do this though.

    If you have a business, most European do, although I don't agree to this for regular users.

  • Decent price for 4 dedicated EPYC cores and 16GB RAM.

  • @pbx said:
    Decent price for 4 dedicated EPYC cores and 16GB RAM.

    Are they dedicated? Didn't know that. That changes things.

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • risharderisharde Patron Provider, Veteran

    Overall good price but again, darn these long term contracts and the VAT stance.

  • @Astro said:

    @pbx said:
    Decent price for 4 dedicated EPYC cores and 16GB RAM.

    Are they dedicated? Didn't know that. That changes things.

    yelp ,they mentioned that on their web page

    Prozessorkerne: 4 dediziert

  • A good deal. Tempting, as usual

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • IMO Their pricing is great, even considering the forced VATs and the long contracts.
    It would still be nice if they could exempt VATs for non-EU customers

    Thanked by 1pbx
  • root@v2202202145645179505:~# curl -Ls yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2021-12-28                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed 16 Feb 2022 09:51:27 AM CET
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 314.9 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 30.52 MB/s    (7.6k) | 246.54 MB/s   (3.8k)
    Write      | 30.54 MB/s    (7.6k) | 247.83 MB/s   (3.8k)
    Total      | 61.06 MB/s   (15.2k) | 494.37 MB/s   (7.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.43 GB/s     (2.7k) | 1.33 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.50 GB/s     (2.9k) | 1.42 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Total      | 2.94 GB/s     (5.7k) | 2.75 GB/s     (2.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.01 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec 
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 2.10 Gbits/sec  | 2.37 Gbits/sec 
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec 
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 272 Mbits/sec   | 529 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 848 Mbits/sec   | 1.48 Gbits/sec 
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 617 Mbits/sec   | 1.54 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 531 Mbits/sec   | 940 Mbits/sec  
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 171 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec  
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed     
                    |                           |                 |                
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.78 Gbits/sec  | 2.34 Gbits/sec 
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 2.32 Gbits/sec 
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 1.56 Gbits/sec  | 2.34 Gbits/sec 
    WebHorizon      | Singapore (400M)          | 321 Mbits/sec   | 527 Mbits/sec  
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 664 Mbits/sec   | 1.44 Gbits/sec 
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 516 Mbits/sec   | 1.01 Gbits/sec 
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 946                           
    Multi Core      | 3368                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12808858
    

    yabs in case someone's interested.
    I've personally had no problem pushing 100% CPU for consistent times for another RootServer, so I believe there won't be any problem with this as well.

    International peering could improve a bit, but I haven't had any issue getting 2.5G on both direction when I needed.

    BTW, do note that there's a fair use policy for Root Servers. This is what I got when I asked them last time.

    No additional fees are charged for traffic to and from your server. On average, 1 Gbps bandwidth is available at least, assuming the root server disposes of a 2.5 Gbps network interface card. If more than 120 TB traffic is used within a month and, in addition, if more than 1 Gbps bandwidth is continuously used over a period of more than 60 minutes on average, the network connection of the root server can be limited to a minimum of 200 Mbps so that other customers do not have any disadvantages.

  • ThinVpsThinVps Member
    edited February 2022

    Having 2.5gbit has been amazing. Got i believe exact deal on exact server during last easter. Been more than pleased with it. Too bad that lowest tier rs 1000 was only 1 euro per month less, so was no brainer to get rs2000. I wish they make rs1000 for like 6-7e during deals, instead of 10e. Yeah the easter egg rs1000 had better stats than regular rs1000, but they should have this cheapest rs1000 for... cheap, during deals (bf, easter). Im canceling mine after 1 year runs out, and will be hunting for new one during this easter. I had no problem paying 60ish euro up front, twice. I messed around with their servers for 5-8 days, cancelled and got refund real quick, no questions asked... so while their strict with charging etc, they also strict on refunding.
    Yeah their peering not greatest, i had nforce, leaseweb dedis 1gbit in amsterdam, also ovh in france 10gbit/1gbit, and it blew netcup out of water, but it was also 60-110e/month dedis, vs 11e/month vps, kind of hookers and nuns comparing, or how in us and a say, apples and oranges.

