Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


โ€บ Free DirectAdmin. $5 VPS: 2GB RAM, 20GB SSD, Dallas, Amsterdam, London, Fremont, Bucharest - Page 2
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Free DirectAdmin. $5 VPS: 2GB RAM, 20GB SSD, Dallas, Amsterdam, London, Fremont, Bucharest

2ยป

Comments

  • AndruAndru Member

    Any ETAfor Cluj? Cant wait to test there ๐Ÿ˜

  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @zuby2402 said:
    Any ETAfor Cluj? Cant wait to test there ๐Ÿ˜

    About 2 weeks

  • sinsin Member

    Does this support custom iso?

  • @zuby2402 said:
    Any ETAfor Cluj? Cant wait to test there ๐Ÿ˜

    Interesting, is there enough connectivity and localized peering to make this beneficial over the capital? We faced a similar situation in the UK where by any northern hosting went via London anyway but that's changed over last five years with growing peering fabrics in Manchester and even Leeds. Unrelated, what's the co-working scene like in Cluj? Romania is on my list before the winter

    Thanked by 1intovps
  • AndruAndru Member

    I live near Cluj...

    Thanked by 1intovps
  • emghemgh Member

    @zuby2402 said:
    I live near Cluj...

    I don't...

  • @intovps said:
    That's something we might do. I'm curious, are you actually making more than 1TB/2TB or just want to be on the same side?

    Of course not! It's always amazing to have extra premium traffic just in case :smile:

  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @alexvolk said:

    @intovps said:
    That's something we might do. I'm curious, are you actually making more than 1TB/2TB or just want to be on the same side?

    Of course not! It's always amazing to have extra premium traffic just in case :smile:

    That's useful feedback. I'll keep that in mind. Thanks!

  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @zuby2402 said:
    I live near Cluj...

    First batch of hardware has been racked in Cluj-Napoca a month ago.

    We've been working to get every possible bit of performance out the the 40G network cards and from the 40G fiberswitches. Drivers, testing optimal OpenStack network setup, active-active setup that can push close to 80Gbs etc.

    Big SATA storage as block device (OpenStack Cinder) and object storage (a la S3, via OpenStack swift) is next in line.

    New toys lot of fun! :smiley:

    See more pictures here: https://hosterion.ro/blog/in-curand-servicii-de-gazduire-web-in-cluj-napoca

    Thanked by 2MikePT vimalware
  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @sin said:
    Does this support custom iso?

    Custom ISO upload feature is already available in Fleio.

    We've been considering some security and performance implication regarding enabling ISO upload.

    But I think we're fine. I'll talk to our staff and see if it's time we enable it on IntoVPS.

    Thanked by 1sin
  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @fpmagic said:

    @zuby2402 said:
    Any ETAfor Cluj? Cant wait to test there ๐Ÿ˜

    Interesting, is there enough connectivity and localized peering to make this beneficial over the capital? We faced a similar situation in the UK where by any northern hosting went via London anyway but that's changed over last five years with growing peering fabrics in Manchester and even Leeds. Unrelated, what's the co-working scene like in Cluj? Romania is on my list before the winter

    In Cluj we're in GTS, a non-carrier-neutral-friendly data center, but never the less, a reputable premium ISP (actually one of the most expensive, if not THE), part of Deutsche Telekom. Peering is also done mainly through Bucharest in Romania (we have some plans to change that, as a side note :) ).

    Even so, Cluj gives a few advantages like disaster recovery location for Bucharest located data (different tectonic plate, less seismic risk), direct connection for local IT companies (which are plenty - https://techcrunch.com/2016/04/06/the-silicon-valley-of-transylvania/ ), exotic location for international customers and some amazing deals on the way. :smiley:

    Cluj-Napoca has some really good co-working facilities, some that I know personally:

    I see some more on Google.

    PM me and come by our office for an espresso. :smile:

    Thanked by 2vimalware fpmagic
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran
    edited July 2019

    Damn. I am starting to love your services. Even more than previously. You guys rock. I did manage a few vps on intovps many years ago though I never bought one for myself... It looks like its time to.

