Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


FLASH SALE BLOWOUT - SMARTHOST - 8GB RAM, 40GB NVME SSD, 4 vCPU, 2TB BW - KVM VPS - Only $6.95/Month - Page 3
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

FLASH SALE BLOWOUT - SMARTHOST - 8GB RAM, 40GB NVME SSD, 4 vCPU, 2TB BW - KVM VPS - Only $6.95/Month

13567

Comments

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @teamacc said:

    @SmartHost said:
    One of our 13 locations happens to be be their Buffalo NY site, as the price was right, and the service is good.

    How many of the other 12 are CC-based?

    None.
    .

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited October 2019

    @agentmishra said:
    in the storage vps, will you allow repository hosting?

    The Storage VPS are not really meant for media streaming, but should be OK as long as not get out of hand, and you have a bandwidth allocation limit anyways.
    .

    Thanked by 1agentmishra
  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited October 2019

    @beagle said:

    SmartHost said: Let me see if I can find away to make it happen for you, on something other than our Storage VPS system

    I could use something like 1vCPU / 1GB / 80-100GB HDD / 1TB bw on FL for under $40/yr

    PM us please to arrange this.
    We don't have Storage VPS in the FL market, but we have one older spinning disk node in FL that we can do that deal on, as we acquired it in an acquisition and it still had some space available.
    .

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @claudio said:
    Great offer, what about:

    a) Do you have any specific restriction on IOPS? Average / Peak? I dont really need much, but had a recent bad experience with another provider enforcing VERY low tps average.

    We try and let things be, unless it gets out of hand and affects other clients.
    General rule of just don't abuse the system and don't affect other clients applies, but no specific hard setting/rules.
    Sometimes we'll migrate a problematic user to a different node more suitable, and balance usage out, in order to keeps things running smoothly.
    Our loads are not overloaded, and we have more hardware available than we know what to do with right now...so we're a little more tolerable of usage at the moment, as we can just spread the load out as needed.

    b) Any ETA on that Sale for Piscataway?

    Sometime this week. Servers are ready/online in NJ, just need order/install the NVME components before we can add them into this offer pool.

    c) Is there any chance I could get the 40 / 80Gb nvme PLUS some HDD space (around 300Gb)? I'd prefer the NY/NJ region.

    We are not configured for a mix of NVME + HDD yet, but are currently working on a plan for that. We're a bit of the ways off for that though, so for now it is not an option.
    .

    Thanked by 1claudio
  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @vyas11 said:
    I am sure Smarthost can answer in detail should they so desire, but comparing CC's DC addresses and Smarthost DC addresses - . There is only one commonality??

    Added later: DC addresses are just one data point among other variables.

    That is correct.
    Just one of our 13 current locations happens to be a ColoCrossing site.
    We are also in a bunch of Psychz locations, and then the others are all just individual players local to their market.
    .

    Thanked by 1dahartigan
  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @jihchi said:
    @SmartHost

    Could I order both KVM LINUX STORAGE VPS and KVM NVME SSD Budget VPS - FLASH SALE! and merge them into one VPS?
    Or, Is that possible to add-on 1TB SAS RAID-6 Disk Space to KVM NVME SSD Budget VPS - FLASH SALE!?

    We are not set up to merge Flash + Rust in one combined service at this time. That will change in upcoming months, but not quite yet.
    .

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @vimalware said:
    I am relieved to see Netherlands/UK is not on the location list for this offer.
    😅

    Yea...the servers we are re-purposing for this flash sale are mostly in the CA, TX, & NY locations we have. We have a smaller quantity available in NJ, and we're going to put some up locally here in NV, and use up some extra space/power in IL maybe, but doubtful we'll have these available in other locations beyond that...especially the EU (due to cost to ship them there). This deal really only works for us as we have unused existing hardware from a large cancellation we are re-purposing...
    .

    Thanked by 1vimalware
  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @Mr_Tom said:
    Tempted on a Wolverhampton one as I presume that's in Veloxservs DC?

    The offer one isn't there but the standard ones seem to let me choose.

    Yes, our Wolverhampton UK location is in the VeloxServ DC.
    Been with them for many many years, and they have always been rock solid for us.
    .

