Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Holliday Offer ! Bucharest storage plan 60% off 1tb less than 1.80 eur/mo ! Limited Offer! - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Holliday Offer ! Bucharest storage plan 60% off 1tb less than 1.80 eur/mo ! Limited Offer!

13

Comments

  • @ben47955 said: Seem still to be slow

    this is ubuntu ?

  • @cociu said: this is ubuntu ?

    Debian10

  • @ben47955 said: Debian10

    my colleage is rebuild all templates , in ubuntu for exemple was not set full duplex and the port speed , can you check please if your network is properly set ? for exemple in ubuntu18 is resolve all issue this command line : ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 1000 duplex full

    before :

    root@ubuntu18:~# ethtool eth0
    Settings for eth0:
    Supported ports: [ ]
    Supported link modes: Not reported
    Supported pause frame use: No
    Supports auto-negotiation: No
    Supported FEC modes: Not reported
    Advertised link modes: Not reported
    Advertised pause frame use: No
    Advertised auto-negotiation: No
    Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
    Speed: Unknown!
    Duplex: Unknown! (255)
    Port: Other
    PHYAD: 0
    Transceiver: internal
    Auto-negotiation: off
    Link detected: yes

    and to be ok need to look something like this :

    root@ubuntu18:~# ethtool eth0
    Settings for eth0:
    Supported ports: [ ]
    Supported link modes: Not reported
    Supported pause frame use: No
    Supports auto-negotiation: No
    Supported FEC modes: Not reported
    Advertised link modes: Not reported
    Advertised pause frame use: No
    Advertised auto-negotiation: No
    Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
    Speed: 1000Mb/s
    Duplex: Full
    Port: Other
    PHYAD: 0
    Transceiver: internal
    Auto-negotiation: off
    Link detected: yes

    let me know if this was help you , any way for tumorrow will have new templates so in this case with a reinstall will work automatically.

  • the speed must to be close to this ones :smile:

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
    | | |
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 722 Mbits/sec | 470 Mbits/sec
    Online.net| Paris, FR (10G) | 668 Mbits/sec | 358 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream | The Netherlands (10G) | 574 Mbits/sec | 283 Mbits/sec

  • Slightly better result overall, but not a game changer. Anyway I will wait the new template tomorrow.

    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 318 Mbits/sec   | 392 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 357 Mbits/sec   | 339 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 410 Mbits/sec   | 336 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 277 Mbits/sec   | 93.3 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 278 Mbits/sec   | 265 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 110 Mbits/sec   | 303 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 246 Mbits/sec   | 342 Mbits/sec
    

  • @ben47955 said: Slightly better result overall, but not a game changer. Anyway I will wait the new template tomorrow.

    better , my colleage is working hard. I have not this issue when we have see the speed results here.

  • @cociu said:

    @toumi111 said: server delivered thank you @cociu

    you can do another test now.

    on ubuntu 20.04
    before changing configuration

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.94 MB/s     (1.9k) | 10.91 MB/s     (170)
    Write      | 7.98 MB/s     (1.9k) | 11.42 MB/s     (178)
    Total      | 15.92 MB/s    (3.9k) | 22.34 MB/s     (348)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 35.15 MB/s      (68) | 140.30 MB/s    (137)
    Write      | 37.17 MB/s      (72) | 149.65 MB/s    (146)
    Total      | 72.33 MB/s     (140) | 289.96 MB/s    (283)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 264 Mbits/sec   | 213 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 123 Mbits/sec   | 359 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 350 Mbits/sec   | 114 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 234 Mbits/sec   | 49.3 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 237 Mbits/sec   | 240 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 102 Mbits/sec   | 223 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 216 Mbits/sec   | 309 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    

    after

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.71 MB/s     (1.9k) | 7.81 MB/s      (122)
    Write      | 7.75 MB/s     (1.9k) | 8.27 MB/s      (129)
    Total      | 15.46 MB/s    (3.8k) | 16.08 MB/s     (251)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 56.16 MB/s     (109) | 178.75 MB/s    (174)
    Write      | 58.87 MB/s     (114) | 190.65 MB/s    (186)
    Total      | 115.04 MB/s    (223) | 369.41 MB/s    (360)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 306 Mbits/sec   | 296 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 384 Mbits/sec   | busy
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 330 Mbits/sec   | 113 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 258 Mbits/sec   | 112 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 255 Mbits/sec   | 210 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 106 Mbits/sec   | 225 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 247 Mbits/sec   | 159 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    
  • This is on SSD plan in the same location, maybe the node is overloaded because everyone doing bench and loading their VPS ?