    Thanked by 2DA_Mark intovps
  • MechanicWebMechanicWeb Member, Patron Provider

    You guys are humble. Why don't you include in your offerings that you are the creator of intoDNS? When I found out about that fact, it was a pleasant surprise and we are grateful to you for creating such an amazing tool.

    Warm regards from the deepest of our hearts.

  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @MechanicWeb said:
    You guys are humble. Why don't you include in your offerings that you are the creator of intoDNS? When I found out about that fact, it was a pleasant surprise and we are grateful to you for creating such an amazing tool.

    Warm regards from the deepest of our hearts.

    We do brag about it on our about page and in the IntoDNS footer. :smile:

    Cheers!

    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep
    edited July 2019

    Testing our upcoming Cluj location on NVMe vs. Amsterdam on SSD's :)

    Cluj-Napoca, GTS data center on NVMe

    wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2099.998 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 58.1 GB (1.2 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 7976 MB (97 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 6 min
    Load average         : 0.00, 0.02, 0.00
    OS                   : Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.15.0-54-generic
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 947 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 1000 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 940 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 962.3 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         72.1MB/s      
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          7.54MB/s      
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            8.06MB/s      
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           49.0MB/s      
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           73.8MB/s      
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             12.2MB/s      
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           14.8MB/s      
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          12.7MB/s      
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            40.1MB/s      
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           11.3MB/s      
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          914KB/s       
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv6 address            Download Speed
    Linode, Atlanta, GA             2600:3c02::4b           13.8MB/s      
    Linode, Dallas, TX              2600:3c00::4b           15.8MB/s      
    Linode, Newark, NJ              2600:3c03::4b           3.84MB/s      
    Linode, Singapore, SG           2400:8901::4b           12.0MB/s      
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               2400:8900::4b           7.73MB/s      
    Softlayer, San Jose, CA         2607:f0d0:2601:2a::4    8.68MB/s 
    Softlayer, Paris, FR            2a03:8180:1301:8::4     48.6MB/s      
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        2401:c900:1101:8::2     11.7MB/s      
    Softlayer, Tokyo, JP            2401:c900:1001:16::4    7.15MB/s      
    

    Amsterdam (Leaseweb in Evoswitch data center) on SSD:

    wget -qO- bench.sh | bash
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    CPU model            : Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
    Number of cores      : 2
    CPU frequency        : 2399.988 MHz
    Total size of Disk   : 58.1 GB (5.4 GB Used)
    Total amount of Mem  : 7976 MB (1931 MB Used)
    Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
    System uptime        : 7 days, 18 hour 58 min
    Load average         : 0.48, 0.21, 0.12
    OS                   : Ubuntu 18.04.2 LTS
    Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
    Kernel               : 4.15.0-54-generic
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    I/O speed(1st run)   : 434 MB/s
    I/O speed(2nd run)   : 469 MB/s
    I/O speed(3rd run)   : 473 MB/s
    Average I/O speed    : 458.7 MB/s
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Node Name                       IPv4 address            Download Speed
    CacheFly                        205.234.175.175         60.1MB/s      
    Linode, Tokyo, JP               106.187.96.148          9.30MB/s      
    Linode, Singapore, SG           139.162.23.4            4.33MB/s      
    Linode, London, UK              176.58.107.39           43.8MB/s      
    Linode, Frankfurt, DE           139.162.130.8           90.7MB/s      
    Linode, Fremont, CA             50.116.14.9             5.52MB/s      
    Softlayer, Dallas, TX           173.192.68.18           10.9MB/s      
    Softlayer, Seattle, WA          67.228.112.250          10.1MB/s      
    Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE        159.122.69.4            48.3MB/s      
    Softlayer, Singapore, SG        119.81.28.170           6.59MB/s      
    Softlayer, HongKong, CN         119.81.130.170          3.91MB/s      
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    Could you please run nench.sh?

