Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Crazy Deals on Storage , SSD and hosting with SPICY GIVEAWAY This Black Friday from ServaRICA - Page 12
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Crazy Deals on Storage , SSD and hosting with SPICY GIVEAWAY This Black Friday from ServaRICA

1910121415

Comments

  • Looks like I got Flying Fish and Polar Bear on the same old node with E5-2650 (not v2). At the same time, normal disks look better than SSD :smiley: I'll wait until mass deploys and benchmarking are finished.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec 15 04:28:59 EST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2000.018 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.97 MB/s     (1.9k) | 33.96 MB/s     (530)
    Write      | 8.01 MB/s     (2.0k) | 34.30 MB/s     (535)
    Total      | 15.98 MB/s    (3.9k) | 68.26 MB/s    (1.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 38.55 MB/s      (75) | 44.57 MB/s      (43)
    Write      | 40.70 MB/s      (79) | 48.00 MB/s      (46)
    Total      | 79.25 MB/s     (154) | 92.57 MB/s      (89)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 951 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 941 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 923 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 577 Mbits/sec   | 21.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 966 Mbits/sec   | 961 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 961 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 553 Mbits/sec   | 903 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 522
    Multi Core      | 1974
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec 15 04:51:20 EST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2000.018 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 35.70 MB/s    (8.9k) | 209.62 MB/s   (3.2k)
    Write      | 35.82 MB/s    (8.9k) | 210.72 MB/s   (3.2k)
    Total      | 71.52 MB/s   (17.8k) | 420.35 MB/s   (6.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 239.40 MB/s    (467) | 219.08 MB/s    (213)
    Write      | 252.12 MB/s    (492) | 233.67 MB/s    (228)
    Total      | 491.53 MB/s    (959) | 452.75 MB/s    (441)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 942 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 943 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 920 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 555 Mbits/sec   | 25.6 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 981 Mbits/sec   | 961 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 932 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 463 Mbits/sec   | 907 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 506
    Multi Core      | 997
    
  • @samm said:

    @swatch said:
    Is the bandwith of 4TB@1Gbps for polar bear - the yearly bandwith or renews monthly?

    It is 4tb/month @1Gbps then unlimited @10Mbps or you can get it 100Mbps unlimited.

    SSD like old disk

  • @_Nic said:
    Looks like I got Flying Fish and Polar Bear on the same old node with E5-2650 (not v2). At the same time, normal disks look better than SSD :smiley: I'll wait until mass deploys and benchmarking are finished.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec 15 04:28:59 EST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2000.018 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.97 MB/s     (1.9k) | 33.96 MB/s     (530)
    Write      | 8.01 MB/s     (2.0k) | 34.30 MB/s     (535)
    Total      | 15.98 MB/s    (3.9k) | 68.26 MB/s    (1.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 38.55 MB/s      (75) | 44.57 MB/s      (43)
    Write      | 40.70 MB/s      (79) | 48.00 MB/s      (46)
    Total      | 79.25 MB/s     (154) | 92.57 MB/s      (89)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 951 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 941 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 923 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 577 Mbits/sec   | 21.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 966 Mbits/sec   | 961 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 961 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 553 Mbits/sec   | 903 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 522
    Multi Core      | 1974
    

    v2 is coming.

    I did another round of YABS moments ago, and now it's similar to yours. There are improvements, as compared to some time earlier when I did the first round of YABS.

    Obvious the Disk IO improved, and compared with yours, the network speed is super stable. I mean we both generated very similar outputs.

    first round below

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon 14 Dec 2020 09:55:28 PM EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2593.770 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 191.0 MiB
    Disk       : 196.6 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 8.46 MB/s     (2.1k) | 24.68 MB/s     (385)
    Write      | 8.50 MB/s     (2.1k) | 25.21 MB/s     (393)
    Total      | 16.96 MB/s    (4.2k) | 49.89 MB/s     (778)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 24.56 MB/s      (47) | 6.00 MB/s        (5)
    Write      | 26.25 MB/s      (51) | 6.50 MB/s        (6)
    Total      | 50.81 MB/s      (98) | 12.50 MB/s      (11)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 931 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 940 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 865 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 564 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 996 Mbits/sec   | 960 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 964 Mbits/sec   | 941 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 471 Mbits/sec   | 905 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 446
    Multi Core      | 1586
    