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @andrew1995 said:
    Which of your west coast location would be best for Asia?

    Los Angeles is probably most suitable for Asia, but a handful of clients like the Las Vegas site as an alternative.
    Depending on routes though to specific clients, once in awhile Texas or the UK seems to do well for that as well, but that is not the norm.
    .

    Thanked by 1andrew1995
  • vyas11vyas11 Member
    edited October 2019

    @SmartHost said:

    Just one of our 13 current locations happens to be a ColoCrossing site.
    We are also in a bunch of Psychz locations, and then the others are all just individual players local to their market.

    In the pictures, your DC locations look prettier than the CC one. Cheers.

  • SpeedTestSpeedTest Member
    edited October 2019

    Mine LAX location is blocked by AT&T, I can't do a speedtest or ping their servers

    @SmartHost

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @SpeedTest said:
    Mine LAX location is blocked by AT&T, I can't do a speedtest or ping their servers

    @SmartHost

    Not really sure what you mean by that.
    Please open a ticket and we will gladly assist you.
    .

  • SpeedTestSpeedTest Member
    edited October 2019

    SmartHost said: Not really sure what you mean by that.

    Please open a ticket and we will gladly assist you.

    Nevermind it's working ok(but not as it should) now, I think it was AT&T problem

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest Monster v.1.4.5 2019-10-13 
     Region: USA  https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -USA
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.4.1.el7.x86_64
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
     CPU Cores    : 4 @ 2599.998 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
     Total Space  : 39G (3.1G ~9% used)
     Total RAM    : 554 MB / 7821 MB (862 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 1023 MB
     Uptime       : 0 days 19:31
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS40676, HostUS Solutions LLC
     Organization : Smarthost
     Location     : Newark, United States / US
     Region       : New Jersey
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 2813  (GOOD)
       Multi Core : 9346
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  87.5 MB/s
       sha256     : 232 MB/s
       md5sum     : 425 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 2286.9 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 5597.9 MB/s
    
     Disk Write Speed:
       1st run    : 951 MB/s
       2nd run    : 950 MB/s
       3rd run    : 980 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 960.3 MB/s
    
     ## USA Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping   
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  792.14 Mbit/s    874.63 Mbit/s    13.007 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           122.08 Mbit/s    56.46 Mbit/s    130.392 ms
     USA, Boston (Starry, Inc.)     227.83 Mbit/s    134.13 Mbit/s    77.144 ms
     USA, Washington, DC (AT&T)     140.17 Mbit/s    221.58 Mbit/s    65.304 ms
     USA, Charlotte, NC (AT&T)      206.09 Mbit/s    200.30 Mbit/s    56.354 ms
     USA, Atlanta (Frontier)        247.54 Mbit/s    211.62 Mbit/s    70.146 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          236.00 Mbit/s    162.67 Mbit/s    70.800 ms
     USA, Nashville (Sprint)        290.90 Mbit/s    324.96 Mbit/s    55.570 ms
     USA, Indianapolis (Metronet)   275.97 Mbit/s    145.99 Mbit/s    58.793 ms
     USA, Cleveland (AT&T)          117.87 Mbit/s    58.32 Mbit/s    137.057 ms
     USA, Chicago (Windstream)      44.82 Mbit/s     221.54 Mbit/s    41.919 ms
     USA, St. Louis (AT&T)          119.14 Mbit/s    75.78 Mbit/s    131.524 ms
     USA, Minneapolis (US Internet) 174.44 Mbit/s    198.19 Mbit/s    81.732 ms
     USA, Kansas City (UPNfiber)    388.31 Mbit/s    220.84 Mbit/s    41.881 ms
     USA, Oklahoma City (OneNet)    396.38 Mbit/s    294.62 Mbit/s    34.331 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         384.33 Mbit/s    142.19 Mbit/s    28.121 ms
     USA, San Antonio, TX (AT&T)    120.76 Mbit/s    52.48 Mbit/s    133.215 ms
     USA, Denver (Vistabeam)        140.18 Mbit/s    351.00 Mbit/s    36.832 ms
     USA, Albuquerque (Plateau Tel) 223.27 Mbit/s    271.91 Mbit/s    42.819 ms
     USA, Phoenix (Cox)             560.60 Mbit/s    358.75 Mbit/s    12.298 ms
     USA, Salt Lake City (UTOPIA)   416.80 Mbit/s    325.99 Mbit/s    23.156 ms
     USA, Helena, MT (The Fusion)   287.42 Mbit/s    435.69 Mbit/s    60.371 ms
     USA, Las Vegas (LV.Net)        503.21 Mbit/s    604.92 Mbit/s     7.442 ms
     USA, Seattle (Sprint)          348.93 Mbit/s    348.61 Mbit/s    30.257 ms
     USA, San Francisco (AT&T)      103.50 Mbit/s    54.05 Mbit/s    147.586 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    777.95 Mbit/s    753.43 Mbit/s     3.594 ms
     USA, Anchorage (Alaska Com)    218.77 Mbit/s    306.76 Mbit/s    52.021 ms
     USA, Honolulu, HI (Dialogix)   266.12 Mbit/s    279.99 Mbit/s    49.354 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 11 min 55 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-10-28 01:58:53 UTC
    
