New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
could be due to LXC.
Could be. CyberPanel works on LXC with Ubuntu OS.
same experience with aapanel on openvz/lxc. ubuntu has best compatibility for me.
is there any difference between LXC and KVM for website building ?
No, LXC is faster.
Got some comments from another forum
and
That's why I like HostCram because of the single-core performance and all of my websites are using WordPress (PHP). Core i9 or AMD Ryzen™ 9 5950X
Just want to share with you.
Source
I must disappoint you, your pious ideas will work only in case of low attendance = when only one user asks to generate the page (or 2, 3 users)
when multiple users request the generation of pages at the same time, one fast core will not help you in that it is faster. It is much more useful to have more cores (multi-threading work), albeit slower, than one faster
next thing: a skilled webmaster/hostmaster/webdev will help himself with caching, which is many times (10 - hundreds times) more effective for speeding up the web, the one who does not know will dream of the fastest cores for it..
I tuned and tested modified HW highly/crazy unefective consuming WP sites at the load of generating +100 - 200 or more pages and requests in 1-2 seconds simultaneously (over edge of 200 pages req in the same time, webserver was collapsing opposite the fact that using caching (DDossed, err.500), not PHP and DB), I know what I'm saying = your dreams won't work in practice, forget that 1 faster core decides on the speed of lazy WP, which has already some audience (not idling, which is no waiting for 1 incoming user 2 or more hours)
last thing: your fast 1 VPS core will be GONE and with 60% or less single core score after say half or 1 year later (when node will be full and with permanent load). This i seen and met on each nodes with shared cores after longer time, incl. absolutely best providers, no exception i remember (every one of them want utilize server for reasonable utilization edge and make little profit, instead of impressing with the benchs results of unloaded server permanently)
Talked about it on some other threads before. What we did was we got more hostnodes instead of getting more RAM & Storage so we can't/don't have to put so many VPS per node like the other providers.
I will try my best to keep up with the acceptable level of performance for everyone.
I agreed with you. What I am trying to tell is my PHP websites will be faster if they're hosted on two i9 cores instead of two old cores 2.3Ghz for example.
One core or two cores will be not enough when the sites are growing up. If two cores or 20GB space are not enough I have to move my sites to another provider because HostCram can't expand it at this time.
is it possible for l2tp vpn?
OpenVPN will work.
i mean can l2tp server be installed?
No idea.
You're mostly correct but the biggest advantage of having fast cores is probably the wordpress backend. Just that alone would justify getting faster cpus.
I think they probably can if you pay more, but if you find yourself in a situation where two latest gen cores aren't good enough, most likely upgrading to a bigger lxc plan isn't the solution.
After some quick googling, it is possible to run l2tp on lxc. But it may depend on host config. Go for kvm if you want to be sure.
each person can only order 2 service?
Correct. 2 per package.
Very good LXC!
Hope in future,your company have more such great offers. cheers!
Even with the Limited Support?
Based on my experience with you, your limited support is equivalent to premium paid support from other hosts.