    Second round below.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue 15 Dec 2020 09:23:54 AM EST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2593.748 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 191.0 MiB
    Disk       : 196.6 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 19.27 MB/s    (4.8k) | 69.11 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Write      | 19.26 MB/s    (4.8k) | 69.51 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 38.53 MB/s    (9.6k) | 138.62 MB/s   (2.1k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 144.94 MB/s    (283) | 102.29 MB/s     (99)
    Write      | 152.64 MB/s    (298) | 109.10 MB/s    (106)
    Total      | 297.59 MB/s    (581) | 211.40 MB/s    (205)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 960 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 954 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 935 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 570 Mbits/sec   | 28.3 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 989 Mbits/sec   | 960 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 962 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 919 Mbits/sec   | 706 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 454
    Multi Core      | 1605
    
  • Same story as on Black Friday. Guys, just give all some time to bench and populate VPS disks with data. Time of good IO will come.

  • @servarica_hani - stock is still available. May we abandon that rule of 1 per customer?

  • @default said:
    @servarica_hani - stock is still available. May we abandon that rule of 1 per customer?

    Same question here. Don't leave money on the table.

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @default said:
    @servarica_hani - stock is still available. May we abandon that rule of 1 per customer?

    @ernie88 said:
    Same question here. Don't leave money on the table.

    OK since we managed to have stock for 1 day , I think most people waiting already got their VPS

    from now you are allowed to order more than once but max is 3 please

    Thanks

    Thanked by 1ernie88
  • Hi, I took the Polar Bear offer. Thank you for the good deal!

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited December 2020

    @servarica_hani said:

    @default said:
    @servarica_hani - stock is still available. May we abandon that rule of 1 per customer?

    @ernie88 said:
    Same question here. Don't leave money on the table.

    OK since we managed to have stock for 1 day , I think most people waiting already got their VPS

    from now you are allowed to order more than once but max is 3 please

    Thanks

    3 new orders? or 3 in total with Black Friday included? :smiley:

  • @_Nic said:
    Looks like I got Flying Fish and Polar Bear on the same old node with E5-2650 (not v2). At the same time, normal disks look better than SSD :smiley: I'll wait until mass deploys and benchmarking are finished.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec 15 04:28:59 EST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2000.018 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.97 MB/s     (1.9k) | 33.96 MB/s     (530)
    Write      | 8.01 MB/s     (2.0k) | 34.30 MB/s     (535)
    Total      | 15.98 MB/s    (3.9k) | 68.26 MB/s    (1.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 38.55 MB/s      (75) | 44.57 MB/s      (43)
    Write      | 40.70 MB/s      (79) | 48.00 MB/s      (46)
    Total      | 79.25 MB/s     (154) | 92.57 MB/s      (89)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 951 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 941 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 923 Mbits/sec   | 927 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 577 Mbits/sec   | 21.1 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 966 Mbits/sec   | 961 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 961 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 553 Mbits/sec   | 903 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 522
    Multi Core      | 1974
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2020-12-07                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec 15 04:51:20 EST 2020
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2000.018 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 1.9 GiB
    Disk       : 1.9 TiB
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 35.70 MB/s    (8.9k) | 209.62 MB/s   (3.2k)
    Write      | 35.82 MB/s    (8.9k) | 210.72 MB/s   (3.2k)
    Total      | 71.52 MB/s   (17.8k) | 420.35 MB/s   (6.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 239.40 MB/s    (467) | 219.08 MB/s    (213)
    Write      | 252.12 MB/s    (492) | 233.67 MB/s    (228)
    Total      | 491.53 MB/s    (959) | 452.75 MB/s    (441)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed
                    |                           |                 |
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 942 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec
    Online.net      | Paris, FR (10G)           | 943 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    WorldStream     | The Netherlands (10G)     | 920 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec
    Biznet          | Jakarta, Indonesia (1G)   | 555 Mbits/sec   | 25.6 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 974 Mbits/sec
    Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 981 Mbits/sec   | 961 Mbits/sec
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 932 Mbits/sec   | 944 Mbits/sec
    Iveloz Telecom  | Sao Paulo, BR (2G)        | 463 Mbits/sec   | 907 Mbits/sec
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 506
    Multi Core      | 997
    

    Plot twist: they provisioned the 2TB on the SSD.