     Share results:
     - https://www.speedtest.net/result/8710450204.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14858811
    
  • sinsin Member

    Picked 1 up in Texas! I really love Smarthost, great performance/specs and Shawn is amazing.

    Thanked by 1claudio
  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    @sin said:
    Picked 1 up in Texas! I really love Smarthost, great performance/specs and Shawn is amazing.

    Thank you so much...I try! ;-)
    .

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran

    In response to most common questions so far:

    1. Yes, Windows Trial ISOs are available in the system.
    2. IPv6 available all locations currently except NY/NJ.
    3. You cannot peg the CPU allocations non-stop. Reasonable usage level expectations apply.
      .
    Thanked by 1feezioxiii
  • @SmartHost said:
    In response to most common questions so far:
    1. Yes, Windows Trial ISOs are available in the system.

    Hi, I do not find Windows templates on node207 LA.
    could you add that please, thank you

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited October 2019

    @tamicrealo said:

    @SmartHost said:
    In response to most common questions so far:
    1. Yes, Windows Trial ISOs are available in the system.

    Hi, I do not find Windows templates on node207 LA.
    could you add that please, thank you

    These are not Windows VPS packages being offered in this flash sale, and we supply Linux templates only. However, we do have Windows ISOs uploaded, so you can install and license yourself.
    .

  • Grabbed one in Dallas... installed Deb 10, Looks good so far but will test it through for a few days before putting in production use.

    Thanks @SmartHost for a good deal.

  • Hi

    LA still has bad(long) connection with ATT customers or at least with their servers

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest Monster v.1.4.6 2019-10-29 
     Region: USA  https://bench.monster/speedtest.html
     Usage : curl -LsO bench.monster/speedtest.sh; bash speedtest.sh -USA
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     OS           : CentOS 7.7.1908 (64 Bit)
     Virt/Kernel  : KVM / 3.10.0-1062.4.1.el7.x86_64
     CPU Model    : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
     CPU Cores    : 4 @ 2599.998 MHz x86_64 16384 KB Cache
     CPU Flags    : AES-NI Enabled & VM-x/AMD-V Enabled
     Load Average : 0.00, 0.01, 0.05
     Total Space  : 39G (3.3G ~10% used)
     Total RAM    : 734 MB / 7821 MB (1305 MB Buff)
     Total SWAP   : 0 MB / 1023 MB
     Uptime       : 2 days 15:31
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     ASN & ISP    : AS40676, HostUS Solutions LLC
     Organization : Smarthost
     Location     : Newark, United States / US
     Region       : New Jersey
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     ## Geekbench v4 CPU Benchmark:
    
      Single Core : 2733  (GOOD)
       Multi Core : 9063
    
     ## IO Test
    
     CPU Speed:
        bzip2     :  85.7 MB/s
       sha256     : 219 MB/s
       md5sum     : 389 MB/s
    
     RAM Speed:
       Avg. write : 1622.3 MB/s
       Avg. read  : 4676.3 MB/s
    
     Disk Read Speed:
       1st run    : 841 MB/s
       2nd run    : 898 MB/s
       3rd run    : 926 MB/s
       -----------------------
       Average    : 888.3 MB/s
    