    Basic System Information:

    Processor : AMD EPYC 7702P 64-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 4 @ 1996.249 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 15.7 GiB
    Swap : 0.0 KiB
    Disk : 314.9 GiB

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 78.13 MB/s (19.5k) 645.37 MB/s (10.0k)
    Write 78.33 MB/s (19.5k) 648.76 MB/s (10.1k)
    Total 156.46 MB/s (39.1k) 1.29 GB/s (20.2k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.56 GB/s (3.0k) 1.53 GB/s (1.4k)
    Write 1.64 GB/s (3.2k) 1.63 GB/s (1.5k)
    Total 3.20 GB/s (6.2k) 3.16 GB/s (3.0k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.09 Gbits/sec | 2.37 Gbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.84 Gbits/sec | 2.36 Gbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 2.19 Gbits/sec | 2.38 Gbits/sec
    WebHorizon | Singapore (400M) | 422 Mbits/sec | busy
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 794 Mbits/sec | 1.57 Gbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 508 Mbits/sec | 1.66 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 572 Mbits/sec | 919 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom | Sao Paulo, BR (2G) | 156 Mbits/sec | 930 Mbits/sec

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 2.09 Gbits/sec | 2.33 Gbits/sec
    Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.32 Gbits/sec | 2.32 Gbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 1.44 Gbits/sec | 2.34 Gbits/sec
    WebHorizon | Singapore (400M) | 348 Mbits/sec | 530 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 672 Mbits/sec | 1.53 Gbits/sec
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 535 Mbits/sec | 1.04 Gbits/sec

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 968
    Multi Core | 3531
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12810586

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • ThinVpsThinVps Member
    edited February 2022

    @sanvit as you can see, ours capped at 1.996, however if you go to their website now, it says max 3.35, so maybe they have new gen running already or whatever.

    sudo dmidecode -t processor | grep "Speed"
    Max Speed: 2000 MHz
    Current Speed: 2000 MHz

    That is why im lurking for 2vcpu for 5-6e ish vs current 4vcpu at 11e ish. i rather have 2.vcpu @ 3.35 than [email protected]

  • oos

  • @ThinVps said:
    @sanvit as you can see, ours capped at 1.996, however if you go to their website now, it says max 3.35, so maybe they have new gen running already or whatever.

    sudo dmidecode -t processor | grep "Speed"
    Max Speed: 2000 MHz
    Current Speed: 2000 MHz

    That is why im lurking for 2vcpu for 5-6e ish vs current 4vcpu at 11e ish. i rather have 2.vcpu @ 3.35 than [email protected]

    I think it's just a hypervisor reporting error. If you search on Geekbench, the highest single core score for EPYC 7702P is 1089, which is around 10% difference from what we're currently getting.

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=AMD+EPYC+7702P&sort=score

    Thanked by 1ThinVps
  • In my experience on this spec at Netcup it runs great, some variance in disk speed between instances (consistent 200MB/s sequential vs consistent 600)

    However the deal breaker for me was that they freeze intermittently (twice a day or so) for up to 30 seconds or so. Sometimes it is so bad that you get an NMI hang report in dmesg. So they are not suitable for anything realtime or anything that needs perfect uptime

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • @darkimmortal said:
    In my experience on this spec at Netcup it runs great, some variance in disk speed between instances (consistent 200MB/s sequential vs consistent 600)

    However the deal breaker for me was that they freeze intermittently (twice a day or so) for up to 30 seconds or so. Sometimes it is so bad that you get an NMI hang report in dmesg. So they are not suitable for anything realtime or anything that needs perfect uptime

    Thanks so much! I'm looking at their offers for production websites. Skip now.

  • @sonic said:

    @darkimmortal said:
    In my experience on this spec at Netcup it runs great, some variance in disk speed between instances (consistent 200MB/s sequential vs consistent 600)

    However the deal breaker for me was that they freeze intermittently (twice a day or so) for up to 30 seconds or so. Sometimes it is so bad that you get an NMI hang report in dmesg. So they are not suitable for anything realtime or anything that needs perfect uptime

    Thanks so much! I'm looking at their offers for production websites. Skip now.

    I can't speak about @darkimmortal's experience, but plenty of people use netcup for production websites

  • @Astro said:
    I don't use netcup at all because they force non residents to pay VAT as well

    if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

  • @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

  • @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

  • @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

    Well I proved to them I'm not a resident of the EU and still have to pay VAT so I guess they get the best of everything.

    Thanked by 1TODO
  • @Astro said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

    Well I proved to them I'm not a resident of the EU and still have to pay VAT so I guess they get the best of everything.

    If you are an individual, I guess even Hetzner charges you higher VAT depending on the country you are from (outside EU) so that's by law for provider to abide by. I would not complain someone complying to law

  • @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

    Well I proved to them I'm not a resident of the EU and still have to pay VAT so I guess they get the best of everything.

