Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Categories

In this Discussion

› › drServer.net ||| Dedicated Servers starting at $12/mo! - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

drServer.net ||| Dedicated Servers starting at $12/mo!

2

Comments

  • DanSummerDanSummer Member

    @grnz said:
    Unrelated to Dedicateds: Haven't had my KVM for more than a day and I'm incredibly impressed with the performance. Thank you Radi!
    This might take me to the next part of getting a dedicated soon.

    You should get one if your use case calls for it. The $12 dedicated is a steal!
    Got one of those 2 weeks ago and I can't recommend it enough.

    Here's my serverscope bench for the $12 server
    .............
    `Test results for Intel® Atom™ C2750 (8-Core, 2.4GHz) 8GB DDR3 1x 240GB SSD 100 Mbps Unmetered at NO IPMI Dallas, TX

    Server specs:

    8 × Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2750 @ 2.40GHz
    8 GB RAM / 229 GB disk space
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic

    Benchmark results summary:

    UnixBench - 2109.4
    Disk Read - 2562 MB/s
    Disk Write - 799 MB/s
    Bandwidth - 89.77 MB/s

    More: https://serverscope.io/trials/vmO9`

    Compared to Kimsufi KS-7 for $17.99

    `Test results for KS-7 at kimsufi

    Server specs:

    4 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2130 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    8 GB RAM / 2 TB disk space
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic

    Benchmark results summary:

    UnixBench - 2597.7
    Disk Read - 1 MB/s
    Disk Write - 1302 MB/s
    Bandwidth - 88.01 MB/s

    More: https://serverscope.io/trials/AGPP`

    Thanked by 1coreflux
  • sanvitsanvit Member

    @DanSummer said:
    Disk Read - 1 MB/s

    Huh

  • HungLoHungLo Member

    to expensive

  • DanSummerDanSummer Member
    edited August 2019

    @HungLo said:
    to expensive

    you're a cheap goat then :)

  • CaptainKirkCaptainKirk Member

    LOL, the fake DDoS.

    Shame!

    A rather disabled and young Norwegian boy, who lives in the majestic foothills of the great fjords, lost his first and last match of Fortnite thanks to this thread.

    It was his last match of Fortnite ever because passed away immediately after the match.

  • Mr_TomMr_Tom Member, Host Rep

    The Atom says HDD in the OP, but looking at peoples comments it's SSD?

  • OujiOuji Member

    Mr_Tom said: The Atom says HDD in the OP, but looking at peoples comments it's SSD?

    There are HDD and SSD servers.

  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    @Mr_Tom said:
    The Atom says HDD in the OP, but looking at peoples comments it's SSD?

    This one is SSD, looks like I made a typo, sorry.

    If any mod wishes, please edit it.

    Thanked by 2Mr_Tom bdl
  • vyas11vyas11 Member

    H or S , still OOS :-)

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member

    @DanSummer said:

    @grnz said:
    Unrelated to Dedicateds: Haven't had my KVM for more than a day and I'm incredibly impressed with the performance. Thank you Radi!
    This might take me to the next part of getting a dedicated soon.

    You should get one if your use case calls for it. The $12 dedicated is a steal!
    Got one of those 2 weeks ago and I can't recommend it enough.

    Here's my serverscope bench for the $12 server
    .............
    `Test results for Intel® Atom™ C2750 (8-Core, 2.4GHz) 8GB DDR3 1x 240GB SSD 100 Mbps Unmetered at NO IPMI Dallas, TX

    Server specs:

    8 × Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU C2750 @ 2.40GHz
    8 GB RAM / 229 GB disk space
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic

    Benchmark results summary:

    UnixBench - 2109.4
    Disk Read - 2562 MB/s
    Disk Write - 799 MB/s
    Bandwidth - 89.77 MB/s

    More: https://serverscope.io/trials/vmO9`

    Compared to Kimsufi KS-7 for $17.99

    `Test results for KS-7 at kimsufi

    Server specs:

    4 × Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-2130 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    8 GB RAM / 2 TB disk space
    Ubuntu 18.04 Bionic

    Benchmark results summary:

    UnixBench - 2597.7
    Disk Read - 1 MB/s
    Disk Write - 1302 MB/s
    Bandwidth - 88.01 MB/s

    More: https://serverscope.io/trials/AGPP`

    I call shenanigans on your numbers. Disk reads above 550MB/s on single SSD? Nope.

