New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
eaven you cheat me i still love you !
Ha? Nah don’t believe that
@jsg said:
Isn’t that the same?
I see.
Maybe if i truly believe in @WSS long enough, eventually i'll see his presence?
Maybe then, once again, life won't be so bleak...
I wonder, is he even more elusive and mysterious than Santa Claus?
I hope that one day the return of @WSS shall take place during the second coming of @WSS and he'll be allowed to post again unrestricted and under his real identity - @WSS.
I don't know
I brought it up
I missed about a year or so— update please?
The avatar is a dead giveaway. I'm surprised nobody picked up on it sooner.
I blinked.
Updates, please!
That warm fuzzy feeling i get and the odd smell, is the mental fabric burning.
I wonder how it all stands together even to this day, but it does.
Not sure what this cracking and screeching sound is though...
@AnthonySmith just tell me already, I can't resist mysteries!
It is/was an account shared by the CC staff.
This is the most concrete lead that you've given us yet. I guess that this would explain why it was surprising for you (staff) to discover that @WSS was using this account. What I don't really understand is how he got hold of such an account ...
Anyway, this conclusively rules out both @CyberMonday and @deank (especially the latter wasn't a serious candidate) ...
@nick ? I place my 1 dollar bet on him
after so much hard work , do not call him serious haha
The problem is that ordinary LET participants like you and me don't have a list of all the past and present CC accounts.
I doubt that it's @Nick.
Still don't understand how @WSS got hold of such an account.
But I said that he wasn't a serious candidate for @WSS! (Though some may have thought that he was.)
Now i am confused.
I thought that @CyberMonday could be @WSS...
@CyberMonday was a much more probable candidate than @deank, but I personally was doubtful ... it also wouldn't have explained the "surprise effect" that the LET staff experienced when they discovered the second identity of @WSS, so it's much more plausible that the second identity is CC-related somehow ...
We must see the evidence...
All i've got this far is:
Username @WSS Joined November 2016
Username @CyberMonday Joined November 2017
And this World War II photo of the battle of Los Angeles:
Unfortunately, that alone doesn't help much.
I believe it was mostly Chris that used the account.
Well, it can't realistically be @CVPS_Chris, so it must be some other account.
Still don't understand how @WSS was/is able to use it.
(The idea that Chris Fabozzi = @WSS is too far-fetched to be even remotely plausible.)
@AnthonySmith I have a far-fetched hunch.
Does the account in question has 6 discussions visible by me, and 13 in total (probably deleted or hidden to staff categories)?
I warned you that this is not a rock you want to uncover and that some things are best left alone, how do you all feel about your free WSS campaigns now?
I read that 3 times, I just don't understand the question.
That's the problem. You read 2 too many times. Just read it once and believe what your gut tells you.
Harzem's post is encoded. It's saying, Friday, the 13rd: The end is nigh.
(here's another clue for you all ... the walrus was Paul)
I'm actually fine with leaving the matter alone,
but if I may say so, you didn't really help the situation by saying that it was "so obvious" what/who his second identity was, etc.
Anyway, just for the record, I've never once engaged in any talk about "freeing WSS", which I frankly have never understood (self-banishment isn't equivalent to being locked up).
Yeah sorry, I was answering your comment but not really directing the answer at you, more the global community.
FREE AnthonySmith