    If you are an individual, I guess even Hetzner charges you higher VAT depending on the country you are from (outside EU) so that's by law for provider to abide by. I would not complain someone complying to law

    That seems to differ by providers though. For example, AWS and DigitalOcean charges 10% Korean VAT (DO doesn't have any presence nor server in South Korea) for me. Hetzner, Scaleway, etc. doesn't charge any (0% VAT), but Netcup charges 19% German VAT.

    I can 100% understand paying my local VAT if required by law, but I think most of the people complaining here is due to the fact that Netcup is the only company requiring you to pay German VAT even though you are not residing on EU

    Thanked by 1TODO
  • @sanvit said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

    Well I proved to them I'm not a resident of the EU and still have to pay VAT so I guess they get the best of everything.

    If you are an individual, I guess even Hetzner charges you higher VAT depending on the country you are from (outside EU) so that's by law for provider to abide by. I would not complain someone complying to law

    That seems to differ by providers though. For example, AWS and DigitalOcean charges 10% Korean VAT (DO doesn't have any presence nor server in South Korea) for me. Hetzner, Scaleway, etc. doesn't charge any (0% VAT), but Netcup charges 19% German VAT.

    I can 100% understand paying my local VAT if required by law, but I think most of the people complaining here is due to the fact that Netcup is the only company requiring you to pay German VAT even though you are not residing on EU

    Indeed, netcup seems to be exceptional in this respect, and I can understand how a non-EU private customer wouldn't be so pleased about this.

    (At the same time, it's probably legal for netcup to do this, assuming a conception that is: "a server is a service that is provided locally".)

    Thanked by 1sanvit
  • @angstrom said:

    @sanvit said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said:

    @Astro said:

    @mehargags said: if you sign up as a 'company' you don't need to

    Dont you have to provide supporting documents?

    ofcourse, else how would you prove you are a 'running business'?

    If you are dubious on giving them your business details... you are not qualified to be their customer and I agree with that.

    Well I proved to them I'm not a resident of the EU and still have to pay VAT so I guess they get the best of everything.

    If you are an individual, I guess even Hetzner charges you higher VAT depending on the country you are from (outside EU) so that's by law for provider to abide by. I would not complain someone complying to law

    That seems to differ by providers though. For example, AWS and DigitalOcean charges 10% Korean VAT (DO doesn't have any presence nor server in South Korea) for me. Hetzner, Scaleway, etc. doesn't charge any (0% VAT), but Netcup charges 19% German VAT.

    I can 100% understand paying my local VAT if required by law, but I think most of the people complaining here is due to the fact that Netcup is the only company requiring you to pay German VAT even though you are not residing on EU

    Indeed, netcup seems to be exceptional in this respect, and I can understand how a non-EU private customer wouldn't be so pleased about this.

    (At the same time, it's probably legal for netcup to do this, assuming a conception that is: "a server is a service that is provided locally".)

    I’ve talked with multiple people at netcup regarding it, and they were pretty strict on charging the VAT. However, they told me on detail why they were required to collect VAT unless I had a company registeration #, and their service is exceptional even with the VAT, so I’m honestly happy with them.

    Thanked by 1angstrom
  • @sanvit said: However, they told me on detail why they were required to collect VAT unless I had a company registeration #,

    Just curious: what did they tell you?

  • @darkimmortal said:
    However the deal breaker for me was that they freeze intermittently (twice a day or so) for up to 30 seconds or so. Sometimes it is so bad that you get an NMI hang report in dmesg. So they are not suitable for anything realtime or anything that needs perfect uptime

    Very ood. Once or two I could understand if they have to migrate the virtual machines around for some reason.
    But daily for presumably a long time frame sounds very strange.

    I don't think I ever experienced anything like that with the instance I have with them -
    dmesg looks clean too.
    But maybe have to pay some more attention to it to encounter it.

  • darkimmortaldarkimmortal Member
    edited February 2022

    @airmass1 said:

    @darkimmortal said:
    However the deal breaker for me was that they freeze intermittently (twice a day or so) for up to 30 seconds or so. Sometimes it is so bad that you get an NMI hang report in dmesg. So they are not suitable for anything realtime or anything that needs perfect uptime

    Very ood. Once or two I could understand if they have to migrate the virtual machines around for some reason.
    But daily for presumably a long time frame sounds very strange.

    I don't think I ever experienced anything like that with the instance I have with them -
    dmesg looks clean too.
    But maybe have to pay some more attention to it to encounter it.