    It's almost like people don't realize the numbers they post don't make sense.

    If the server was sold with NVMe, it would be criminal not to advertise that as it would sell hella more. Hell, I'd buy for 100% idle.

  • acidpukeacidpuke Member

    I'm getting 544MB/s read... 471MB/s write... these are sata3 which helps.

    Anything over 550MB/s highly doubt also ...test seems skewed

  • DanSummerDanSummer Member

    @acidpuke said:
    I'm getting 544MB/s read... 471MB/s write... these are sata3 which helps.

    Anything over 550MB/s highly doubt also ...test seems skewed

    Yes, the numbers are out of whack. I've ran it several times and serverscope keeps showing the same nonsense. A quick search for other serverscope benchmark on LET shows the same thing (for example, this one shows ssd with 6828 MB/s, which is impossible considering it's sata 3
    - https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/2996995#Comment_2996995).

    A manual test of the $12 ssd shows 264 MB/s.

  • GiveAndTakeGiveAndTake Member

    Is there a network upgrade available option? How much would a port upgrade cost?

  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    @GiveAndTake said:
    Is there a network upgrade available option? How much would a port upgrade cost?

    What port speed are you interested in?

  • GiveAndTakeGiveAndTake Member

    @Radi said:

    @GiveAndTake said:
    Is there a network upgrade available option? How much would a port upgrade cost?

    What port speed are you interested in?

    300mb/s or more? How is the pricing?

  • MPGMPG Member

    Man all sold out that was quick. :-) Intel Atom C2750 (8 Cores, 2.4 Ghz) would have been perfect for my stuff. :-( Next time I guess.

  • HarambeHarambe Member, Host Rep

    @Radi what's the cost of the 'production kit' upgrades on the bigger servers?

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member

    @DanSummer said:

    @acidpuke said:
    I'm getting 544MB/s read... 471MB/s write... these are sata3 which helps.

    Anything over 550MB/s highly doubt also ...test seems skewed

    Yes, the numbers are out of whack.** I've ran it several times and serverscope keeps showing the same nonsense. **A quick search for other serverscope benchmark on LET shows the same thing (for example, this one shows ssd with 6828 MB/s, which is impossible considering it's sata 3
    - https://www.lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/2996995#Comment_2996995).

    A manual test of the $12 ssd shows 264 MB/s.

    Prop: stop using broken benchmark.

  • ifykoifyko Member
    edited August 2019

    @GiveAndTake said:

    @Radi said:

    @GiveAndTake said:
    Is there a network upgrade available option? How much would a port upgrade cost?

    What port speed are you interested in?

    300mb/s or more? How is the pricing?

    "$50 per 100mbps"

    Thanked by 1drserver
  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    @Harambe said:
    @Radi what's the cost of the 'production kit' upgrades on the bigger servers?

    Production kit contains:
    Priority support
    Ability to upgrade your hardware (RAM, Disks, RAID Cards) per your specification
    Ability to announce your own IP addresses in our network
    Ability to upgrade your bandwidth
    Ability to use secondary network

    It costs $20.00 per month + Upgrade value

    Network Upgrades:
    Additional IPv4 address $5.00 USD per month
    IPv6 Block /100 $5.00 USD per month
    Private network port $10.00 USD per month
    Port upgrade in 100Mbps increments $50.00 USD per month

    RAID Upgrades:
    RAID Card $20.00 USD per month
    BBU for raid card $10.00 USD per month

    Disk upgrades:
    2x240GB ||| SSD $25.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 35.00 USD per month
    4x240GB ||| SSD $50.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 70.00 USD per month
    2x480GB ||| SSD $40.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 60.00 USD per month
    4x480GB ||| SSD $80.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 120.00 USD per month
    2x980GB ||| SSD $70.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 90.00 USD per month
    4x980GB ||| SSD $130.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 180.00 USD per month
    2x1.92TB ||| SSD $120.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 150.00 USD per month
    4x1.92TB ||| SSD $230.00 USD per month ||| NVMe 300.00 USD per month

    Some examples of production kit pricing:
    50 USD Dedicated Server + Production kit + 2 IPv4 Addresses = 80 USD per month
    50 USD Dedicated Server + Production kit + 4x480GB SSD drives = 150 USD per month

    Thank you.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran
    edited August 2019

    So, you pulled a old school Hetznar now?
    2x IPv4 costs 30$, thats terriable.