  • @default said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @default said:
    @servarica_hani - stock is still available. May we abandon that rule of 1 per customer?

    @ernie88 said:
    Same question here. Don't leave money on the table.

    OK since we managed to have stock for 1 day , I think most people waiting already got their VPS

    from now you are allowed to order more than once but max is 3 please

    Thanks

    3 new orders? or 3 in total with Black Friday included? :smiley:

    The latter makes more sense.

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @default said:
    3 new orders? or 3 in total with Black Friday included? :smiley:

    3 orders of the same plan in total regardless of when you got it
    So if you got 1 polar in BF and one yesterday you still can get 3rd today

    Thanked by 1ernie88
  • the control panel doesn't provide vnc access info.

    also, any way to switch boot order, if I want to boot frm netboot.xyz?

    Ubuntu 20 seems to fail update as apt upgrade throws out some dpkg error code.

    It could be great that ServaRica provides self assistant reinstalling & customization to a higher level.

  • ernie88ernie88 Member
    edited December 2020

    @aRNoLD said:
    the control panel doesn't provide vnc access info.

    also, any way to switch boot order, if I want to boot frm netboot.xyz?

    Ubuntu 20 seems to fail update as apt upgrade throws out some dpkg error code.

    It could be great that ServaRica provides self assistant reinstalling & customization to a higher level.

    Didn't notice VNC in the CP either.

    Although their Ubuntu 18.04 image works perfectly for me. Maybe try installing it and upgrade to 20.04 from inside 18.04.

  • @servarica_hani said:
    3 orders of the same plan in total regardless of when you got it
    So if you got 1 polar in BF and one yesterday you still can get 3rd today

    Fantastic, got 2 more Polar Bears. Thank you for this amazing deal!

  • @ernie88 said:

    @servarica_hani said:
    3 orders of the same plan in total regardless of when you got it
    So if you got 1 polar in BF and one yesterday you still can get 3rd today

    Fantastic, got 2 more Polar Bears. Thank you for this amazing deal!

    You got UltraVPS, HostHatch and now ServaRica great deals.

  • @aRNoLD @ernie88 VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • @aRNoLD said:
    You got UltraVPS, HostHatch and now ServaRica great deals.

    Thanks for figuring that for me :smile:

    @its420somewhere said:
    VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full-blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    Yes, seen it but you were faster than me.

    Thanked by 1its420somewhere
  • aRNoLDaRNoLD Member
    edited December 2020

    @its420somewhere said:
    @aRNoLD @ernie88 VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    frankly, not an easy-to-use console, not as much as that with Virtualizor or Solusvm. It's inside the webpage, hard to press any keys, esp. when rebooting the machine. I actually wanted to locate the VNC's info so that I could use some external, separate apps, such as VNC Viewer to connect as I always did with other host mgmt systems. I then realized this is a new platform, not KVM, not OpenVZ, but Xenica. I've never tried it before.

    Thank you @its420somewhere and @ernie88

    Thanked by 1its420somewhere
  • @aRNoLD said:

    @its420somewhere said:
    @aRNoLD @ernie88 VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    frankly, not an easy-to-use console, not as much as that with Virtualizor or Solusvm. It's inside the webpage, hard to press any keys, esp. when rebooting the machine. I actually wanted to locate the VNC's info so that I could use some external, separate apps, such as VNC Viewer to connect as I always did with other host mgmt systems. I then realized this is a new platform, not KVM, not OpenVZ, but Xenica. I've never tried it before.

    Thank you @its420somewhere and @ernie88

    Ahh yes, you're right. I see there's no way to get those details either through the client area.

    By the way, you may not know this but if it comes up in trivia one day perhaps you'll thank me: Xenica is actually created by Servarica themselves.

    They run their servers on the Xen platform, which is basically the same as KVM except that it's apparently more prem in some way - but that's probably a Linux vs FreeBSD type of argument.

  • aRNoLDaRNoLD Member
    edited December 2020

    @its420somewhere said:

    @aRNoLD said:

    @its420somewhere said:
    @aRNoLD @ernie88 VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    frankly, not an easy-to-use console, not as much as that with Virtualizor or Solusvm. It's inside the webpage, hard to press any keys, esp. when rebooting the machine. I actually wanted to locate the VNC's info so that I could use some external, separate apps, such as VNC Viewer to connect as I always did with other host mgmt systems. I then realized this is a new platform, not KVM, not OpenVZ, but Xenica. I've never tried it before.