     ## USA Speedtest
    
     Location                       Upload           Download         Ping   
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net                  704.66 Mbit/s    881.40 Mbit/s    27.425 ms
     USA, New York (AT&T)           123.56 Mbit/s    58.95 Mbit/s    129.908 ms
     USA, Boston (Starry, Inc.)     146.43 Mbit/s    106.90 Mbit/s    80.487 ms
     USA, Washington, DC (AT&T)     227.66 Mbit/s    171.05 Mbit/s    64.869 ms
     USA, Charlotte, NC (AT&T)      235.61 Mbit/s    153.59 Mbit/s    56.214 ms
     USA, Atlanta (Frontier)        218.90 Mbit/s    205.10 Mbit/s    70.173 ms
     USA, Miami (Frontier)          252.82 Mbit/s    157.75 Mbit/s    69.570 ms
     USA, Nashville (Sprint)        294.23 Mbit/s    283.40 Mbit/s    55.520 ms
     USA, Indianapolis (Metronet)   296.49 Mbit/s    186.28 Mbit/s    51.624 ms
     USA, Cleveland (AT&T)          62.66 Mbit/s     53.14 Mbit/s    137.341 ms
     USA, Chicago (Windstream)      259.98 Mbit/s    248.51 Mbit/s    44.177 ms
     USA, St. Louis (AT&T)          120.72 Mbit/s    53.71 Mbit/s    137.144 ms
     USA, Minneapolis (US Internet) 238.14 Mbit/s    171.53 Mbit/s    72.033 ms
     USA, Kansas City (UPNfiber)    258.54 Mbit/s    245.08 Mbit/s    45.577 ms
     USA, Oklahoma City (OneNet)    335.08 Mbit/s    308.57 Mbit/s    34.314 ms
     USA, Dallas (Frontier)         307.40 Mbit/s    262.16 Mbit/s    37.868 ms
     USA, San Antonio, TX (AT&T)    118.91 Mbit/s    52.03 Mbit/s    132.780 ms
     USA, Denver (Vistabeam)        318.84 Mbit/s    396.92 Mbit/s    36.542 ms
     USA, Albuquerque (Plateau Tel) 192.54 Mbit/s    490.49 Mbit/s    42.929 ms
     USA, Phoenix (Cox)             502.19 Mbit/s    274.12 Mbit/s    12.524 ms
     USA, Salt Lake City (UTOPIA)   458.76 Mbit/s    366.31 Mbit/s    23.067 ms
     USA, Helena, MT (The Fusion)   266.58 Mbit/s    651.16 Mbit/s    60.403 ms
     USA, Las Vegas (LV.Net)        579.64 Mbit/s    464.39 Mbit/s     7.502 ms
     USA, Seattle (Sprint)          310.62 Mbit/s    341.47 Mbit/s    30.291 ms
     USA, San Francisco (AT&T)      116.97 Mbit/s    52.80 Mbit/s    142.018 ms
     USA, Los Angeles (Spectrum)    695.80 Mbit/s    753.93 Mbit/s     2.791 ms
     USA, Anchorage (Alaska Com)    172.05 Mbit/s    359.33 Mbit/s    52.050 ms
     USA, Honolulu, HI (Dialogix)   262.93 Mbit/s    524.56 Mbit/s    49.568 ms
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     Finished in : 11 min 54 sec
     Timestamp   : 2019-10-29 21:59:04 UTC
     Saved in    : /root/speedtest.log
    
     Share results:
     - http://www.speedtest.net/result/8716029715.png
     - https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14867181
     - https://clbin.com/deR8d
    
  • hi @SpeedTest - for this kind of thing it might help to do an mtr to and from your server and your att endpoint - and open a ticket with the results, in case the provider may be inclined to change the routing (sometimes it's possible, other times not so much)

  • SmartHostSmartHost Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited October 2019

    @SpeedTest said:

    LA still has bad(long) connection with ATT customers or at least with their servers

    We do not connect to AT&T, nor peer with AT&T, directly at that location, so issues with them are well outside our network. This really has nothing to do with us. If anything, AT&T has some overloaded circuits/peering in the LA market, with some upstream carriers.
    .