  • intovpsintovps Member, Host Rep

    @MikePT said:
    Could you please run nench.sh?

    root@cluj:~# (wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash; wget -qO- wget.racing/nench.sh | bash) 2>&1 | tee nench.log
    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.06.29 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2019-07-17 09:17:25 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
    CPU cores:    2
    Frequency:    2099.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         -
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-54-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda     60G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.004 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.809 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        1.537 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 65.3 us / 138.9 us / 7.09 ms / 45.4 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 24.6 k requests in 5.00 s, 6.01 GiB, 4.92 k iops, 1.20 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    953.67 MiB/s
        2nd run:    953.67 MiB/s
        3rd run:    885.96 MiB/s
        average:    931.10 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    185.250.105.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         70.82 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        56.56 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   13.99 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      55.58 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         19.67 MiB/s
    
    IPv6 speedtests
        your IPv6:    2a06:cd40:400:xxxx
    
        Leaseweb (NL):        31.54 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   0.00 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      31.55 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         13.28 MiB/s
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    -------------------------------------------------
     nench.sh v2019.06.29 -- https://git.io/nench.sh
     benchmark timestamp:    2019-07-17 09:18:34 UTC
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Processor:    Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)
    CPU cores:    2
    Frequency:    2099.998 MHz
    RAM:          7.8G
    Swap:         -
    Kernel:       Linux 4.15.0-54-generic x86_64
    
    Disks:
    sda     60G  HDD
    
    CPU: SHA256-hashing 500 MB
        4.008 seconds
    CPU: bzip2-compressing 500 MB
        6.803 seconds
    CPU: AES-encrypting 500 MB
        1.463 seconds
    
    ioping: seek rate
        min/avg/max/mdev = 65.4 us / 134.5 us / 7.97 ms / 76.5 us
    ioping: sequential read speed
        generated 22.9 k requests in 5.00 s, 5.58 GiB, 4.57 k iops, 1.12 GiB/s
    
    dd: sequential write speed
        1st run:    934.60 MiB/s
        2nd run:    953.67 MiB/s
        3rd run:    953.67 MiB/s
        average:    947.32 MiB/s
    
    IPv4 speedtests
        your IPv4:    185.250.105.xxxx
    
        Cachefly CDN:         71.89 MiB/s
        Leaseweb (NL):        60.44 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   14.49 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      61.97 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         20.17 MiB/s
    
    IPv6 speedtests
        your IPv6:    2a06:cd40:400:xxxx
    
        Leaseweb (NL):        56.73 MiB/s
        Softlayer DAL (US):   0.00 MiB/s
        Online.net (FR):      48.81 MiB/s
        OVH BHS (CA):         18.55 MiB/s
    -------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanked by 1MikePT
  • MikePTMikePT Moderator, Patron Provider, Veteran

    That seems much better than my experience @intovps. Love the speed and IOPS!

    Thanked by 1intovps
  • @alexvolk said:

    @intovps said:
    As you know, we can do that right now.

    But those are shared cores and that will overload the servers, making those two cores worth about the same like 1 core.

    Another reason is that we have disabled Hyperthreading on all our servers to mitigate the Intel Xeon vulnerabilities. We're also running the latest kernel. Just best security practice in any multi-tenant environment. I hope other hosters have disabled HT, as well.

    Improved security lost us about 30% of compute power.

    I've been using your services from 2011.

    I think with recent additions of big players you can't simply offer the similar looking specs at the higher price. You can do that but don't expect someone from here would prefer you.

    I'm not sure who cares about your lost computer power except yourself?

    Speak for yourself, that is useful info and suitable for a hosting forum discussion board. This is hands on experience. I'm sure your life was negatively affected by reading one sentence that you had to be rude for.

  • @TimboJones said:
    Speak for yourself, that is useful info and suitable for a hosting forum discussion board. This is hands on experience. I'm sure your life was negatively affected by reading one sentence that you had to be rude for.

    I'm not trying to be specially rude

    If provider wants to compete with others then I really don't care if they've lost some computing power due to some vulnerability.

  • @alexvolk said:

    @TimboJones said:
    Speak for yourself, that is useful info and suitable for a hosting forum discussion board. This is hands on experience. I'm sure your life was negatively affected by reading one sentence that you had to be rude for.

    I'm not trying to be specially rude

    If provider wants to compete with others then I really don't care if they've lost some computing power due to some vulnerability.

    OK. Just letting you know that IS useful information, as it is a security improvement that many others DO care about, as well with Ryzen update this month and more providers setting up AMD boxes instead of Xeon boxes. No exploits needing to disable HT equivalent on AMD CPUs.

Sign In or Register to comment.