    Thank you @its420somewhere and @ernie88

    Ahh yes, you're right. I see there's no way to get those details either through the client area.

    By the way, you may not know this but if it comes up in trivia one day perhaps you'll thank me: Xenica is actually created by Servarica themselves.

    They run their servers on the Xen platform, which is basically the same as KVM except that it's apparently more prem in some way - but that's probably a Linux vs FreeBSD type of argument.

    CANNOT believe that! ServaRica is the creator? I never imagined this. Their OS templates look so un-polished. Some are cloned, some caused error msg after VM created and machine rebooting. So from an amateur's perspective, tech gurus like ServaRica won't always allow these happen.

    update:

    You are right, and I just located their home.
    https://xenmodule.com/

    Thought it is a VPS provider, and now find out they are developers.

  • https://xenmodule.com/#features

    Show VM info :
    (Host,IP, Password, Registration Date, Bandwidth Usage, etc.. )
    Show VM Specification :
    (Disk Space, Virtual CPUs, Memory size)
    Detect VM current power state (Running, Halted, Paused)
    Basic VM Control (Boot, Shutdown, Reboot)
    VM Change Root Password :
    (clients can reset their VMs password)
    VM ReInstall :
    (can select OS from allowed templates list)
    VM SnapShots (list, create and delete)
    VM Console
    (for both Linux/Windows, keep works even if SSH is off)
    VM Graph/Stats :
    (statistics graph for HD,Net,CPUs,RAM Usage)
    VM mount CD :
    (can mount an ISO file from Server Storage Repository)
    VM commands history
    

    http://wiki.xenmodule.com/doku.php?id=console_instructions

    http://wiki.xenmodule.com/doku.php?id=linux_template_creation

    http://wiki.xenmodule.com/doku.php?id=iso_repository

    various features, some of which are not seen in my panel, say root pwd change, graph/stats, and esp. mounting ISO/CDs. ServaRica may allow more features on client side panel.

    The manual is written in detailed manner.

  • Is it possible to order two Polar Bear Storage Offer and have it provisioned on two separate servers?

  • @aRNoLD said:
    the control panel doesn't provide vnc access info.

    also, any way to switch boot order, if I want to boot frm netboot.xyz?

    Ubuntu 20 seems to fail update as apt upgrade throws out some dpkg error code.

    It could be great that ServaRica provides self assistant reinstalling & customization to a higher level.

    Well, you kinda need to note the exact dpkg error...

    Today, my Centos 8 update failed due to insufficient space in /boot. I got around it by manually removing old kernels and then update succeeded. Default configuration will likely run into this for others.

    @servarica_hani Centos 8 tells me it only knows about kernel 4.x versions, but in /boot there is a 3.10 el7 kernel. Do you know if that is there for a Xen host thing, or I can probably delete it as a leftover Centos 7 to 8 upgrade remnant? Though, I thought I installed from centos 8 template, but can't quite remember.

  • @TimboJones said:
    Today, my Centos 8 update failed due to insufficient space in /boot. I got around it by manually removing old kernels and then update succeeded. Default configuration will likely run into this for others.

    I am using Ubuntu 20.04 also encountered the same problem, /boot partition space is a bit small, so you must ensure that no non-essential to keep the old kernel before updating the kernel.

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • @TimboJones said:

    @aRNoLD said:
    the control panel doesn't provide vnc access info.

    also, any way to switch boot order, if I want to boot frm netboot.xyz?

    Ubuntu 20 seems to fail update as apt upgrade throws out some dpkg error code.

    It could be great that ServaRica provides self assistant reinstalling & customization to a higher level.

    Well, you kinda need to note the exact dpkg error...

    Today, my Centos 8 update failed due to insufficient space in /boot. I got around it by manually removing old kernels and then update succeeded. Default configuration will likely run into this for others.

    @servarica_hani Centos 8 tells me it only knows about kernel 4.x versions, but in /boot there is a 3.10 el7 kernel. Do you know if that is there for a Xen host thing, or I can probably delete it as a leftover Centos 7 to 8 upgrade remnant? Though, I thought I installed from centos 8 template, but can't quite remember.

