New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Yet-Another-Bench-Script
v2020-01-08
https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script
## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##
Sat Feb 1 22:29:28 EST 2020
Basic System Information:
Processor : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz
CPU cores : 1 @ 2199.998 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 991M
Swap : 1.0G
Disk : 24G
dd Sequential Disk Speed Tests:
Write | 215 MB/s | 228 MB/s | 224 MB/s | 222.33 MB/s
Read | 959 MB/s | 943 MB/s | 964 MB/s | 955.33 MB/s
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed
| | |
Bouygues Telecom | Paris, FR (10G) | 8.16 Gbits/sec | 6.89 Gbits/sec
Online.net | Paris, FR (10G) | 7.68 Gbits/sec | 7.39 Gbits/sec
Severius | The Netherlands (10G) | busy bits/sec | busy bits/sec
Worldstream | The Netherlands (10G) | 8.36 Gbits/sec | 3.30 Gbits/sec
wilhelm.tel | Hamburg, DE (10G) | 4.48 Gbits/sec | 4.32 Gbits/sec
Biznet | Bogor, Indonesia (1G) | 786 Mbits/sec | 476 Mbits/sec
Hostkey | Moscow, RU (1G) | 916 Mbits/sec | 925 Mbits/sec
Vultr | Piscataway, NJ, US (1G) | busy bits/sec | busy bits/sec
Velocity Online | Tallahassee, FL, US (10G) | 1.55 Gbits/sec | 2.02 Gbits/sec
Airstream Communications | Eau Claire, WI, US (10G) | 1.65 Gbits/sec | 1.61 Gbits/sec
Hurricane Electric | Fremont, CA, US (10G) | 1.51 Gbits/sec | 1.41 Gbits/sec
Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 2730
Multi Core | 2660
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/15193280
If you have evidence of continued wrong-doing I am happy to de-list. Drop the evidence my way.
Well that's what my point was, do you consider posting on Hack Forums to be a wrong doing? If not, that's the only thing this provider has actually been done wrong, having posted on Hack Forums.
So far mostly positives for HostSlick. The performance and support is good. Have three services with them.
< / end talk>
My concerns are with poor performance, unsustainable pricing and deadpooling. Do you have strong reasons why HackForums should count against a provider who do not have any red flags regarding my key concerns? I am happy to consider well-reasoned arguments.
No, that's what I'm saying! I'm saying that everyone else was roasting this provider for being on Hack Forums, including a LET mod @hzr whilst some other providers on the whitelist are also posted on Hack Forums. Was highlighting the double standard/witch hunt