Start-2-S-SATA

I have one https://www.scaleway.com/en/dedibox/start/start-2-s-sata/ which I have now no more use. I have this on sale price euro 1.99 monthly. I think I can not transfer server on online.net but can do Outsourcing. I do not want to make money on this so my asking price is euro 1.99 monthly plus any paypal fee.
Server location Datacenter: AMS1
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Yet-Another-Bench-Script
v2021-12-28
https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Mon 10 Jan 2022 10:53:51 AM CET
Basic System Information:
Processor : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2350 @ 1.74GHz
CPU cores : 2 @ 1744.991 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 256.0 MiB
Disk : 915.8 GiB
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS) |
---|---|---|
Read | 271.00 KB/s (67) | 3.84 MB/s (60) |
Write | 289.00 KB/s (72) | 4.12 MB/s (64) |
Total | 560.00 KB/s (139) | 7.96 MB/s (124) |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS) |
------ | --- ---- | ---- ---- |
Read | 16.67 MB/s (32) | 19.41 MB/s (18) |
Write | 18.01 MB/s (35) | 21.67 MB/s (21) |
Total | 34.69 MB/s (67) | 41.09 MB/s (39) |
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.77 Gbits/sec | 2.28 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 1.77 Gbits/sec | 2.31 Gbits/sec
Clouvider | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 1.71 Gbits/sec | 1.25 Gbits/sec
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 175
Multi Core | 296
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/12089654
Comments
What kind of outsourcing you mean
It's his fancy way of "reselling" the service.
Hence the monthly price.
https://www.scaleway.com/en/docs/dedibox-console/my-account/how-to/outsource-dedibox/
if it's available.can i have it?
It is not my way but scaleway way which you are not aware of.
https://www.scaleway.com/en/docs/dedibox-console/my-account/how-to/outsource-dedibox/
But wont you be still responsible for paying for that VPS?
They wrote that its just technical outsourcing, not billing
"The other Dedibox account holder has access to all the technical details of your Dedibox but will not be able to view your billing information"
Then I don't think this will be allowed because there's no change of ownership but just providing technical and administrative access to it.
Starting this January the price for this server has been increased from 1.99 to 2.99 EUR/mo.
Allowed by whom, Scaleway? Or LET mods?
Scaleway doesn't have a problem with it. LET-wise it is a gray area of "get a provider tag" but ehh, for one 3 EURO server, really.
I also noticed that in latest bill it is now euro 2.99.
Just noticed you have 2.5 Gbit network on yours. Very lucky, both of mine are only 1 Gbit/s.
visiting the current Start-2-S-SATA page (https://www.scaleway.com/en/dedibox/start/start-2-s-sata/) shows me this:
Am I looking at the wrong page?
"this on sale price"
In terms of bandwidth - . I have their "100Mbps" stardust instance and here's yabs
So I think its normal that on Scaleway you get better speeds than advertised.
It is not useful to generalize, as their dedis and VPS are kind of separate, even use two separate control panels. But what I meant is my dedicated servers have 1Gbit NIC and are connected to the switch at 1Gbit, whereas the OP seems to have gotten a variant of their hardware with 2.5 Gbit network.
and you both should have 250Mbps according to product page. You both don't, thats why I told that it seems normal that you get more than what is written, because I have the same thing on several Scaleway VPSes.
I know that there is different control panel, its just like on Hetzner where Cloud (VPS) and Robot (dedi) is competently different thing. But it seems like Scaleway has faster network in both VPSes and dedis compared to what they should provide.
Do you still wanna sell it ><
That HDD speed lol
Server has been outsourced. Thanks everyone
So whoever you outsourced it to is at risk of losing the service if for some reason you stop paying?
I completely agree with you as this is not one time buyer-seller relationship. Buyer has more risk if he put important data and I forget to pay or do not pay then he will loss his data. And my intension was also not to make money so went with one who knows me personally.
Gotcha.
If that's the case, then it's alright I suppose.
The OP is on LET since 2011 and is not new to such outsourcing endeavours:
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/70949/online-net-kidechire-for-rent (2015)
Last time it went with no complaints from anyone so I'd say it would have been fine in any case
I would assume the problem could come the other way around, as OP probably is legally the person to whom online.net is renting the server: if there is illegal activity on it, he might be considered responsible. Not sure what this "outsourcing" implies on that front, though.