    I got it on both my instances (different nodes), had to give up on using them in production. I've never seen anything like it on any VPS before. No sign of any issue in collectd or uptime monitoring, just my application temporarily freezing roughly twice daily and the strange NMI hang messages about once a month

    https://www.google.com/search?q=rcu_sched++stall+"netcup" shows a few others are hitting it too

    kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
    kernel: rcu:         2-...!: (26 ticks this GP) idle=09e/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=9574021/9574021 fqs=205 
    kernel:         (t=8193 jiffies g=22749321 q=1421)
    kernel: rcu: rcu_sched kthread starved for 6443 jiffies! g22749321 f0x0 RCU_GP_WAIT_FQS(5) ->state=0x402 ->cpu=1
    kernel: rcu:         Unless rcu_sched kthread gets sufficient CPU time, OOM is now expected behavior.
    kernel: rcu: RCU grace-period kthread stack dump:
    kernel: task:rcu_sched       state:I stack:    0 pid:   13 ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
    kernel: Call Trace:
    kernel:  __schedule+0x282/0x870
    kernel:  schedule+0x46/0xb0
    kernel:  schedule_timeout+0x8b/0x140
    kernel:  ? __next_timer_interrupt+0x110/0x110
    kernel:  rcu_gp_kthread+0x51b/0xba0
    kernel:  ? rcu_cpu_kthread+0x190/0x190
    kernel:  kthread+0x11b/0x140
    kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
    kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
    kernel: NMI backtrace for cpu 2
    kernel: CPU: 2 PID: 1235743 Comm: kworker/2:2 Not tainted 5.10.0-9-amd64 #1 Debian 5.10.70-1
    kernel: Hardware name: netcup KVM Server, BIOS RS 2000 G9 07/30/2021
    kernel: Workqueue: events_freezable_power_ disk_events_workfn
    kernel: Call Trace:
    kernel:  <IRQ>
    kernel:  dump_stack+0x6b/0x83
    kernel:  nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x32/0x69
    kernel:  ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu+0x80/0x80
    kernel:  nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xd7/0xe0
    kernel:  rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa2/0xd0
    kernel:  rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x1ff/0x3d6
    kernel:  update_process_times+0x8c/0xc0
    kernel:  tick_sched_handle+0x22/0x60
    kernel:  tick_sched_timer+0x7c/0xb0
    kernel:  ? tick_do_update_jiffies64.part.0+0xc0/0xc0
    kernel:  __hrtimer_run_queues+0x12a/0x270
    kernel:  hrtimer_interrupt+0x110/0x2c0
    kernel:  __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x5f/0xd0
    kernel:  asm_call_irq_on_stack+0x12/0x20
    kernel:  </IRQ>
    kernel:  sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x80
    kernel:  asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20
    kernel: RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x11/0x20
    kernel: Code: e0 4c 39 f0 76 d8 80 4d 00 04 eb 92 cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 00 e8 36 38 82 ff 66 90 48 89 f7 57 9d <0f> 1f 44>
    kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb9afc7dafb60 EFLAGS: 00000293
    kernel: RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff9b4218608000 RCX: ffffd9afbfd02105
    kernel: RDX: ffff9b452fd28f88 RSI: 0000000000000293 RDI: 0000000000000293
    kernel: RBP: ffff9b42186f2118 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff9b452fd2b660
    kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000293
    kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9b42186f2118 R15: ffff9b4461a37000
    kernel:  ata_scsi_queuecmd+0x4f/0x80 [libata]
    kernel:  scsi_queue_rq+0x31f/0xa60 [scsi_mod]
    kernel:  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x11a/0x7c0
    kernel:  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0xca/0x190
    kernel:  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
    kernel:  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xe0
    kernel:  __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x15b/0x170
    kernel:  blk_execute_rq+0x4b/0xa0
    kernel:  __scsi_execute+0xe8/0x250 [scsi_mod]
    kernel:  sr_check_events+0xa0/0x280 [sr_mod]
    kernel:  ? dequeue_entity+0xc6/0x450
    kernel:  cdrom_check_events+0x1a/0x30 [cdrom]
    kernel:  sr_block_check_events+0x96/0x120 [sr_mod]
    kernel:  disk_check_events+0x67/0x180
    kernel:  process_one_work+0x1b6/0x350
    kernel:  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
    kernel:  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
    kernel:  kthread+0x11b/0x140
    kernel:  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
    kernel:  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
    
Sign In or Register to comment.