    I hope you where not on LIQUID when you came up with this idea.

  • jbuggiejbuggie Member

    What's the CPU allocation & network speed on the KVM-S ($7/mo)?

  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran
    edited August 2019

    @jbuggie said:
    What's the CPU allocation & network speed on the KVM-S ($7/mo)?

    You get 4 cores on a fair share basis. We are pretty lenient with usage unless you cause problems for other people or are unreasonable with it. Network speed is 1 Gbps shared.

  • jbuggiejbuggie Member
    edited September 2019

    I went ahead and tried out the KVM-S (4GB RAM/4 cores) but could not use it due to extremely slow aes-xts encryption performance (about 100MB/s). A tiny J4105 CPU at 1.5Ghz would get about 12x as much.

    cryptsetup benchmark

    Algorithm | Key | Encryption | Decryption
    ** aes-xts 256b 103.0 MiB/s 98.0 MiB/s**

    nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh

    benchmark timestamp: 2019-09-02 00:59:35 UTC

    Processor: QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.3
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 2599.998 MHz
    RAM: 3.9G
    Swap: -
    Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic i686

    Disks:
    vda 90G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    4.089 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    7.744 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    4.818 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    bash: line 220: ./ioping.static: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
    ioping: sequential read speed
    bash: line 222: ./ioping.static: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 315.67 MiB/s
    2nd run: 508.31 MiB/s
    3rd run: 453.00 MiB/s
    average: 425.66 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 192.138.210.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN:         67.48 MiB/s
Leaseweb (NL):        9.79 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US):   88.05 MiB/s
Online.net (FR):      2.53 MiB/s
OVH BHS (CA):         21.73 MiB/s

    IPv6 speedtests
    your IPv6: 2604:880:52:xxxx

    Leaseweb (NL):        5.55 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US):   81.74 MiB/s
Online.net (FR):      7.76 MiB/s

    OVH BHS (CA): 18.40 MiB/s

    nench.sh v2019.07.20 -- https://git.io/nench.sh

    benchmark timestamp: 2019-09-02 01:00:56 UTC

    Processor: QEMU Virtual CPU version 1.5.3
    CPU cores: 4
    Frequency: 2599.998 MHz
    RAM: 3.9G
    Swap: -
    Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic i686

    Disks:
    vda 90G HDD

    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
    4.160 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
    7.325 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
    5.319 seconds

    ioping: seek rate
    bash: line 220: ./ioping.static: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
    ioping: sequential read speed
    bash: line 222: ./ioping.static: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error

    dd: sequential write speed
    1st run: 339.51 MiB/s
    2nd run: 500.68 MiB/s
    3rd run: 494.00 MiB/s
    average: 444.73 MiB/s

    IPv4 speedtests
    your IPv4: 192.138.210.xxxx

    Cachefly CDN:         61.65 MiB/s
Leaseweb (NL):        6.88 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US):   75.25 MiB/s
Online.net (FR):      3.55 MiB/s
OVH BHS (CA):         12.83 MiB/s

    IPv6 speedtests
    your IPv6: 2604:880:52:xxxx

    Leaseweb (NL):        3.29 MiB/s
Softlayer DAL (US):   78.63 MiB/s
Online.net (FR):      5.45 MiB/s

    OVH BHS (CA): 22.69 MiB/s

  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    @jbuggie You could have also sent a ticket, you know. :smile:

  • AuroraZAuroraZ Barred

    Radi said: @jbuggie You could have also sent a ticket, you know.

    You mean this is not your support desk? What a wonderful and novel idea.

    Thanked by 1Ouji
  • JoeMeritJoeMerit Veteran

    Why can't more providers just do cpu passthrough by default.. is it really that tough?

    Thanked by 1DemoroCZE
  • RadiRadi Host Rep, Veteran

    @JoeMerit said:
    Why can't more providers just do cpu passthrough by default.. is it really that tough?

    Anyone who asked us, got it enabled within 5 minutes.

  • jbuggiejbuggie Member

    @Radi said:

    @JoeMerit said:
    Why can't more providers just do cpu passthrough by default.. is it really that tough?

    Anyone who asked us, got it enabled within 5 minutes.

    Did I do something wrong? I just posted the output of nench.sh and explained why I could not use it.

  • JoeMeritJoeMerit Veteran

    @jbuggie ask @Radi to enable cpu passthrough and then re-do your benchmark, it will be a lot faster.

Sign In or Register to comment.