    Thank you for mentioning this which I may have neglected. I still have no idea how to handle the template-born issue. If ServaRica can investigate or have a work-around, that would be much better.

  • aj_potcaj_potc Member
    edited December 2020

    You're right -- the space in /boot is uncomfortably tight.

    One workaround for CentOS 8 is to limit the number of kernels retained. This lets you avoid having to clean them up manually.

    In /etc/dnf/dnf.conf, edit the option:

    installonly_limit=

    Setting this to 1 saved a bit of space for me.

    Still, I'd be happier seeing /boot set to something bigger. I usually give it a GB in my installations, which is probably overkill.

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • Happy with my new Polar Bear

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @aRNoLD said:
    the control panel doesn't provide vnc access info.

    I guess the members here answered this already

    also, any way to switch boot order, if I want to boot frm netboot.xyz?

    you can have the iso and ask us to mount it for you
    also I am sure there is a way to boot it without iso as some of our users do it but never tried to do it

    I assume from the console you have really small window after reboot to choose to switch bot method

    @its420somewhere said:
    @aRNoLD @ernie88 VNC is in the client area, it's called "Console" - it's a full blown VNC, not a serial console like the name may suggest.

    wrote my answers before seeing yours Thanks :smile:

    @aRNoLD said:
    frankly, not an easy-to-use console, not as much as that with Virtualizor or Solusvm. It's inside the webpage, hard to press any keys, esp. when rebooting the machine. I actually wanted to locate the VNC's info so that I could use some external, separate apps, such as VNC Viewer to connect as I always did with other host mgmt systems. I then realized this is a new platform, not KVM, not OpenVZ, but Xenica. I've never tried it before.

    There is 2 limitations here
    1- We run internal network for the management of our servers and this network is never exposed externally for security reasons , so even if the xenserver can expose the vnc info you will not be able to reach it

    2- xenserver and xcp-ng dont expose the typical VNC with ip and port , instead they expose vnc as a url and the vnc traffic is encoded in different manner than what vnc clients can read

    @aRNoLD said:
    CANNOT believe that! ServaRica is the creator? I never imagined this. Their OS templates look so un-polished. Some are cloned, some caused error msg after VM created and machine rebooting. So from an amateur's perspective, tech gurus like ServaRica won't always allow these happen.

    update:

    You are right, and I just located their home.
    https://xenmodule.com/

    Thought it is a VPS provider, and now find out they are developers.

    yes I agree we need to work more on our templates
    expect to see changes regarding them soon

    @aRNoLD said:
    various features, some of which are not seen in my panel, say root pwd change, graph/stats, and esp. mounting ISO/CDs. ServaRica may allow more features on client side panel.

    The manual is written in detailed manner.

    we enabled graphs for all new plans
    pwd change is disabled intentionally for security reasons , we dont want anyone who have access to the client area to be able to reset the vm password

    mounting ISO is not enables as mostly you will need to contact us to upload your iso , but we should look into it

    @Bandai said:
    Is it possible to order two Polar Bear Storage Offer and have it provisioned on two separate servers?

    yes , we do that usually without even asking but add it as order note to make sure it is done

    @TimboJones said:

    @aRNoLD said:

    Today, my Centos 8 update failed due to insufficient space in /boot. I got around it by manually removing old kernels and then update succeeded. Default configuration will likely run into this for others.

    @servarica_hani Centos 8 tells me it only knows about kernel 4.x versions, but in /boot there is a 3.10 el7 kernel. Do you know if that is there for a Xen host thing, or I can probably delete it as a leftover Centos 7 to 8 upgrade remnant? Though, I thought I installed from centos 8 template, but can't quite remember.

    yes you can delete it , xen does not need any old kernel so it is safe to be removed
    the reason it is there is that the centos 8 template is created by upgrading older template as when it was created xenserver didnt fully support centos8 (now it does)

    @aRNoLD said:
    Thank you for mentioning this which I may have neglected. I still have no idea how to handle the template-born issue. If ServaRica can investigate or have a work-around, that would be much better.

    will ask the team to recreate the template with older kernels removed

  • Hmm... plans are still available. People were making so much noise that they did not get to buy, and now they don't want to buy.

    @servarica_hani - how many plans have sold since refill? How many are still available?

Sign In or Register to comment.