    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 577 Mbits/sec   | 414 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 704 Mbits/sec   | 629 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 794 Mbits/sec   | 588 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 14.4 Mbits/sec  | 84.9 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 608 Mbits/sec   | 654 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 94.4 Mbits/sec  | 458 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 206 Mbits/sec   | 14.1 Mbits/sec
    

  • @cociu said: ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed 1000 duplex full

    This is not permanent fix, it will revert old settings once reboot. Any permanent solution without reinstall?

  • cociucociu Member
    edited December 2020

    @samm said: This is not permanent fix, it will revert old settings once reboot. Any permanent solution without reinstall?

    yes will came tumorrow with a solution. my colleage is working in the templates

  • @ben47955 said: This is on SSD plan in the same location, maybe the node is overloaded because everyone doing bench and loading their VPS ?

    in storage plan is normal to have less speed because all people is start from the first day to save data so IO and bench is not related ... wrost with such quantity of orders in so less time you can imagine what is support the storage nodes ...

  • Here is my iperf3 after configuration, seems very slow network speed. Should I wait until tomorrow ?

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 50.3 Mbits/sec  | 69.3 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 106 Mbits/sec   | 85.6 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 67.5 Mbits/sec  | 51.8 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 54.1 Mbits/sec  | 19.5 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 47.5 Mbits/sec  | 41.6 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 37.3 Mbits/sec  | 25.5 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 58.7 Mbits/sec  | 15.9 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | busy            | busy
    
    
  • cociucociu Member
    edited December 2020

    @samm said: Here is my iperf3 after configuration, seems very slow network speed. Should I wait until tomorrow ?

    give me your ip in privete please to take a look in proxmox

  • @cociu said: give me your ip in privete

    Sent, thanks. Just wanted to let you know that this is not new server.

  • @samm said: Sent, thanks. Just wanted to let you know that this is not new server.

    i see it , more is in Oradea , this offer was in bucharest , but still need to be improoved.

  • @yoursunny said:

    @mikewazar said:
    Performance to my home in South Africa is 300-500Mbps so not too sad but I need this as an SSHFS mount to my Hetzner box lol

    Setup a VPN and tunneling via that for now and get 200-300Mbps but CPU lacks AES-NI so maxes out when I transfer... guess this is idling until Jan 1st

    You can use NFS instead of VPN or SSH.
    NFS itself is insecure because anyone who can send packets to the server can do anything as any user, but you can setup iptables rules so that only the Hetzner box can access the storage.
    There's no encryption so it doesn't need AES-NI.

    Just because the endpoints have firewalls, why in the living fuck would you send your data unencrypted over the public Internet? You know there's several parties capturing unencrypted data all over the place all the time, right?

    Thanked by 1mikewazar
  • @cociu said:

    @samm said: Here is my iperf3 after configuration, seems very slow network speed. Should I wait until tomorrow ?

    give me your ip in privete please to take a look in proxmox

    my speed test also like this
    Cachefly CDN: 12.65 MiB/s
    Leaseweb (NL): 6.11 MiB/s
    Softlayer DAL (US): 2.37 MiB/s
    Online.net (FR): 1.14 MiB/s
    OVH BHS (CA): 4.15 MiB/s

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    @TimboJones said:

    @yoursunny said:

    @mikewazar said:
    Performance to my home in South Africa is 300-500Mbps so not too sad but I need this as an SSHFS mount to my Hetzner box lol

    Setup a VPN and tunneling via that for now and get 200-300Mbps but CPU lacks AES-NI so maxes out when I transfer... guess this is idling until Jan 1st

    You can use NFS instead of VPN or SSH.
    NFS itself is insecure because anyone who can send packets to the server can do anything as any user, but you can setup iptables rules so that only the Hetzner box can access the storage.
    There's no encryption so it doesn't need AES-NI.