  • AFAIK there is an NSA data vacuum installed at a number of AT&T sites which may explain that anomaly also. Both are outside of the control of @SmartHost to the best of my knowledge.

  • SpeedTestSpeedTest Member
    edited October 2019

    SmartHost said: We do not connect to AT&T, nor peer with AT&T, directly at that location, so issues with them are well outside our network. This really has nothing to do with us.

    Actually I don't care, I use Cloudflare. But some of your customers might do, so it's better to investigate what's is going on

    Thanked by 1uptime
  • TheLinuxBugTheLinuxBug Member
    edited October 2019

    SmartHost said: We do not connect to AT&T, nor peer with AT&T, directly at that location, so issues with them are well outside our network. This really has nothing to do with us. If anything, AT&T has some overloaded circuits/peering in the LA market, with some upstream carriers.

    Edited:
    Maybe it would still be worth working with the customer in a ticket even if you don't believe it is your direct issue. If they haven't opened one to you, maybe offer to open one to them and see if there is anything that can be done? Telling them, "This isn't our problem", seems an awful lot like passing the buck on this.

    my 2 cents.

    Cheers!

    Thanked by 1sanvit
  • muffinmuffin Member
    edited October 2019

    @TheLinuxBug said:

    SmartHost said: We do not connect to AT&T, nor peer with AT&T, directly at that location, so issues with them are well outside our network. This really has nothing to do with us. If anything, AT&T has some overloaded circuits/peering in the LA market, with some upstream carriers.

    ...
    my 2 cents.
    Cheers!

    I’ll copy the words of sir @FHR ,

    speedtest-cli, apart from being wildly inaccurate and showing completely unrealistic numbers (0.2Mbps upload to a server located 0.2ms away on an uncontested gigabit pipe) introduces too many variables into the equation.
    If you see low numbers, you have no idea whether
    a) the speedtest server is just crap
    b) the speedtest server isn’t able to handle your speeds (since it can be on a 10Mbps line and you wouldn’t know)
    c) your connection is bad
    d) the issue is somewhere in the middle
    e) requires quite a bit of CPU at higher speeds
    With iperf, you know the IP of the server, which means you can traceroute it to troubleshoot any issues. The iperf server operators also generally publish how fast the connection is.
    Not to mention iperf can utilize multiple threads, which simulates real world usage much much better (a server generally serves multiple users), while being able to max out any connection (assuming both sides are fast enough)
    Also, iperf does IPv6 :joy:

    Speedtest shouldn’t really be used in the first place. Trace route isn’t even possible. Psychz doesn’t even peer with them.

    Thanked by 2FHR sanvit
  • TheLinuxBugTheLinuxBug Member
    edited October 2019

    I will give you this, there was more conversation I didn't see originally. At the time, it seemed off to me that it wasn't suggested to open a ticket and then work with the customer in that way. The way that statement was made, to me (I will grant maybe I interpreted intent differently than intended), sounded a lot like they were just passing the buck.

    I see, now, above that they did mention to open a ticket. So for that aspect of my comment I do apologize as I think in my quick reading originally I had missed that:

    SmartHost said:
    Not really sure what you mean by that.
    Please open a ticket and we will gladly assist you.

    Though thanks @muffin for making me re-read things again. I will blame it on my lack of coffee at the time of writing, even if it is an excuse. :neutral:

    Cheers!

    Thanked by 2uptime cazrz
  • @SmartHost said:

    @jihchi said:
    @SmartHost

    Could I order both KVM LINUX STORAGE VPS and KVM NVME SSD Budget VPS - FLASH SALE! and merge them into one VPS?
    Or, Is that possible to add-on 1TB SAS RAID-6 Disk Space to KVM NVME SSD Budget VPS - FLASH SALE!?

    We are not set up to merge Flash + Rust in one combined service at this time. That will change in upcoming months, but not quite yet.
    .

    +1 for interest in this plan.

  • @letitrain said:
    +1 for interest in this plan.

    Congrats on your first comment

  • @angstrom - congratulations on your 5242nd comment :smiley:

Sign In or Register to comment.