    Just because the endpoints have firewalls, why in the living fuck would you send your data unencrypted over the public Internet? You know there's several parties capturing unencrypted data all over the place all the time, right?

    Encrypting the pipe (network connection) does not protect against several parties. Romanian/German police went to HostSolutions/Hetzner to pull hard drives. If data is secret, encrypt it when it's produced and only store it in encrypted form. If data is not secret, send them in plaintext.

    My websites have HTTPS now, but it's only because Chrome disabled several APIs on HTTP. My secret download sites are FTP with files are pre-encrypted by AES.

  • @cociu said:

    @samm said: This is not permanent fix, it will revert old settings once reboot. Any permanent solution without reinstall?

    yes will came tumorrow with a solution. my colleage is working in the templates

    Waiting for pemanent solution without reinstall

  • @Umair said:
    @cociu

    Your looking glass is down.
    Can you setup a speed test file for the location and share it here ? (Or PM if you don't want it to be public)

    Or anyone here who can do that for me to be able to test speed from Amsterdam ?

    Thanks

    Anyone ?

  • Hi, can I apply for an ipv6 address (now or in the future)?

  • lentrolentro Member, Host Rep

    @cociu just curious, what are the internet uplinks you have in Bucharest vs in Ordea?

  • mikewazarmikewazar Member
    edited December 2020
    root@debian10:~# wget https://speed.hetzner.de/10GB.bin
    --2020-12-24 03:10:20--  https://speed.hetzner.de/10GB.bin
    Resolving speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)... 88.198.248.254, 2a01:4f8:0:59ed::2
    Connecting to speed.hetzner.de (speed.hetzner.de)|88.198.248.254|:443... connected.
    HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
    Length: 10485760000 (9.8G) [application/octet-stream]
    Saving to: '10GB.bin'
    
    10GB.bin                    6%[=>                                 ] 625.80M  13.2MB/s    eta 11m 57s^C
    

    Seems to be resolved, more than usable now thank you @cociu

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited December 2020

    @yoursunny said:

    @TimboJones said:

    @yoursunny said:

    @mikewazar said:
    Performance to my home in South Africa is 300-500Mbps so not too sad but I need this as an SSHFS mount to my Hetzner box lol

    Setup a VPN and tunneling via that for now and get 200-300Mbps but CPU lacks AES-NI so maxes out when I transfer... guess this is idling until Jan 1st

    You can use NFS instead of VPN or SSH.
    NFS itself is insecure because anyone who can send packets to the server can do anything as any user, but you can setup iptables rules so that only the Hetzner box can access the storage.
    There's no encryption so it doesn't need AES-NI.

    Just because the endpoints have firewalls, why in the living fuck would you send your data unencrypted over the public Internet? You know there's several parties capturing unencrypted data all over the place all the time, right?

    Encrypting the pipe (network connection) does not protect against several parties. Romanian/German police went to HostSolutions/Hetzner to pull hard drives. If data is secret, encrypt it when it's produced and only store it in encrypted form. If data is not secret, send them in plaintext.

    You're missing the point. Encrypting the pipe prevents those WITHOUT physical access to your hardware. You're saying, "I don't need to lock my car doors because the cops can just kick in my house front door". Security is a layers thing.

    You're also going to know if your hard drive is suddenly missing and possibly copied, whereas sharing your unencrypted data on the public wires, you NEVER KNOW.

    Thanked by 1bdl
  • I don't know if I should start setting up the server or wait for them to enable aes...

  • @12938450 said:
    I don't know if I should start setting up the server or wait for them to enable aes...

    Wait unless you have another box to temporarily move everything to

  • last one cupon was gone ! Thanks all and happy Christmas.

  • @lentro said: @cociu just curious, what are the internet uplinks you have in Bucharest vs in Ordea?

    great news is come , we will have a new website verry soon where will be posted instant traffic and the total capacity for each location.

    Thanked by 2benj0x lentro
  • @12938450 said: I don't know if I should start setting up the server or wait for them to enable aes...

    for activating Aes is not need reinstall/

  • @cociu said:

    @mikewazar said: On existing KVM storage too?

    with a reinstall yes wil be automaticall changed.

    .

    @cociu said:

    for activating Aes is not need reinstall/

    Which one is it?

    Thanked by 1mikewazar
Sign In or Register to comment.